Gary Whitta
Member
Gingrich has always scored with married women. Just not the ones he's married to.Fox news is reporting that Gingrich won among married women. :lol
Gingrich has always scored with married women. Just not the ones he's married to.Fox news is reporting that Gingrich won among married women. :lol
Even with a huge Gingrich win here, I can't see him winning the nomination. No way does the GOP establishment let that happen.
They have Anderson Cooper. He's pretty good usually. But yeah, they generally suck.
Even though what newt actually says is insane, he actually understands what these debates are really about. Soundbites.
All Newt will have to do is make some alpha male-esque stab at Obama's record, reprimanding the media or liberals and "socialism", and that will be the soundbite used by all media outlets the next day - effectively a win for Newt.
Obama would have to be really, really careful not to be out-soundbited.
He's a total robot, I've seen him on camera outside of work and he's no more human. I guess CNN likes to have no bias, no opinion, no personality so he's the total embodiment of the bland, flavorless CNN persona.I truly don't understand why Wolf Blitzer has a job. He's this perfect storm of unattractive, dumb as bricks, incompetent, and speaks in the most boring monotone on earth.
He had momentum out of Iowa, but he performed dismally in NH. Then, most voters were breaking towards Romney until Newt's debate performance Monday night. Thereafter, his support skyrocketed and everyone's stagnated. There simply was little opportunity for Santorum to surge.How come Santorum didn't do better? He had the momentum coming out of Iowa and this is the first southern primary, where'd you'd expect a big social conservative to play better. Isn't he the Huckabee of this cycle?
Yeah, I like Cooper, but that's about it on CNN...
I think this is more due to the fact that Santurum is an uninspired public speaker.The best attack of the debate on Thursday actually came from Santorum, handily deconstructing the various controversies which Newt was involved with and why this is going to be massive baggage going into the general. He even made a pointed attack about Newt being big on ideas ("an idea a minute") and very poor on execution of said ideas.
This was easily the best attack of the night... but it was impossible to soundbite. Newt goes for the big soundbite up front, and that is all anyone talked about for the next 36 hours. Nobody remembers a single thing about the rest of the debate.
If Obama tries to beat Newt on substance, he'll get many Santorum-esque losses in the debates. Where substantively he has the better points overall, but he simply couldn't compete with Newt's large mouthed condemnations acting as a de facto representation for the anger that many Americans feel right now
GPS feels like something that they're pirating from a better station.Fareed Zakaria? He sticks out even more prominently than Cooper does, to me.
Zakaria is great but they've got him stuck in that dead slot on the weekends. I would give him Blitzer's job and make him the face of CNN in a heartbeat.Fareed Zakaria? He sticks out even more prominently than Cooper does, to me.
The biography goes in a bit more detail about why Jobs thinks America is lagging behind. As I recall he was quite interested in getting Obama to make some changes for the better and stressed on vocational training. According to him, either workers are over-qualified, or under qualified, leaving few factory workers with an understanding of the machinery they're working with. And that's where China excels.
Fareed Zakaria? He sticks out even more prominently than Cooper does, to me.
I like your style.Even with a huge Gingrich win here, I can't see him winning the nomination. No way does the GOP establishment let that happen.
I think this is more due to the fact that Santurum is an uninspired public speaker.
Obama is a much better debated, you throw a Gingrich over the plate for him and he knock that shit out of the park.
That's barely coherent. As if law and accountancy firms don't spend a lot of money training their employees. Why should the government train people to make a pittance? Jobs just wanted more subsidies and loved his Chinese cheap labor.
Blitzer is a master of hype; he's more like a carnival barker than a newsman.When Wolf Blitzer said (just a few moments ago) that they were ready to make a "dramatic announcement", I thought for a second they were going to call Romney winning and throw a wrench into all of this lol.
Yes. Romney has been consolidating establishment support. And I do not envisage the trend dramatically reversing.IS there even an establishment candidate this time around?
If only because of his electability, he seems far too centrist on social issues for those GOP smoke-filled rooms to be thrilled about him.Yes. Romney has been consolidating establishment support. And I do not envisage the trend dramatically reversing.
Does anyone believe Jindal or Christie or Jeb Bush isn't waiting in the tall grass, waiting for this deadlock to play out so they can ride in at the last minute as the (comparatively unvetted and certainly unbloodied) savior?
EDIT: NBC just said this is the first time in history that Iowa, NH and SC have been won by three different candidates.
Does anyone believe Jindal or Christie or Jeb Bush isn't waiting in the tall grass, waiting for this deadlock to play out so they can ride in at the last minute as the (comparatively unvetted and certainly unbloodied) savior?
EDIT: NBC just said this is the first time in history that Iowa, NH and SC have been won by three different candidates.
Wow Gingrich now beating Romney in electability by 9%. Ability to beat Obama by far the biggest factor in voting with 45%.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/updates/4433?ref=fpblgAccording to the exit polls, Mitt Romney lost all income levels with the exception of those making over $200,000 a year.
https://twitter.com/#!/SteveDeaceShow/status/160886280488615937Rick Santorum lost the Catholic vote and finished behind Mitt Romney among evangelicals, which is inexplicable.
It may not be one of those three but if this deadlock continues to the convention SOMEONE is going to try to seize the opportunity.
It may not be one of those three but if this deadlock continues to the convention SOMEONE is going to try to seize the opportunity.
Ha, maybe I'm being too influenced by the fake campaign on the West Wing where they had a brokered Democratic convention and last-minute candidates came out of the woodwork.that's just not how the system works. These candidates already are splitting delegates. Anyone who jumped in now would have such immense organizational problems it'd be just ridiculous. Even making it on the ballot in most of the remaining states would be complicated at this stage without the organizational system in place.
There is no chance that anyone will jump in now. These are the four candidates remaining; Santorum is about to be out shortly and Paul is only doing it for shits and gigs like always.
It's Romney vs. Gingrich.
Does anyone believe Jindal or Christie or Jeb Bush isn't waiting in the tall grass, waiting for this deadlock to play out so they can ride in at the last minute as the (comparatively unvetted and certainly unbloodied) savior?
EDIT: NBC just said this is the first time in history that Iowa, NH and SC have been won by three different candidates.
Bobby Jindal said:"While I don't plan to endorse anyone else in the primary, I look forward to supporting the nominee," Jindal said. "America cannot afford four more years of Barack Obama."
Gingrich works drive-thru window.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/updates/4431
GAF, this is why I love this man. Listen to that voice he makes at the beginning.