Remember seeing comparison pics when they were still natural to now.
This will seem defence force-ish, but it's significant that the comparison pics were pre or mid-puberty. And look at that Neville Longbottom dude.
Hard to say who has had what done, because if it is there, it's ridiculously top-tier surgery.
Asians look the same pretty much their whole life from childhood to adult hood..
I'm not saying they didn't get some kind of surgery. Just saying it's not super obvious (you may/will disagree) or necessarily super extensive.
If I doubt the universality of this statement, are you going to flip out at me as a presumptuous Kpop-gaffer ? I mostly defer.
I'm not saying they didn't get some kind of surgery. Just saying it's not super obvious (you may/will disagree) or necessarily super extensive.
Agreed. People as beautiful as them do not need extensive surgery.
I'm sorry that I started out so hostile, I am just a huge fan of music in general and it reeeeeeally bothers me how poorly these people are treated. And I just can't help but cringe when someone tries to pretend it's semi-normal how things work in the K-Pop world.
weird and uncomfortable when people started talking about dreams and stuff.
You'd be surprised at the number of similarities between the sports world and kpop.
To put it in sports terms you may understand Tebow = Yoona, loved or hated for whatever reasons. Fandoms that dislike/rival each other i.e. Michigan vs Ohio State = ELFs vs SONE
I'm sure there are some people interested in what their life is like:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xndiia_star-life-theater-ep-09-snsd-2011-11-21-en_shortfilms
There are 4 main music shows each week that hold live performances of the top performers that week. Three of these shows give an award to the "winner" of that week, which is decided by a aggregate of physical and digital sales, popularity on search portals, phone and website votes, industry critics, etc. Each show has a different way of adding all of this up, so if you win one show it doesn't mean you'll win the others. How many you win obviously has correlation to the overall performance which decides year-end awards, though those can use different systems of determining who was "the best" that year.Uh what
noso it's like football but more pathetic
What a terrible song to use to debut in America. Why would they do that? It's a horrible song with no good lyrics, bad beat and overall boring. The dancing was amazing, but no amount of dancing could've made that song sound good. They have so many better songs! D:
The concept of mechanically putting a group of girls together like a puzzle for maximum entertainment seems offputting to me.Yeah. If you watch the variety shows and interviews and stuff - which is really almost the bulk of their entertainment work, then you start to get what each one offers. That's something that they can't offer a foreign audience that consumes music in a more discrete (less linked up with tv shows) way. It's the chemistry and interaction between different personalities in the group that makes the tv appearances funny and interesting and sweet. 9 members is a lot, but if you approach the entertainment as the package it was initially designed to be, then it sort of works.
That package won't travel to a mass audience, and the execs aren't kidding themselves that it will. Hence the (somewhat misjudged) emphasis on American production. To compensate.
There, now it actually says what you meant and it also doesn't come off insultingly.The concept of deliberately putting a group of girls together like a puzzle for maximum entertainment seems offputting to me.
You talk like kpop is one big Korean conglomerate where it's decided by Korea on who to send to dominate America. It's basically small entertainment agencies trying to make a profit.
SME/SNSD is just testing the waters and being smart about it, create a little buzz, see what the reaction will be without going in full steam like JYP/Wonder Girls did. Wonder Girls had some limited success to open up America to kpop, now it's Soshi's turn to open it up further. If Soshi succeeds then it opens the door more for YGE/2NE1 to enter the US market and I'm sure CCM/T-ara/Rainbow will be close behind to saturate the market.
It has nothing to do with where they're from. It's the music. If a K-Pop group came over with a hit song that subscribed to American tastes, and they really made a play for the States, they'd be a hit...and nobody would really care where they were from.
You're right. It worked so well for BoA.
The music BoA put out in the US is good? That's news to me.
Uh, yeah it was, in terms of American pop.The music BoA put out in the US is good? That's news to me.
I'm confused. You say that Korean music isn't just some big conglomerate, but then in your next paragraph you make it seem like it's a joint effort between the agencies to "Open Up" America. Which is it?
The common theme I'm noticing in this thread is this idea that Korea has to "open up" the American market for K-Pop...but the thing is, the fact that no group has done it so far has nothing to do with the fact that they're Korean...and everything to do with the music. To put it simply, the standard K-Pop fare is just too different from where American tastes lie, and in some ways a lot of it sounds very dated. "The Boys" sounds like a song from late 90s pop explosion.
The idol culture that makes these girls huge mega stars in Korea won't translate here at all, and because their performances are so staunchly choreographed, it means American audiences will never really get to know these girls and their personalities. That's very important in the US. Wonder Girls, SNSD, and whoever else comes next, really...they didn't open the door anymore than it already was opened. The next group that comes over is going to be starting off from square one just as those who came before
It has nothing to do with where they're from. It's the music. If a K-Pop group came over with a hit song that subscribed to American tastes, and they really made a play for the States, they'd be a hit...and nobody would really care where they were from.
Uh, yeah it was, in terms of American pop.
http://youtu.be/OLnr2u_nj10
http://youtu.be/7ehZw9RGkEQ
In light of Ke$ha and Black Eyed Peas success at the time... exactly how does this fail in any way? I guess she could have done Touched and gone for a sexier, Ciara-like concept, or more of a straight pop style with Did Ya, but I don't think it would have been recognized any more than these two.
It was mainstream pop made for American tastes.
Uh, yeah it was, in terms of American pop.
http://youtu.be/OLnr2u_nj10
http://youtu.be/7ehZw9RGkEQ
In light of Ke$ha and Black Eyed Peas success at the time... exactly how does this fail in any way? I guess she could have done Touched and gone for a sexier, Ciara-like concept, or more of a straight pop style with Did Ya, but I don't think it would have been recognized any more than these two.
It could be the lack of any catchy hook and the bland production.
Or you can stick with the Americans hate Koreans thesis.
high fiveI fucking love Tommy February6. She's my all time favorite. ALL TIME
May I ask if you've heard anything other than The Boys? I can understand not enjoying Girl's Generation, what I do not understand is how you can claim that kpop isn't as catchy pop music in the west. The only difference is the language. Are you sure you aren't turned off because you do not understand the language, or did you really only listen to this shitty version of GGs shittiest promoted song?
I hope they crash, burn, and melt into a puddle of plastic in the States.
high five
I have their first two albums. There are couple songs (Gee, Oh!) that are decent a few more that are moderately listenable and the rest are totally forgettable.
I have 1.2 TB of music. About 25% of it is in Japanese, Chinese, French, or Italian. I tend to prefer pop music in languages I don't fully understand because the lyrics tend to be really stupid or offensive (certain stereotypes really annoy me). So I don't think the language is the problem.
The biggest problem is the music isn't catchy. The next biggest problem is the sound - the vocals are uninteresting and so is the accompanying background music. The next are the girls themselves - they all sound and look the same. And finally, there is the creepiness factor of listening to grown women sing and act like 13-year-olds. The jutxaposition of childishness and sex grosses me out. I think this may just be a cultural thing, though. But I can't take women seriously who make stupid faces, hand gestures, sing about love as if they're 9-years-old, etc all while dressing and dancing provocatively. Of course, if the music was extremely catchy or interesting in some way, then I wouldn't care - Girls Generation would be a guilty pleasure of mine.
I sought them out in the first place because I wanted some stupid, catchy foreign pop and the GAF thread was 10,000 posts long. To say that I was disappointed is an understatement. I hope they crash, burn, and melt into a puddle of plastic in the States.
I would write out an argument for this but its not worth the time. But pretty much, its not the same. I know, great argument, right?I've always wondered why we only apply this standard ("manufactured" vs "art") to the music industry but not other broad forms of entertainment like television, games and movies.
Do we look down on most actors because they don't write their own dialog? Is Arrested Development not worthwhile entertainment because you have separate writers, actors, directors, foley artists, editors, etc? Should we not like it because Michael Cera didn't grow up with Jason Bateman and they didn't form their own acting troupe which became Arrested Development? Like actors, these singers have to pass rigorous audition processes that show they have the raw talent to become stars and they work very hard to reach the level they do. The difference is that they have the "benefit" of being signed at an earlier age based on that potential rather than being signed after gaining some level of commercial success.
I don't care if people like K-Pop or not. But disliking a genre of music just because it's "manufactured" seems short-sighted. It discredits the insane amount of hard work and dedication these singers put into their performances and ignores that the vast majority of entertainment we all consume is on one level or another "manufactured". Now if you don't like it because you think it's a bad song (like "The Boys" for example), be my guest.
I've always wondered why we only apply this standard ("manufactured" vs "art") to the music industry but not other broad forms of entertainment like television, games and movies.
Do we look down on most actors because they don't write their own dialog? Is Arrested Development not worthwhile entertainment because you have separate writers, actors, directors, foley artists, editors, etc? Should we not like it because Michael Cera didn't grow up with Jason Bateman and they didn't form their own acting troupe which became Arrested Development? Like actors, these singers have to pass rigorous audition processes that show they have the raw talent to become stars and they work very hard to reach the level they do. The difference is that they have the "benefit" of being signed at an earlier age based on that potential rather than being signed after gaining some level of commercial success.
I don't care if people like K-Pop or not. But disliking a genre of music just because it's "manufactured" seems short-sighted. It discredits the insane amount of hard work and dedication these singers put into their performances and ignores that the vast majority of entertainment we all consume is on one level or another "manufactured". Now if you don't like it because you think it's a bad song (like "The Boys" for example), be my guest.
I would agree with this...The reasons each are formulaic is different, but the result and reaction from others is the samePretty sure people sneer at formulaic TV, movies, games, etc. Kitsch is kitsch.
The strangest thing I get from this topic is why you like your favorite member, because of their "charming, interesting personality." Where are you seeing this?
These girls were basically bred from adolescence to whatever age they are now to be media puppets. Whatever personality you have seen from them in music, tv, EVERYTHING, has been carefully designed, edited, and approved by their management. Just like reality TV in the US, whatever shows you see them in are not the "real" them but some kind of pseudo-reality where everything is pre-scripted and edited for maximum punch and effect.
Then you have the whole idea of "picking" your favorite girl in the group, which is just like picking out your Barbie or some other doll: you just project your own ideals and interest into a "totem" of your affection.
The strangest thing I get from this topic is why you like your favorite member, because of their "charming, interesting personality." Where are you seeing this?
These girls were basically bred from adolescence to whatever age they are now to be media puppets. Whatever personality you have seen from them in music, tv, EVERYTHING, has been carefully designed, edited, and approved by their management. Just like reality TV in the US, whatever shows you see them in are not the "real" them but some kind of pseudo-reality where everything is pre-scripted and edited for maximum punch and effect.
Then you have the whole idea of "picking" your favorite girl in the group, which is just like picking out your Barbie or some other doll: you just project your own ideals and interest into a "totem" of your affection.
The strangest thing I get from this topic is why you like your favorite member, because of their "charming, interesting personality." Where are you seeing this?
These girls were basically bred from adolescence to whatever age they are now to be media puppets. Whatever personality you have seen from them in music, tv, EVERYTHING, has been carefully designed, edited, and approved by their management. Just like reality TV in the US, whatever shows you see them in are not the "real" them but some kind of pseudo-reality where everything is pre-scripted and edited for maximum punch and effect.
Then you have the whole idea of "picking" your favorite girl in the group, which is just like picking out your Barbie or some other doll: you just project your own ideals and interest into a "totem" of your affection.
These girls were basically bred from adolescence to whatever age they are now to be media puppets. Whatever personality you have seen from them in music, tv, EVERYTHING, has been carefully designed, edited, and approved by their management. Just like reality TV in the US, whatever shows you see them in are not the "real" them but some kind of pseudo-reality where everything is pre-scripted and edited for maximum punch and effect.
Then you have the whole idea of "picking" your favorite girl in the group, which is just like picking out your Barbie or some other doll: you just project your own ideals and interest into a "totem" of your affection.