I just remembered we have no idea who's even doing the score for the movie, since Hanz Zimmer denied he was involved at all. Makes me wonder if WB has closed a deal with anyone yet.
Need more conclusive proof bro.IT'S FAKE
The helicopter pics are just ripped from set photos from last summer, for example.
I would think that has to do more with chronology than anything else...The fact that 300 is top billing over The Dark Knight should tell you how fake that poster is.
FWIW, I liked Watchmen. I had no experience with the comic so I basically went in fresh and I enjoyed the movie. And yeah, Dawn of the Dead was excellent.DotD was excellent. Everything after that, not so much.
The logo makes me think of Mortal Kombat
LOL @ anybody who thinks that poster is real.
Listen, you can just barely hear a Dean Cain laugh.
Dude doesn't look like superman. He looks like an Italian mobster in a Halloween costume.
They can change the suit, they can change the hair and even mood of the film, but I will be disgusted if they abandon the Williams score.
They can change the suit, they can change the hair and even mood of the film, but I will be disgusted if they abandon the Williams score.
Time for you to re-adjust your expectations. Because Williams' score will not be a part of this re-imagining. And rightly so.
Time for you to re-adjust your expectations. Because Williams' score will not be a part of this re-imagining. And rightly so.
They can change the suit, they can change the hair and even mood of the film, but I will be disgusted if they abandon the Williams score.
I'm glad they're not using it, batman has had different iconic scores.
Yeah but nobody cares about Batman
Where do you think you are?
Yeah but nobody cares about Batman
it had to be said, way too many people ride batman's nuts. it's like no other type of character can be liked or appreciated.
Was meant to be a joke
This movie has everything needed to be great. Nolan and Goyer story, great cast, and good budget. Snyder better do this right, if it doesn't work out he will get the most criticism.
The Nolan name attached to this film has certain drawbacks because a lot of us nerdy types are going to go into this expecting a little bit more than a superhero film. Like we are at the start of some epic trilogy. I'm trying to keep my expectations in check. If it does end up being another Superman failure I wonder what happens to the franchise?
If anything, having Nolan's name attached should leave people pleasantly surprised with how good the action in the film is going to be.
Meh I don't think many left the Nolan Batman films being all that disappointed in the action sequences. Besides I've never been very excited by any sort of live action fight or rescue scenes in superhero films. I guess Snyder does have a chance to surprise me and a few others in that way. I'd like to see a Superman vs Zod fight be sort of like a live action version of the Avatar cartoon finale, with them jumping around and being acrobatic. Though I suppose flying kind of destroys the need for acrobatics. That's one thing I've never liked about Superman, he flies in, punches something, grabs something etc. I want to see some flashy and clever stuff.
DON'T BUMP THIS THREAD UNLESS THE TEASER/TRAILER IS OUT
GOD DAMN!
DON'T BUMP THIS THREAD UNLESS THE TEASER/TRAILER IS OUT
GOD DAMN!
DON'T BUMP THIS THREAD UNLESS THE TEASER/TRAILER IS OUT
GOD DAMN!
In a strategic move in the copyright battle between Warner Bros and the heirs to Supermans creators, the studio has filed an appeal to reverse earlier rulings in the case and put everything out in open court. This long-running dispute should be brought to an end, Warner Bros wrote in a dense 117-page appeal (read it here) filed Friday with the 9th Circuit Court. In typical Hollywood legalities, the move actually resolves nothing expect to see a response from the heirs and then another back from Warner Bros, and all off it to end up one way or another in the Appellate Court sometime in the late summer or early fall.
Through the courts, the estate of Superman co-creator Jerry Siegel recaptured half of the original Superman rights in 2008, with the estate of co-creator Joe Shuster to do the same in 2013. Warner Bros, which owns longtime Superman publisher DC Comics, disagrees with those decisions. This case is about the ownership of copyright in the earliest comics that introduced elements of the iconic Superman character and story, the appeal from Warners lawyer Daniel Petrocelli states. The case presents an unusually broad array of doctrinal, factual, and procedural issues. But much of the case reduces to a familiar proposition: a deal is a deal.
Warners contends that Laura Siegel Larson, the heir to the Siegel estate, reneged on a copyright deal with DC that guaranteed the family many millions of dollars in cash, royalties, and other compensation. In its call to have the issue decided by trial, the studio says the family asserted there was no deal without a long form and the district court agreed, casting aside established California contract law principles principles essential to the entertainment industry, where many business deals are never formalized. The latest legal move by Warner Bros follows a win last year in the matter, when Judge Otis Wright tossed out a First Amendment suit by Marc Toberoff, a rights lawyer for the heirs.
None of this will have any immediate effect on the upcoming Zack Snyder-directed Superman reboot Man Of Steel, scheduled to be released June 14, 2013, or any potential sequels from that property.
Thought this movie was dead.