Glen Rice's kid is nothing like his pops. SMH.
Kid can shoot
Glen Rice's kid is nothing like his pops. SMH.
dude that guy is riding the bench ... he can't even start over Eddie Jones.
LOL YOU SEE THOSE AIRBALLS IN THE PLAYOFFS? LOL
The Nuggets essentially traded Carmelo and Billups for Gallo and Andre Miller.
OMG WHAT A STEAL
seriously, i'm not even going to halfass this "arguement" with you. First Jefferson sucks because a 19 year can't even start over him.. but it was a dumb move because we have Jefferson. lol
Lakers don't trade superstars for bench players... lol what the hell you think the Shaq trade was?
dude that guy is riding the bench ... he can't even start over Eddie Jones.
LOL YOU SEE THOSE AIRBALLS IN THE PLAYOFFS? LOL
We can draft them all we want, but we're not trading superstars for them...like your dumb ass GM WITH NO PRESSURE WHATSOEVER did.
How's this for a tough pill to swallow.
D-Will > Melo
Nuggets rejected the NJ offer for Melo, then cleaned out the Knicks. the Jazz swooped in with no pressure whatsoever and took the inferior NJ deal for the superior player.team
lol..
this kid..
this kid.
oh and they traded Shaq for Odom, Grant, and Caron Butler. Good thing they didn't get any bench players though.
lol..
this kid..
this kid.
oh and they traded Shaq for Odom, Grant, and Caron Butler. Good thing they didn't get any bench players though.
In Vag's world, players don't age or get better. Thanks for the knowledge, bro.
And on a side note, no one take Hoopshype seriously ever again. They just put up some shit about Diaw for Petro, Farmar, and Houston's 1st. The Knicks got a better chance at being a 6 seed.
Jefferson sucks for all the reasons that you know Jefferson sucks. And you're acting as if this experiment hasn't been going on for a year and the Jazz haven't shown that they essentially traded D Will for a bad PG and two bench players who have potential, but on your team, are going to be bench players for the foreseeable future.
So since you basically have NO defense for your trade besides "Give Favors time, he might be Kobe good"
You're now bashing a Lakers trade that happened almost a decade ago? I agree that trade was a bad trade. The Jazz / NJ trade is still complete ass for the Jazz and you've made 0 points to prove otherwise other than some veiled troll attempt that it's worth trading superstars for players who ride the bench behind one of your best players because.... look KOBE lol
Receiving 2 lottery picks and a decent player, at that time at least, for one great player isn't a bad deal vahagn. They may have gotten a better deal from someone else, but I sincerely doubt it would have been as much of an improvement as you're suggesting.
Who's that "decent" player? Favors is more than that. Kanter has great value. And a lottery pick is still coming their way in 2012 or in 2013.
I'm basically discounting Harris, but you're forgetting a part of the deal. Everyone in the discussion is, here.
Nobody in the league thinks of Favors and Kanter as just "bench players with potential". They hold very decent trade value, it won't disappear like that. Al Jefferson is a 15M$ expirer in 2013 who averages 20/10 until then. I don't think you realize that Utah has options. Favors and Kanter are going to be good to great starters at some point in their career, everyone knows that. And you're forgetting something: Jazz have a lottery pick coming from the trade (Warriors' pick, top 7 protected).
LegendofJoe said:Receiving 2 lottery picks and a decent player, at that time at least, for one great player isn't a bad deal vahagn. They may have gotten a better deal from someone else, but I sincerely doubt it would have been as much of an improvement as you're suggesting.
It's Devin Harris. Favors and Kanter hold a lot of value, I'm definitely not questioning that.
It's Devin Harris. Favors and Kanter hold a lot of value, I'm definitely not questioning that.
Lottery Picks recently haven't meant much because most have been bad basketball players. Ask the Wolves how valuable Johnny Flynn or Wes Johnson have been?
I'm talking about what is happening now, and what's happened for the last year. You guys are all talking about best case future scenarios. When we get to that point, we'll re-evaluate the trade.
Damn, it's good they built their team around seasoned veterans Kevin Love and Ricky Rubio who were not drafted in the lottery. Can't imagine what would have happened if they had to pick guys at 5th in the 2008 and 2009 drafts.
so basically evaluating the trade this early when it will revolve around how the lottery picks turn out is retarded?
couldn't agree more... so why did you evaluate it?
what the hell are you talking about? You're the one who said the Lakers don't make those trades.
Deron was leaving after this year, we werent going to win anything with that team, we got 2 players with potential and decent trade bait and another pick. What the hell are you not understanding? You bring up that Denver-NYK trade like Denver got away with robbery.. and fail to actually look at what they got.
Shit, I can't even hate on Kanter anymore. God knows I want to.
C) Last year they got Chandler, Harrington, Felton, Gallo, Mosgov...all who played good to AMAZING for them. This year Chandler and Felton haven't been in the lineup but Harrington has been great for them, Mosgov has been their backup C, and Gallo was having a career year before the injury. On the flipside, Melo is complete ass while Deron, even while un-engaged, is still destroying foos. So yea, there's no comparison between the two trades either from last year, or this year.
Edit: Everyone's entire argument for why this trade is good is "Derrick Favors and Kanter might be great yo!" Despite the fact that they have no reasonable way of starting on this squad until 2014 and, haven't actually shown themselves to be anything close to great. The only way this trade makes any sense is the overrating of Favors / Kanter and their potential instead of looking at the current situation, in which case, it was a bad trade!
I get it but they got Favors PLUS 2 lottery picks, not Harris plus two lottery picks.
Current Lakers team?
The one that was ready to trade Kobe for Deng?
You don't make a trade for immediate results. Not when you get a #2 pick, a #3 pick and another lottery pick that might be very high in 2013! And we have yet to see you acknowledge the existence of that last pick. That package beasts over Gallo & scraps.
You really don't know the difference between trade demands and 1.5 years of contract left do you?
And you really don't know the difference between a guy with a no trade clause who forces his GM to entertain a particular offer versus trading a guy in the dark for basically the first package thrown your way because you live in Utar and are pissed off that your HOF coach quit.
By all means, compare the two instances evenly. This wouldn't be an argument if D-Will had said "Trade me to NJ"...that's not what happened, don't compare it to a situation where a player does that
They got a damned good return. Which in return kinda screwed up NY's position a bit...That trade isn't even worth discussion. Nobody will know how those picks turn out for a few years.. and nobody knows what else the Jazz could have got instead.
But we have Millsap and Jefferson until 2013.. clearly we will be wasting the 20 and 21 year old primes of the players we got.
They got a damned good return. Which in return kinda screwed up NY's position a bit...
But I agree, Favors, Kanter, and whoever the fuck should just retire at 23.
Deron Williams for Harris and 3 lotto picks is bad. Word. Thanks for reinforcing everyone's opinion of you, Vag.
You're making my point again. The 'Current' Lakers were forced to look at trades twice with Shaq and Kobe and they did so by looking at potential. Potential in Deng, potential in Butler, potential in Odom, etc.
But since you've obviously found Odom's secret stash, I think you should enjoy it and stop posting.
If you were a GM for the bobcats, would you trade to get two lottery picks who play the same position as your two best players?
If you were a GM for the bobcats, would you trade to get two lottery picks who play the same position as your two best players? Because if you would, go join Utah's staff, I'm sure they'll love to have you.
Whether its the start demanding the trade (and still denying it through his no trade clause) have no real relevance in this one. The Lakers entertained the idea because they felt it benefited them, no? Why? Figure it out.Kobe forced the Lakers to look at the Bulls. He has a no trade clause and demanded a trade. Team can't do anything once that happens. Holy hell you're stupid, honestly. And you're just re-inforcing what I've always said, when you get into an argument with me, you'll say anything and everything, no matter how out of context and irrational just to get points.
If you were a GM for the bobcats, would you trade to get two lottery picks who play the same position as your two best players? Because if you would, go join Utah's staff, I'm sure they'll love to have you.
People ridiculed Kahn for taking 3 PG's in the same draft, and then signing two more. But it's ok that O'Conner signed / traded for / drafted / 4 Bigs within 2 years while giving away a true superstar who had no trade demands made?
Stay classy...and ignore details and thinking. Durr durr 3 lottery picks good!!!
I didn't think we had 'best players' lolzLOOOOOOOOOOL
I didn't think we had 'best players' lolz
Meh it's still DJ i think. Biyombo next year?
Don't trade DJ for 3 lottery picks though.. that would retarded.
I'd take a second at this point. Something is better than nothing.Meh it's still DJ i think. Biyombo next year?
Don't trade DJ for 3 lottery picks though.. that would retarded.
Y! Sources: Whatever the Magic do at trade deadline, Dwight Howard's still determined to sign with the Nets in July. http://t.co/LDxMziSG
http://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/179629709548720130
Could the Lakers be in the lead for landing Ramon Sessions? HoopsWorld says so: "The Lakers have been linked to Ramon Sessions for weeks and they continue to express significant interest in the Cleveland Cavaliers' point guard. While other teams have called about Sessions, the Lakers are believed to be the frontrunner to acquire his services, if they decide to pull the trigger on a deal."
One thing the Magic are holding out for, a source told Sporting News, is the resurrection of talks with the Los Angeles Lakers. As the process has played out, it has become clear that the Magic are not going to get a better player in return for Howard than All-Star Lakers center Andrew Bynum. Back in December, the Lakers had strong interest in Howard, but team VP Jim Buss said there was no way he would trade both Pau Gasol and Bynum to the Magic for Howard. Given Bynum’s injury history, a deal in which Bynum was the main target was a longshot.
Read more: http://aol.sportingnews.com/nba/sto...rd-orlando-magic-want-la-in-mix#ixzz1p1WHVWHO
Seriously, DJ isn't going to resign. I'd be absolutely trilled if the Cats could get a lottery pick for him.
The Warriors might get to give it a go with the current unit. According to team sources, the club is embracing the likelihood that a trade -- especially a major splash -- won't happen by Thursday's deadline.
Golden State, as this newspaper reported, was gearing up to make a play for Milwaukee center Andrew Bogut. But that attempt comes with many hurdles. Not only might Bogut (fractured left ankle) be done for the year. But any deal for him might require bringing back Stephen Jackson, who left the Warriors on bad terms in 2009.
Sources dismissed reports Monday that Golden State is considering trading Ellis in a three-team deal involving Orlando and New Orleans. Golden State still isn't willing to part with Ellis for anything on Orlando other than Dwight Howard. And no one on the Hornets, not even former All-Star center Chris Kaman, makes the Warriors willing to part with Ellis, one source said.
Warriors management might look for a smaller deal to give the team an immediate boost. But one team source said Golden State is OK if it doesn't pull off a trade by the deadline. That way, the Warriors can deal in the offseason, this time without the lockout hindrances from last offseason.
Knicks fans are so happy that you keep them from being the consistent laughing stock of NBA-age.So Reading this I imagine Dy_Nasty and dIEHARD were telling everyone to calm down in 2008 about the Pau Gasol trade right?
"Wait, we can't judge this deal yet, Marc Gasol is still really young and there's lots of flexibility and cap space...let's hold judgement and wait a few years as this team isn't a contender so they don't need to worry about immediate growth"
right?....bullshit. dIEHARD is just being an irrational Homer and Dy, you're just being Dy. Like I said, anytime I post anything you just interject yourself into the argument and start tossing personal insults / illogical arguments my way
A fun little tidbit from the new stats gizmo at NBA.com: The Warriors are plus-15 this season when Steph Curry plays and Monta Ellis are on the bench but minus-119 when Ellis plays and Curry is on the pine. The season before, they were plus-23 with Curry and no Ellis but minus-191 with Ellis and no Curry. The season before that, the tally was plus-122 with Curry and no Ellis and minus-89 for the opposite.
So, for the three seasons those two have been together, Golden State has outscored its opponents by 160 points when Curry plays and Ellis sits despite being badly outscored overall. And, in the opposite situation, the Warriors have been outscored by 399 points.