Black Mamba
Member
Why would the Nets even trade for Dwight? What sense does it make?
If you trade for him now, you just ruin your draft pick and give up assets.
if you wait til the offseason, you have a lottery pick + whatever you want to keep now.
Eh, 2003 the lakers were a robert horry 3 from probably winning the title again. in 2004, Malone got hurt. While I agree with your argument, I think those examples don't work.
Like I said, I'm fine with trading Pau for the right package. I agree with your sentiments. I just don't think the packages presented, especially with Boozer, actually improve the team.
If you trade for him now, you just ruin your draft pick and give up assets.
if you wait til the offseason, you have a lottery pick + whatever you want to keep now.
I was thinking of that piece on how contenders try to keep cores together and how this leads to teams slowly getting worse but afraid to move any of the core because of the past together and general fear in uncertainty. The last Lakers dynasty went through a similar aspect where they still had Shaq and Kobe dominating but the rest of the team was slowly turning into shambles or guys like Rick Fox were still playing too many minutes because of their veteran status.
Shaq was obviously a blow it up situation but the current Lakers still have Bynum and Kobe to keep, can you move Pau to keep contending for more years or are you dropping off from a level to where you will still win but not be quite good enough? Do you then stick with Pau, try to win with what you have one or two more times (like the Shaq team did in 2003 and 2004), let Kobe chase Kareem and try to setup the future building around Bynum?
On the other hand you also have the willful disbanding of contenders like the Mavericks somewhat did, and in another sport a team like the Marlins. The Odom trade being along these lines, if he's still around does that completely take the notion off the table because of how good the team is, or does it make moving Pau for depth more attractive?
Sorry about the rambling on hypotheticals, I think it's an interesting aspect of constructing a team, when to pull the plug (like the Bucks did today on Bogut) and when to hold serve and trying to patch things up in an attempt to keep going. (Trading Pau could arguably be seen as both.)
Eh, 2003 the lakers were a robert horry 3 from probably winning the title again. in 2004, Malone got hurt. While I agree with your argument, I think those examples don't work.
Like I said, I'm fine with trading Pau for the right package. I agree with your sentiments. I just don't think the packages presented, especially with Boozer, actually improve the team.