Mass Effect 3 SPOILER THREAD: LOTS OF SPECULATION FROM EVERYONE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Again, do you seriously think that Bioware is capable of doing this? Given Tali's stock photo and Joker's sudden urge to go relay jumping (Ride the Flavor Wave! with your choice of lime, cherry, or blue raspberry!), the ending just screams laziness.

In the end, the indoctrination theory is just a "it's all a dream" theory. It's not necessarily a bad thing; Inception and Total Recall handle it well, mostly because those two films are built around the questioning of reality. In Mass Effect, it's there, but it's not really prominent.

Still, even if it were true, with the prevailing theory that everything after the red beam is a dream, Shep's still on Earth taking a nap (or dead) while everyone is dying around him. He failed.

not really prominent?

two of the MAIN antagonists are indoctrinated! the key factor with each encounter being that they don't realize it...did you never question how Shepard manages to find himself around reapers or reaper technology for so long without succumbing to ANY effects?
 
What would be awesome is if they said you had to buy the Mass Effect anime to get a code to download the real ending. SYNERGY.

A combination of East and West to discover the truth. Penned by Hideo Kojima.
 
Seeing this (Saren dies, but is then taken over by Sovereign), makes me think: Shepard's dead: Harbinger's taking over his/her body.

ME3-2: KILL SHEPARD

So if the whole indoctrination troll is real and they do have something else planned, it would possibly work out well I guess?

The way I see it playing out if true is Shep would be indoctrinated from the moment s/he got fried by Harbinger, after that all of much of what occurred was a hallucination, especially after Anderson dies and Shep gets lifted on the platform.

So when it comes to the three endings, Destroy would be the correct one to make because of the "secret" ending with Shep still alive. This would be since everything is happening in Shep's head, both Merge and Control could be seen as giving in to the Reapers.

Merge in this sense could be the worst because Shepard is most actively working with the Reapers to "merge" everyone together, but in reality is simply aiding the Reapers in harvesting everyone and adding them into the Reaper collective conscious.

Control then is probably much like its shown in the game, but Shepard cant control the Reapers because s/he is actually indoctrinated and instead of controlling the Reapers the complete opposite occurs and he/she is turned into another Husk with all remnants of Shepard being erased.

Destroy then is the only good ending choice because as the Catalyst points out Shepard him/herself is part synthetic, ie Reaper. So in Destroying everything Shepard is thus destroying the Reaper part of his/her conscious, breaking their control and no longer being indoctrinated.

This is why only the Destroy ending has the clip of Shepard still being shown alive in an area that appears to be on earth, because Shepard has broken the Reaper's hold on his/her mind and has returned to reality, which is still back on earth.

Thats my quick view on the subject if this whole indoctrination thing turns out to be true. If it is BioWare are geniuses and tricky motherfuckers of the highest level.
 
From the Giant Bomb thing



Can anyone confirm this?
Damn, that theory is getting to me.

All your dead squad mates whisper to you during that dream. I heard Kaiden, Jack, Samara, and Jacob, who all died in my previous games. Maybe Grunt or Wrex was dead in their game and they mistook their voice for Harbinger.
 
Give me a Garrus ending DLC and I'll buy it
"Remember all the calibrations that I did on the old Normandy? Here's the result"
*a giant cannon emerge from the Normandy and shoot Harbringer in the face*
Reapers return to dark space in fear, never to be seen again.
Same Epilogue, just the child saying "Please Grandpa, tell me another story of THE VAKARIAN"

God, I would buy that.
 
Why do people want this to be the Indoctrinated ending? It's just as bad as "it was all a dream."

It was all a dream isn't a inherently bad trope. No trope is, it depends on the way that it's used.

I definitely believe in indoctrination if only because of the hints suggesting it with no real contradictions to it, or atleast nothing that has occured to me (if anyone has an idea of why the indoctrination theory does not work, please, speak up, I'd love to hear it because it'd be conclusive proof that bioware messed up rather than have this be a twist that the entire internet has to work in unison in order to solve). None of the hints for it are definitive, but the sheer overwhelming volume of them convince me it's true. And like I said, if you have evdience to the contrary, speak up, because I'm going crazy and beginning to like the ending after all.
 
All your dead squad mates whisper to you during that dream. I heard Kaiden, Jack, Samara, and Jacob, who all died in my previous games. Maybe Grunt or Wrex was dead in their game and they mistook their voice for Harbinger.

I wasn't sure I was hearing it until post Rannoch, when I heard Legion's "Shepard-Commander, help us" or something like that.
 
I'd bet my life savings that Bioware didn't actually intend the ending to be thought of as indoctrination.

And now that they've seen the outcry they'll claim that it actually was indoctrination which gives them a good enough reason to fool the poor souls in denial that will end up buying their DLC ending.
At this point, as long as they change it I don't care. As it stands now, we have one of the lamest game endings ever experienced.
 
At this point, as long as they change it I don't care. As it stands now, we have one of the lamest game endings ever experienced.

Yup they can use whatever excuse they want to be able to go back and re-do it into a great ending.

Even then it'll take time for me to erase this one mentally but I'll get there.
 
not really prominent?

two of the MAIN antagonists are indoctrinated! the key factor with each encounter being that they don't realize it...did you never question how Shepard manages to find himself around reapers or reaper technology for so long without succumbing to ANY effects?

Relatively prominent. In Inception and Total Recall, it was always brought up to the main characters. Always. There was never a moment where it was never in the back of your mind.

In Mass Effect, I did question how Shep could be around so much Reaper tech and not get indoctrinated, then I remembered that Bioware killed him at the beginning of the second game and no one treats his resurrection as something miraculous. I then remember that the reason for the entire series is an awkward "solution" to synthetics. Things get brought up, set up, and then dropped. Everything points to Bioware being lazy and crappy at writing.

If anything, the moment the "dream" begins should be at the beginning of ME2 since he died.
 
what

no it doesnt

you can walk in yourself and
still be rescued and go on and play the new end game

fuck you talking about, they literally changed the ending completely from
one of having to sacrifice yourself to some totally different shit
because people yelled at them that their ending was shitty

You missed my point. The work required to modify the ending is minimal. That's why it works. From what I can see, that scene was easy to fix.

Comparing it to what Bioware would need to do in order to change the endings is insane. It's a total rework of the animations, the cut scenes, the voice work.

It's never going to happen. You guys are in for one hell of a deception.
 
I'd bet my life savings that Bioware didn't actually intend the ending to be thought of as indoctrination.

And now that they've seen the outcry they'll claim that it actually was indoctrination which gives them a good enough reason to fool the poor souls in denial that will end up buying their DLC ending.

The answer to this depends on how soon we see a trailer for an indoctrination ending, if one exist. If it really is in a like month time frame I'd be inclined to believe they planned it out if the turn around was that fast.

Also god this thread is the greatest example of desperately grasping at straws ever.
 
Another interesting point made in favor of the indoctrinated theory. Its kinda creepy how it all fits.

bsn said:
Not sure if it has been mentioned in the last 400+ pages, maybe you can edit it into the first post, but the VI on Thessia refuses to tell you what the catalyst is. When you question it further, it says "indoctrinated presence detected" and Kai Leng shows up behind you. Naturally, you assume that it is Kai Leng, but what if you are the indoctrinated presence? Why would the VI speak around your questions? VI's are not suppose to think.

The VI only talks to you after the Illusive Man alters the AI and disables the safeguards preventing it from giving information away to indoctrinated subjects, and the VI explicitly says that it's safeguards have been removed. And then it just spits out the information that the catalyst is the Citadel when you ask it. Again, why is it so forthcoming now when it was dancing around you with words before?

Also, when you enter the Citadel, there is this part where Anderson says the walls are moving. You can see some of the walls move when you cross the chasm. The moving walls serve no purpose, there is no need for Anderson to point it out if it is meaningless. From ME2, the scientists on the disabled Reaper said it felt like walls were moving.
 
I read all these theory, debates, and fanfic or evidence online and I came to the only possible solution :

Bioware had no clue on how to end the series so they just made it the vaguest possible, then wait for the outcry and fan abnoxious delusions for explanations. Then they will copy what people will make up about the ending and then release it as DLC
 
All your dead squad mates whisper to you during that dream. I heard Kaiden, Jack, Samara, and Jacob, who all died in my previous games. Maybe Grunt or Wrex was dead in their game and they mistook their voice for Harbinger.

I can remember hearing Thane, Wrex (well, generic Krogan voice :P ), Mordin, and Legion. A few others, but were so quiet (and only the 1 word), that they became hard to decipher who the voices were.


Lifejumper: Totally didn't connect the "walls are moving" bit, back with the dead reaper scientists in ME2.
 
This will be amazing whichever way it turns out. Imagine the tears when April finally arrives, Bioware unveils their amazing DLC and it turns out to be a bunch of new races for MP and retaking Omega...

Believe!
 
So I've been reading everything about this for a while, so it indeed is indoctrination at the end. And it seems likely Bioware will release the end, due to time constraints ect. I think this is amazing. Hopefully everyone doesnt jump down their throats for this...
 
If he were indoctrinated, why wouldnt the prothean vi at thessia know? It detected Kai leng. So you have to assert Shepard was "corrupted" between thessia and earth.

Just doesn't sit right with me.
 
Another interesting point made in favor of the indoctrinated theory. Its kinda creepy how it all fits.

Also, when you enter the Citadel, there is this part where Anderson says the walls are moving. You can see some of the walls move when you cross the chasm. The moving walls serve no purpose, there is no need for Anderson to point it out if it is meaningless. From ME2, the scientists on the disabled Reaper said it felt like walls were moving.

I don't know if I saw a bunch of walls moving I would point them out as clear identifier of where I am.
 
I read all these theory, debates, and fanfic or evidence online and I came to the only possible solution :

Bioware had no clue on how to end the series so they just made it the vaguest possible, then wait for the outcry and fan abnoxious delusions for explanations. Then they will copy what people will make up about the ending and then release it as DLC

Yea... it's no where that easy. If the DLC releases at the end of the year, then I'd wager you are right. And they would not take such an expensive gamble to appease the hardcore.


If he were indoctrinated, why wouldnt the prothean vi at thessia know? It detected Kai leng. So you have to assert Shepard was "corrupted" between thessia and earth.

Just doesn't sit right with me.
I don't believe you were indoctrinated the entire time. Just when you get knocked out on Earth and that giant reaper is standing above you.
 
Also god this thread is the greatest example of desperately grasping at straws ever.

To be fair to this thread, it's not that different anywhere else on the internet.

If he were indoctrinated, why wouldnt the prothean vi at thessia know? It detected Kai leng. So you have to assert Shepard was "corrupted" between thessia and earth.

Just doesn't sit right with me.

Shepard has always been indoctrinated since encountering Sovereign in ME1! So the VI didn't say he/she was indoctrinated to lure him/her into a false sense of security!
 
So I've been reading everything about this for a while, so it indeed is indoctrination at the end. And it seems likely Bioware will release the end, due to time constraints ect. I think this is amazing. Hopefully everyone doesnt jump down their throats for this...

I think it's only a matter of time until this indoctrination DLC happens.

Then we'll spend years debating whether Bioware intended it to be like this or they turned out to be the luckiest bastards ever with like 20 things that just happened to all point to Shepard being indoctrinated.
 
I wasn't sure I was hearing it until post Rannoch, when I heard Legion's "Shepard-Commander, help us" or something like that.
This reminded me of MGS3's river of sorrow.

So if we take cues from that, we're currently playing Big Shep, and in the next game we'll be playing as Solid Shep and Kai becomes an ali. Because it's all a fanfiction.

I read all these theory, debates, and fanfic or evidence online and I came to the only possible solution :

Bioware had no clue on how to end the series so they just made it the vaguest possible, then wait for the outcry and fan abnoxious delusions for explanations. Then they will copy what people will make up about the ending and then release it as DLC
That's my biggest fear, but it would take so much work for them to do anything.
 
I think it's only a matter of time until this indoctrination DLC happens.

Then we'll spend years debating whether Bioware intended it to be like this or they turned out to be the luckiest bastards ever with like 20 things that just happened to all point to Shepard being indoctrinated.

Haha, indeed. I think you are totally right about it being unintentional, but at this point I don't really care.

NeoGAF's motto has never been more appropriate:

Believe.
 
If he were indoctrinated, why wouldnt the prothean vi at thessia know? It detected Kai leng. So you have to assert Shepard was "corrupted" between thessia and earth.

Just doesn't sit right with me.

I don't think Shepard is indoctrinated for the entire game (if he was at all). It is possible if we follow the theory that the little boy is a tool the Reapers are using to attempt to indoctrinate Shepard, but he has been resisting it successfully.

Only at the end, when he is right in front of Harbinger, and "shot" with the laser, does the full indoctrination process begin. According to the theory anyway.
 
You missed my point. The work required to modify the ending is minimal. That's why it works. From what I can see, that scene was easy to fix.

Comparing it to what Bioware would need to do in order to change the endings is insane. It's a total rework of the animations, the cut scenes, the voice work.

It's never going to happen. You guys are in for one hell of a deception.

or you know

they play the cutscene of shepard breathing in

waking up and just run the new dlc they made from there

they dont have to change the ending at all, they just add new shit on top of it. just like f3 didnt change the ending up to you blacking out at all either, they just didnt run the credit sequence and played the new shit from then
 
Relatively prominent. In Inception and Total Recall, it was always brought up to the main characters. Always. There was never a moment where it was never in the back of your mind.

In Mass Effect, I did question how Shep could be around so much Reaper tech and not get indoctrinated, then I remembered that Bioware killed him at the beginning of the second game and no one treats his resurrection as something miraculous. I then remember that the reason for the entire series is an awkward "solution" to synthetics. Things get brought up, set up, and then dropped. Everything points to Bioware being lazy and crappy at writing.

If anything, the moment the "dream" begins should be at the beginning of ME2 since he died.

Maybe things ended up being a little understated, but basically every single character that knew Shepard in ME1 was either shocked to see he's alive, or had heard he was alive and could scarcely believe it. The question always came back to "what else did Cerberus do to you that you don't know about?" and it was hammered into you repeatedly by Kaidan/Ashley in ME2 and 3. To say that no one treated his resurrection as something miraculous is just patently false.

And maybe I'm getting a little meta here, but any of the hints in ME3 of indoctrination are really subtle...as they should be. The hints are much more pronounced in the citadel at the ending though. All that was missing was an exchange like this:

Shepard: You're indoctrinated, Illusive Man!
TIM: No, Shepard, you are the indoctrinated.
And then Shepard was a zombie.
 
Saw the ending a couple of hours ago.

My major gripe: Teamwork was always a big theme in every ME game. And Shepard proved himself as a great leader. Most of the time, he was more diplomat that soldier.

And yet, in the final minutes of the trilogy, Shepard alone holds the fate of the entire galaxy in his own hands and becomes a martyr.

I can live with all that deus ex machina crap and strange cryptic endings. But this really bothers me. I just doesn't fit with the rest of the series and Shepard as a character.
 
I think it's only a matter of time until this indoctrination DLC happens.

Then we'll spend years debating whether Bioware intended it to be like this or they turned out to be the luckiest bastards ever with like 20 things that just happened to all point to Shepard being indoctrinated.

This all really comes down to timing and quality. If Bioware releases the DLC 6 months from now and it's shoddily put together (more than usual) with lot's of dialogue missing; then it's obviously was a scramble attempt. If this comes out however next month and it's fairly pact/put together and free -- it's obvious it was their intention along. This next month will prove to me, if they are completely confused how to do this story or they are way on top of it.

I'm glad of all this though, my favorite series is not fully over yet! Or at least I assume so.
 
Only at the end, when he is right in front of Harbinger, and "shot" with the laser, does the full indoctrination process begin. According to the theory anyway.
But it wouldn't make any sense that Shep gets indoctrinated only to then snap out of it simply to continue a different ending.

Shouldn't Kai be Vamp?
But who's cyborg ninja?

Saw the ending a couple of hours ago.

My major gripe: Teamwork was always a big theme in every ME game. And Shepard proved himself as a great leader. Most of the time, he was more diplomat that soldier.

And yet, in the final minutes of the trilogy, Shepard alone holds the fate of the entire galaxy in his own hands and becomes a martyr.

I can live with all that deus ex machina crap and strange cryptic endings. But this really bothers me. I just doesn't fit with the rest of the series and Shepard as a character.
He ascends reality, changing from Jesus (a unifying force) to God (choosing the fate of the universe).
 
If he were indoctrinated, why wouldnt the prothean vi at thessia know? It detected Kai leng. So you have to assert Shepard was "corrupted" between thessia and earth.

Just doesn't sit right with me.

It's obvious that it only detected Shepard being indoctrinated as Kai Leng walked into the room, and its warning that an indoctrinated person had entered was actually aimed at Shepard.
 
You missed my point. The work required to modify the ending is minimal. That's why it works. From what I can see, that scene was easy to fix.

Comparing it to what Bioware would need to do in order to change the endings is insane. It's a total rework of the animations, the cut scenes, the voice work.

It's never going to happen. You guys are in for one hell of a deception.

You're leaving out the option that the VA and all of this are already done, and were done before the game was complete, though.
 
This all really comes down to timing and quality. If Bioware releases the DLC 6 months from now and it's shoddily put together (more than usual) with lot's of dialogue missing; then it's obviously was a scramble attempt. If this comes out however next month and it's fairly pact/put together and free -- it's obvious it was their intention along. This next month will prove to me, if they are completely confused how to do this story or they are way on top of it.

I'm glad of all this though, my favorite series is not fully over yet! Or at least I assume so.

If it comes out next month, I would be absolutely blown away, because that would mean Bioware intended to do this all along.

It's incredibly risky, but also incredibly genius if true.

I like Bioware and all, but I don't give them that much credit.
 
If it comes out next month, I would be absolutely blown away, because that would mean Bioware intended to do this all along.
Hey remember how we totally fucked with your mind and sent you into that spiraling, deep, dark depressing? Psych! Here's some DLC!
 
The only way I would have believed it was all a dream or the result of some indoctrination was if they didn't show the scene on the winter planet at the very end and if they had clearly showed it was earth during the secret scene (and if that scene was available for every endings).

With what I've seen it's simply bad writing. The scene at the end is basically identical to the ending scene of DAII where Varric tells Cassandra the final part of the story. No matter what you did in the game a big unavoidable event happened anyway. In DAII it was the mages' revolution and in ME3 it's the end of space travels. Varric is simply telling the story like the old grandfather was telling a story to the kid.

It was fairly easy to show it was all a dream but they didn't so it's simply bad writing. I really don't care about that scene in the rubbles as nothing confirms it was on earth anyway. The only evidence I saw is that the rubbles are made of concrete or that you breathe. So what? I mean they were already very lazy copying some desktop picture to do the winter scene at the end and photoshopping a stock picture to do Tali's face so the guy making the 2 seconds scene probably never saw the space god temple or that scene was maybe not even supposed to be used for that anyway. Moreover, in ME1 when you beat Saren you're also udner a pile of concrete so there's obviously concrete on the Citadel. It was super easy to show Major Coats or even Anderson pulling you up (he should be alive if it's a dream) but they didn't. Breathing doesn't mean it's on Earth either. For all I care I've never seen the Citadel completely blown up either.

Moreover you "wake up" before the winter scene so the last part is clearly not a dream and even confirms space travel is no longer possible.
 
But it wouldn't make any sense that Shep gets indoctrinated only to then snap out of it simply to continue a different ending.

Why wouldn't it? You would have to break the indoctrination process, which means you never get fully indoctrinated, to continue the game. The indoctrination theory is that everything after the beam of light from Harbinger is an illusion. It is in Shepard's head, and part of the final indoctrination process. Not real.
 
Maybe things ended up being a little understated, but basically every single character that knew Shepard in ME1 was either shocked to see he's alive, or had heard he was alive and could scarcely believe it. The question always came back to "what else did Cerberus do to you that you don't know about?" and it was hammered into you repeatedly by Kaidan/Ashley in ME2 and 3. To say that no one treated his resurrection as something miraculous is just patently false.

In ME2, no one treated his resurrection as something miraculous. Everyone is basically "Hey, Shep. How are you doing?" The VS on Horizon was mad at you because you didn't contact them in two years and there was no option to tell them, "Hey, I was dead. Now worship me for I am the Shepherd reborn."

You are Space Jesus and no one cares.

And maybe I'm getting a little meta here, but any of the hints in ME3 of indoctrination are really subtle...as they should be. The hints are much more pronounced in the citadel at the ending though. All that was missing was an exchange like this:

Shepard: You're indoctrinated, Illusive Man!
TIM: No, Shepard, you are the indoctrinated.
And then Shepard was a zombie.

You're right: they shouldn't hit you over the head with the hints, but it doesn't work in this game because it's not a game where you question reality. In Inception, you question whether Cobb's reality is the correct reality. In Total Recall, you question whether or not it was a vast plan to keep three-titted aliens from breathing suitable air.

In the end, according to the theory, if Shep was indoctrinated, he is still lying on Earth while everyone dies around him. Nothing is accomplished.
 
Hey remember how we totally fucked with your mind and sent you into that spiraling, deep, dark depressing? Psych! Here's some DLC!

Yea. That's brilliant.

Also having the high EMS makes the kid say, "Wake up" instead of "why are you here?" is pretty trippy indeed.


Why wouldn't it? You would have to break the indoctrination process, which means you never get fully indoctrinated, to continue the game. The indoctrination theory is that everything after the beam of light from Harbinger is an illusion. It is in Shepard's head, and part of the final indoctrination process. Not real.
I think this would have worked better if the the Destroy ending was available if you have 100% ect. instead of the completely wrong one...
 
or you know

they play the cutscene of shepard breathing in

waking up and just run the new dlc they made from there

they dont have to change the ending at all, they just add new shit on top of it. just like f3 didnt change the ending up to you blacking out at all either, they just didnt run the credit sequence and played the new shit from then

That makes no sense. Do you just say that the original ending was all a dream? Every single part of it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom