axisofweevils
Holy crap! Today's real megaton is that more than two people can have the same first name.
Wii U Music to be launch game!
Believe!
Believe!
I'm watching Nintendo's E3 2010 presentation and I must say this is definitely getting me hyped.
Huh? No. The current, optimized engine performs roughly the same on Wii U and 360. The initial, unoptimized Wii U port only achieved a fraction of it's current performance. This is about software optimization, not different devkit versions.No... He said that the engine originally ran a bit better then xenon can run it, this is after the latest kits, it runs multiples of times better then on the previous dev kits. xenos was never brought up.
Ha, the Expansion Pak, I remember that thing around 99-00. A few games even required it, like Perfect Dark, DK64, C&C, Majora's Mask because of the visuals they were putting out. 4 whole extra MBs of RAM, would you believe! Five years later we got systems shipping out with 512 MB
I remember it enable some high resolution modes on some of the games. It was definitely worth it.
It's just a little frustrating and sad that while the system will be leaps and bounds ahead of the PS360 in some aspects, it is still weaker/on par with 2006 hardware on other areas
He said his not going to use the extra power, that its just a straight port.
Is Wii U's IBM CPU likely to have 4 threads per core?
With 3 cores, that'd be 12 threads, double that of XB360.
With 4 cores....
Yeah.. I like going back and looking at years past. It can be fun, depressing, silly, and fascinating when looking back and knowing how things turned-out. The hints pointing at the future are there, and it's one thing that makes this time around a bit more difficult.. not even hints to be had.
As far as power goes, I'm not going to be happy or depressed until official, concrete confirmation. Things are all over the place, so it's hard to get a bead on where Nintendo really is going.
I see lots of the "But.. It's Nintendo" thought pattern internalized within its own fans. Kinda sad. Just wait before condemnation.
Trying to remain positive. Trying to remain positive. Trying to remain positive.
reallly trying
Is Wii U's IBM CPU likely to have 4 threads per core?
With 3 cores, that'd be 12 threads, double that of XB360.
With 4 cores....
Imagine if developers had no hardware limitations whatsoever to deal with. Would games all the sudden become indistinguishable from real life? Of course not. That would take budgets well beyond what Hollywood blockbusters require. Remember, we're talking about games that are typically longer than a couple hours. Equating more hardware power to Avatar is like equating a hotter oven to better food. People still have to put the ingredients in there.(Avatar sucked, but you know what I'm saying)
Well, the more reliable rumors/leak about the CPU about the cores is likely lherre, bgassassin, arkam, and now wsippel. lherre stated that there are 3 cores and two threads, like the 360's, but with asymmetrical amount of L2 Cache per core. I believe bgassassin stated that it was 3MB of L2 cache total. Arkam mentioned that the cores are OOE, so that by itself will make it a different design than Xenon.
Going by Arkam and wsippel's statements, the CPU should be more efficient than Xenon but is probably clocked lower.
I feel that non-gaming apps like YouTube and web browsing are going to be very important for Wii U, I just have a feeling. The possibilities with HD visuals and the small screen are endless.
Not really... better tools... automated modeling.. etc. Mass assets for all developers to use etc. Would come in future.
And is some cases like buildings, its just the case of applying better lightning, modifying textures settings and adding tes.
Well, I'm not ruling out 2, and no, I'm more than happy here in the land of the fairies where life is beautiful thanks.
I think he's trying to say its either 1 or 8GB![]()
So Wii U is "weak" again?
No, it's the Wii U, not the Wii K.
Sorry.
It's going to take a shitload of work to match what a lot of gaffer's expectations seem to be (Samaritan).
And as far as NeoGAF posters go: if you like Nintendo, it'll end-up being fine enough and any flaws will be overlooked once new first-party titles are shown. If you have misgivings about Nintendo, they won't be alleviated and the head-shaking will continue. If you hate Nintendo, you'll have new excuses for bashing them. I foresee no real change there.As a consumer if you are on the negative side, I don't see much changing you from that. If you are on the positive side, I don't see much changing you from that.
I specifically remember the 3DS push - Nintendo put 5000 demo units out before the launch here in North America. (yes, I remember that number specifically)I think Wii U is going to need a massive marketing push. I mean kinect-level of spending. Spend half a billion dollars on marketing this shit. It needs to be everywhere.
So.. I'm not the only one who gets a twisted sense of glee when a once-graphics-tunnelvisioned studio shifts focus to iPhone and Facebook games? Truly, there are times when idiotic desire for the unsustainable has me wondering about a redo of 1983. This town needs an enema?!GAF is functionally retarded and incredibly depressing to read. It's solipism at its worst.
Some days I almost feel like the GAF demographic deserves to have iOS rise up and swallow it whole.
Did Arkam ever post in this thread? I'm trying to find quotes on what he said about the power of the GPU?
GAF is functionally retarded and incredibly depressing to read. It's solipism at its worst.
Some days I almost feel like the GAF demographic deserves to have iOS rise up and swallow it whole.
Truth be told, if non-gamers see that the uPad can be used for an internet browsing experience that can be comparable to the iPad, and then they see that some games can be pulled off of the TV onto just the pad, I can see this thing catching fire among gift-giving shoppers, among parents, and among those who are always maneuvering for TV access.
Watching TV while surfing the web has become something of a national pasttime, and I think Nintendo is going to emphasize how much their new device fits this behavioural pattern quite nicely.
But Nintendo has to absolutely nail the web experience. The Wii's and DS' browsing experiences, from my view, are a bit too clunky to compete.
Did Arkam ever post in this thread? I'm trying to find quotes on what he said about the power of the GPU?
Did Arkam ever post in this thread? I'm trying to find quotes on what he said about the power of the GPU?
I swear he did, but search says otherwise:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/search.php?searchid=500961
Edit: Search Lies
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=36321117&postcount=8683
It will have some factors that are superior like Memory amount(though bus speeds are slow) but other things (GPU) are slightly less than what we have come to expect from the current gen systems. I am sure if a game a is built from the ground up on the console it will look nice, but porting anything from the HD twins over will take a hit.
He did. He just repeated the same song and dance he did last time - some things are better than 360, some things are worse, porting requires concessions, reinforced the fact that he doesn't have a lot of technical knowledge, and explained he's no longer working with the dev kit in any way but would have heard of any major changes if they had occurred recently.
Didn't you know, Keplar level graphics are in the next XBox and PlayStation.So Wii U is "weak" again?
PINGU, PINGU!
I feel that non-gaming apps like YouTube and web browsing are going to be very important for Wii U, I just have a feeling. The possibilities with HD visuals and the small screen are endless.
Truth be told, if non-gamers see that the uPad can be used for an internet browsing experience that can be comparable to the iPad, and then they see that some games can be pulled off of the TV onto just the pad, I can see this thing catching fire among gift-giving shoppers, among parents, and among those who are always maneuvering for TV access.
Watching TV while surfing the web has become something of a national pasttime, and I think Nintendo is going to emphasize how much their new device fits this behavioural pattern quite nicely.
But Nintendo has to absolutely nail the web experience. The Wii's and DS' browsing experiences, from my view, are a bit too clunky to compete.
What's it like living in Hyrule?
The thing is, if Arkam is right, this whole 1+ year rumor cycle is going to look even more ridiculous. It would mean a ton of reported values were completely off.
an rv770 - one of the very first rumors out there - in the early dev kits would have to have been false
over 1GB of ram? Forget about it. Probably more like 768mb
"lots" of EDRAM? Hah!
Using power7 and watson to hype up the CPU will have been a complete joke
or more likely, everyone has their own view of what's going on (depending on their development goals), but really no one knows the exact details except developers that won't talk or nintendo.I would simply say there is deliberate disinformation going on from sources. Thats the simplest and most likely answer.
The information from all sides is just far too contrdictory and regardless of people trying to spin it as well this doesnt really disqualify that etc one side is spewing pure bullshit it really is that simple.
I am not going to say which side that is but its obvious one side is.
The thing is, if Arkam is right, this whole 1+ year rumor cycle is going to look even more ridiculous. It would mean a ton of reported values were completely off.
an rv770 - one of the very first rumors out there - in the early dev kits would have to have been false
over 1GB of ram? Forget about it. Probably more like 768mb
"lots" of EDRAM? Hah!
Using power7 and watson to hype up the CPU will have been a complete joke
I would simply say there is deliberate disinformation going on from sources. Thats the simplest and most likely answer.
The information from all sides is just far too contrdictory and regardless of people trying to spin it as well this doesnt really disqualify that etc one side is spewing pure bullshit it really is that simple.
I am not going to say which side that is but its obvious one side is.
But that's only if we only believe Arkam. If we believe lherre (who, by the way, actually works on the dev kits) has already stated that Nintendo is pushing for the barest minimum of 1GB of RAM, with a good possibility of putting in more for the retail units (based on how much the dev kits have).
We also know that Nintendo and AMD have been developing this GPU for years, probably up until after E3, even. So it's not going to have a 2005 feature set, and will probably be far more efficient and more powerful.
We also know that the CPU is OOE, which means that it's far more efficient than the 360's, even if the clock speed is about the same.
And it was IBM's own admission that they were adding a lot of eDRAM (though, how it functions in the actual unit is unknown.)
These are all facts, stated by people that have worked on the device. So even at a bare minimum, it's more powerful, and by quite a bit.
It was never, ever, going to stack up to the Durango/PS4, simply because of timing and cost, but it's not going to just be a 360, or really even close.
Hasn't someone in this thread already found out that the CPU on on par with the 360 CPU?
On par as far as clock speed, like I said.
But the simple fact that it's Out of Order is already an increase in performance, plus the fact that it's likely more efficient.
But that's only if we only believe Arkam. If we believe lherre (who, by the way, actually works on the dev kits) has already stated that Nintendo is pushing for the barest minimum of 1GB of RAM, with a good possibility of putting in more for the retail units (based on how much the dev kits have).
We also know that Nintendo and AMD have been developing this GPU for years, probably up until after E3, even. So it's not going to have a 2005 feature set, and will probably be far more efficient and more powerful.
We also know that the CPU is OOE, which means that it's far more efficient than the 360's, even if the clock speed is about the same.
And it was IBM's own admission that they were adding a lot of eDRAM (though, how it functions in the actual unit is unknown.)
These are all facts, stated by people that have worked on the device. So even at a bare minimum, it's more powerful, and by quite a bit.
It was never, ever, going to stack up to the Durango/PS4, simply because of timing and cost, but it's not going to just be a 360, or really even close.
no, wsippel is talking about actual performance by some middleware with the wii u having a slight edge.
perhaps that slight edge will get larger with further optimization *shrugs*