GI.biz: "Wii U less powerful than PS3, Xbox 360, developers say"

Maybe this is just an issue of Nintendo not paying the Pikmin enough money to work harder?

Time for the Pikmin to unionize?
 
Why are people here so obsessed with graphics? Graphics are fun? We should .

Graphics and gameplay are inseperable.

Many games rely heavily on immersion (Bioshock, The Last of Us, Resident Evil, Doom, Mass Effect, Killzone, Assassins Creed, Battlefield, Red Dead, Elder Scrolls, God of War, Grand Theft Auto, Alan Wake, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.), which is broken everytime we see a crappy low res texture that looks like it was made in MS paint, or take part in what is supposed to be an epic battle that involves 12 NPC's, or are supposed to be frightened by a shadow that look likes a staircase, or can't tell what something is supposed to be by looking at it.


Graphics will continue to get better, and games will continue to get better as a result.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if it was originally going to be more powerful, then Nintendo saw the lacklustre response to the high 3DS price and decided they needed to keep the price of the Wii U low and scaled back the hardware accordingly.
 
Truth is, without next-gen specs, they won't be able to target the core demographic. And, as far as we know, Nintendo has absolutely no plans for a console that's going to be on par with what Microsoft and Sony are willing to offer.
I don't think next-gen specs are needed, but they need higher than 360/PS3.
 
People talk about Zelda demo like its second coming. Tri Ace tech demo in real time on PS360 at 720p looks better, much better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cuXgRVMvZ0

I don't think so. Whoo!

4M8iP.gif
 
If this is true, a lot of core gamers would never buy a Wii U. Personally, I highly doubt this rumor is true. Nintendo would be nuts to release a console less power than it competitors last generation consoles.
 
LMAO to all the "graphics are good enough already" posts.


No, they are absolutely fucking not, and the masses will flock as soon as they see the upgrade in graphics for popular games like CoD/Halo/Uncharted/Gears/Killzone/Mass Effect/ Fallout/ Elder scrolls/ etc. Their favorite franchises with melting visuals.


Casual gamers care about graphics, and the Wii selling well does nothing to refute that.

Wait wait wait. If CASUALS are now the people who play popular games like Halo and whatever. Then what does that make the..actual casuals who play family/party games? Sub-gamers?
 
So now the devs in the quote don't know what OpenGL is and WiiU only needs current gen ports and not next gen ones.

Denial. It's not just a river of tears that flows through Nintendo Defense Force land. Or maybe it is.

You seem to know what's up. It couldn't possibly be that I know what I'm talking about and am not in this for the console defense angle. You got me.

Of course, if you know so much more than me, you can explain to me how "it has more shaders" makes any sense whatsoever, because you're clearly so knowledgeable that you would defend them so adamantly. I mean, if you are so confident about your position, you should then certainly be in a position of great understanding.

Or you could admit that you simply like posting "Nintendo Defense Force" because boy that just rolls off the tongue so nicely you forgot your point back home.
 
for the millionth time, zelda demo is not that impressive and it is nothing new that we haven't seen on current gen. anyways with Nintendo it has always been about the gameplay.
 
Wait wait wait. If CASUALS are now the people who play popular games like Halo and whatever. Then what does that make the..actual casuals who play family/party games? Sub-gamers?


Casuals and hardcore gamers alike play these games. If you are denying that you are ignorant to the current climate of gaming.


There are millions of gamers who play CoD/Gears/Halo, that don't have the slightest clue what is going on narritivley, or dont play more than 2-3 hours a week, but still buy the games every time they release.


I am not saying they are any less of a gamer. And what is wrong with family and party games? I play them with my family. I also spend 100s of hours playing and investing in the lore of RPGs and shooters. What of it?
 
for the millionth time, zelda demo is not impressive and it is nothing new that we haven't seen on current gen. Regardless with Nintendo it has always been about the gameplay.
"It looks good" doesn't cut it... if it doesn't somehow raise the bar in a technical way I don't care about it!
 
"It looks good" doesn't cut it... if it doesn't somehow raise the bar in a technical way I don't care about it!

I don't dissect the technicalities of it.

I look at the video and it looks great.

Breaking down every aspect of every detail seems counterproductive to me and isn't why I play games.
 



As we said, yes.


Go ahead and link us to some youtube videos of a game you have never played.

I have played it, on my 55' 3DTV, and it beats that demo in most cases, and at worst looks on par.


Considering one is a playable game with gigantic scale, large number of enemies and AI, on 6 year old hardware. And the other is a controlled tech demo of a small room, no AI, on unreleased future hardware, I would say that puts things into perspective.
 
for the millionth time, zelda demo is not that impressive and it is nothing new that we haven't seen on current gen. anyways with Nintendo it has always been about the gameplay.

Oh ok, i thought it was impressive and so did all the websites writing about it. But i guess it didnt meet the pixels and polygons quota. I dont understand why pixel fanatics look at consoles anyway, get a good pc and drool away. Then buy a nintendo for gameplay innovations.
 
That gif made me laugh so hard. Its really cute. But I'll have to say, yes. That tech demo looks better than anything on consoles and certainly better than Zelda demo.

Well I don't mind if we disagree. I just don't think that tech demo looks better than the zelda demo. *shrugs*

This thread is chock full of solipsistic bullshit though, as are all threads of this nature. Can't wait till we're well into the next gen so people can shut the fuck up and just play some goddamn vidja games! Sheesh!
 
Has anybody brought up the possibility that the article is entirely fabricated bullshit sourced through people who are now "unavailable", in an effort to drum up dem clicks?

Looking at this thread, I'm almost certain that's the case.
 
You haven't played GoW3

As we said, yes.


Go ahead and link us to some youtube videos of a game you have never played.

I have played it, on my 55' 3DTV, and it beats that demo in most cases, and at worst looks on par.


Considering one is a playable game with gigantic scale and the other is a controled tech demo of a small room, I would say that puts things into perspective.




And did you saw the Zelda Demo ? I guess no. In terms of animations, polycount, effects, the Zelda demo looks better. And should I mention that Zelda games are not corridor games ?
Seriously man, April Fool's Day was yesterday.
 

Watching a youtube video is just like playing the game on a sexy Panasonic plasma, or maybe even better.


And did you saw the Zelda Demo ? I guess no. In terms of animations, polycount, effects, the Zelda demo looks better. And should I mention that Zelda games are not corridor games ?
Seriously man, April Fool's Day was yesterday.

It's not a game. How could I?
 
Top Bottom