Game Informer May 2012 Cover revealed: Halo 4

Did GI say the cover looks amazing or the screens included in the magazine? I'm asking because I don't see the big deal with this cover at all. Just concept art and rather boring one at that

"The screenshots from out next cover story are gorgeous. My jaw is still on the ground...which is making walking difficult."
 
You're absolutely right. Halo 3 was marred by too many graphical problems. However, what many people seem to be doing in this thread is using Halo 3's lack of graphical prowess and applying it to all Halo games (not directed to you ofc). Halo 1, 2 and Reach all looked great. Maybe not so much as other games that are directed experiences but that's fine, I'd rather have Halo play like a Halo experience.

Halo: Combat Evolved was extremely impressive when it came out and was a testament to their technical prowess at the time. Halo 2 had some severe texture pop-in issues, but was otherwise a nice looking game. The PC version really shows how good looking it is. And you're right, aside from some ghosting and framerate issues, Reach looks good. But Halo 3 just seemed like they put all of their expertise into the lighting and half-assed the rest of it.
 
The only things truly bad about Halo 3 were the humans. Everything else looked pretty good, and I prefer the look.the Covenant had it it over what they looked like in Reach. Brutes especially.
 
It's funny how people can have such wildly different reactions to the same information.

"Game Informer May 2012 Cover revealed: Halo 4 Reply to Thread"
HOLY SHIT, YES, SO EXCITED FOR THIS GAME.

"Game Informer May 2012 Cover revealed: Halo 4 Reply to Thread"
HOLY SHIT, YES, TIME TO TROLL.

Edit : I want to clarify and say that not all critics are trolls. By all means, don't like Halo, but it'd be nice if you offered an actual critique.
 
I love how anyone that criticizes this or many other franchises are automatically fanboys of the opposite side that have a vendetta against the game. I like the Halo series and own all of them. But I look at Halo 3 and there are a ridiculous amount of jaggies and the sub-HD resolution that combined make the IQ shit. Then you have the low-resolution textures, bad character models (someone upload Lord Hood), terrible animations and ugly geometry. The only two good things Bungie did with Halo 3 was the lighting and the skyboxes.

But nope, I'm just a fanboy that's out to knock poor beat up Halo down a peg or two out of some ridiculous Internet allegiance. People sure do have a strong persecution complex.

When I look at Halo 3, it's simply the only way my brain can parse it. "How could anybody look at this and say it looks bad? Especially compared to all of the other games out there?"
 
Oh... I get it now. Good one.

I'm not saying Halo 3 is the best looking game ever. I'm saying that whatever specific flaws it has, it still looks great to me in general. That's all. All of the posts in the world going on and on about lo res textures, jaggies, no AA etc. isn't going to change what I see with my own eyes.

Same here.

Sure, it had its good share of jaggies. Poor looking NPCs and decent animations.

None of that took away from the fantastic particle effects, the gorgeous water effects, the gigantic scale of the levels, the beautiful skyboxes, amazing lighting and great looking enemies, etc. Just eye candy overall.
 
In Reach Brutes were nothing but giant naked monkey men :(

I never got that concept art Brute that scares the shit out of me :(

edit: that one:
161f1e61.jpg
 
In Reach Brutes were nothing but giant naked monkey men :(

Yeah, I don't know why Bungie changed them. Their evolution from H2 to H3 was good and I would have liked to see them expand their species more, but I also would have been content with better looking H3 Brutes.
 
When I look at Halo 3, it's simply the only way my brain can parse it. "How could anybody look at this and say it looks bad? Especially compared to all of the other games out there?"

Different standards. Wouldn't mind Microsoft releasing Halo 3 on PC. With some upgraded textures, a decent resolution and AA cranked up, it could look like a decent game.

EDIT: Brutes served their purpose in Reach. It wouldn't make sense for them to have all of the armor and technology from Halo 3 since most of that was after they took over as protectors of the Prophets. They were shock troopers in Reach and it worked for the most part.
 
It's funny how people can have such wildly different reactions to the same information.

"Game Informer May 2012 Cover revealed: Halo 4 Reply to Thread"
HOLY SHIT, YES, SO EXCITED FOR THIS GAME.

"Game Informer May 2012 Cover revealed: Halo 4 Reply to Thread"
HOLY SHIT, YES, TIME TO TROLL.

Edit : I want to clarify and say that not all critics are trolls. By all means, don't like Halo, but it'd be nice if you offered an actual critique.

I don't like Halo or first person shooters, but it's a big franchise so I don't see how this can be a letdown reveal. For some reason all these reveal Twitter hints get posted and hyped up, and it's a person's own fault if they are disappointed for whatever reason. Unless you're like 12 and haven't followed videogames for more than 3 months, there's no excuse to be disappointed or bitch about it.
 
Different standards. Wouldn't mind Microsoft releasing Halo 3 on PC. With some upgraded textures, a decent resolution and AA cranked up, it could look like a decent game.

EDIT: Brutes served their purpose in Reach. It wouldn't make sense for them to have all of the armor and technology from Halo 3 since most of that was after they took over as protectors of the Prophets. They were shock troopers in Reach and it worked for the most part.
Not going to happen sadly. Would be awesome to get Halo 3, ODST and Reach on PC but Halo 2 failed badly (mostly due to GFWL, awful KB+M support and lack of custom options) so I doubt we will see Halo 3 PC until there is a HD remake anyways :/
 
I love how anyone that criticizes this or many other franchises are automatically fanboys of the opposite side that have a vendetta against the game. I like the Halo series and own all of them.

But nope, I'm just a fanboy that's out to knock poor beat up Halo down a peg or two out of some ridiculous Internet allegiance. People sure do have a strong persecution complex.
I don’t think anybody is going to call you a fanboy is because you actually discussed the problems, but you also have to respect that people might not agree with you. There are actually multiple groups: trolls (fun bait and switch tactic), objectors (those who have played it, might have liked it, but have problems with it) and defenders (fans, all kind of forms, know what was wrong and good). IMO if you start a decent discussion, people will discuss it with you. Trust me, people will.

The thing about this thread is that people are so furious about Halo 4 getting the cover, which is absurd. Would the same reaction be if it was their favorite franchise? I doubt that. Also the defense of franchise fatigue is unwarranted in this thread, you see that it says “Halo 4” so why even enter? Furthermore this has been discussed to death in threads before, just to rehash it for this thread seems counterproductive. Nothing is being talked about Halo 4, it’s the same old rehashed discussion we have had earlier.
 
Cortana is a MILF?

Fronkle promised on taking bold directions to save the franchise from the Reach MP fuckaton.

I don't like being in the dark about ennemies for son long, that Chief + Cortana thing is too big for me, and as a French pervert I always get dirty thoughts when 343i pours down my throat their unique and oh so important relationship.

Can I get a Didact reveal? with cool artwork? pretty juicy tits please?

Anyways, my Mjolnir is so very ready for the reveals.

PS : fuck you other thread gaffers who dissed on my Halo, I'll see you in Fanboy's Hell.
 
Not going to happen sadly. Would be awesome to get Halo 3, ODST and Reach on PC but Halo 2 failed badly (mostly due to GFWL, awful KB+M support and lack of custom options) so I doubt we will see Halo 3 PC until there is a HD remake anyways :/

Halo 2's issue was they forced DX10 on it and made it Vista only when the OS had just come out. Halo isn't a series that's going to push hardware on the PC side. Microsoft were fools for attempting that. I would imagine both games would come to the system eventually, but that was before both Gears 2 and 3 were completely confirmed to never go PC side. It's a shame because there is potential.

Are you primarily a PC gamer?

I game on just about every system available. I didn't get back into PC gaming until 2009. So even before that, I knew Halo 3 had serious technical issues.
 
I bet the article STILL won't divulge who we'll be fighting in Halo 4.

Do you think they'll really wait til E3 to reveal that we'll be fighting
the forerunner?
 
He just really, really hates Halo 3.

Well, that's not very nice.

I am primarily a PC gamer. I really love the series and I do not think the games looks horrible, they look quite nice. Hell even Dennis thinks that. So I would not really generalize :)

I was trying to perform some due diligence to make up for offending him earlier. Otherwise I wouldn't be able to sleep well tonight.
 
Have always been completely baffled over the popularity of the Halo franchise. I got the original Xbox quite late in its life cycle, with a copy of the super-revered first game and Fahrenheit to introduce me to my new console. By the end of Halo, I was supremely underwhelmed by what I had played and still to this day am bewildered by the hype it got. I think my most damning feeling towards it was that it had no sense of identity to call its own. I'd use the word 'generic', but that feels be an understatement.

Mind you, I never played 2, 3 or Reach, so maybe the series got better?
 
I loved playing through the Halo Reach SP. But I just can't get into the whole environment and atmosphere of the Halo series, there's just something about it that doesn't draw me in. I would like a grittier version of Halo, I think I could get into it then.
 
I loved playing through the Halo Reach SP. But I just can't get into the whole environment and atmosphere of the Halo series, there's just something about it that doesn't draw me in. I would like a grittier version of Halo, I think I could get into it then.

You should have played Reach I guess.
 
I wish game informer would go away. So pointless. Each year they get worse and worse. This isn't even a reveal, it's something we all knew was coming, and the viddoc by 343 probably has more info on the game then what these guys will have.
And they only have hands on with MP, something 343 already released footage of
 
I bet the article STILL won't divulge who we'll be fighting in Halo 4.

Do you think they'll really wait til E3 to reveal that we'll be fighting
the forerunner?

Will post the possibilities list

-The Didact and Prometheans (pretty much confirmed in CEA)
-The Flood (They are still alive)
-Forerunner machines (we are on a Forerunner planet after all)
-Precursors (
creators of all life in the universe also they are flood graveminds
)
-Ex Covenant (Some races might have joined us and some might want to kill us)
 
Top Bottom