65 or 75c is high haha? how long have you been building computers? seems low to me considering its quite warm outside now and every card i've had for the past 10 years or so ran at around those temps with MUCH higher noise and quite a few of those had custom cooling solutions on them. not seen a single person criticise the stock cooler on a 680 so far, with good reason
never noticed any downclocking in BF3 with stock fan curve, certainly no performance drop but i don't have the gpu speed on the osd so i coudn't say for sure but there seems to be a lot of reviews showing higher temps with no performance loss, say the hardocp 680 overclocking article from earlier on today
Oh for years my good man and I've used third party coolers ever since they became widely available and viable, specifically Accelero Xtreme on both my 4970x2 and 5970 which did wonders on both cards, pushed the 4970x2 down to 24c idle, whereas the stock was closer to 50 and the 5970 to 30c and stock was a tad over 50. So don't think you using reference coolers all your life makes you a unique. Just because you've found a reference cooler that is better than those god-awful reference coolers of the olden days, doesn't mean it's good - Get over it. 75c is fucking awful for any kind of GPUs. It's not hard to improve on the vacuum designs that has been plaguing the market for years.
So as revolutionary says, it's decent for a REFERENCE COOLER, like 8mpg is good for an American muscle car. Still makes it shit in the big picture.
That REV.2 ICY vision which wasn't even designed specifically for that 680 can get it down to 54c full load compared to the 85c full load they also recorded of the reference cooler. That just goes to show there's a massive room for improvement.
Saying 75c isn't high ... holy shit, what am I reading.