As long as there's no reproduction I don't consider it to be anyone's business. If there is reproduction you are putting a child at serious risk and I do believe that should be punishable under the law.
There was a time when me and my sister experimented our sexuality, but then our parents caught us.
Very awkward moment. I am glad we were just kids.
ok, who here would fuck me if i were your older latino brother with a large penis you lust for
"Would you fuck me if you wanted to fuck me" is kinda a leading question :lol
Argument 1 involves saying people find homosexuality gross because of "instinct". Sure, often it is instinct, but it's instinct born of societal norms, norms that are becoming outdated and irrelevant. An instinctive negative reaction to incest is born on natural norms- you're not supposed to be attracted to relatives on any level. The natural norms of finding incest to be fucking gross will never go away. Because, you know, it fucks up babies.
Yeah, I guess in principle it could be okay for (adult) siblings to fuck each other if they both really wanted to. I guess much of the taboo comes from the potential kids being fucked up and from most people finding the thought of it repulsive and thus assuming people into it are fucked in the head. And I'd be willing to bet a lot of money that most incest relationships aren't healthy ones. It is by nature wrong. Humans need a certain degree of diversity to breed healthy offspring.
To be fair it can be argued that homosexuality is beneficial to society and evolution, I'm not so sure if you can say the same thing about incest.This (wrong) assumption could be levelled against homosexuality, too. Whenever it is, it's called "homophobia". There doesn't seem to be a similar term for incest.
i dont like the no.2 argument. while it is statistically true there are also other instances that make the chances higher that a child will be disabled that are not as prohibited as incest (for example women getting kids with an age over 35 oreven worse alcohol and tobacco as op pointed out) also it implies that disabled are lesser humans. we cannot, in one society/nation, proclaim equality of nondisabled and disabled amd than try to prohibit certain type of behaviour just because the chances of disability is higher.
i believe incest between two totally sane adult people is their own. usiness. would i ever do it? no not a chance but i dont condem others for doing it.
This (wrong) assumption could be levelled against homosexuality, too. Whenever it is, it's called "homophobia". There doesn't seem to be a similar term for incest.
This (wrong) assumption could be levelled against homosexuality, too. Whenever it is, it's called "homophobia". There doesn't seem to be a similar term for incest.
is that a yes
Tell that to the Habsburg dynasty.
Gross Gross Gross.
Argument 1 involves saying people find homosexuality gross because of "instinct". Sure, often it is instinct, but it's instinct born of societal norms, norms that are becoming outdated and irrelevant. An instinctive negative reaction to incest is born on natural norms- you're not supposed to be attracted to relatives on any level. The natural norms of finding incest to be fucking gross will never go away. Because, you know, it fucks up babies.
There was a time when me and my sister experimented our sexuality, but then our parents caught us.
Very awkward moment. I am glad we were just kids.
I don't think incest between consenting adults will ever become legal personally. Simply because It's pretty damn rare that a "innocent" consenting incest relationship between brother-to-sister, brother-to-brother, sister-sister etc ever happens, and the other kinds of incest such as mother-son, father-daughter are rightfully taboo due to the unbalanced power dynamic.
This (wrong) assumption could be levelled against homosexuality, too. Whenever it is, it's called "homophobia". There doesn't seem to be a similar term for incest.
There was a time when me and my sister experimented our sexuality, but then our parents caught us.
Very awkward moment. I am glad we were just kids.
I don't see how incestual sexual relationships are any less "natural" than homosexual ones, especially if you look at other animals. They're both practiced by several species and both detrimental to the proliferation of the species.
Argument 1 involves saying people find homosexuality gross because of "instinct". Sure, often it is instinct, but it's instinct born of societal norms, norms that are becoming outdated and irrelevant. An instinctive negative reaction to incest is born on natural norms- you're not supposed to be attracted to relatives on any level. The natural norms of finding incest to be fucking gross will never go away. Because, you know, it fucks up babies.
This. It multiplies the rate of autism substantially. I believe it's her right to have a child, regardless.
You're gonna have to illustrate your concern clearer than that.
Nope.
I don't think this is a fair point at all. You are never going to hear about normal people having an incestuous relationship because it's something normal people will take with them to the grave instead of being open about it with the rest of their family and friends.
You'll only hear about it happening in the media or through fiction through these messed up scenarios and what not.
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/nmmjr/iama_man_who_had_a_sexual_relationship_with_his/
In case you want to get to the main bits without reading all the question/answers, it basically boiled down to:
1. Was a positive experience for him and his mother, the father knew and would get jealous occasionally but was okay with it. Sister never knew and he said she wouldn't be okay with it so he never told her.
2. They did pretty much everything.
3. Started when he was injured at some point and physically couldn't masturbate, had blue balls and wanted relief, mother offered and it went on from there.
4. He said he was physically attracted to her before it started. I believe the research being done was in regards to attraction between close relatives or something like that.
There was a time when me and my sister experimented our sexuality, but then our parents caught us.
Very awkward moment. I am glad we were just kids.
I find incest gross but it shouldn't be illegal.
If two consenting adults want to have a relationship with each other then they should be allowed to do so.
#2 argument is the strongest argument against Incest (and it is not that strong). Of course if two adult sisters want to love each other then it doesn't apply at all.
This (wrong) assumption could be levelled against homosexuality, too. Whenever it is, it's called "homophobia". There doesn't seem to be a similar term for incest.
Practiced by several species is a dumb argument for incest. Not all animals have the same genetic issues or reproductive systems as we do. Like cats for instance. When the female is in heat she can accept sperm from several different males.
its gross
and the lannisters
Incest is disgusting and taboo for a reason. Shut up.
#2 alone is reason enough for it to be illegal.
I don't think this is a fair point at all. You are never going to hear about normal people having an incestuous relationship because it's something normal people will take with them to the grave instead of being open about it with the rest of their family and friends.
You'll only hear about it happening in the media or through fiction through these messed up scenarios and what not.
So we should sterilize those with chronic heritable diseases, or at least prohibit them from having sex, right?
Practiced by several species is a dumb argument for incest. Not all animals have the same genetic issues or reproductive systems as we do. Like cats for instance. When the female is in heat she can accept sperm from several different males.
I'd look at you weird, but whatever.
Having kids is not okay, in my opinion, because it breaks one of the rules I believe that people should follow in general:
If everybody (or a majority of people) did this would society be hindered by it?
The answer to this rule, for incest, is yes, society would be hindered by it. If they're not going to have kids, then whatever, they're not hurting anybody (except possibly eachother).
actions that might help to keep a child from being born with health problems.