Marvel's The Avengers |OT| (Dir. Joss Whedon) [Spoilers unmarked]

Status
Not open for further replies.
How many individuals do you think troll the Internet looking up Christoper Nolan & Christian Bale's respective contracts that state they're signed on for 3 films?

You're looking at it as a fan of the source material and/or director. I completely agree that it'd be great if Nolan killed off Bruce. It's just unrealistic. DC has had too many box office flops (Returns, Lantern). DC is a business and they're in this to maximize profits. As much as you or I would like Batman to die, Average Joe and family would hate that notion.

How do you explain to the majority, that, he's only dead for this specific trilogy and they're approaching a reboot in a few years?

There are still individuals out there that don't know Tobey is not Spider-Man anymore.

You are looking at it like WB honestly had a choice. It was either let Nolan do what he wanted or watch him take his films to another studio. They let him do Inception because how much money he made them with TDK. They were upset at the script of TDKR for unknown reasons. But they would rather kill batman off than watch Nolan walk. Especially after watching Green Lantern bomb so hard.
 
Outstanding, spectacular work. I loved it but was stricken with awe the first time around, but on second viewing I really paid attention to detail. Making that sequence believable at all was a feat but having it look so damn cool as well... *bow*
 
tumblr_m3muo0sOBA1qdv0k6o1_400.gif
This movie deserves Best Picture for this scene alone.
 
It really does make a play for "most viscerally satisfying scene I've ever experienced watching a movie," against all odds somehow up there with Andy's escape in The Shawshank Redemption, Leeloo unleashing her power in the Fifth Element, Neo diving into Smith in The Matrix, and (most sensibly) River's Moment of Awesome in Serenity. Most surprising of all was how cathartic it was watching it in the theater a second time even knowing it was coming.

Loki finally learns some humility.
 
You need to learn how to contribute to a conversation rather than shitting on it for the sake of shitting on it. You add no valid points to back your opinion. It is obvious that Marvel is already pursuing an Ant-Man (most likely with Wasp) film, so it is highly likely that he will be included in the next Avengers, if the movie finally gets off the ground. If it does, it will be the second 2014 film from Marvel, released in the fall/winter.

And adding She-Hulk would not complicate matters. People know of her character, although most don't know her origin. She is a popular character that could add to a stand-alone Hulk film. She would be a new element that isn't an retread from the previous films, so Marvel should at least explore the idea.



It's going to be hard, but with what Marvel has done thus far, I have confidence they pull it off. I have more concern about Doctor Strange than Ant/Giant Man translating well on the big screen.

The name is corny and his powers even more so. Hey, let's add Flea man! How about Head Lice man! It will simply remind people they would rather see Spider Man in the Avengers, a cool invertebrate based hero. His name and powers just don't mix well with what's been established.

She-Hulk is redundant.
 
It really does make a play for "most viscerally satisfying scene I've ever experienced watching a movie," against all odds somehow up there with Andy's escape in The Shawshank Redemption, Leeloo unleashing her power in the Fifth Element, Neo diving into Smith in The Matrix, and (most sensibly) River's Moment of Awesome in Serenity. Most surprising of all was how cathartic it was watching it in the theater a second time even knowing it was coming.

Loki finally learns some humility.

I wish it did that for me. I thought it was awesome and a great scene. But there was no build up, it sort of just happened. I know you are just giving your opinion, but Andy's escape did so much more for me than anything in this film.
 
I want a gif of Captain somersaulting all over the place while fighting the Chitauris on the street and then suddenly Iron Man came over and fires a ray towards Cap and Cap deflects it to hit one of the Chitauris. Just the part where Captain somersault itself is cool enough but the addition of the shield deflection would be ace.
 
I wish it did that for me. I thought it was awesome and a great scene. But there was no build up, it sort of just happened. I know you are just giving your opinion, but Andy's escape did so much more for me than anything in this film.
Welp, Shawshank is my favorite movie of all-time, and obviously the scene in question operates so effectively because of an entire movie's worth of build-up (it's, like the Count of Monte Cristo, essentially about a prison break from the first moment even though you don't realize it).

This was sort of the opposite. The fact that it was so sudden, unexpected and brutal enhanced the impact. You have no idea what's really going to happen at that moment, you don't know if Loki still has another trick to deploy, or if he can fight back against Hulk to some extent as could Thor. But no... just no.
 
The name is corny and his powers even more so. Hey, let's add Flea man! How about Head Lice man! It will simply remind people they would rather see Spider Man in the Avengers, a cool invertebrate based hero. His name and powers just don't mix well with what's been established.

She-Hulk is redundant.

There you go =D

The only reason I want Ant-Man is he brings forth many other characters (Ultron, Wasp, Vision, and even Wonder Man).
 
Just saw it. It was awesome.


I just have two questions:


1) How did Thor get back to Earth? I thought he couldn't go back since he broke the Rainbow bridge and I doubt he uses the Tessaract.

2) Why wasn't Hulk just smashing everything and trying to kill everyone (including the Avengers)? I thought when Banner became Hulk he had no control over his actions. I find it weird that he was going crazy at SHIELD's hq but was in control in NYC.
 
Just saw it. It was awesome.


I just have two questions:


1) How did Thor get back to Earth? I thought he couldn't go back since he broke the Rainbow bridge and I doubt he uses the Tessaract.

2) Why wasn't Hulk just smashing everything and trying to kill everyone (including the Avengers)? I thought when Banner became Hulk he had no control over his actions. I find it weird that he was going crazy at SHIELD's hq but was in control in NYC.

They don't really explain in depth how Thor got back, they bascially say "Odin did something crazy."
 
2) Why wasn't Hulk just smashing everything and trying to kill everyone (including the Avengers)? I thought when Banner became Hulk he had no control over his actions. I find it weird that he was going crazy at SHIELD's hq but was in control in NYC.
This is something that bugged me too. It made zero sense to me as well as the people I watched the movie with.
 
I wish it did that for me. I thought it was awesome and a great scene. But there was no build up, it sort of just happened. I know you are just giving your opinion, but Andy's escape did so much more for me than anything in this film.

Really? No build-up? The entire movie from scene 1 is spent building up Loki as an arrogant little punk who thinks he owns the place, who thinks he's got everything under control, who thinks he can control the Hulk, use the Hulk, who responds to Tony's "We have a Hulk" threat with indifference.

The build-up is the entire reason that scene is so great. In one quick moment, Loki gets taken down a peg or two, or five, because he underestimated the Hulk. He didn't understand that Hulk is strongest there is.
 
This is something that bugged me too. It made zero sense to me as well as the people I watched the movie with.


My take is that Banner reached an accord with the Hulk, much like he did in World War Hulk. Instead of repressing his anger, he just lets it roll.


EDIT: on the carrier he was being messed with, like the others, by Loki's staff. That, combined with the trauma from the fall (when the fan exploded), pushed him over the edge.
 
Just saw it. It was awesome.


I just have two questions:


1) How did Thor get back to Earth? I thought he couldn't go back since he broke the Rainbow bridge and I doubt he uses the Tessaract.

2) Why wasn't Hulk just smashing everything and trying to kill everyone (including the Avengers)? I thought when Banner became Hulk he had no control over his actions. I find it weird that he was going crazy at SHIELD's hq but was in control in NYC.

Odin harnessed enough dark energy to send him back to Earth. But that's as far as they get explaining it. I'm going to assume they explain this in Thor 2.

I'm basing this from my own assumption: Bruce fell and transformed without his control, hence uncontrollable Hulk. In New York, he transformed into the Hulk in his own terms.

"You wanna know my secret? I'm always angry." What a boss line.
 
I like how people are pulling the "Avengers had no emotional weight because you know they won't die," then in the same breath say "Batman could die, Nolan built a world where that could be the case."

It's hilarious how on one hand, you have to convince yourself the character won't die (Iron Man) because somehow the situation doesn't have the proper elements to pull it off, whereas knowing in advance and being mentally prepared for Batman's death somehow doesn't dilute the emotional effectiveness?

Give me a break.

That doesn't sound ridiculous to you?
 
This is something that bugged me too. It made zero sense to me as well as the people I watched the movie with.

Banner has some control when he chooses to transform, hence his "always angry" secret as well as his increased ability to keep it together. A forced/uncontrolled transformation due to self-preservation/external forces (i.e. the tense argument+anger at being used/lied to+Loki staff influencing them all) results in no control.
 
I like how people are pulling the "Avengers had no emotional weight because you know they won't die," then in the same breath say "Batman could die, Nolan built a world where that could be the case."

It's hilarious how on one hand, you have to convince yourself the character won't die (Iron Man) because somehow the situation doesn't have the proper elements to pull it off, whereas knowing in advance and being mentally prepared for Batman's death somehow doesn't dilute the emotional effectiveness?

Give me a break.

That doesn't sound ridiculous to you?

Take a breath. Now, on one hand, at no point during the avengers did it feel like the heroes were in any trouble. The only point at which it looked kinda messy was already spoiled by the trailers. Now on the other hand you have a series of films that has shown the ability to kill off major characters. No one knows what will happen in TDKR.
 
Take a breath. Now, on one hand, at no point during the avengers did it feel like the heroes were in any trouble. The only point at which it looked kinda messy was already spoiled by the trailers. Now on the other hand you have a series of films that has shown the ability to kill off major characters. No one knows what will happen in TDKR.



Batman will rise, oh shit I forgot to spoiler tag that
 
I sit here contemplating what could have been a huge avengers video game for thq. Having worked there, I can't comment on the game but I do wish I had an avengers video game to play on the next gen.
 
Take a breath. Now, on one hand, at no point during the avengers did it feel like the heroes were in any trouble. The only point at which it looked kinda messy was already spoiled by the trailers. Now on the other hand you have a series of films that has shown the ability to kill off major characters. No one knows what will happen in TDKR.

Except this notion that because you knew in advance the characters weren't any real trouble, it had no effect on you, but knowing that Batman could die before the movie is out is somehow more emotionally effective?
 
I dunno. I was kinda surprised when Coulson died.

But, in retrospect, that seems like pretty classic Joss Whedon. Build up a character as nice and likable and relatable, and just when you're giving him his moment to shine, BAM, sudden brutal unexpected death.
 
Take a breath. Now, on one hand, at no point during the avengers did it feel like the heroes were in any trouble. The only point at which it looked kinda messy was already spoiled by the trailers. Now on the other hand you have a series of films that has shown the ability to kill off major characters. No one knows what will happen in TDKR.

major characters? Lol ok.
 
Except this notion that because you knew in advance the characters weren't any real trouble, it had no effect on you, but knowing that Batman could die before the movie is out is somehow more emotionally effective?



No, they were in no real trouble because the film never made me believe they were in any real trouble. Except for maybe Iron Man, but since I had seen the trailer, I knew Hulk saved him.

With regards to knowing that Batman could die, yes, it is more emotionally effective. Not because I assume he will die, but because I cant assume anything. I love not being able to assume anything. Are you honestly telling me knowing for a fact your hero will live is better than not knowing either way?

major characters? Lol ok.

Are Rachel, Dent, and Ra's not major characters? Bruce's love interest for two films dying is not major?
 
Now on the other hand you have a series of films that has shown the ability to kill off major characters. No one knows what will happen in TDKR.

Do you mean whats-her-name, the recast love interest? Ehhh. I dunno, I don't think the Batman movies are about to turn into Game of Thrones.

No, they were in no real trouble because the film never made me believe they were in any real trouble. Except for maybe Iron Man, but since I had seen the trailer, I knew Hulk saved him.

You weren't at all worried for Scarlett, in the Hulk freakout scene?
 
I sit here contemplating what could have been a huge avengers video game for thq. Having worked there, I can't comment on the game but I do wish I had an avengers video game to play on the next gen.



Wasn't there a beat-em-up arcade game similar to X-Men? A new Avengers game like that could be really awesome
 
My take is that Banner reached an accord with the Hulk, much like he did in World War Hulk. Instead of repressing his anger, he just lets it roll.


EDIT: on the carrier he was being messed with, like the others, by Loki's staff. That, combined with the trauma from the fall (when the fan exploded), pushed him over the edge.

Yeah I think you're right. That might explain how he willingly transformed into the Hulk when Iron Man brought that crazy alien thing to him.


I think this was also alluded in the end of the Hulk movie. Banner was trying to control Hulk iirc.
 
No, they were in no real trouble because the film never made me believe they were in any real trouble. Except for maybe Iron Man, but since I had seen the trailer, I knew Hulk saved him.

With regards to knowing that Batman could die, yes, it is more emotionally effective. Not because I assume he will die, but because I cant assume anything. I love not being able to assume anything. Are you honestly telling me knowing for a fact your hero will live is better than not knowing either way?

No, it means the excuse of something being emotionally ineffective because you already know it will happen works for both situations. If Batman dies, I was prepared for it because of the rumor and apparently "that's the kind of universe Nolan built."
 
Do you mean whats-her-name, the recast love interest? Ehhh. I dunno, I don't think the Batman movies are about to turn into Game of Thrones.



You weren't at all worried for Scarlett, in the Hulk freakout scene?

The actress was recast, but that doesnt make the character she played any less important. And no, I was not worried about Scarjo at all. Coulson was surprising, but they tried to build it up as much more important than it was. Coulson tied everything together, but I never got the feeling that anyone gave a shit about him.


No, it means the excuse of something being emotionally ineffective because you already know it will happen works for both situations. If Batman dies, I was prepared for it because of the rumor and apparently "that's the kind of universe Nolan built."

This doesnt work. Because I knew none of the heroes in Avengers would die. Hence the big set pieces, while cool to look at, held no weight for me. While I have no idea what will happen in Batman. You are trying to tell me these are the same things, but they are not. It is simply not knowing vs. Knowing. Those two things are not the same.
 
No, they were in no real trouble because the film never made me believe they were in any real trouble. Except for maybe Iron Man, but since I had seen the trailer, I knew Hulk saved him.

With regards to knowing that Batman could die, yes, it is more emotionally effective. Not because I assume he will die, but because I cant assume anything. I love not being able to assume anything. Are you honestly telling me knowing for a fact your hero will live is better than not knowing either way?



Are Rachel, Dent, and Ra's not major characters? Bruce's love interest for two films dying is not major?


Coulson = Rachel
 
Yeah I think you're right. That might explain how he willingly transformed into the Hulk when Iron Man brought that crazy alien thing to him.


I think this was also alluded in the end of the Hulk movie. Banner was trying to control Hulk iirc.
Exactly right.

Despite the number of people who've asked about this, I am kind of glad they didn't spell it out more, for two reasons:

1) If you did see The Incredible Hulk, it was rewarding in its consistency
2) Tony Stark is the only Avenger who seems to understand that he can legitimately control his burden for good, and in opinion the two of them really sold that scene in the lab ("You're saying the Hulk- the other guy- saved my life..."). Having a line of dialogue to be all like "hey audience, when Banner transforms willingly he can control it" would have undercut the unspoken understanding between he and Stark.
 
I sit here contemplating what could have been a huge avengers video game for thq. Having worked there, I can't comment on the game but I do wish I had an avengers video game to play on the next gen.

Marvel has all sorts of huge potential for games. Disney needs to start throwing some money into videogames as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom