Marvel's The Avengers |OT| (Dir. Joss Whedon) [Spoilers unmarked]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Andrew Garfield wants Spiderman to join "The Avengers"

http://www.vulture.com/2012/05/andrew-garfield-death-of-a-salesman-spider-man-interview.html

Have you seen The Avengers? If Sony would let you assemble, would you? After all, Spidey eventually becomes a member of the team in the comics ...

I saw it, and I was blown away. And I'm going to see it again this weekend. I have no problem adding to the amount of money it's making! [Laughs.] Joss Whedon is a genius, and it's an incredible cast. I was very, very jealous, and I wanted to jump on the screen and play with them. It killed me that I wasn't in it, but I understand why, and I'm not insulted. But hey, if Samuel L. Jackson wants to give me a shout, I'm there for the next one!
 
Damn that. Ill buy some S.I.C figures first. But I guess it's the level of detail is what people are paying for.

Yeah, I'm really interested in these even though I don't collect toys at all. Can't afford many of them. Maybe I'll stick to Iron Man, once they get to making the Mark VII.
 
I'd pay double ticket prices if that was what it took to let the studios work together in the MCU. Not even kidding :'(
 
I'd pay double ticket prices if that was what it took to let the studios work together in the MCU. Not even kidding :'(

Seconded. Getting Spidey to interact with Stark and Banner would be amazing.

Of course, I would still kill for a proper live action interpretation of Doctor Doom.
Great comic book villain, or greatest comic book villain?
 
awlWb.png


hawkeye is fabulous guys
 
Speaking of Spider-Man, one nitpick that annoys me to no end is the NYC is being attacked and its just the fucking Avengers saving the day. You would expect the Fantastic Four, Blade or any other Marvel heroes that are based in NYC to make a cameo to help save the day but nope. Fuck the movie studios for not letting this happen and killing my fanboy dreams up the ass.
 
Speaking of Spider-Man, one nitpick that annoys me to no end is the NYC is being attacked and its just the fucking Avengers saving the day. You would expect the Fantastic Four, Blade or any other Marvel heroes that are based in NYC to make a cameo to help save the day but nope. Fuck the movie studios for not letting this happen and killing my fanboy dreams up the ass.

It is an Avengers film after all. If we were to use that logic then we would never have films based on one hero or group. Spidey would have Iron Man helping him out anytime Goblin was doing something.
 
Speaking of Spider-Man, one nitpick that annoys me to no end is the NYC is being attacked and its just the fucking Avengers saving the day. You would expect the Fantastic Four, Blade or any other Marvel heroes that are based in NYC to make a cameo to help save the day but nope. Fuck the movie studios for not letting this happen and killing my fanboy dreams up the ass.

blades not an nyc localized hero. hes kinda all over. what kinda bothers me is that it seems that most of the major villains attack new york like theres a huge bullseye on it.
 
blades not an nyc localized hero. hes kinda all over. what kinda bothers me is that it seems that most of the major villains attack new york like theres a huge bullseye on it.

They take shifts, so they don't accidentally plot stuff at the same time, and gives them ample time off to hone their craft or just indulge in hobbies.
 
So I saw the Avengers for the second time today.

It's somewhat of weaker movie when you know all the jokes ahead of time. Still a great movie, but it has lost much of the impact because you know whats coming and it solidifies it's status, in my mind, as very shallow. Which there is nothing wrong with as far as I'm concerned, and I stress, still a fun movie, but the second view highlights it's flaws and lessens it's strengths.

Just my 2 cents.
 
So I saw the Avengers for the second time today.

It's somewhat of weaker movie when you know all the jokes ahead of time. Still a great movie, but it has lost much of the impact because you know whats coming and it solidifies it's status, in my mind, as very shallow. Which there is nothing wrong with as far as I'm concerned, and I stress, still a fun movie, but the second view highlights it's flaws and lessens it's strengths.

Just my 2 cents.

I felt about the same way after my first viewing.

Thing is, I went in mainly expecting to see superheroes doing awesome shit. It delivered.

Hulk punching the space whale? Hell yeah.
 
I felt about the same way after my first viewing.

Thing is, I went in mainly expecting to see superheroes doing awesome shit. It delivered.

Hulk punching the space whale? Hell yeah.

One joke that was actually more effective is Hulk smashing Loki, because the first time, opening night, the audience would not stop cheering. This time, I got the hear his groaning, which was utterly hilarious.

The jokes were still effective, and the action was still great and it did definitely deliver on superheroes doing awesome shit. I will never be caught saying this is a bad movie by any stretch of the imagination.

But I do think the people comparing it to Nolan's batman movies are misguided. His films have drama and themes to them. Whether you agree that the movies work or not, his films is definitely trying to tell a meaningful story. Avengers just wants to be fun. These are two seperate paths of entertainment, and while it's perfectly fine to prefer one to another, you have to understand that both movies are attempting different things. It's impossible to make a good comparison that definitively proves the superiority of one over the other when their goals are so separate.
 
But I do think the people comparing it to Nolan's batman movies are misguided. His films have drama and themes to them. Whether you agree that the movies work or not, his films is definitely trying to tell a meaningful story.
He wants to tell a meaningful story. He never actually does.

"Batman. I've come to threaten the city and force you into a moral quandry about your role. I have no real goal, but I really want to teach you an object lesson."

Which villain am I referencing here?

All of them.

Avengers just wants to be fun.

Pretty much.
 
I was listening to a podcast and they suggested that Andrew Garfield should've been in the NY crowd taking photos. Could've been a nice Easter Egg without needing Sony's approval.
 
Hopefully now that they've successfully captured an extremely wide audience with these films, they can inject some emotion and whatnot into them --- it seems to be the path Whedon wants to take with Avengers 2, clearly he's not content just making a "fun movie".
 
So I saw the Avengers for the second time today.

It's somewhat of weaker movie when you know all the jokes ahead of time. Still a great movie, but it has lost much of the impact because you know whats coming and it solidifies it's status, in my mind, as very shallow. Which there is nothing wrong with as far as I'm concerned, and I stress, still a fun movie, but the second view highlights it's flaws and lessens it's strengths.

Just my 2 cents.

I actually agree completely. The time in the theater I absolutely loved the film and had a blast. When I saw it again though, it just seemed petty good: not great, just good - where the meager story and especially the flaws in Loki's motivation came through. It just doesn't seem like a movie that will hold up without those awesome opening weekend crowd experiences.

Still though, better than most of the summer blockbusters Hollywood churns out.
 
So I saw the Avengers for the second time today.

It's somewhat of weaker movie when you know all the jokes ahead of time. Still a great movie, but it has lost much of the impact because you know whats coming and it solidifies it's status, in my mind, as very shallow. Which there is nothing wrong with as far as I'm concerned, and I stress, still a fun movie, but the second view highlights it's flaws and lessens it's strengths.

Just my 2 cents.

This was my main concern. I'm hoping the few months until the BR release will help me forget some of the more funny scenes/jokes, but I doubt it...gaf will probably be full of gifs weeks before the BR is out.
 
Let's hope Sony and Disney get their heads out of their collective asses and deliver an Avengers-movie with Spidey in it.

How can New York City be threatened, invaded AND destroyed, and not have one Peter Parker go "hmm, that power and responsibility-thing, maybe it's time to put my money where my mouth is..."?
I mean, Bruce Banner came in from across the globe to help stop it, the least Parker could do is hop around the corner and web a few baddies.

Also; I really want a dialogue between Banner, Stark and Parker on a scientific level.

Edit;

isn't the Fantastic 4 HQ located in NY? Where were they when this went down?
 
Let's hope Sony and Disney get their heads out of their collective asses and deliver an Avengers-movie with Spidey in it.

How can New York City be threatened, invaded AND destroyed, and not have one Peter Parker go "hmm, that power and responsibility-thing, maybe it's time to put my money where my mouth is..."?
I mean, Bruce Banner came in from across the globe to help stop it, the least Parker could do is hop around the corner and web a few baddies.

Also; I really want a dialogue between Banner, Stark and Parker on a scientific level.

You do realize that Spiderman doesnt exist in the MCU, right?
 
He wants to tell a meaningful story. He never actually does.

"Batman. I've come to threaten the city and force you into a moral quandry about your role. I have no real goal, but I really want to teach you an object lesson."

Which villain am I referencing here?

All of them.

This really isn't the place to debate this, but Ra's al Ghul had a definitive goal. As did Scarecrow and Twoface, who didn't really care that much about Batman in particular that much anyway. Scarecrow was just doing his job as a lackey and twoface was trying to resolve his own moral quandry rather than force one on batman. Only joker was in it for the lulz and had a thing with batman, but that was the essence of his character. And honesty, not only what you described can be meaningful on it's own, but it doesn't necessarily even have to be specific to batman, but many stories in general.

But as I said, this really isn't the place to debate this. We can take it to the DKR thread if you want to continue, or you can PM me if you want an isolated discussion. I'm about to head out to Aruba though, so replies might be sporadic. Also, it wasn't even the point of what I was saying. I'm just saying them having 2 different goals makes them incomparable in determining which is the better films. Whether they succeed at what they try is irrelevant.
 
Let's hope Sony and Disney get their heads out of their collective asses and deliver an Avengers-movie with Spidey in it.

How can New York City be threatened, invaded AND destroyed, and not have one Peter Parker go "hmm, that power and responsibility-thing, maybe it's time to put my money where my mouth is..."?
I mean, Bruce Banner came in from across the globe to help stop it, the least Parker could do is hop around the corner and web a few baddies.

Also; I really want a dialogue between Banner, Stark and Parker on a scientific level.

Edit;

isn't the Fantastic 4 HQ located in NY? Where were they when this went down?
You have to understand that the FF4, Spiderman and whoever else simply don't exist in the MCU; the only people that exist with 100% certainty are the ones that have been shown in the MCU movies.
 
I don't understand the desire for Spider-Man in an Avengers movie. I also question whether it would do much to move the boxoffice needle.

Then again I suppose I would question it since I dont get it.
 
I don't understand the desire for Spider-Man in an Avengers movie. I also question whether it would do much to move the boxoffice needle.

Then again I suppose I would question it since I dont get it.

Uh, what's not to understand? Seeing Spider-Man hang and kick some ass with Thor, Stark, Banner and Capt. would be awesome.
 
The Avengers and Spider-Man are the two biggest Marvel properties at the box office. Put them together and it's not hard to see what they will do.
 
You have to understand that the FF4, Spiderman and whoever else simply don't exist in the MCU; the only people that exist with 100% certainty are the ones that have been shown in the MCU movies.

Owh I understand, but it's retarded when you look at it from afar. To the common man, Spider-Man is Marvel, Iron Man is Marvel, Thor is Marvel, Hulk is Marvel....
To the common man, not having Spider-Man in a Marvel-comics-movie in NYC is like having a Starsky & Hutch without Huggy Bear; it just feels wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom