I just remembered why we don't and think the title will soon be edited without spaces. Hopefully that happens before Dan comes in yelling. Woops!
I do think it's fitting for this movie though.
Too late. I got to my post before it was changed.

I just remembered why we don't and think the title will soon be edited without spaces. Hopefully that happens before Dan comes in yelling. Woops!
I do think it's fitting for this movie though.
how do you know if your imax is liemax?
Guys stop hotlinking Amazon images.
edit - American Gangster was good, no doubt, but not his best. Also it felt like it was missing the ending. Which it was.
Funniest thing, Cameron is a much more consistent director than Scott. If you were to compare their entire library, Cameron would win. It's just that Scott's highs are so much higher. 'Best director of all time' higher.
I generally agree, although I'm not a fan of Cameron, so it's easy for me to say.Guys stop hotlinking Amazon images.
edit - American Gangster was good, no doubt, but not his best. Also it felt like it was missing the ending. Which it was.
Funniest thing, Cameron is a much more consistent director than Scott. If you were to compare their entire library, Cameron would win. It's just that Scott's highs are so much higher. 'Best director of all time' higher.
I generally agree, although I'm not a fan of Cameron, so it's easy for me to say.
Still though... why do these threads always come down to Cameron Vs. Ridley? Is it because they both do genre films?
Guys stop hotlinking Amazon images.
edit - American Gangster was good, no doubt, but not his best. Also it felt like it was missing the ending. Which it was.
Funniest thing, Cameron is a much more consistent director than Scott. If you were to compare their entire library, Cameron would win. It's just that Scott's highs are so much higher. 'Best director of all time' higher.
SINCE THE DAWN OF TIME, THERE HAS RAGED A BATTLE SO FIERCE, SO AWESOME THAT...I generally agree, although I'm not a fan of Cameron, so it's easy for me to say.
Still though... why do these threads always come down to Cameron Vs. Ridley? Is it because they both do genre films?
... yeah, this.Because either Sculli or Suairyu always brings it up.
Ranking Gladiator above The Duellists is just obscene. I can't actually include 'Robin Hood' in any Ridley discussion because it's so bad. Not as bad as Legend, but, you know, still down there.Edmond Dantès;38104078 said:So, how would everyone rank Ridley's filmography. I'd rate his historical dramas in this order;
Kingdom of HeavenC
Gladiator
The Duellists
1492: Conquest of Paradise
White Squall
Robin Hood
Alien and Blade Runner above all these and as for the rest, I'm not quite sure on the order. Although, I am quite fond of Legend.
Funniest thing, Cameron is a much more consistent director than Scott. If you were to compare their entire library, Cameron would win. It's just that Scott's highs are so much higher. 'Best director of all time' higher.
Edmond Dantès;38104078 said:Although, I am quite fond of Legend.
Ugh, are you people talking about Cameron, again?
guess whats awesome about Prometheus? It has close to nothing related to Cameron.
Ugh, are you people talking about Cameron, again?
guess whats awesome about Prometheus? It has close to nothing related to Cameron.
okay can the cameron fanboys stop shitting up this thread already please. we don't need to discuss aliens or avatar here. i swear you're worse than nolan fans.
Yes, see in 3D.
Ridley Scott, the greatest visual director of all time, says it's better that way. You shut your mouth and listen.I haven't been to the theater in years, but I'm planning to see this. I've never seen a 3d movie, but what exactly is the appeal? Is it like a definitive version, or does it just give you a bad headache? That's pretty much what I remember of 3d stuff.
Robin Hood!Ridley Scott, the greatest visual director of all time, says it's better that way. You shut your mouth and listen.
I'd say ranking Kingdom of HeavenSINCE THE DAWN OF TIME, THERE HAS RAGED A BATTLE SO FIERCE, SO AWESOME THAT...
... yeah, this.
Or, more accurately, somebody else just starts the argument and we wade in, axes poised, and fight until we're the only ones fighting.
More accurately still, I'm just trolling in this thread. Sculli and I rarely fight anymore. It's actually quite heartbreaking.
Ranking Gladiator above The Duellists is just obscene. I can't actually include 'Robin Hood' in any Ridley discussion because it's so bad. Not as bad as Legend, but, you know, still down there.
I rate his work thusly:
Blade Runner: Final Cut
Kingdom Of Heaven: Director's Cut
Alien
Other cuts of Blade Runner
The Duellists
Thelma and Lousie
Black Hawk Down (I don't give a shit about how biased and un-political it was in its portrayal of the enemy, it's the most convincing film in the 'a few hours with a single squad' genre ever)
Gladiator
American Gangster
I'll have to re-watch the rest though because it's been ages.
really?I was hoping it was being misleading. But I'm sure we can still count on surprises right? to be honest the 3 minute trailer doesn't give away much more than the original teaser trailer if you pay close attention to both, they are showing pretty much the same thing, the latest one only extends the shots.
I honestly thought Bloom suited the role. His soft voice and pretty features were a match for the character as Ridley envisioned him. I don't believe leading men need to be "strong" if the narrative does not dictate it. Him being a not-strong character until it counts is essential.Edmond Dantès;38104872 said:I'd say ranking Kingdom of HeavenC above Alien is obscene too. Alien is as close to film perfection as you'll get. KOH has one big flaw that sets it back a great deal in comparison to Alien; a weak leading protagonist in the form of Orlando Bloom's Balian of Ibelin.
Now if the character of Godfrey was omitted (didn't even exist during that period of the crusader era, inspired by Godfrey of Bouillon from the First Crusade) and Liam Neeson was chosen to play Balian instead, well it would be a different story.
Mia Sara.Oh god people liked Legend. Outside of makeup and cinematography (it is a Ridley Scott film, after all), it has few redeeming qualities. Garbage.
I don't think he ever reached that level of strength you mention and was completely overshadowed by the great Ghassan Massoud who played Saladin to such great effect. Orlando's 'rise a Knight' speech was more awkward than inspiring. Needed someone with more gravitas.I honestly thought Bloom suited the role. His soft voice and pretty features were a match for the character as Ridley envisioned him. I don't believe leading men need to be "strong" if the narrative does not dictate it. Him being a not-strong character until it counts is essential.
You're the one who started this whole thing.okay can the cameron fanboys stop shitting up this thread already please. we don't need to discuss aliens or avatar here. i swear you're worse than nolan fans.
But the lack of gravitas was the point! You don't need gravitas to be inspirational or to rise to a challenge.Edmond Dantès;38105234 said:Needed someone with more gravitas.
Love the silence of it. Just the sound effects and the juxtaposition of cold steel and hot-coloured cloth.Edmond Dantès;38105740 said:Speaking of KOHC, this sword fight between Guy and Balian was just brilliant.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Xw-myeCHOU
So what's the ideal setup to watch this movie? IMAX or IMAX + 3D? This is my most hyped movie this year and I want my experience to be perfect.
And man, it's going to be a hard sell to get my friends to watch this with me. The trailers don't really show anything and most of their exposure to the Alien franchise comes from AVP. :barf:
I'm deff interested in this question as well. Not too educated on the different movie formats.
We don't deny it. But his best stuff is amazing, so it kind of overrules it.scott has put out way too much shit to be considered the best of anything anymore. chalk it up to whatever you want, he either doesn't care or he's genuinely become this bad, but 80% of his output is still mediocre.
scott has put out way too much shit to be considered the best of anything anymore. chalk it up to whatever you want, he either doesn't care or he's genuinely become this bad, but 80% of his output is still mediocre.
He's certainly up there with David Lean as 'greatest visual director of all time'.We don't deny it. But his best stuff is amazing, so it kind of overrules it.
That, and no matter how bad a film he releases is, it'll always look amazing. It's why I'm always cautious to say 'greatest visual director of all time' rather than simply 'greatest director'.
scott has put out way too much shit to be considered the best of anything anymore. chalk it up to whatever you want, he either doesn't care or he's genuinely become this bad, but 80% of his output is still mediocre.
Agreed. I'm already working on a Ridley >> Cameron avatar ..Funniest thing, Cameron is a much more consistent director than Scott. If you were to compare their entire library, Cameron would win. It's just that Scott's highs are so much higher. 'Best director of all time' higher.
Then you'd look like Good Job Bob, and nobody wants that.Agreed. I'm already working on a Ridley >> Cameron avatar ..
Silly, I wouldnt sport it. Would make some one else do it for me.Then you'd look like Good Job Bob, and nobody wants that.
Silly, I wouldnt sport it. Would make some one else do it for me.
On a tangential note, just done claiming the OTs for Skyfall and Hobbit.![]()
This is why OTs shouldn't go up until the day of release. Otherwise you just get hundreds of garbage posts and round #879 of the usual movie GAF debates.
It's actually really fun to prod the hornets nest and see who takes you seriously.This is why OTs shouldn't go up until the day of release. Otherwise you just get hundreds of garbage posts and round #879 of the usual movie GAF debates.
Even if you post your Skyfall OT on day 1, I'll still fill my QOS hate quota.