I still have a funny feeling about this movie.
1. I did in fact pm Mr. Sam and he was completely fine with the OT, since I already had it created.
2. Reserving OT's is a goddamn stupid practice, almost as stupid as putting the thread for said stupid practice in the gaming community forum. I will never subscribe to this practice and only pm'ed Mr. Sam because he's a cool dude I didn't want to piss off royally.
Edmond Dantes should be the only person doing The Hobbit OT, but again, reserving OT's is goddamn retarded. They should be as they always have: Either the week of their first release or when the very first reviews hit in the first month of release.
It's more inception than the Inception |OT|Solo and Sculli are creating an uprising against the |OT| |OT|.
Solo and Sculli are creating an uprising against the |OT| |OT|.
Well it's honestly the most goddamn stupid thing I've ever heard of on GAF, which is saying something. It's no wonder why we get suspiciously professional looking, 8 post long, OTs that look and read more like a piece of PR than a simple OT.
2. Reserving OT's is a goddamn stupid practice, almost as stupid as putting the thread for said stupid practice in the gaming community forum.
Edmond Dantes should be the only person doing The Hobbit OT, but again, reserving OT's is goddamn retarded.
I hope you're not talking about my Avenger OT becuase that thing was created in paint. I mean really created all in paint.
Well it's honestly the most goddamn stupid thing I've ever heard of on GAF, which is saying something. It's no wonder why we get suspiciously professional looking, 8 post long, OTs that look and read more like a piece of PR than a simple OT.
Yes.
Yes.
Official reservation is retarded. Informal consensus that someone has shown interest is cool. Especially if they're a fan of the property, why not let them have it. I doubt many people would argue that Dantes should do the OT for Hobbit considering the fantastic job he did with the Hobbit trailer thread. Regardless, it should be a meritocracy. If two Hobbit OTs for instance get posted within a very short span of each other, the one that people actually post in should be the one kept, not the one that was reserved in Gaming Community forum.
Well it's honestly the most goddamn stupid thing I've ever heard of on GAF, which is saying something. It's no wonder why we get suspiciously professional looking, 8 post long, OTs that look and read more like a piece of PR than a simple OT.
Some people are actually professional designers. So of course their OTs will look better than other, basic OTs.
As for claiming, I don't have problem with either method. Although I admit it's annoying to see something that you want to do already claimed by someone else who then ended up doing shitty job at it. If you're going to do OT then at least do it right.
I think the problem came from artist claiming OTs out of spite. Solo rarely does OTs but if he were to do one OT in the next couple years it should be the Skyfall OT. I didn't' think anyone would have claimed that OT. Same for The Hobbit OT, give it to someone who has been really hyped for the film. Artist basically exposed the hols in that system.
I think the problem came from artist claiming OTs out of spite.
Agreed. But then the trailer thread is a different beast. When a trailer hits, you post it as soon as it goes up. A trailer thread doesn't need anything except a link to the goddamn trailer - because that is all people really want from that thread, which is why we had that fun last time.
I've seen plenty of instances where multiple people were working on OT's and discovered a ways in that they conflicted. In general I think it's a sensible thing to organize, though I'm not sure that's the best way to go about it.I don't really understand what you're so mad about. People who wanna put in the time to collect all the relevant information about a game/movie, with some nice art to surround it, should be able to do so and not have to worry about something interrupting that. As someone who creates OTs semi-regularly, it's a nice thing to have. Haven't seen an eight-post long OT in a while (I think that's because of the new rules limiting them to one post).
*shrugs* People like to make threads.
This is my issue. Like I said in that thread, my issue is not borne out of me wanting to do an OT, but rather having someone claim an OT for a game/movie/album who is not actually a fan of it/looking forward to it and instead is doing it do piss off others.
It would be like me claiming Halo 4's OT. I fucking hate that franchise. So why in the hell I would I claim an OT for it?
Again, this is simply untrue.I think the problem came from artist claiming OTs out of spite. Solo rarely does OTs but if he were to do one OT in the next couple years it should be the Skyfall OT. I didn't' think anyone would have claimed that OT. Same for The Hobbit OT, give it to someone who has been really hyped for the film. Artist basically exposed the holes in that system.
Again, this is simply untrue.
I claimed the OTs first then came across the commotion on the OT here and Solo walked in and turned it all personal. I claimed both OTs only because they were the only two major films unclaimed. All major summer OTs are already claimed.
Puddles claimed it but I dont know if he's perm'd .. I asked, no one answered.What about TDKR?
Puddles claimed it but I dont know if he's perm'd .. I asked, no one answered.
I've seen plenty of instances where multiple people were working on OT's and discovered a ways in that they conflicted. In general I think it's a sensible thing to organize, though I'm not sure that's the best way to go about it.
I'm kind of expecting that for Halo 5. Someone's going to snag it the second it's announced.
You are.jk I'm not a complete dick. I would want DM or Guzim to have it.
You're just lazy.I don't do OTs. I leave that to much better men.
I'm curious, is the rest of the world forced to sit through a laser light show prior to watching a film on an IMAX screen? In Canada, we have to sit through the most annoying 5 minute laser light show that explains the history and the features of IMAX. I think it's just a Canadian Content thing since it's a Canadian product. :/
Again, this is simply untrue.
I claimed the OTs first then came across the commotion on the OT here and Solo walked in and turned it all personal. I claimed both OTs only because they were the only two major films unclaimed. All major summer OTs are already claimed.
Suits you.Twilight. You can do that OT.
OT5? Besides, there were quite a few alt threads that took over, yet you created this one.Yes, I made the new hype thread. To be a dick? No. Because the old thread was well over 20,000 posts, and as per the GAF rules, a new thread was warranted.
Unless we're claming hype threads now :/
Because, right after I claimed it. Solo walks in here and throws hissy fit at the claiming practice. It was weird timing.Then why the "sogood.gif"? You seemed to revel in your claim.
Again, this is simply untrue.
I claimed the OTs first then came across the commotion on the OT here and Solo walked in and turned it all personal.
I agree, Charlize really should wear skin-tight pants all the time.
This is my issue. Like I said in that thread, my issue is not borne out of me wanting to do an OT, but rather having someone claim an OT for a game/movie/album who is not actually a fan of it/looking forward to it and instead is doing it do piss off others.
It would be like me claiming Halo 4's OT. I fucking hate that franchise. So why in the hell I would I claim an OT for it?
Didn't see 3rd trailer, and am ready for BFI London Imax. I understand human emotions, although I don't feel them myself.
If you have sufficient reasoning for thinking that
artist said:Yup, grandpa Craig will have to do with whatever seconds he's got after the big boys have done their thang. So much for Solo hyping up grandpa Craig's BO draw. :lol
artist said:Martin Campbell :lol
This isnt the Bond reboot, casting Grandpas is out of the question.
Not really. Craig is now officially looking grandpa Bond.
I liked the opening sequence, the rest of the "little" action was decent. I wouldnt call it one of the best of the decade over one sequence alone, which was inspired by Bourne'ish sequences.
Aww, I see that the next Bond movie getting delayed is showing signs. Suicide watch was correct.
Finally we agree on something, its great that you didnt got sucked in CR either. What an painful movie it is for a re-watch ..
Is that what you call sane people? Nolan has not made a bad movie yet, Bond? 20 something odd. I'm glad to be on the right side.![]()
![]()
.
Bond fans can cry bitter tears. Sole contender for longest series with lowest grosses.![]()
Bourne is no where close to Bond's fan following, yet they are making similar amount of money proves how good movies dont need a "following".
In terms of quality, Bond movies (this reboot with Craig) is good but it wont come anywhere close to BU.
Solo is the most homoerotic guy here in GAF.
He's not the worst, not the best either. No one can even come close to SSSSHEAN!
That said, CR sucked.
:lol