Shut-up, Gui! What do you know about hookers?
Is that an actual question? Pffffft
Shut-up, Gui! What do you know about hookers?
List of things to experience on GAF:
[X] Have my avatar serve as a reply to something I said.
[] Have my avatar serve as a reply to something I said and make sense.
While that's amusing, that's not how you avatar quote someone! I am REMOVING the check off the list.I just imagined Littlefoot saying 'What do you know about hookers" with that look on his face and laughed
why the sad face?
Just got back. Was pretty hyped on this and left disappointed. Characters were a big let down. None of them brought anything interesting to the table apart from Fassbender. To make it worse Alien was on TV when I got back in. Such a shame. I'll have to give it another go sometime though.
I'm a bit surprised at everyone moaning about the characters. The main core; Shaw, David, Vickers, Janek are hardly the most developed characters ever, but neither is anyone in the first Alien and no one save Ripley in the second.
Exactly. Name one fully developed character in Alien, assuming you had seen Alien when it was released and none of the sequels. You know nothing.I'm a bit surprised at everyone moaning about the characters. The main core; Shaw, David, Vickers, Janek are hardly the most developed characters ever, but neither is anyone in the first Alien and no one save Ripley in the second.
I'm not reading this thread (had to open up the first page just to post), but I thought I'd let you all know that I'm seeing this 26 hours from now so you can bask in the unbiased and untainted impressions of somebody going in for the virgin experience.
I'm a bit surprised at everyone moaning about the characters. The main core; Shaw, David, Vickers, Janek are hardly the most developed characters ever, but neither is anyone in the first Alien and no one save Ripley in the second.
Why does everyone want to love this so much? Yes, I want it to be good, too, but I'd like to think I'm objective enough to admit it's pedestrian if it actually is. I haven't seen it yet; I'm just referring to all the tip-toeing "Well, maybe...," and "But if..." comments that are trying to find some way to prop up the quality of the movie.
So anyone that's seen it so far, are there many jump scares in it? I like the creepiness to be told through atmosphere, not lame stuff like that.
I can't wait to see Sculli's tears.
I want it to be >90 lol. I know it will never be. Most probably around 65~75.
I really don't care about the RT ratings or whatever, I'm just kidding.
Can't wait to lick it. But he'll probably just go "It's a good film, not awesome but good". I mean he won't even admit how basic Bomba Carter was.
So this movie is complete shit then?
So I just saw Alien for the first time.
Uh, yikes.
Confused about some bits(namely their origin of the eggs conflicting with Aliens', and why Ripley flipped out at Mother), but it was great to finally see the origin of it all.
At the very end, Ripley was trying to abort the self destruct countdown because the alien was between her and the escape shuttle. She completed the sequence to abort a few seconds too late - Mother kept it going anyways. Ripley was not pleased with her options at that point.
Ah. What about the 'kill me' scene? Kind of conflicts with the queen creating eggs, if one xenomorph can do it alone.
Ah. What about the 'kill me' scene? Kind of conflicts with the queen creating eggs, if one xenomorph can do it alone.
Ah. What about the 'kill me' scene? Kind of conflicts with the queen creating eggs, if one xenomorph can do it alone.
I prefer the single Xeno making eggs theory. But as it wasn't in the theatrical cut and the queen was. I don't know which one Scott goes with.
Ah, you watched the special edition. That was not in the theatrical edition of the film, it was added in 2003 by Scott in a special re-issue because so many fans wanted to see it in there. Without that scene, Cameron was free to add his own origin for the eggs.
I suggest seeing the theatrical cut; it's got a few fewer scenes but is a stronger version and is Scott's preferred one.
Some interesting additional deleted scenes scenes not in either version here, here, here.
The first one was on the version I saw, the second definitely wasn't.
(Blu-ray anthology.)
Judging how critical he is of everything after Alien, I assume his version.
I like that version more too. It's even worse body horror, and the 'queen and the hive' thing is just saying the aliens are just like earth insects instead of being more alien.
This, so much. I like Aliens, but it's really unfortunate that Cameron took such a, well, alien creature and gave it a familiar life cycle and social order (they're scary ants/bees!). The deleted scene really makes their life cycle that much stranger and more frightening.
There's a scene in the Alien screenplay, I don't think ever filmed, where the crew finds the food lockers ripped into and the stores largely eaten, while looking for the creature. It gave some additional background on its life cycle; it couldn't just generate biomass on its own, it had to ingest food to do it. It had a crazy fast metabolism to grow with such speed, but it couldn't generate that much biomass out of nothing. I've always wished that was in; the sequels and spin offs did crazy things with how much mass they create out of thin air.
I've been in a huge blackout for this movie, and I wanna know only one thing... It's really a prequel for the Alien movies? I mean, same universe?
Same universe.
Judging how critical he is of everything after Alien, I assume his version.
In the novel Ash is also leaving food out for it.
On the subject of 3D, does anyone ever forget they're wearing the glasses then you go to scratch for face, pull your hand away, and send the glasses flying across the room?
Cause I did that.
Twice.
People who have seen it, can you rate it compared to the other 4? Leaving out the AVP filth of course. Please no one tell me they found it worse than those...