Microsoft Surface Tablet announced

Status
Not open for further replies.
They did a horrible job defining the boundaries during the conference. The compelling shit is in the pro and they aren't even showing it at the conference. smh


As someone who has owned a touchpad , ipad 1 and now ipad 3. You clearly don't know whats going on.
Its readable at 1080p but when you have high resolution the text looks amazing.

at what point does the PPI become 'high resolution' exactly? i know it's somewhere between 220 and 260 does the PPI, but can you narrow it down a bit for future reference?
 
I love the industrial design of the tablet. Reminds me of the Zune HD design in pics like these:
surface-202-verge-1200_gallery_post.jpg


And, look how terrible the non-Retina display looks in the RT tablet *rolleye.gif*
surface-208-verge-1200_gallery_post.jpg
 
I only want an x86 Windows 8 Tablet, reguardless of who makes it.

The fact the specs show the intel based tablet is 224g(around 2lb total) heavier and
is 4mm thicker kinda worries me and is probably why they aren't showing it.

They want to show a product that is as light and thin as an ipad 3..not one thats thicker and heavier then the ipad 1.

I'm gonna wait to see how the specs compare to something like the x86 asus transformer book
 
Who is ignoring? What are you going on about? Simply asked If the xbl app in Windows 8 can be used to access arcade titles. I suggested nothing about the hardware not being capable of playing 360 games, nor did I care if it did. You chose to go off that tangent for some strange reason.

I don't think it's a strange reason.

Why would someone want XBLA apps and not Xbox 360 apps if they paid $600 for a device that could run 360 apps?

Move on, this isn't meant to upset you. Good lord. In my example, MS was the one doing the "ignoring"... English language.
 
USB 3 is awesome and stuff, but please give me a folder I can off-load files onto with the limit only being how much space you have left on the flash drive.

Also, please let me install a full version of photoshop.

That is all.

All 3 things you listed are in the pro edition ;)
 
OK, so what kind of ballpark pricing are we talking for the 2 models? Yes, I read the OP but I don't know much about tablets and would like to see an actual number rather than that.
 
Microsoft did a great job confusing consumers. This thread is case and point. People think the RT version can run all their favorite x86 apps. It can't. Also the RT version seems not to support a stylus either.
 
I can't get over how smart the kickstand idea is. I mostly browse from my bed, it's always a pain to do it with the iPad. You either have to hold it up in your hands or use the smart cover folded up (which isn't very stable when you've got it on your chest/stomach). This kickstand is perfect, combined with the keyboard cover, it's just a brilliant solution. If this thing has some good power and battery life, I don't see any reason why this can't be a one size fits all solution. The interactivity, games, apps of a tablet with the power and flexibility of a PC. Fantastic stuff.
 
i really don't understand this "platform investment" thing that people keep talking about, really.. If you change platforms, you have to destroy every single product from the other platform you own? Are all those "hundreds of dollars" that people claim are being "invested" in a platform just disappears?

Back in my days, I had both a Genesis and a Super Nintendo and that sounded like the best idea ever. You can't keep your current "insert device from platform here" and invest on something else and be a part of both eco-systems?

It really is easy. If you have a bunch of software on the ipad, then you are invested in that platform. A normal person is not going to use two tablets, so having all your software on one is important. It isnt that hard to understand.
 
Really, given what you just posted? Lots of people have lots invested in apps. Are you sure you don't? I mean, it's you, I kind of can't believe you don't. Anyway, if you (royal you) have hundreds of dollars worth of apps (and worse, the apps are not available outside the ecosystem), that is a significant anchor.
I've invested several hundreds into the iOS app ecosystem before I realized that I didn't care for 99.9% of the apps.

Really, the only app that I find I must have is the bank app for checking my account balance and that app costs $free.99
 
i really don't understand this "platform investment" thing that people keep talking about, really.. If you change platforms, you have to destroy every single product from the other platform you own? Are all those "hundreds of dollars" that people claim are being "invested" in a platform just disappears?

Back in my days, I had both a Genesis and a Super Nintendo and that sounded like the best idea ever. You can't keep your current "insert device from platform here" and invest on something else and be a part of both eco-systems?
People like it when all their devices and content are connected together, you can't really do that when they're divided between different platforms.
 
Come on dude. You have Ipads which are basically standalone devices in an enterprise environment then you have this which can be integrated into your current ADS along with full MS office compatibility. Manage wise this is good news. You would indeed test a couple of units first before going to the board requesting Surface tables for all schools lol.

I wonder how long it will take schools to implement Full Sized Microsoft Surfaces as desks. If they worry about breaking, just be strict on students/parents replacing broken tables. The future of Education is almost here everyone! Just have to get politicians to stop cutting school funding for once :\

Anyhow, I really want one of these devices. If it doesn't release by September they will miss my deadline for purchase though.
 
They did a horrible job defining the boundaries during the conference. The compelling shit is in the pro and they aren't even showing it at the conference. smh

As someone who has owned a touchpad , ipad 1 and now ipad 3. You clearly don't know whats going on.
Its readable at 1080p but when you have high resolution the text looks amazing.

I don't think your potential bias here could be more transparent.

Microsoft did a great job confusing consumers. This thread is case and point. People think the RT version can run all their favorite x86 apps. It can't. Also the RT version seems not to support a stylus either.

and bolding your posts doesn't make us any more likely to be more sympathetic to your view.


The compelling shit isn't necessarily the pro at all. As I see it, the pro is a sexy new wildcard for people who want tablet aesthetic and full computing compatibility and functionality. That could actually make it the more niche of the two products. The specs, pen and cover make it a very attractive proposition though -- I'd consider it alongside an ultrabook laptop very seriously.

But the RT model is great too. Pre-installing Office is a slice of genius. The average consumer doesn't need the full functionality of the pro model, they don't need to be able to run Creative Suite 6, their own Apache server, Maya or geeky media transcoding shit... although I'm sure they'll be able to do some of that on this too, in time. They just need an app marketplace, apps of useful / fun utility, an Office suite for practical matters in their lives, and the ability to use Facebook as a time-sink. It looks like a great device for students and professionals on the move. I think you'll be mistaken if you don't believe the app marketplace will be well supported - migrating most apps won't be all that difficult. The industrial design of the device is beautiful too... we've had Windows and ARM based tablets before, but none of them have the visual appeal of this. If the price is right, and the support is there (as it looks to be) - it can be a hit.

Having decent inputs and outputs is such a huge plus too. People will be plugging in their existing peripherals (mice and printers, USB hubs), phones, external storage, existing SD cards... there will be very little that the average RT consumer 'misses' from the Pro version on a day to day basis.
 
Definitely an impressive looking product and it's awesome to see some good looking competition in the tablet space, but I'm put off by there being no price and no date and the overall feeling of vagueness around the product. Do they want me to think this is vaporware?

Have they talked at all about how this thing will interact with Windows Phone or is that an entirely separate concept? I mean could one have an app that's on your phone and on this similar to iPad/iPhone?
 
those complaining are pissed they spent money on a ~$1000+ apple laptop and want to persuade themselves this is horrible don't they?


all these complaints I'm seeing, are pretty much all non complaints lol...

It means they actually delivered! Color me surprised.
 
i really don't understand this "platform investment" thing that people keep talking about, really.. If you change platforms, you have to destroy every single product from the other platform you own? Are all those "hundreds of dollars" that people claim are being "invested" in a platform just disappears?

Back in my days, I had both a Genesis and a Super Nintendo and that sounded like the best idea ever. You can't keep your current "insert device from platform here" and invest on something else and be a part of both eco-systems?
For businesses, that's the case I'd imagine.

If your company's been running Windows for years, all your software is Windows based. If you change to OSX, then those software become useless and you'd have to spend thousands licensing new OSX compatible software. Not to mention the thousands of dollars you'd have to put into your IT department to equip them for the conversation, and the huge hassle of getting your staff properly converted over. Work flow also gets wrecked because different OS use different shortcuts.
 
Microsoft did a great job confusing consumers. This thread is case and point. People think the RT version can run all their favorite x86 apps. It can't. Also the RT version seems not to support a stylus either.

Should've posted in all caps too, just to be safe.
 
Microsoft did a great job confusing consumers. This thread is case and point. People think the RT version can run all their favorite x86 apps. It can't.
Also the RT version seems not to support a stylus either.


OMG it's dead!

Dude it was announced hours ago, releasing months from now. They'll have it sorted by then, and the apps on Day 1 will be enough for most people.
 
Is the material the Surface made out of the same material that all the blogs were going ga-ga over when a simple rumor emerged that Apple was going to use it in the new iPhone?
 
Wait a second, does this thing not have NFC?

That seems like a horrible omission since ultrabooks are going to have it ubiquitously.

How does this relate to what I said about consumers wanting to use WinAMP and mIRC?

Seemed like you were implying those wouldn't be around for windows 8/RT.
 
those complaining are pissed they spent money on a ~$1000+ apple laptop and want to persuade themselves this is horrible aren't they?


all these complaints I'm seeing, are pretty much all non complaints lol...

It means they actually delivered! Color me surprised.

what is going on in here lol. What are you talking about?
 
see, this is the kind of confusion I'm talking about.

What you're talking about is the Pro version, which we expect to land in the $1000 range. Your district could afford 2 iPads for the price of one Pro. Which won't launch until 2013, by the way.

Unless Windows RT + Office (with no compatibility with their other existing software because of ARM, a noticeably lower resolution, and no stylus support) is acceptable to them.
lol $1k your joking right. The 64 gig wifi will run $700 and u really need just a few apps on it
 
I really don't think this thing will make a dent in the tablet market. If no one is buying a windows phone why would they buy this?
 
I don't really understand the point of the RT model. Why even bother with it? The Pro version is the real hotness.

Unless the RT model is REALLY cheap.
Battery life and price.

There are plenty of people that don't have a need to use 'desktop apps' on their tablet beyond Office ... so why spend more and give up battery life if you don't need it.




retina display?
yes




1k for a 10" tablet? does money grow on the trees behind your house?
It's a competitor for 11" Ultrabooks and MacBook Airs.




Full HD, so I guess 1080p.
No need to guess. That's what 'Full HD' refers to.




Looking at it, it isn't winning me over. is that keyboard attached to it?
magnetic - it's removable.

There are two keyboard options. One is a super thin cover that has multi-touch built in to act as a keyboard and touchpad ... the other is an actual mechanical keyboard and touchpad like the Transformer.




Pro months later! :( Well, I will upgrade my a500 to win 8 meanwhile.
Makes sense given the statement it's using the next generation of intel processors?




Like the Xbox MS could take a loss @ retail on the hardware and make it up with sales in the marketplace

Could be their plan
While they may strive to break even, I can't see them taking a loss. That would completely alienate OEMs.




"This keyboard measures touch faster than any keyboard you can use today."


what
I assume they're referring to the cover? Uses different tech than traditional touch screens and is faster?




Oh, MS...
KuGsj.gif


Really impressive, but the pricing (whenever it is released) is likely gonna put a lot of interested people off.
If it's priced as they say ... why would it put people off?

Ultrabooks and MacAirs sell well ... as do iPads.




I'm late....What did the 5:20 card mean?
Group time for hands-on




Intel dropped the Ultrabook pricing to $799 and is currently meeting with the chinese ODMs to reduce the price further (after Apple slashed $100 off the MacBook Air), so $799 has to be the cieling for the Pro SKU.
By ceiling you mean starting point?
 
Microsoft did a great job confusing consumers. This thread is case and point. People think the RT version can run all their favorite x86 apps. It can't. Also the RT version seems not to support a stylus either.

Like I said, a chart with check marks for the features Pro has that RT doesn't have needs to basically be in the OP and quoted on each page.

Thing is, we can't even develop one yet because some details are murky.


Battery life and price.

There are plenty of people that don't have a need to use 'desktop apps' on their tablet beyond Office ... so why spend more and give up battery life if you don't need it.
I agree. My concern about RT is...what is it bringing beyond Office that makes it more attractive for the price than the competition? Starting from scratch with the Microsoft Store means they'll have decidedly less available software for it than the Android/Apple tablets. So why buy it? I'm not sure either.
 
I thought the presentation was the best they could do to clarify the difference between Windows 8 and Windows RT.


Windows 8 = Windows RT + backwards compatibility
 
Definitely an impressive looking product and it's awesome to see some good looking competition in the tablet space, but I'm put off by there being no price and no date and the overall feeling of vagueness around the product. Do they want me to think this is vaporware?

Have they talked at all about how this thing will interact with Windows Phone or is that an entirely separate concept? I mean could one have an app that's on your phone and on this similar to iPad/iPhone?
there is a windows phone conference on wednesday where they talk about the next version of the OS. It is widely considered to be bringing the same development platform that Windows RT/8 use.
 
I am sooooo in for a Pro if the digitizer is Wacom-level and lets me take good hand-written notes. I'll definitely need the optional, more traditional keyboard cover though, not the touch one, I can't imagine typing on that thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom