Microsoft Surface Tablet announced

Status
Not open for further replies.
I trolling hard ... and to make it more effective when I use BOLD

MAYBE NEXT TIME I'LL USE ALL CAPS. CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?!!?!?

Since my post many people have come in here confused. Just because you call it trolling doesn't make it trolling.

Just on the last pages someone said is windows RT and different than windows 8.

How is stating a fact trolling.
 
Why does everyone keep saying 2013 release? Isn't Windows 8 releasing this year? I already know most of the other companies out there said they have W8 tablets lined up for launch so it makes sense these ones are also available.
 
I really like this tablet and want it to do well. Not saying I'm ready to give up the iPad, but I dont want the iPad to just dominate. Competition leads to better products, easily.
 
Wireless Gamepad + Steam =
ixEfOpvT6DEzX.gif
 
I think it will catch up much faster than any other platform has.

The genious behind WinRT is that it's in both Windows RT and in Windows 8. That's not just tablets, but in laptops and desktops as well. Once Windows 8 hits, it will be the only packed in OS available for consumer PC. That gives it an instant userbase. And considering the Windows Store is for WinRT, there will be tons of devs releasing apps for it. It's the first time there's been a unified store for Windows. Since that has great advantages for discovery, devs are quite intrigued when you factor in everything.

We'll see soon enough! I can't agree or disagree at this point. It won't matter to me since I'll be getting a tablet with full Windows 8, so if the Metro scene doesn't flesh out well, I'll have the regular OS.


Why does everyone keep saying 2013 release? Isn't Windows 8 releasing this year? I already know most of the other companies out there said they have W8 tablets lined up for launch so it makes sense these ones are also available.
your posts have been funny man. for a bunch of reasons.

To answer your question, Microsoft said themselves at the event that the Pro would launch a few months after the RT, which is coming around the Windows 8 launch.
 
Oh I see, you're just going to play the stupid card now. I thought you were actually going to engage in honest discussion, but you want to try to make sense of your initial post by ignoring the fact that Pro owners have access to their previously bought software and have access to lower priced software by pretending that they won't bother to look, therefore it's a $150 cover charge for Office regardless to make it seem like a terrible thing. Gotcha.
What stupid card? My point was the value proposition that they'll see if they think they need to pay a bunch more to get Office, versus it being pre-installed on RT.

When you go to demo it in-store, both devices will look the same, except the RT version will have Office when you go to Desktop, the Pro version won't have it. You ask the sales guy if it comes with Office on the Pro, they say you need to buy it separately, and they will push the fact that Office is free on RT. At that point, you're either looking at the software section or the Windows Marketplace to see the extra cost of Office.

Office coming free on RT, in Desktop mode, will also confuse the public into thinking that RT can run all legacy apps.
 
Battery life and price.

I imagine they're still frantically optimizing, and trying to nail down the supply chain.

Yeah they most likely haven't settled on final specs for the devices. So fair enough. But the price and battery mean a lot.

i got my info from actually using my brother's iOS devices. can't multitask while idle on IRC, you get disconnected in ~10m.
I can stay connected not problem. Something must be up.

Colloquy on iOS disconnects after a while.
Maybe Ive never been idle long enough?
 
Why is everybody making a big deal about gaming on the Pro? Most ultrabooks aren't even good at gaming.

The Pro is plainly aimed at business users who travel 75% of the year. The Thinkpad users who wanted an iPad.
 
Looks great and everything, but ... widescreen for a tablet? I recently bought a cheap (like, 150 euro cheap) 10" chinese android tablet. On a whim, just to see if it's something I could actually use and need. I like it ... except for the widescreen ratio. It works great on a TV or a 24"+ monitor, not so much on a tablet, imo.
 
This thing won't be able to run most steam games. A under clocked i5 with hd4000 would have pretty serious slow down issues.
 
Pro is very close in specs and size to Samsung S7 Slate (11.6", 2 lbs, Core i5) , which is $1299 for 128GB SSD.

http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/31/samsungs-series-7-slate-pc-hands-on/
seriessevenslatepostshot01.jpg

seriessevenslatepostshot02.jpg


People need to keep their pricing expectations in check.

Surface RT: $500~800
Surface Pro: $1100~$1200

I'm being optimistic about Pro's price by about $100 BTW.


I'm typing this on one of these now, which is why I said somebody's 600/1200 prediction was likely in the ballpark. But that was before the pricing non-announcement, which makes me think the Pro will be 1K even. MS selling at a loss, no OEM OS cost, passage of time.
 
Why is everybody making a big deal about gaming on the Pro? Most ultrabooks aren't even good at gaming.

The Pro is plainly aimed at business users who travel 75% of the year. The Thinkpad users who wanted an iPad.

Yeah, I was about to go with an X1 Carbon, but Microsoft may have me sold on the Pro. I have my PC for gaming. If the pro can play old stuff like Deus Ex, and HL1 then that is more than enough for me to get that light gaming fix on the go.
 
Why is everybody making a big deal about gaming on the Pro? Most ultrabooks aren't even good at gaming.

The Pro is plainly aimed at business users who travel 75% of the year. The Thinkpad users who wanted an iPad.
Yeah I think people are getting carried away with a false equation that just because it's a full-featured PC it's going to be great for gaming. It's like they suddenly all forgot that you need a really beefy system with discrete graphics to play anything decent.

I think it will be pretty good at playing many games, but not to the degree that a lot of people might be expecting.
 
Looks great and everything, but ... widescreen for a tablet? I recently bought a cheap (like, 150 euro cheap) 10" chinese android tablet. On a whim, just to see if it's something I could actually use and need. I like it ... except for the widescreen ratio. It works great on a TV or a 24"+ monitor, not so much on a tablet, imo.

Windows 8 is pretty much made for a wide screen. It is meant to be held landscape.
 
If they could get the Pro's tablet price between iPad and ultrabook, it would be so sick.

That said, I am getting one of these. This could be pretty sweet!
 
Ugh, 3 is too many. 3 companies in the console market has led to a diminished product (especially for JP market)

Microsoft and Google need to work something out, release a fusion OS in a couple years. Only way they'll even touch Apple.
 
Why is everybody making a big deal about gaming on the Pro? Most ultrabooks aren't even good at gaming.

Read up on the Intel HD4000 gpu. You'll get the answer to your question.

It's a significant leap from HD3000 graphics just a year ago. Serious strides. Most ultrabooks out today are using HD3000 graphics.
 
can Microsoft absorb some of the costs and sell them at a loss for however long they need to? or does the X-box drag them down and prevent them from adopting a similar model?
 
Yeah I think people are getting carried away with a false equation that just because it's a full-featured PC it's going to be great for gaming. It's like they suddenly all forgot that you need a really beefy system with discrete graphics to play anything decent.

Well, I was thinking more along the lines of indie games ported to it or made for it exclusively. I'm not expecting to play Max Payne 3 on full settings.
 
The genious behind WinRT is that it's in both Windows RT and in Windows 8. That's not just tablets, but in laptops and desktops as well. Once Windows 8 hits, it will be the only packed in OS available for consumer PC. That gives it an instant userbase. And considering the Windows Store is for WinRT, there will be tons of devs releasing apps for it. It's the first time there's been a unified store for Windows. Since that has great advantages for discovery, devs are quite intrigued when you factor in everything.
Why would non-touchscreen windows 8 users, which will be the vast majority of the userbase, care or pay for apps designed for the metro mode that they universally hate (on a non-touchscreen device) or straight up can not use due to not having a touchscreen?

Or, why would developers give 30% of their cut to MS, if they can just sell the app on their website the same way they have been doing for years, and they would be usable on Windows 8 as always?
 
Yeah, but a bit better since it's the Ivy Bridge chipset.

Hell yeah, Sins runs fine on that thing.

I think people are talking about games because it speaks to the performer and openness. Sure it won't run Crysis but it will run a lot more real games than any android or apple tablet.

Plus, games drive app markets.
 
Yeah I think people are getting carried away with a false equation that just because it's a full-featured PC it's going to be great for gaming. It's like they suddenly all forgot that you need a really beefy system with discrete graphics to play anything decent.

I'm thinking more about XBLA gaming and indie games from Steam myself. Those, and whatever app games come out for it, are enough for me. I save real PC gaming for my desktop and GTX 570.

LastWindow said:
Well, I was thinking more along the lines of indie games ported to it or made for it exclusively. I'm not expecting to play Max Payne 3 on full settings.

GMTA.
 
can Microsoft absorb some of the costs and sell them at a loss for however long they need to? or does the X-box drag them down and prevent them from adopting a similar model?

selling at a significant loss simply fucks over their partners. Why would they do that? Their goal isn't to hurt OEMs (who are already hurting from the slowing Windows PC market, btw)
 
Yeah I think people are getting carried away with a false equation that just because it's a full-featured PC it's going to be great for gaming. It's like they suddenly all forgot that you need a really beefy system with discrete graphics to play anything decent.

Exactly. It'll be great at lightweight stuff. The "I need a real PC tablet and Microsoft just granted my wish" crowd needs a reality check.

Yeah they most likely haven't settled on final specs for the devices. So fair enough. But the price and battery mean a lot.

In reality it's a bit of a premature announcement.

If (if) it ends up being ridiculously expensive, I will laugh.
 
Oh interesting ... the current speculation is RT version will actually use Tegra 3+

I know some had complained about this having Cortex A9's, but if it is Tegra 3+ that's not the case.


http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Nvidia-Tegra-Wayne-Grey-Icera,15407.html

Tegra 3+ is 'Wayne'.

"It'll be high performance," Rayfield said. "It's a pretty significant bump."

The specs for "Wayne" include a 28-nm quad-core ARM Cortex-A15 MPCore plus an additional low power companion core (4-PLUS-1), clocked at 1.8 GHz for tablets and notebooks. Also thrown into the mix will be 24 GPU cores with support for DirectX 11.x, OpenGL 4.x and PhysX.

It's expected to ship in the 3rd quarter, so that actually fits with the proposed launch window.
 
I'm thinking more about XBLA gaming and indie games from Steam myself. Those, and whatever app games come out for it, are enough for me. I save real PC gaming for my desktop and GTX 570.



GMTA.

Same here. I realize this thing won't play Crysis II. Also, EMULATORS AIEEEEEE.
 
Windows 8 is pretty much made for a wide screen. It is meant to be held landscape.

Yeah, I though it may have something to do with the OS. Still, a browser is a browser in Android or Windows 8. Surfing in portrait mode on a 10" widescreen tablet isn't the best of experiences. Not for me, at least. Or maybe it'll just take some getting used to.
 
Yup for a lot of little indie games it will be great, and the PC's indie scene is better than it has ever been.

Thinking about that and your mention of the strength of that scene suggests to me that possibly MS has this in mind. Tapping into that library either through steam or grabbing those games onto their marketplace as an already set library of games/apps for your tablet.

BlueTsunami said:
Same here. I realize this thing won't play Crysis. Also, EMULATORS AIEEEEEE.

Oh you HAD to go there, didn't you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom