RobotChant
Member
Okay, I stand corrected.
He never mentioned anything about entry level, or low end ultrabooks.
Okay, I stand corrected.
He never mentioned anything about entry level, or low end ultrabooks.
the highest priced iPad has LTE. and of course the screen. Comparing hardware, Surface has more in common with the wifi iPad, which maxes out at $650 and starts as low as $400.yeah I keep on thinking about the highest priced iPad vs Pro's hopeful $999 price
I am with you 100% on this one. Even iPhone and iPad should be made 8:5 IMO. All apple devices should strive to match the aspect ratio of their laptops (except for the crappy 11" air lol)16:10 is really the perfect aspect ratio for nearly all purposes. I wish apple adopted this ratio for the iPad, iPhone, Monitors and the upcoming Apple TV. One universal aspect ratio and just three resolutions for ALL Apple devices. 960x600 for iPhone. 1920x1200 for pretty much everything else. 2880x1800 for anything they want to brand as retina.
indeed.
the highest priced iPad has LTE. and of course the screen. Comparing hardware, Surface has more in common with the wifi iPad, which maxes out at $650 and starts as low as $400.
I think $999 is a great price point, but I wonder if that's high enough. $1199?
Every time I look at a 16:9 computer device it feels way too narrow and long. Maybe it's something I could get used to, and it does seem useful when using the (very cool) multiple apps feature, but I am so used to reading my iPad in portrait mode, and this sucks for portrait. Pages for reading are meant to be in portrait!
nah $999 would be perfect for the Pro, and releasing in 2013, would be logical
Every time I look at a 16:9 computer device it feels way too narrow and long. Maybe it's something I could get used to, and it does seem useful when using the (very cool) multiple apps feature, but I am so used to reading my iPad in portrait mode, and this sucks for portrait. Pages for reading are meant to be in portrait!
That's just not true. If you want to put any type of your own content on it, ie music, videos, pics, etc, you still have to deal with iTunes.
I've heard you mention this a few times, but are you sure about that? Every company that I've been at in the last few years has had $1000+ laptops. Many have MacBook Airs and MacBook Pros. I know this because I've been given the choice and I've seen people walking around with them. Now maybe it's I've been lucky enough to have only seen companies that spend considerable money on laptops, but I never would have thought it was an unusual thing to do.
At the same time its MUCH better for video because there will be no "wasted" space for letterboxing. I support 16x9 because its the standard video resolution (and it is atleast a standard). I would prefer 16x10 but I much prefer using something standard over the small difference between 16x9 and 16x10.
I doubt 99% of consumers will mind (or even notice) watching 16:9 video zoomed in to fill a 16:10 screen on a portable device, up to and including laptops. They don't seem to mind it even on the 4:3 iPad! However, for every other use, they will appreciate the better form factor.
Name Posts
Gary Whitta 142
Windu 128
MThanded 125
Dreams-Visions 83
coldfoot 65
I think its fair to say MS Office on iOS has been delayed
$1000 has been my guess since I saw it...but if you look at the competition and what they're pricing their hardware at...
....I'm just not sure they'd be willing to sell it at $1000. We'll see, but I can easily see it going for a couple hundred more than that.
Is the 16:9 ratio an OS requirement? Is it possible to see other hardware manufacturers doing something different in this regard?
I think more of the cloud services - skydive, Dropbox - help alleviate some of those transfer issues.
As far as the business discussion, very rarely in my experience do I see $1000 laptops offered on a company wide basis. In fact I don't think I've ever seen it when I think about it. That's usually only an individual user expense.
School districts, of course, are even less likely to go that route. Unless there's going to be a pretty unheard of discount.
yeah, I'm just hoping for the $999 because if it is a couple hundred more than that, I'd rather get a more powerful laptop
The devices that Microsoft showed off earlier this week weren’t real; they were simply prototypes. And anyone claiming to have gotten “hands-on” time with a Surface tablet was exaggerating, at best: No one was allowed to touch a working prototype, so those typing videos occurred on dead pieces of hardware without a working screen.
For all of its desire to be just like Apple, Microsoft is nothing like Apple. And Apple would never have introduced such a half-realized product as this. Had Apple announced the Surface, you’d know everything about it, would be able to view the full product specs on its website, would see all of the model versions and options, and so on. And you’d be able to buy it, or at least preorder it, right now.
The Surface tablet looks amazing, but until we know more about it—until it is actually real—I recommend scaling back the excitement a bit. There are just too many questions.
This sounds very even-minded, all legitimate reasons not to get too excited just yet. Sounds like many things are still very much up in the air.Paul Thurrott says that the unveiling was basically a Potemkin Village of Surfaces:
Go back to the first sentence of this post to see who wrote that.
http://www.winsupersite.com/article...et-microsoft-takes-apple-mimics-google-143481
No they had working prototypes but they didn't let non-MS people handle them.So... the whole thing was a mockup? interesting.
Then it really comes down to what people want to use it for. If you mainly watch video/movies on your tablet it's a big plus. But for people like me who mostly look at page-based content, it sucks.At the same time its MUCH better for video because there will be no "wasted" space for letterboxing. I support 16x9 because its the standard video resolution (and it is atleast a standard). I would prefer 16x10 but I much prefer using something standard over the small difference between 16x9 and 16x10.
It's not just about the event, and I don't think you have to be an Apple enthusiast to note the obvious influence.The only people saying MS wants to be like Apple are Apple centric folk. Yeah it was un MS like to not let shit leak beforehand, but im pretty sure that has more to do with them just (BIG SHOCK).....not wanting shit to leak in the first place.
The only people saying MS wants to be like Apple are Apple centric folk. Yeah it was un MS like to not let shit leak beforehand, but im pretty sure that has more to do with them just (BIG SHOCK).....not wanting shit to leak in the first place.
How is not letting stuff leak an Apple trait? We know more about Apple products before they announced more than just about any other CE that I typically follow.
What MS didn't learn from Apple is that you don't announce new hardware until it's ready to start shipping. It's why you don't see Apple saying "Hey, here's the iPad 3...and you can't get it for another 5 months!" It impacts current sales...and in the case of MS, messes with vendor relations.
MS hit the newswire too soon and with something too incomplete. Not sure what motivated doing this NOW versus waiting until it was ready.
the interesting one is an intel device, of course its thicker.
The only people saying MS wants to be like Apple are Apple centric folk. Yeah it was un MS like to not let shit leak beforehand, but im pretty sure that has more to do with them just (BIG SHOCK).....not wanting shit to leak in the first place.
The big difference is that Apple doesn't reveal prototypes.The way they sold the product to the audience at that keynote was very Apple like. There was more talk about the design, feel, build quality, possibilities and filosophy of the product then actual tech. Exactly what Apple does. Selling it like you would sell a luxury car to someone who knows nothing about cars. Making you want to buy it or try it instead of analyze it.
The big difference is that Apple doesn't reveal prototypes.
How many products have MS actually launched tho? lol.The way they sold the product to the audience at that keynote was very Apple like. There was more talk about the design, feel, build quality, possibilities and filosophy of the product then actual tech. Exactly what Apple does. Selling it like you would sell a luxury car to someone who knows nothing about cars. Making you want to buy it or try it instead of analyze it.
The only people saying MS wants to be like Apple are Apple centric folk. .
What MS didn't learn from Apple is that you don't announce new hardware until it's ready to start shipping. It's why you don't see Apple saying "Hey, here's the iPad 3...and you can't get it for another 5 months!" It impacts current sales...and in the case of MS, messes with vendor relations.
MS hit the newswire too soon and with something too incomplete. Not sure what motivated doing this NOW versus waiting until it was ready.
Does the original iPhone announcement count?
Original iPhone, Mac Mini, and MBA all kind of felt like beta tests.
The Mac Mini and MBA being beta tests is debatable, but when the original iPhone was announced it wasn't available for months just like Surface. I think it makes a lot of sense to announce it this way, it gets people excited for a future device while also making them reconsider if they want an iPad/Android tablet.
The Mac Mini and MBA being beta tests is debatable, but when the original iPhone was announced it wasn't available for months just like Surface. I think it makes a lot of sense to announce it this way, it gets people excited for a future device while also making them reconsider if they want an iPad/Android tablet.
Especially since the Pro won't be available until after the holidays, I think they made the right decision with an unveil in June. Windows 8 is August, right? So the Surface RT should be out in 2-3 months.
The original iPhone reveal was involuntary. The FCC sorta forced their hand on that one, since it had to be approved and it would be on public record that they had a phone.
The subsequent reveals? Well, there was no surprise a phone was coming, but they could keep the specifics secret.