Microsoft Surface Tablet announced

Status
Not open for further replies.
He never mentioned anything about entry level, or low end ultrabooks.

indeed.


yeah I keep on thinking about the highest priced iPad vs Pro's hopeful $999 price
the highest priced iPad has LTE. and of course the screen. Comparing hardware, Surface has more in common with the wifi iPad, which maxes out at $650 and starts as low as $400.

I think $999 is a great price point, but I wonder if that's high enough. $1199?
 
16:10 is really the perfect aspect ratio for nearly all purposes. I wish apple adopted this ratio for the iPad, iPhone, Monitors and the upcoming Apple TV. One universal aspect ratio and just three resolutions for ALL Apple devices. 960x600 for iPhone. 1920x1200 for pretty much everything else. 2880x1800 for anything they want to brand as retina.
I am with you 100% on this one. Even iPhone and iPad should be made 8:5 IMO. All apple devices should strive to match the aspect ratio of their laptops (except for the crappy 11" air lol)

Just look, 16:9 is stupidly wide screen, should not be used outside of TV's.

K4xXu.gif
 
indeed.



the highest priced iPad has LTE. and of course the screen. Comparing hardware, Surface has more in common with the wifi iPad, which maxes out at $650 and starts as low as $400.

I think $999 is a great price point, but I wonder if that's high enough. $1199?

nah $999 would be perfect for the Pro, and releasing in 2013, would be logical
 
Every time I look at a 16:9 computer device it feels way too narrow and long. Maybe it's something I could get used to, and it does seem useful when using the (very cool) multiple apps feature, but I am so used to reading my iPad in portrait mode, and this sucks for portrait. Pages for reading are meant to be in portrait!
 
Every time I look at a 16:9 computer device it feels way too narrow and long. Maybe it's something I could get used to, and it does seem useful when using the (very cool) multiple apps feature, but I am so used to reading my iPad in portrait mode, and this sucks for portrait. Pages for reading are meant to be in portrait!

Is the 16:9 ratio an OS requirement? Is it possible to see other hardware manufacturers doing something different in this regard?
 
nah $999 would be perfect for the Pro, and releasing in 2013, would be logical

$1000 has been my guess since I saw it...but if you look at the competition and what they're pricing their hardware at...

....I'm just not sure they'd be willing to sell it at $1000. We'll see, but I can easily see it going for a couple hundred more than that.
 
Every time I look at a 16:9 computer device it feels way too narrow and long. Maybe it's something I could get used to, and it does seem useful when using the (very cool) multiple apps feature, but I am so used to reading my iPad in portrait mode, and this sucks for portrait. Pages for reading are meant to be in portrait!

At the same time its MUCH better for video because there will be no "wasted" space for letterboxing. I support 16x9 because its the standard video resolution (and it is atleast a standard). I would prefer 16x10 but I much prefer using something standard over the small difference between 16x9 and 16x10.
 
That's just not true. If you want to put any type of your own content on it, ie music, videos, pics, etc, you still have to deal with iTunes.



I've heard you mention this a few times, but are you sure about that? Every company that I've been at in the last few years has had $1000+ laptops. Many have MacBook Airs and MacBook Pros. I know this because I've been given the choice and I've seen people walking around with them. Now maybe it's I've been lucky enough to have only seen companies that spend considerable money on laptops, but I never would have thought it was an unusual thing to do.

I think more of the cloud services - skydive, Dropbox - help alleviate some of those transfer issues.

As far as the business discussion, very rarely in my experience do I see $1000 laptops offered on a company wide basis. In fact I don't think I've ever seen it when I think about it. That's usually only an individual user expense.

School districts, of course, are even less likely to go that route. Unless there's going to be a pretty unheard of discount.
 
At the same time its MUCH better for video because there will be no "wasted" space for letterboxing. I support 16x9 because its the standard video resolution (and it is atleast a standard). I would prefer 16x10 but I much prefer using something standard over the small difference between 16x9 and 16x10.

I doubt 99% of consumers will mind (or even notice) watching 16:9 video zoomed in to fill a 16:10 screen on a portable device, up to and including laptops. They don't seem to mind it even on the 4:3 iPad! However, for every other use, they will appreciate the better form factor.
 
I doubt 99% of consumers will mind (or even notice) watching 16:9 video zoomed in to fill a 16:10 screen on a portable device, up to and including laptops. They don't seem to mind it even on the 4:3 iPad! However, for every other use, they will appreciate the better form factor.

I don't think people really care about 16x10 and 16x9 in general but 16x9 is more of a standard.... the usability differences really aren't that big in standard use cases.
 
$1000 has been my guess since I saw it...but if you look at the competition and what they're pricing their hardware at...

....I'm just not sure they'd be willing to sell it at $1000. We'll see, but I can easily see it going for a couple hundred more than that.

yeah, I'm just hoping for the $999 because if it is a couple hundred more than that, I'd rather get a more powerful laptop
 
I think more of the cloud services - skydive, Dropbox - help alleviate some of those transfer issues.

They key there though is some. It doesn't solve all the problems which means you can't always ditch iTunes when it comes to content management. I still think music and videos have to be done through iTunes in order for them to show up in their respective apps. Not sure about photos though.

As far as the business discussion, very rarely in my experience do I see $1000 laptops offered on a company wide basis. In fact I don't think I've ever seen it when I think about it. That's usually only an individual user expense.

School districts, of course, are even less likely to go that route. Unless there's going to be a pretty unheard of discount.

Schools of course I wouldn't expect, and maybe it's different in CA but it just doesn't seem unusual to see a company give you a choice between a Mac or PC for your laptop and that those are usually starting at $1000 from what I've witnessed. I'm sure the industry and field also makes a difference too. In the worst case scenario, I wouldn't think it's uncommon like Cheebo is making it sound like.
 
Paul Thurrott says that the unveiling was basically a Potemkin Village of Surfaces:

The devices that Microsoft showed off earlier this week weren’t real; they were simply prototypes. And anyone claiming to have gotten “hands-on” time with a Surface tablet was exaggerating, at best: No one was allowed to touch a working prototype, so those typing videos occurred on dead pieces of hardware without a working screen.

For all of its desire to be just like Apple, Microsoft is nothing like Apple. And Apple would never have introduced such a half-realized product as this. Had Apple announced the Surface, you’d know everything about it, would be able to view the full product specs on its website, would see all of the model versions and options, and so on. And you’d be able to buy it, or at least preorder it, right now.

The Surface tablet looks amazing, but until we know more about it—until it is actually real—I recommend scaling back the excitement a bit. There are just too many questions.

Go back to the first sentence of this post to see who wrote that.

http://www.winsupersite.com/article...et-microsoft-takes-apple-mimics-google-143481
 
I love everything about this device except for the 16:9 aspect ratio. It's probably going to prevent me from purchasing this nice piece of technology.

I read much more than watch on the internet. Hopefully, they'll offer a version that is more pleasing in portrait mode.
 
So... the whole thing was a mockup? interesting.
No they had working prototypes but they didn't let non-MS people handle them.

Thurrott makes a good point that, as much as this whole thing seemed like MS is becoming more Apple-like, they still did a lot of things that Apple would never do. Apple would never show something this unfinished to the public, every tiny detail would be screwed down tight. Hell in many cases the product would go on sale THE SAME DAY they first revealed it.

I think MS pushed forward the reveal of this event because they felt they couldn't wait any longer to start the excitement - every day they wait is another day lost to Apple or Google.
 
At the same time its MUCH better for video because there will be no "wasted" space for letterboxing. I support 16x9 because its the standard video resolution (and it is atleast a standard). I would prefer 16x10 but I much prefer using something standard over the small difference between 16x9 and 16x10.
Then it really comes down to what people want to use it for. If you mainly watch video/movies on your tablet it's a big plus. But for people like me who mostly look at page-based content, it sucks.
 
Not just that, but Google is showing off their tablet next week.

MS needs to turn this good buzz into something concrete by revealing more info and showing off finished devices fast. What they usually do is stall for months and end up releasing a mediocre half-finished product with all these weird bugs and issues. And it just makes people mad for waiting.

People laugh at Apple fans for buying their products right way but I guarantee that if MS had Surface for sale and shipping on Tuesday they would've sold a lot of them. From what Thurrott said the Pro isn't even shipping until 3 months after Win8 which is just crazy.
 
The only people saying MS wants to be like Apple are Apple centric folk. Yeah it was un MS like to not let shit leak beforehand, but im pretty sure that has more to do with them just (BIG SHOCK).....not wanting shit to leak in the first place.
 
The only people saying MS wants to be like Apple are Apple centric folk. Yeah it was un MS like to not let shit leak beforehand, but im pretty sure that has more to do with them just (BIG SHOCK).....not wanting shit to leak in the first place.
It's not just about the event, and I don't think you have to be an Apple enthusiast to note the obvious influence.
 
The only people saying MS wants to be like Apple are Apple centric folk. Yeah it was un MS like to not let shit leak beforehand, but im pretty sure that has more to do with them just (BIG SHOCK).....not wanting shit to leak in the first place.

How is not letting stuff leak an Apple trait? We know more about Apple products before they announced more than just about any other CE that I typically follow.

What MS didn't learn from Apple is that you don't announce new hardware until it's ready to start shipping. It's why you don't see Apple saying "Hey, here's the iPad 3...and you can't get it for another 5 months!" It impacts current sales...and in the case of MS, messes with vendor relations.

MS hit the newswire too soon and with something too incomplete. Not sure what motivated doing this NOW versus waiting until it was ready.
 
How is not letting stuff leak an Apple trait? We know more about Apple products before they announced more than just about any other CE that I typically follow.

What MS didn't learn from Apple is that you don't announce new hardware until it's ready to start shipping. It's why you don't see Apple saying "Hey, here's the iPad 3...and you can't get it for another 5 months!" It impacts current sales...and in the case of MS, messes with vendor relations.

MS hit the newswire too soon and with something too incomplete. Not sure what motivated doing this NOW versus waiting until it was ready.

It is confounding to say the least. They didn't even give a real release date at all. I'm guessing when Google announces the Nexus Tablet next week, at the bare minimum they'll say "Available in July!" or something similar.
 
I heard that Steve Jobs taught Ballmer how to make a tablet before he died. Then the perspiration from Ballmer's pits oozed down his arms into his hands, causing him to drop it. They've been slowly putting it back together. That's why it's not quite done yet.
 
The only people saying MS wants to be like Apple are Apple centric folk. Yeah it was un MS like to not let shit leak beforehand, but im pretty sure that has more to do with them just (BIG SHOCK).....not wanting shit to leak in the first place.

The way they sold the product to the audience at that keynote was very Apple like. There was more talk about the design, feel, build quality, possibilities and filosophy of the product then actual tech. Exactly what Apple does. Selling it like you would sell a luxury car to someone who knows nothing about cars. Making you want to buy it or try it instead of analyze it.

A few years ago we would have only seen the tech and software. We would have gotten numbers and dry tech talk. Apple changed that and it works to wow the press.
 
The way they sold the product to the audience at that keynote was very Apple like. There was more talk about the design, feel, build quality, possibilities and filosophy of the product then actual tech. Exactly what Apple does. Selling it like you would sell a luxury car to someone who knows nothing about cars. Making you want to buy it or try it instead of analyze it.
The big difference is that Apple doesn't reveal prototypes.
 
The way they sold the product to the audience at that keynote was very Apple like. There was more talk about the design, feel, build quality, possibilities and filosophy of the product then actual tech. Exactly what Apple does. Selling it like you would sell a luxury car to someone who knows nothing about cars. Making you want to buy it or try it instead of analyze it.
How many products have MS actually launched tho? lol.

I can understand people wanting to know when it's coming out and such, but saying MS needs to be like/or is trying to be like Apple in announcing or launching a product just smacks to me. They simply need to and should do better period. Apple or no Apple.
 
What MS didn't learn from Apple is that you don't announce new hardware until it's ready to start shipping. It's why you don't see Apple saying "Hey, here's the iPad 3...and you can't get it for another 5 months!" It impacts current sales...and in the case of MS, messes with vendor relations.

MS hit the newswire too soon and with something too incomplete. Not sure what motivated doing this NOW versus waiting until it was ready.

What sales are they impacting exactly? Microsoft doesn't have an existing line of tablets that this will cannibalize. I'm thinking they are hoping they will impact Apple's sales, if anything :)

If you think about it, I think it makes more sense for them to announce this early - but if the Surface is successful, I think we would both agree that an early announcement of Surface 2 would be counterproductive...
 
Original iPhone, Mac Mini, and MBA all kind of felt like beta tests.

The Mac Mini and MBA being beta tests is debatable, but when the original iPhone was announced it wasn't available for months just like Surface. I think it makes a lot of sense to announce it this way, it gets people excited for a future device while also making them reconsider if they want an iPad/Android tablet.
 
Especially since the Pro won't be available until after the holidays, I think they made the right decision with an unveil in June. Windows 8 is August, right? So the Surface RT should be out in 2-3 months.
 
The Mac Mini and MBA being beta tests is debatable, but when the original iPhone was announced it wasn't available for months just like Surface. I think it makes a lot of sense to announce it this way, it gets people excited for a future device while also making them reconsider if they want an iPad/Android tablet.

The original iPhone reveal was involuntary. The FCC sorta forced their hand on that one, since it had to be approved and it would be on public record that they had a phone.

The subsequent reveals? Well, there was no surprise a phone was coming, but they could keep the specifics secret.
 
The Mac Mini and MBA being beta tests is debatable, but when the original iPhone was announced it wasn't available for months just like Surface. I think it makes a lot of sense to announce it this way, it gets people excited for a future device while also making them reconsider if they want an iPad/Android tablet.

The main issue is telegraphing your plans in advance. Apple knew they were years ahead of the market with the iPhone. Except for Google, no one understood the potential, so announcing early worked out.

Another example is the Palm Pre. Announced 6 months ahead of time, widely praised by the tech media, and then steamrolled by the next iPhone and the Droid on release.

I guess my point is that announcing this early can be good or bad. There are too many other variables.
 
The original iPhone reveal was involuntary. The FCC sorta forced their hand on that one, since it had to be approved and it would be on public record that they had a phone.

The subsequent reveals? Well, there was no surprise a phone was coming, but they could keep the specifics secret.

Involuntary or not, the point still stands that it had a lot of people holding off on purchasing a new phone until the iPhone was released.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom