• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Being white is a privilege, says this PSA.

Status
Not open for further replies.
lol? Ok.. Congrats?

Point is that you should work to transcend your race, stereotype and the rest of your physical appearance and totally forget about the races and just be you.

People will still be racist but I don't care and know they're limiting themselves instead of me by not treating me as an equal human being. It's them missing out on that hard working employee or awesome friend, not me.
 
Point is that you should work to transcend your race, stereotype and the rest of your physical appearance and totally forget about the races and just be you.

People will still be racist but I don't care and know they're limiting themselves instead of me by not treating me as an equal human being. It's them missing out on that hard working employee or awesome friend, not me.

I don't think you understand much about the nature of systemic racism. If you did, you wouldn't consider using the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" argument. You should really take the time to read the two books Mumei suggested earlier. They're really eye opening.
 
Point is that you should work to transcend your race, stereotype and the rest of your physical appearance and totally forget about the races and just be you.

People will still be racist but I don't care and know they're limiting themselves instead of me by not treating me as an equal human being. It's them missing out on that hard working employee or awesome friend, not me.

I never said otherwise... But to pretend that you are working on an equal slate is not something I can do... Because we have to work hard to transcend..
 
Point is that you should work to transcend your race, stereotype and the rest of your physical appearance and totally forget about the races and just be you.

People will still be racist but I don't care and know they're limiting themselves instead of me by not treating me as an equal human being. It's them missing out on that hard working employee or awesome friend, not me.

You can simultaneously "work to transcend your race" while also pointing out that the fact that you have to do that is a perfect example of how privilege plays itself out in society.
 
You are trying to pretend that people here are explaining "privilege" to you in general, non-specific ways - as if it was trying to bridge the gulf of difference between two people living completely different lifestyles - when they are in fact quite specific in explaining the ways this privilege reveals itself. Please stop.
The PSA doesn't really cover any of that nuance though. I guess I just have an issue with the use of the word 'privelidge' in this context, a 30 second TV spot. I don't disagree with what the PSA is trying to get across, that life is more difficult for minorities and that they face problems that generally just don't exist for most white people, I just think that this is a very poor way of doing it and is just as likely to reinforce racial divides rather than break them down.
 
I guess I just have an issue with the use of the word 'privelidge'

Well that's good, because the ad didn't once use the word "privelidge." Probably because that's not a fucking word.

Sorry for the snark, but you ignored my previous (serious) responses to you, so I'm not even going to bother wasting my time.
 
lol at the 400 year headstart, we colored people in Europe have to deal with a ~4000 year+ headstart.
The wast difference here being that your ancestor very unlikely arrived on a slave ship to Europe and very very unlikely were not given civil rights until about 50 years ago. Quite frankly most likely you have arrived in the past 30 years and have enjoyed a solid foundation of welfare benefits and services that have been out of reach for Americans that have assured a certain quality of life level that is likely to be above the average African american.

Therefore I think the 4000+ year headstart thing is pretty fucking dumb :)

EDIT: Probably should add that I don't think life for minorities in Europe are all roses and well aware of white privilege existing here as well but there simply are more means given to minorities here for upward social mobility.
 
Amazing how the European vs. American racism argument sneaks into every thread.

I've lived in Hawaii since I was like 4, and it's pretty shitty being white here.

Well, people are still a little resentful of the violent coup d'état, maybe. I'm interested in hearing more about this -- I lived in Hawaii til I was 18 and have heard this before from people, but frankly I always assumed that being treated equally was too much for them to handle.
 
Seriously....watch the video I posted. For real. Take some time and just give it a go. If you want a perspective on it other than "guilt" give it a watch. It's not about guilting White people.

I'm only about 4 minutes in and so far it's cringe worthy. He's done his absolute best so far to make sure the audience knows he's inferior yet has a position to speak because of his skin color.

He may go on to give good facts and arguments from here, but his lead up is ridiculous.

7 minutes in now and it's getting worse.
 
Amazing how the European vs. American racism argument sneaks into every thread.



Well, people are still a little resentful of the violent coup d'état, maybe. I'm interested in hearing more about this -- I lived in Hawaii til I was 18 and have heard this before from people, but frankly I always assumed that being treated equally was too much for them to handle.

Hawaii is the outlier in the American experience. But, I have also heard from white pople who moved from Hawaii, how much better it is on the mainland for them as well.

I would hope that going through an experience like that would make you more empathetic. But, it often doesn't, and I don't blame them.
 
Being blind to race only helps those who are already privileged.

This is the first (and somewhat counter-intuitive) lesson I needed to learn, and I can tell from this topic that I am not the only one. This is why I recommended those two books; one of them explained the rhetoric behind the insistence on "color-blindness" - which perversely positions the person who notices racism and points it out as the truly racist person - and made it seem a part of a cohesive whole. I had noticed the individual planks, but I had not thought of it as a collective pool of rhetoric that (especially) white people use to justify and explain unequal racial outcomes using non-racial explanations. The other book explains one of the most concrete ways in which black people are oppressed in American society - the drug war and its selective enforcement - and ties in really quite well with the previous book.

Though I do think I need to learn more about the issues faced by non-black racial minorities in the United States; I'm a bit narrowly focused in what I feel any comfort talking about right now.

I don't think you understand much about the nature of systemic racism. If you did, you wouldn't consider using the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" argument. You should really take the time to read the two books Mumei suggested earlier. They're really eye opening.

ibiA1x5TdxmkUt.gif
 
I'm only about 4 minutes in and so far it's cringe worthy. He's done his absolute best so far to make sure the audience knows he's inferior yet has a position to speak because of his skin color.

He may go on to give good facts and arguments from here, but his lead up is ridiculous.

7 minutes in now and it's getting worse.

all I hear are alot of awkward truths sure to collide with some people's worldview.
 
I'm half white

where does that put me on the privilege scale

That depends on how white you look. Based on your avatar, probably pretty high. I would assume you're european on sight (although filters you put on the picture interfere with that)
 
I've been reading more about this lately and I think there is a lot to it I didn't originally address. The PSA might make me feel irritated or angry, but there is truth to what they are saying that can't be denied.

One way to look at it is as a tier:


>White privilege

--> How everyone should be treated in an equal and balanced society

---> How minorities are treated.

So not only are minorties often not even treated in a humane equal way, but also white people enjoy powers and privileges that are above what any normal person should be allowed to have, such as ignoring the culture and opinions of others or feeling like they can subjugate or feel comfortable in not giving voice to people outside of their race.

Basically everyone has work to do in bringing basic rights and equality to minorities AND in eliminating unfair privileges and attitudes that NO RACE should have, but Whites currently have. The second part was a new concept that took a while for me to realize and let it sink in. Perhaps PSA's like this are trying to bring that idea to more people, which is a goal I can get behind.
 
He's an example where white people have it easier than people of color, and the way people of color are treated wrongfully.
I have an older sibling who works at a extremely high end retail store[cheapest item is probably a $300 shirt] She's the only black woman that works at that store. No problem with any of the other workers, ok fine, that's all good. They treat her well and they are good friends.
However, one way too many occasions she tells me or I'd go and see this happen. She would approach a white family [almost all customers and people who live in that area is white unless they are famous]. Greets them with a warm welcome tells them they have new stuff in season. What do they do? They look at her dead in the face, don't say a word and then walks to another wall. Her coworkers witness this and one of them tries to see what was up with them. SO one worker[white] goes up to that same family, ask the same question. And what happens to her? She's talked back to with open arms and the customers let her show her new products. So now my sibling lost a customer to put in her client book, sales and commission because of the way she was treated.
And a similar time she did the same thing and was told by the customer to " Stop Bothering her" And when a white sales associate came to her, all was well. And when the sale was finished and her white coworker needed help by that same customer, the customer had the nerve to say to her "Now you can bother me". So Yeah >_>. This is just one example in the work force and this is a more direct type of inequality rather than the way the institutionalized way of racism in society has treated us[ in this example her]
 
I understand that I'm privileged. First of all to be white, secondly because I'm male, and I'd probably throw 'born in England' in as a privilege too. Hell, even having blue eyes is something of a privilege in a very small way.

Thing is, whilst I have privilege, I have no power. I can recognise my privilege all day long but I really can't do much to afford that privilege to others in anything other than small, personal interactions. I'm not sure how we move from realising that white people have privilege to extending that courtesy to others.

I think the reason that many people struggle to see our 'privilege' is because people have certain expectations from the word. People assume that 'privileged' means 'having wealth' or 'steeped in luxury' when our privilege is much, much subtler than that. Basically, we're treated the way that people should be treated. It shouldn't be a privilege, but it is.

This is a great post. I think becoming aware of privilege is the most important thing. The more you learn about it, the more obvious it is when it comes up in every day life. That gives one the opportunity to challenge inequality wherever you find it in your personal life.

The PSA doesn't really cover any of that nuance though. I guess I just have an issue with the use of the word 'privelidge' in this context, a 30 second TV spot. I don't disagree with what the PSA is trying to get across, that life is more difficult for minorities and that they face problems that generally just don't exist for most white people, I just think that this is a very poor way of doing it and is just as likely to reinforce racial divides rather than break them down.

This is often the line used to end racial debate, which as mentioned by others, only benefits the privileged. Sometimes being made aware of the truth is uncomfortable. But speaking openly about racism, even in a supposedly confrontational manor, always helps to raise awareness. If people choose to ignore the information they're given, it's not likely they were all that open to challenging racism in the first place.

I'm only about 4 minutes in and so far it's cringe worthy. He's done his absolute best so far to make sure the audience knows he's inferior yet has a position to speak because of his skin color.

He may go on to give good facts and arguments from here, but his lead up is ridiculous.

7 minutes in now and it's getting worse.

What? He said that he, as a white man, knows less about racism against black people than black people know themselves. This is controversial? He also says that he gets better speaking engagements and commands more attention on this subject than black speakers. Why is this a surprise, or why should we suspect that he's wrong? Perhaps you will feel differently by the end of the video.
 
When Applying to college, My high school guidance counselor[white] that i was assinged to "help me get into college" became notorious for playing "Favorites". My self along side plenty of other minority students had our transcripts sent extremely late because of him. And when we were trying to figure out where i could go, he was telling me i wouldn't get into schools. I called several of those applied schools about a month or 2 after he was supposed to and they told me they still didn't get a thing. I had to go to another guidance counselor that wasn't mine[She was black ] to send everything to the last few schools i was applying to as well as one of the schools i applied with him once again, and i had no hassle after that. Almost all the schools he told me i wasn't going to get in, I did get in, and it was the schools I didn't apply with him that I got in. I wasn't top of the class but i was very far from the bottom too. I can go back to my old graduating classmates or alum that had him as a guidance counselor and I can hear similar experiences that I had with him.
 
Point is that you should work to transcend your race, stereotype and the rest of your physical appearance and totally forget about the races and just be you.

People will still be racist but I don't care and know they're limiting themselves instead of me by not treating me as an equal human being. It's them missing out on that hard working employee or awesome friend, not me.

This is so incredibly naive.
 
Naive, perhaps...but is it still not admirable to seek to live outside of expectations?

Not when that exact same rhetoric is used by people who actively oppose any social, political, and economic reforms that could address the underlying racism.

Wazzim made it, and he's a minority! Whaddaya mean, affirmative action?! Just work harder, like he did!
 
Not when that exact same rhetoric is used by people who actively oppose any social, political, and economic reforms that could address the underlying racism.

Wazzim made it, and he's a minority! Whaddaya mean, affirmative action?! Just work harder, like he did!

Just because it's used as an excuse by bootstrappers doesn't make it any less legitimate a way of life. Just about anything could be used as empty rhetoric in the wrong hands.

Other equally valuable concepts are currently being abused by the right for political gain. Hard work. Personal responsibility. These concepts are no less important for being a teabagger's talking points memo. They shouldn't be rejected out-of-hand.
 
When Applying to college, My high school guidance counselor[white] that i was assinged to "help me get into college" became notorious for playing "Favorites". My self along side plenty of other minority students had our applications and transcripts sent extremely late because of him. And when we were trying to figure out where i could go, he was telling me i wouldn't get into schools. I called several of those applied schools about a month or 2 after he was supposed to and they told me they still didn't get a thing. I had to go to another guidance counselor that wasn't mine[She was black ] to send everything to the last few schools i was applying to as well as one of the schools i applied with him once again, and i had no hassle after that. Almost all the schools he told me i wasn't going to get in, I did get in, and it was the schools I didn't apply with him that I got in. I wasn't top of the class but i was very far from the bottom too. I can go back to my old graduating classmates or alum that had him as a guidance counselor and I can hear similar experiences that I had with him.
Your high school guidance counselor sent your application in for you? Is that normal?
 
This is so incredibly naive.
No it isn't. The real modern demographical fight is the one between the classes.
It doesn't matter from what race you are, have the capital and you can dominate.

I don't think you understand much about the nature of systemic racism. If you did, you wouldn't consider using the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" argument. You should really take the time to read the two books Mumei suggested earlier. They're really eye opening.
I´m not that interested in racism and have other books to read which cover subjects I'm more interested in.
 
No it isn't. The real modern demographical fight is the one between the classes.
It doesn't matter from what race you are, have the capital and you can dominate.


I´m not that interested in racism and have other books to read which cover subjects I'm more interested in.

What do you think paying minorities less, making sure urban education sucks and generally making it harder to climb the socio-economic ladder do to minorities in America? Keeps capital out of their hands.
 
What do you think paying minorities less, making sure urban education sucks and generally making it harder to climb the socio-economic ladder do to minorities in America? Keep capital out of their hands.

I don't believe there's a single person in this thread who doesn't believe in institutionalized racism - it seems to me that wazzim is just suggesting a method for coping with it. If I'm wrong I'll eat a shit sandwich.
 
No it isn't. The real modern demographical fight is the one between the classes.
It doesn't matter from what race you are, have the capital and you can dominate.

Funny how out of the top ten richest people in America, 100% of them are straight cisgender white people, and 80% are male. Here's a weird theory -- maybe rather than being a magical privilege source that dominates all other privilege, class is, statistically speaking, actually a combined result of the effects of multiple other sources of privilege. I wonder how you could verify that? If that theory were true, you'd expect minority groups, including people of color, GLBT, women, ad kyriarchum, to be disproportionately represented below the poverty line and in prison and underrepresented in higher-echelon business, politics, and professional careers.

Hmm.

I´m not that interested in racism and have other books to read which cover subjects I'm more interested in.

Why are you posting with such apparent conviction in a thread about a topic you aren't actually interested in?
 
Not when that exact same rhetoric is used by people who actively oppose any social, political, and economic reforms that could address the underlying racism.

Wazzim made it, and he's a minority! Whaddaya mean, affirmative action?! Just work harder, like he did!
Hahaha, well if you know me from previous political/social threads you'd know that I'm not that kind of guy.

What do you think paying minorities less, making sure urban education sucks and generally making it harder to climb the socio-economic ladder do to minorities in America? Keeps capital out of their hands.
I don't think the person you think I am is the person I really am.
I'm politically active in a party which fights to eliminate the inequalities you described. Don't see me as one of those 'just pull up your bootstrap' guys.

Do you think it behooves us to ignore possible impediments to acquiring said capital?
No but make sure that those impediments don't take control of your life (some people get depressed, give up etc).
 
I don't think the person you think I am is the person I really am.
I'm politically active in a party which fights to eliminate the inequalities you described. Don't see me as one of those 'just pull up your bootstrap' guys.

Then stop posting like one.
 
No but make sure that those impediments don't take control of your life (some people get depressed, give up etc).

Not that there's not truth to that. However -- in regards to the outlook of society at large -- I would argue that it's never beneficial to pretend like we are in some post-racial world where opportunity is handed out equally.
 
Why are you posting with such apparent conviction in a thread about a topic you aren't actually interested in?
I'm quite interested in the topic, just not enough to spent my time reading 2 whole books about it. I read a book about Malcolm X though, that kinda counts.

Then stop posting like one.
I don't post like one. You should rather start seeing that you should always tackle problems in this world with mixed approaches.
White privilege is important when discussing the socio-economic situation of minorities but it's all part of the big struggle between rich and poor which we all have to deal with. A poor trailer park kid will not see much of that white privilege at all.

Not that there's not truth to that. However -- in regards to the outlook of society at large -- I would argue that it's never beneficial to pretend like we are in some post-racial world where opportunity is handed out equally.
Fair enough.
 
I don't post like one. You should rather start seeing that you should always tackle problems in this world with mixed approaches.
White privilege is important when discussing the socio-economic situation of minorities but it's all part of the big struggle between rich and poor which we all have to deal with. A poor trailer park kid will not see much of that white privilege at all.

Again with the poor trailer park kid strawman. My grandmother grew up a dirt poor daughter of migrant farm workers who managed to understand discrimination just fine. This isn't about whether or not the poor white kid can grasp racial privilege and I think it's ironically insulting to assume that poor white people cannot recognize or empathize with unfair treatment, because they certainly can and do. Sometimes they can recognize it better than a middle class or rich person because they've been shit on unfairly for years. That's how it worked with my grandmother. She managed to identify all kinds of unfair treatment whether it be gender, race or sexuality because she lived through biased treatment as the daughter of poor farmers out of Stockton. She knew what it was like to be outcast, labeled and spat on because she wasn't of a higher class. She could empathize readily with what she had been told by minorities.

Just because a white person of lower means won't see "as much" privilege as a white person of a better economic class doesn't change the reality of the situation or the upward mobility advantage a white person will have over a minority in the same status just based on stereotyping, assumed interests and prejudice. My grandmother was eventually able to go to college and do lab work while minorities were relegated to "separate but equal" education.

People like to think we've come a long way but they are closing schools in urban environments so to say "it's only about class" when the cross section of minorities missing out on a well oiled education is extremely high is naive and quite the "boot strap" nonsense you proclaim not to be a part of. How can minorities reasonably gain capital if they can't even count on a decent education?
 
White privilege is important when discussing the socio-economic situation of minorities but it's all part of the big struggle between rich and poor which we all have to deal with. A poor trailer park kid will not see much of that white privilege at all.

...But he will have a better chance at social mobility than a minority in the same position.
 
Again with the poor trailer park kid strawman. My grandmother grew up a dirt poor daughter of migrant farm workers who managed to understand discrimination just fine. This isn't about whether or not the poor white kid can grasp racial privilege and I think it's ironically insulting to assume that poor white people cannot recognize or empathize with unfair treatment, because they certainly can and do. Sometimes they can recognize it better than a middle class or rich person because they've been shit on unfairly for years. That's how it worked with my grandmother. She managed to identify all kinds of unfair treatment whether it be gender, race or sexuality because she lived through biased treatment as the daughter of poor farmers out of Stockton. She knew what it was like to be outcast, labeled and spat on because she wasn't of a higher class. She could empathize readily with what she had been told by minorities.

Just because a white person of lower means won't see "as much" privilege as a white person of a better economic class doesn't change the reality of the situation or the upward mobility advantage a white person will have over a minority in the same status just based on stereotyping, assumed interests and prejudice. My grandmother was eventually able to go to college and do lab work while minorities were relegated to "separate but equal" education.

People like to think we've come a long way but they are closing schools in urban environments so to say "it's only about class" when the cross section of minorities missing out on a well oiled education is extremely high is naive and quite the "boot strap" nonsense you proclaim not to be a part of. How can minorities reasonably gain capital if they can't even count on a decent education?

Let's not forget about the black woman that was arrested because she lied in order to get her child into a better school that happened to not be in the district she lived in.

I understand that there are rules about school jurisdictions/districts, but the message it's sending to a black person that wants a better education for their child is: "Stay in your shitty area, with the shitty school curriculum, and don't dare strive for anything better, or we will punish you for wanting a better life for your child, and try to give them a leg up. That is reserved for whites only."

At least, that what it seems like to me.
 
But you’re just considering whites and blacks, what about Indians and North East Asians and South East Asians. When I posted before about Asians not getting harassed by police, and not having large incarceration rates, people replied to me and said that Asians have different types of problems instead like being considered outsiders while only whites get the status of true Americans. Now I’m not arguing that this is false, I just believe that it is a problem that will happen to minorities anywhere.

This is not correct. I did reply to you:

This really depends on where you are. In San Jose, CA? No... they're not chasing the Taiwanese kids around. In Houston, TX... being a Vietnamese kid in Alief or Sharpstown is hard. They don't get any "passes" there. It's really a class war in that respect. If you go down the road to Sugarland where the middle-to-upper class East Asians live, it's a totally different story. It really depends on the municipality and the general wealth of the Asians. Communities made up of immigrees are typically going to be treated better than the communities made up of refugees.
To make it more clear, SE Asians are absolutely oppressed the way blacks and Hispanics are oppressed in parts of my city (Houston), partcularly poor ones in poor neighborhoods. And, it's not just the ones that dress "gangster" (though that doesn't help). Vietnamese, Cambodian, Laotian, and Burmese refugees and/or the children of those refugees who have been unable to get out of being poor have pretty hard lives all over the South.
 
As opposed to a minority born into great wealth. Individuals existing outside of demographics, and whatnot.

Well, there's also a point that every phenomenon doesn't have to be universally applicable for it to be worthy of being recognized as a problem that deserves attention. Yes, there are going to be any number of exceptions. However, are you suggesting that there isn't an inequality, or that -- generally speaking -- it's advantageous to be white?
 
Who, exactly, do you think is suggesting that individuals don't exist outside of demographics?

Read the thread. A metric shit-ton of people. It's weird, and such behavior only seems to spring out in threads like these.

Well, there's also a point that every phenomenon doesn't have to be universally applicable for it to be worthy of being recognized as a problem that deserves attention. Yes, there are going to be any number of exceptions. However, are you suggesting that there isn't an inequality, or that -- generally speaking -- it's advantageous to be white?
Nope. I'm quite aware that institutionalized racism is a powerful force in society. I just don't believe that it is absolute in who it effects, and how.
 
As opposed to a minority born into great wealth. Individuals existing outside of demographics, and whatnot.

Heh don't see why you pointed that out. What I was discussing was never about people of different economic classes. It was about people of the same economic class that are different in skin color.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom