You know who originally said that line to Peter in Amazing Fantasy #15?
Nobody. The narrator tells us Peter realizes it on his own.
It was pretty clear IMO, at first, Parker decides to use his new found powers to seek revenge, during his conversation with Captain Stacy during dinner the captain says spiderman is a vigilante that only looks for criminals with a certain look therefore he's just looking for revenge. Finally in the bridge Parker sees that his powers can be put to better use when he saves the kid and he sees the reaction from the father being so happy after he saved the kid, he even tells Gwen about it so he decides to drop his quest for revenge and instead help the people of New York.The difference in screen-time is negligible at best, and Uncle Ben's death in ASM. Therefore I don't see how Uncle Ben's death has a more emotional impact in ASM.Which leads to Peter being depressed for a bit and looking for the killer, but then suddenly stops looking (for no apparent reason) and decides to take on the Lizard. In SM1 the thug steals Ben's car and shots him in the process (ignoring SM3 here), and Peter tracks down his Uncle's killer and pushes him out a window. Through this he learns that his Uncle would of wanted him to use his powers for good, not revenge A.K.A. With great power comes great responsibility. Uncle Ben's death is felt throughout the whole movie in SM1, while it's barely even mentioned again 20 minutes after it happens in ASM
You know who originally said that line to Peter in Amazing Fantasy #15?
Nobody. The narrator tells us Peter realizes it on his own.
Maybe whenHe'll have an internal monologue at the end of the movie. Then that'll appease all the naysayers.Gwen dies inevitably
It's funny that this movie did same thing Batman Begins did by doing the opposite of what was expected. Batman Begins bucked the comics and previous movies by wrapping up the Joe Chill plotline immediately (and smartly). ASM bucks the comics and the previous movies by leaving his quest for revenge unfulfilled.
ETA: I think Aunt May knew in the second movie. You just reminded me of the scene where Peter tells her that he could have stopped Joe Chill. Now I am sad.
If you mean ASM then I agree.
The only thing that actually matters about the killer of Uncle Ben was that it was a guy Peter could've stopped. It just so happens that in the comics and Spider-Man 1, Peter wasn't at the scene of the crime so they had to have him catch the killer to see his face and learn his mistake. In ASM, the entire thing unfolds all at once, so they didn't need to repeat the fact that Peter has to catch the guy to learn he was the one who did it. He knows it was the guy he let go since he killed Ben seconds later, thus learning the lesson.It's funny that this movie did same thing Batman Begins did by doing the opposite of what was expected. Batman Begins bucked the comics and previous movies by wrapping up the Joe Chill plotline immediately (and smartly). ASM bucks the comics and the previous movies by leaving his quest for revenge unfulfilled.
The only thing that actually matters about the killer of Uncle Ben was that it was a guy Peter could've stopped. It just so happens that in the comics and Spider-Man 1, Peter wasn't at the scene of the crime so they had to have him catch the killer to see his face and learn his mistake. In ASM, the entire thing unfolds all at once, so they didn't need to repeat the fact that Peter has to catch the guy to learn he was the one who did it. He knows it was the guy he let go since he killed Ben seconds later, thus learning the lesson.
The one thing I actually hated in Batman Begins was that Joe Chill was caught almost immediately and then ends up getting killed. I liked the fact that in the Batman mythos the killer gets away and thus is always the driving force for Bruce to fight crime. I think it works better for Spider-Man as well.
So who was that mysterious character in?the post-credits scene
It's been suggested to be pretty much everyone at this point (go through the list of Spider villains). No official confirmation.
I think it's safest to say it's Norman Osborn.
oh yeah. I remember there was a video floating around on youtube showing a behind the scenes thingy showing off the green goblins makeup. I was surprised he wasn't in this movie.
So who was that mysterious character in?the post-credits scene
I kind of doubt that was official (or maybe it was pre-production concepts for 2002 Spider-man?).. I think for those who have followed the film's development closely, Goblin was never suggested to be in this film?
I think it was Richard Parker, as a figment of Connors' mind, haunting him for the wrongdoing Connors did in order to fasttrack the formula, leading to Parker's death.
But it'll probably be Mysterio, who somehow knows what Connors did to Richard Parker and using it as leverage.
I guess not. The Lizard looked very cool. Kinda reminded me of Neogaf user MisterHero's avatar tho lol.
While the tomatometer is hardly a good reference, I agree with it;
SM1 89%
SM2 93%
SM3 63%
TASM 73%
So in effect, SM2 > SM1 >>>>>>> TASM > SM3
Ughhhh again with this bullshit. "THE LINE" was practically made famous by SM1 alone, not the comics. Ben never even says as much. Get over it people.Agreed. Spidey 1 handled it way better. In Amazing,Ben didn't even say the line. They awkwardly tiptoed around it. "something something something something RESPONSIBILITY". I laughed out loud.
Yeah, a lot of people like it about the same as Raimi's SM1 if not better (even than SM2 lol). I need to watch it again, but I think it's equal to SM1, below SM2, and bounds better than SM3.I think it's right too.
There seems to be a contigent of people who prefer ASM to SM1, but in my opinion... naw... SM1 was magic back in the day, while ASM is good but flawed.
Ughhhh again with this bullshit. "THE LINE" was practically made famous by SM1 alone, not the comics. Ben never even says as much. Get over it people.
oh yeah. I remember there was a video floating around on youtube showing a behind the scenes thingy showing off the green goblins makeup. I was surprised he wasn't in this movie.
I kind of doubt that was official (or maybe it was pre-production concepts for 2002 Spider-man?).. I think for those who have followed the film's development closely, Goblin was never suggested to be in this film?
I think it was this vid :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEZBhL5lpqg
It was a green goblin animatronic/makeup test done before Spider-man 2002... and then they chose the ugly power-rangers suit
The line was always there in some form or another, but not to do with Ben directly. It was something Peter 'realizes' and lives by. IIRC the first time this line actually comes out of Ben's mouth in the comics (through a flashback I think) was the same year SM1 came out and used it.I'm pretty sure I heard that line in the cartoons (probably the 1994 one). Could be my mind playing tricks on me... but I remember being familiar with it when I saw the movie.
This could've truly been fucking terrifying in a movie. But even with the audience's suspension of belief, I don't know how they could pull it off in explanation. Is it a mask, did he transform into having huge ears, etc. If they could get pas that, it would definitely be awesome.I think it was this vid :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEZBhL5lpqg
It was a green goblin animatronic/makeup test done before Spider-man 2002... and then they chose the ugly power-rangers suit
I think it's right too.
There seems to be a contigent of people who prefer ASM to SM1, but in my opinion... naw... SM1 was magic back in the day, while ASM is good but flawed.
Garfield was the better Spider-man for sure.
But I still prefer SM1 to ASM
SM2 > SM1 > ASM > shit on fire > SM3 > Green Lantern
I actually really hated how the killer sequence was done in ASM. It showed Pete was okay with being REALLY fucking petty and stealing from a douchebag convenience store clerk. Not to mention after Ben died all he did was try to hunt the guy down and get revenge. There wasn't really any remorse or even a god damn funeral. Too fucking rushed.
Also the crane sequence in the ending was awful. Like, uh, why can't he suddenly shoot onto the buildings like he has been doing the whole movie?
Lizard was a weak villain as well.
The crane-sequence was weird too in that regard, but it was a better display of "New Yorkers are with Spider-Man all the way" than that train-sequence.... no way anyone ever will stand up to a mad scientist with 4 metal arms growing out of his back.
Yeah, that scene in SM2 was pretty cheese-worthy but honestly that came out in a different era. We wouldn't even have all these other comic book movies like we do if it wasn't for Raimi's success with SM so I can give him some leeway with being the pioneer. With so many awesome comic movies since then and especially since the abomination of SM3 they are held to a higher standard with ASM and that scene is extremely out of place in a 2012 comic movie.
That's just my opinion though.
Raimi was hardly a pioneer. Blade, Spawn, Darkman, the Batman-films and X-Men opened the way for Spider-Man and comic-bookmovies in general.
Stop reminding me about the crane scene...i'm still cringing from it
I could at least understand your point of view but you listed Spawn in the middle there.
I'm not saying Raimi's SM movies were the first comic movies, obviously they weren't. But you can't really argue that the original Spider-man was the comic movie that blended spectacle with the source material so well that it brought people to see it in theaters.
Stop the hyperbole. It's not as cringe-worthy as this shit:
http://i.imgur.com/OPohH.png[IMG][/QUOTE]
What's so cringe-worthy about that?
What kind of face was he supposed to be making when he was stopping a train with his arms/legs?Stop the hyperbole. It's not as cringe-worthy as this shit:
![]()
Sure, Spider-Man was a huge success, but it's hard to call Raimi a pioneer, when the road you walk on is paved. The Batman-films, for better or worse, proved that people wanted super-hero-movies. Movies like Blade, Spawn and Darkman showed studios that comic-book-movies do not have to be aimed at just kids. All X-men and Spider-Man did was follow along on that path and take shit to the next level, it's not like Raimi/Sony pictures took a giant leap of faith by putting that movie out there.
But even if you disregard THAT, you cannot argue that a movie should be forgiven for certain design- and story-flaws, just because it existed in an era where it's the only one of it's kind.
What's so cringe-worthy about that?
What kind of face was he supposed to be making when he was stopping a train with his arms/legs?
Man, there is a straight up dance number in a big summer blockbuster.
Raimi has some balls
One of the best scenes in a major blockbuster in the past decade. Come at me bros.
Ughhhh again with this bullshit. "THE LINE" was practically made famous by SM1 alone, not the comics. Ben never even says as much. Get over it people.
Everything. Tobey's constipared face, his grunting, the way the New Yorker went "You mess with him, you mess with us". Lawl, like they can do shit to Doc Ock. So cheesy and Godawful.
Everything. Tobey's constipared face, his grunting, the way the commuters went "You mess with him, you mess with us". Lawl, like they can do shit to Doc Ock. So cheesy and Godawful.
Maybe a body injury pained expression as opposed to Tobey's constipated look? I know it's hard to distinguish the two if you regularly have a hard bowel movement but they actually are two different things.
Problem wasn't the face or even his quadruple chin, it was that it went on forever. He kept holding that face even after the train stopped, to the point where his face was red. When he passed out, it was like 'oh thank god'.What kind of face was he supposed to be making when he was stopping a train with his arms/legs?
I know, that's my point. So many people are basing this Peter/SM off of the old movies. "Hey that's not how Peter should act!" as if they know wtf they're talking about. Basically saying they want carbon copy of the previous rendition.90% of people seeing these movies are only seeing the movies. "With great power comes great responsibility" has become iconic in pop culture, whether it ever appeared a a comic or not. The movies are bigger than the comics. Deal with it.
Problem wasn't the face or even his quadruple chin, it was that it went on forever. He kept holding that face even after the train stopped, to the point where his face was red. When he passed out, it was like 'oh thank god'.
It was still a great scene imo, but his acting was too stiff there. There's a lot more you can do than just grind your teeth and squish your chin into your neck.
The final Spidey/GG fight from S-M1 is so great. It has a rawness and a brutality to it that the rest of the series lacked.