But come on,amazing?
Wow.That would mean you havent seen many films.
I've seen plenty of films. I'm not swayed at all by people who think the breadth of their movie viewing gives them the power to deem which films are and aren't allowed to be amazing. I thought TDKR was pretty amazing. That doesn't mean I'm making an apples to apples comparison to 2001: A Space Odyssey, though, since your categorical hierarchy seems to be so linear. For how far this movie, and the trilogy as a whole, elevated the comic book genre I think it is quite amazing. For how ambitiously and thoroughly it tackled the themes presented in all three movies, I think it's amazing. For how well done the cinematography was throughout the series, I think it's amazng. No, it's not Casablanca. It was never trying to be. It's a series of action blockbusters and, in my opinion, is possibly the most solid trilogy that's been made of the sort. I don't understand a lot of people's qualms with it.
A few points I'd like to argue:
-The last shot isn't about Robin Blake Griffin, it's about Batman. The mantle has been passed on and Batman has truly become more than a man.
-If you couldn't understand Bane that's unfortunate, but I understood him fine in both showings that I went to, so it's not an objective flaw.
-Aside from superheroes being the main characters, Avengers and TDKR have very little in common. I enjoyed both. Yes, I enjoyed TDKR more, but that doesn't detract from The Avengers. It'd be like comparing Abe Lincoln: Vampire Hunter to Spielberg's upcoming Lincoln film. I feel that it's a distraction of superficial commonalities that fall apart when you really dig into either film.
-Juno Temple's character seemed pointless. If anyone would like to explain her purpose to me I'd appreciate it.
Overall, probably my favorite in the trilogy. It just felt so... ambitious.
edit- also, I'm a little wishy-washy on Jonathan Crane's cameo. At first I thought it was charming, but now I think it's a bit hard to take seriously.