REMEMBER the dArk knight rises UnmaRked spOileR threAd | You only legend once

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joker playing a role in this movie could've been amazing. I could see him as a wildcard, not on Bane's side and not on Batman's, but doing his own thing, working with either faction when it's convenient for him.

It's a damn shame what happened.
 
Watched it for the second time today. I never noticed that the way Bale delivers one of his last lines is tricky. He tells Catwoman there's "No autopilot" when she asks something to the effect of how he plans to get the bomb out of Gotham. But after knowing the ending, when I watched the scene again today I took it as Bale saying "No, autopilot" as in he's going to use the autopilot. Understood most of Bane's dialogue this time around too.

was there a pause for the comma?

DAMN YOU GRAMMAR!
 
Watched it for the second time today. I never noticed that the way Bale delivers one of his last lines is tricky. He tells Catwoman there's "No autopilot" when she asks something to the effect of how he plans to get the bomb out of Gotham. But after knowing the ending, when I watched the scene again today I took it as Bale saying "No, autopilot" as in he's going to use the autopilot. Understood most of Bane's dialogue this time around too.

I think he says "No autopilot". That sets up so people think he died, then they see Fox with the autopilot hacked in scene to bring back the thought he is alive.
 
Watched it for the second time today. I never noticed that the way Bale delivers one of his last lines is tricky. He tells Catwoman there's "No autopilot" when she asks something to the effect of how he plans to get the bomb out of Gotham. But after knowing the ending, when I watched the scene again today I took it as Bale saying "No, autopilot" as in he's going to use the autopilot. Understood most of Bane's dialogue this time around too.

I see. That makes sense.

no-money-down1.jpg
 
The final moments of the movie emphasize that Batman is a symbol and not the person of Bruce Wayne. Bruce says something revealing to Jim Gordon to let him know who he is while at the same time emphasizing that it's important that who Batman is remain a secret to the population at large.

Effectively, it's Batman revealing himself to someone important to him but to no one else.

As for the cops breaking off pursuit, they're breaking it off because he's a wanted fugitive who killed their cities greatest hero and also there is a superior officer with his eyes shining for a promotion who wants to be the guy that caught Batman. He's not trying to reveal his identity. He's trying to capture him which would subsequently reveal his identity as a result.

Also, Robin became Robin because Bruce saw himself in him and also saw that he was similarly willing to fight to the last thr ough his leadership during the Gotham under siege part. He felt he had found someone who would be an appropriate successor when he left Gotham. It had nothing to do with him knowing who he was.

You are right that people wished to know who
I didn't say it's just a comic book. I said that them not inferring the truth based on circumstantial evidence was comic book logic. But most importantly it doesn't effect the overall narrative thrust of the movie.

1) you're right about the symbolism but the actual scenes emphasize his identity

2) it plants the seed - I think this issue could've been ENTIRELY voided by eliminating JGL's intuition moment - his 'knowing' that Bruce = Batman should've been omitted.

3) the pursuit only heightens the emphasis upon batman's identity and it broke my disbelief. The fact he gets away with from the entire force with a single handy jump right afterward was appallingly bad. Why not let Batman just get away normally?


Agree to disagree. I've got a bunch of other complaints but I'm on a cell phone :/
 
I mean after she (Bane) took control of the city.

Her staying embedded is how they managed to derail Gordon's plan. They gave her the radiation detector to mark the right truck, she marked the decoy to ruin their plan. Also, since she knew their plan she was able to rig the flooding of the reactor room to prevent them from succeeding. She also gave away the under cover US marines who went to get Fox.

Her staying under cover is a huge part of why they were able to get so close to succeeding.
 
Pretty sure Fox and Bruce talk about the autopilot long before.

Yes I know, but I'm talking about the ending in particular when he delivers the "No autopilot" line. Fox and Bruce don't talk about whether or not Bruce has fixed it when they get the Bat. Bruce just says "It works fine, even without the autopilot".
 
I assumed he just said it as a way of verbally displaying that he's not coming back. That way he can slip out and Batman will be no more. He likely wanted to reveal to his group (Gordon, Selina, Blake, Alfred, Fox) that he was okay when the time was right, by way of the will for Blake, and so on and so forth.

Plot hole #4872938

Also, how does Bruce do anything after he fakes his death? He has no money.

Selina fences all of her many many expensive stolen things? Imagination, man.
 
So...whilst its obviously the better film, TDKR feels in some ways like Matrix Revolutions:

- Final in a successful trilogy
- MUCH larger in scale than the last two
- Things get crazy. More tech/effects.
- All out war.
- An overwhelming sense of despair and hopelessness throughout the film.
- The lead character struggles with his own legend, and sacrifices himself/it to save his world.

Or is that comparison silly?
 
So...whilst its obviously the better film, TDKR feels in some ways like Matrix Revolutions:

- Final in a successful trilogy
- MUCH larger in scale than the last two
- Things get crazy. More tech/effects.
- All out war.
- An overwhelming sense of despair and hopelessness throughout the film.
- The lead character struggles with his own legend, and sacrifices himself/it to save his world.

Or is that comparison silly?

Matrix 2 and 3 were pretty awful so I personally don't care to compare them.
 
Plot hole #4872938

Also, how does Bruce do anything after he fakes his death? He has no money.

Did you not see that other thread about the 1% and all their off shore accounts hiding money all over the world? You don't think rich people have connections?

Your posts have a thousand plots holes! Hehe.
 
Matrix 2 and 3 were pretty awful so I personally don't care to compare them.

I know. That doesn't in any way change the similarities however.

That's like saying 'me and that guy are very similar, but he's a dick so im ignoring all those similarities '
 
So...whilst its obviously the better film, TDKR feels in some ways like Matrix Revolutions:

- Final in a successful trilogy
- MUCH larger in scale than the last two
- Things get crazy. More tech/effects.
- All out war.
- An overwhelming sense of despair and hopelessness throughout the film.
- The lead character struggles with his own legend, and sacrifices himself/it to save his world.

Or is that comparison silly?

The Dark Knight Rises actually had a real conclusion for Bruce Wayne and not a bullshit copout ending for Neo.
 
Plot hole #4872938

Also, how does Bruce do anything after he fakes his death? He has no money.

"They don't even go broke like the rest of us." - Selina Kyle

Bruce probably had secret stashes all over the world.

Edit: Revolutions was the ass end of Reloaded, and the ending was a return to status quo so they could launch their crappy mmorpg. Everything is worse than Matrix 1 and 2.
 
Just got back. Mehhhhh.

To me, Gotham City is the central character of any good Batman story. It's at its best treated like an island unto itself; Representative of the world, yet at the same time, sealed away from it.

There's something that takes me out of the Batman mythos when the US Army shows up at Gotham's doorstep, when the President comes on TV and addresses the city, when Batman spends half the movie in a prison far away.

That's part of why TDK is so great in comparison to BB and now TDKR. It's all Gotham, all the time, there are no external factors encroaching into it. It's its own private puppet theater where a guy in a batsuit makes sense. As soon as you start imposing upon it a place in the "real world", the sense starts peeling away.
 
Wasn't it kind of a dick move for Bats to make Gordon and the cops hang out on the ice while his sign lit up?

I'd be like "Fuck your flare, get us out of here!"
 
Just remembered another scene that I loved due to the dialogue:

That's a brazen costume for a cat burglar
Yeah? Who are you pretending to be?
Bruce Wayne, playboy
 
Just remembered another scene that I loved due to the dialogue:

That's a brazen costume for a cat burglar
Yeah? Who are you pretending to be?
Bruce Wayne, playboy

The delivery from Bale is hilarious there, like he's really straining to put a smile on his face while he says that
 
Wasn't it kind of a dick move for Bats to make Gordon and the cops hang out on the ice while his sign lit up?

I'd be like "Fuck your flare, get us out of here!"

First few steps are fine, it was when you got out deep, you were done.
 
So...whilst its obviously the better film, TDKR feels in some ways like Matrix Revolutions:

- Final in a successful trilogy
- MUCH larger in scale than the last two
- Things get crazy. More tech/effects.
- All out war.
- An overwhelming sense of despair and hopelessness throughout the film.
- The lead character struggles with his own legend, and sacrifices himself/it to save his world.

Or is that comparison silly?

Main difference is, I loved the ending to TDKR.
 
That's part of why TDK is so great in comparison to BB and now TDKR. It's all Gotham, all the time, there are no external factors encroaching into it. It's its own private puppet theater where a guy in a batsuit makes sense. As soon as you start imposing upon it a place in the "real world", the sense starts peeling away.

Did you forget the Hong Kong sequences?

Man, everyone is nit picking in this thread, it's ridiculous!
 
Just got back. Mehhhhh.

To me, Gotham City is the central character of any good Batman story. It's at its best treated like an island unto itself; Representative of the world, yet at the same time, sealed away from it.

There's something that takes me out of the Batman mythos when the US Army shows up at Gotham's doorstep, when the President comes on TV and addresses the city, when Batman spends half the movie in a prison far away.

That's part of why TDK is so great in comparison to BB and now TDKR. It's all Gotham, all the time, there are no external factors encroaching into it. It's its own private puppet theater where a guy in a batsuit makes sense. As soon as you start imposing upon it a place in the "real world", the sense starts peeling away.

I agree it's a little jarring, and the President stuff could have been more off-hand, but you go and take over an American city, and you can sure as hell bet the military would get involved.
 
Just got back. Mehhhhh.

To me, Gotham City is the central character of any good Batman story. It's at its best treated like an island unto itself; Representative of the world, yet at the same time, sealed away from it.

There's something that takes me out of the Batman mythos when the US Army shows up at Gotham's doorstep, when the President comes on TV and addresses the city, when Batman spends half the movie in a prison far away.

That's part of why TDK is so great in comparison to BB and now TDKR. It's all Gotham, all the time, there are no external factors encroaching into it. It's its own private puppet theater where a guy in a batsuit makes sense. As soon as you start imposing upon it a place in the "real world", the sense starts peeling away.

Are we retconning Hong Kong from TDK?
 
Just got back. Mehhhhh.

To me, Gotham City is the central character of any good Batman story. It's at its best treated like an island unto itself; Representative of the world, yet at the same time, sealed away from it.

There's something that takes me out of the Batman mythos when the US Army shows up at Gotham's doorstep, when the President comes on TV and addresses the city, when Batman spends half the movie in a prison far away.

That's part of why TDK is so great in comparison to BB and now TDKR. It's all Gotham, all the time, there are no external factors encroaching into it. It's its own private puppet theater where a guy in a batsuit makes sense. As soon as you start imposing upon it a place in the "real world", the sense starts peeling away.

On the flip side, I would find it odd that the government allowed a terrorist to take the city hostage for 5 months and not do anything about it.
 
Watched it for the second time today. I never noticed that the way Bale delivers one of his last lines is tricky. He tells Catwoman there's "No autopilot" when she asks something to the effect of how he plans to get the bomb out of Gotham. But after knowing the ending, when I watched the scene again today I took it as Bale saying "No, autopilot" as in he's going to use the autopilot. Understood most of Bane's dialogue this time around too.

That just fits with the ending being alfred's dream and batman dying and robin taking over as the new batman
 
On the flip side, I would find it odd that the government allowed a terrorist to take the city hostage for 5 months and not do anything about it.

The terrorists had a nuclear weapon they threatened to use at the sign of interference.

The US government also ignored that and sent special forces disguised as aid workers, and that failed too.
 

It really did feel, in a weird way, like Bane almost had sympathy for Wayne in that moment. Bane is actually a genuinely interesting character. I lol'd at seeing Tom Hardy in the flashback sans mask for some reason, hahahaha.

The craziest rumour I read that didn't come true was that JGL turned out to be a spy for the League of Shadows that gets shot in the head near the end of the movie by one of Talia's goons or something.
 
Did you forget the Hong Kong sequences?
Haha, I guess so.

Well, it was a short sequence and it was a city at nighttime, it's not fundamentally divorced from Gotham. And it was a good testbed for the sonar-vision gadget he used later in the movie.

I guess I just don't dig him being in stone-walled, non-urban places. It's not Batman without towering skyscrapers and urban decay.
 
It really did feel, in a weird way, like Bane almost had sympathy for Wayne in that moment. Bane is actually a genuinely interesting character. I lol'd at seeing Tom Hardy in the flashback sans mask for some reason, hahahaha.

The craziest rumour I read that didn't come true was that JGL turned out to be a spy for the League of Shadows that gets shot in the head near the end of the movie by one of Talia's goons or something.

He felt bad for Wayne because he was a former member of the League.
 
Actually dude... that is the perfect explanation. He has billions stashed away.

"They don't even go broke like the rest of us." - Selina Kyle

Bruce probably had secret stashes all over the world.

This was my assumption too. No way in hell do I believe Bruce is totally broke. Both he and Alfred are fucking rich and off to have their happy endings.

I am wondering if Alfred and Bruce will ever interact again... that scene at the end may be enough for Alfred, knowing that Bruce is finally okay and wanting to live a life, but I'm just curious.
 
Another line.. that was kind of a throwaway but kind of interesting...

Is Bruce talking to Alfred about why he doesn't give some of his tech to law enforcement, and he's like "One's man tool.. is another man's weapon"

And watching Begins
It dawns on me, Ra's uses his dad's train as a weapon.. as well as a weapon from Wayne Enterprises
Technically The Joker turned Batman's weapon against him, if you count Harvey Dent as his way out
And Talia/Bane turn Bruce's nuclear device against him in Rises.. as well as the Tumbler.
 
Another line.. that was kind of a throwaway but kind of interesting...

Is Bruce talking to Alfred about why he doesn't give some of his tech to law enforcement, and he's like "One's man tool.. is another man's weapon"

What scene was that? I can't remember
 
Rewatchced Begins over lunch. Really put into light the importance of Wane's character, and the symbolisms of enduring icons and symbols in the absence of people. The return of the League of Shadows represents the latter, how even without Ra's al Ghul and the league effectively dismantled they still endured, again with the desire to destroy Gotham, simply for what the mission represented. Bruce's sacrifice of the Batman character represents the exact same thing: the endurance of something more than human.

And it isn't until the end of the film that Bruce Wane, the man, finally finds himself with a future. He essentially didn't exist for the three films, because no matter how Wane viewed Batman as a symbol, Batman was always him more than Wane was. It isn't until TDKR ends that Batman becomes the symbol he's been built up to be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom