• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Romney: Olympic prep "disconcerting". Cameron: London isn't "middle of nowhere" Utah

Status
Not open for further replies.
And some shouldn't have been allowed to compete in the Olympics after testing positive for banned substances. What a disgrace.

Yeah it's pretty sad Johnson had his gold stripped and awarded to Lewis, due to Johnson's positive drug test. And then years later, when it came to light that Lewis was juicing too, Johnson said Lewis' medal should be stripped like his was, and Lewis just blew him off like, who cares if I was on steroids, everyone was ? Like he had no idea why Johnson would be pissed off after that info came out.
 

SteveWD40

Member
LOL

The security for the London Olympics is going down exactly as we planned all along....

Plans change, shit happens, it's the ability to adapt and think on the fly that defines success, things went to shit and we called in the army.

Try and dig around to spin this however you like but it's not just the Brits taking a chunk out of Romney.
 
Yeah it's pretty sad Johnson had his gold stripped and awarded to Lewis, due to Johnson's positive drug test. And then years later, when it came to light that Lewis was juicing too, Johnson said Lewis' medal should be stripped like his was, and Lewis just blew him off like, who cares if I was on steroids, everyone was ? Like he had no idea why Johnson would be pissed off after that info came out.

I agree. His actual quote was "who cares I failed a drug test". I used to really look up to the guy as a kid.
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
The problem is the only one who was speaking the truth was Cameron, Romney just showed how bad his advisers are.

Romney's comments were perfectly valid. It's certainly a lot harder in a place like London than Salt Lake City, but if stories were out there about 78 of 80 security guards not showing up, I'd be disconcerted too.
 
Plans change

The plan fell apart due to extremely poor, incompetent, security contracting.

I have no dog in the hunt. I hate Romney's politics and don't like his character either. I'd never vote for him, but most of the spin in this thread is coming from the British govt and its wounded citizens.

And to hold up Carl Lewis, as some champion for criticizing Romney, given his shady history in the Olympics, is funny.

And I think the majority of the American critics of Romney's comments about the disconcerting situation in London, are simply his political enemies, looking to score points.
 
"England is just a small island"

Yeah, but you know what he meant. It's a reflection of how inconsequential the UK has become, a shadow of its former self. The country is small. The part about not making things the rest of the world wants to buy and would have been invaded by Hitler are accurate.
 

ChiTownBuffalo

Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
What's a wazzock?
 
Romney's comments were perfectly valid. It's certainly a lot harder in a place like London than Salt Lake City, but if stories were out there about 78 of 80 security guards not showing up, I'd be disconcerted too.

So disconcerted you wouldn't watch the news again? They were already replaced by Soldiers who are obviously better suited for that particular role long before his comments, he just comes across as badly informed.

Yeah, but you know what he meant. It's a reflection of how inconsequential the UK has become, a shadow of its former self. The country is small. The part about not making things the rest of the world wants to buy and would have been invaded by Hitler are accurate.

It's more an reflection on how ignorant Romney is.
 

ChiTownBuffalo

Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider

ChiTownBuffalo

Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
Because the Americans have a fine history of taking criticism from visiting foreign nationals on the chin and not getting a little pissy about it don't they?

Dude. You ate our food then burned our shit down.

british-army-burning-the-white-house-in-1814-during-the-war-of-1812.jpg
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
Yeah, but you know what he meant. It's a reflection of how inconsequential the UK has become, a shadow of its former self. The country is small. The part about not making things the rest of the world wants to buy and would have been invaded by Hitler are accurate.

If not having an inhumane empire and turning towards socialist welfare state policies is 'a shadow of its former self' then I'm happy for the UK to be a shadow, thanks.

The part about having been invaded by Hitler if it were joined to mainland Europe is indeed accurate, but irrelevant if intended to be a slight. It's rather like saying the US would have been invaded by Germany if it were very small and between France and Germany. Well sure, it's true, but so what?
 
Yeah, but you know what he meant. It's a reflection of how inconsequential the UK has become, a shadow of its former self. The country is small. The part about not making things the rest of the world wants to buy and would have been invaded by Hitler are accurate.
The UK will never again have a competitive manufacturing industry and it is ridiculous to try and compete with other countries on that level when people like Mitt Romney encourage outsourcing. However, our economy has vast potential if it was restructured and likely will have a resurgence given the socioeconomic shift in China and India.

Also, plenty of countries buy up the output of our media industries.
 
Because the Americans have a fine history of taking criticism from visiting foreign nationals on the chin and not getting a little pissy about it don't they?


Hahaha.
You're basically admitting I'm right.

I'm sure if Cameron came to the US and made some negative remark, many Americans would react badly. But what of it ?

The comment you quoted me on was an observation. And your reply is, you guys would do the same thing too !
 

akira28

Member
He also spilled the beans on a "secret" meeting with the head of MI-6. I'm starting to think this is going to go down as the worst presidential candidate foreign policy tour in U.S. election history, I certainly can't think of one which was worse.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-news-blog/2012/jul/26/mitt-romney-britain-gaffes

MI6 refuses to confirm #Romney meeting, fueling speculation he may have been fooled by an Austin Powers impersonator #RomneyShambles
lol
 

SteveWD40

Member
If not having an inhumane empire and turning towards socialist welfare state policies is 'a shadow of its former self' then I'm happy for the UK to be a shadow, thanks.

The part about having been invaded by Hitler if it were joined to mainland Europe is indeed accurate, but irrelevant if intended to be a slight. It's rather like saying the US would have been invaded by Germany if it were very small and between France and Germany. Well sure, it's true, but so what?

Or saying that, if not for the French intervention on their behalf the US war of Independence would never have gone the way it did...

History is funny that way when you change major factors and play fan-fiction.

Why on Earth is Romney getting meetings with MI6 anyway.

It's an odd one, maybe it's a tradition from the Cold War?
 

ChiTownBuffalo

Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
Hahaha.
You're basically admitting I'm right.

I'm sure if Cameron came to the US and made some negative remark, many Americans would react badly. But what of it ?

The comment you quoted me on was an observation. And your reply is, you guys would do the same thing too !

I guess the difference here is that Cameron is the sitting PM.

Romney is someone who wants to lead.
 
would have been invaded by Hitler are accurate.

Learn your fucking history numb nuts...the UK was never in danger of invasion after September 1940, after the RAF defeated the Luftwaffe.

The fact this took place 18mths BEFORE the US could be arsed to enter WWII has obviously escaped your somewhat limited intelligence.

Fucking Hollywood and their bullshit version of history has (un)educated 3 generations of Americans about WWII.
 
If not having an inhumane empire and turning towards socialist welfare state policies is 'a shadow of its former self' then I'm happy for the UK to be a shadow, thanks.

The part about having been invaded by Hitler if it were joined to mainland Europe is indeed accurate, but irrelevant if intended to be a slight. It's rather like saying the US would have been invaded by Germany if it were very small and between France and Germany. Well sure, it's true, but so what?

Well I thought his comments were bang on. He said the country was small, doesn't make things the people of the world want and would have been invaded by Hitler had it not been separated from Europe by water. I think some people took umbrage with that comment. The implication seems to be the UK is powerless and inconsequential.
 

SteveWD40

Member
Learn your fucking history numb nuts...the UK was never in danger of invasion after September 1940, after the RAF defeated the Luftwaffe.

The fact this took place 18mths BEFORE the US could be arsed to enter WWII has obviously escaped your somewhat limited intelligence.

Fucking Hollywood and their bullshit version of history has (un)educated 3 generations of Americans about WWII.

Well, to be fair the Battle of Britain was significant as they needed to cross the channel to get their land units here, if that wasn't the case it could have been much easier.

Fact is it's a fucking stupid argument, as I pointed out above as we are not joined to the continent.

doesn't make things the people of the world want

BAE systems are one of the worlds leading arms manufacturers / dealers, we just tend not to advertise it as it's not very PC.
 

Shiggy

Member
Mitt Romney seems just stupid enough to become American president. Finally a worthy successor to George W. Bush jun.
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
Learn your fucking history numb nuts...the UK was never in danger of invasion after September 1940, after the RAF defeated the Luftwaffe.

The fact this took place 18mths BEFORE the US could be arsed to enter WWII has obviously escaped your somewhat limited intelligence.

Fucking Hollywood and their bullshit version of history has (un)educated 3 generations of Americans about WWII.

I think the point is that they couldn't use blitzkrieg against the British because there's water in the way.

I mean, it's still a completely irrelevant point. Because there was water in the way Britain had a powerful navy, so Germany couldn't risk a sea attack, and Britain won the ensuing air battle, thus ensuring German would be unable to invade.

Like I said, it's like saying that 'only reason' the US wasn't invaded during WW2 is that they are huge and on the other side of the world to the rest of the fighting. Well yeah, sure, it's true. It's also completely asinine.
 
Well I thought his comments were bang on. He said the country was small, doesn't make things the people of the world want and would have been invaded by Hitler had it not been separated from Europe by water. I think some people took umbrage with that comment. The implication seems to be the UK is powerless and inconsequential.

His points are irrelevant:

Yes the UK is a small country but it didn't stop us from conquering most of the world

Doesn't make things the people of the world want? Nonsense, because we wouldn't have a functioning economy otherwise. We may not have a strong manufacturing industry but then neither does the USA (thanks to people like Romney making a fortune outsourcing).

The Hitler comment: If ifs and buts were candy and nuts then we'd all have a Merry Christmas.
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
Well I thought his comments were bang on. He said the country was small, doesn't make things the people of the world want and would have been invaded by Hitler had it not been separated from Europe by water. I think some people took umbrage with that comment. The implication seems to be the UK is powerless and inconsequential.

It's obviously intended to mean that the UK is powerless and inconsequential. But it's halfway between not being the slight he thinks it is (I would rather the UK be inconsequential than consequential because of empire), and completely asinine counter-factual statements.

If he'd really wanted to shade the UK he should have pointed out that the UK is, in many important socio-economic metrics, behind both Europe and the USA in important factors such as social mobility and GINI. That would actually be a real, legitimate criticism. Instead he criticised the UK on grounds that only a dipshit could think were important, such as not having the biggest penis or the house with the most number of bathrooms.
 
I think the point is that they couldn't use blitzkrieg against the British because there's water in the way.

I mean, it's still a completely irrelevant point. Because there was water in the way Britain had a powerful navy, so Germany couldn't risk a sea attack, and Britain won the ensuing air battle, thus ensuring German would be unable to invade.

Like I said, it's like saying that 'only reason' the US wasn't invaded during WW2 is that they are huge and on the other side of the world to the rest of the fighting. Well yeah, sure, it's true. It's also completely asinine.

All true, but what pisses me off is this constant retort by Americans that they saved us from Hitler and German invasion...they didn't.

We saved ourselves from that, what America did do however, was ensure mainland Europe was liberated.

Without America, the worst that would have happened is that the UK would have 'accepted' German domination of mainland Europe, while we turned the other cheek, minded our own business and kept our Empire.

It's well documented that Hitler would have found such an 'arrangement' the best outcome for all concerned.

That fact that we didn't take the easy route, is something that we dont get enough recognition for.
 

Dead Man

Member
Well I thought his comments were bang on. He said the country was small, doesn't make things the people of the world want and would have been invaded by Hitler had it not been separated from Europe by water. I think some people took umbrage with that comment. The implication seems to be the UK is powerless and inconsequential.

LOL, the US would have been invaded by Hitler too if it had not been separated from Europe by water. And the US is not really a manufacturing economy these days either. And why does that matter?
 

SteveWD40

Member
in many important socio-economic metrics, behind both Europe and the USA in important factors such as social mobility and GINI

Stats be damned, when I see a Tent City in the UK or people living in the Storm Drains I will say we have issues like the US does.

It's well documented that Hitler would have found such an 'arrangement' the best outcome for all concerned.

Hitler actively lobbied the UK upper class / Fascists to make sure he didn't have to go to war with us, invading the UK was the last thing he actually wanted (early on at least).
 
Well, to be fair the Battle of Britain was significant as they needed to cross the channel to get their land units here, if that wasn't the case it could have been much easier.

Fact is it's a fucking stupid argument, as I pointed out above as we are not joined to the continent.



BAE systems are one of the worlds leading arms manufacturers / dealers, we just tend not to advertise it as it's not very PC.

The point is had Britain been joined the Germans would have run over the top of them, just like they did to the BEF at Dunkirk when the Brits were looking at a conditional surrender.

As far as BAE goes, he was talking about what the people of the world want, things like computers, cars, cell phones. The UK makes practically nothing people want.
 

SteveWD40

Member
The point is had Britain been joined the Germans would have run over the top of them

I am trying to decide if you are trolling ala Korey or just really stupid. you seem to be ignoring the many reasons posted that this is dumb and you should feel dumb.

The UK makes practically nothing people want.

Weapons and dodgy financial markets are in very high demand actually.
 
All true, but what pisses me off is this constant retort by Americans that they saved us from Hitler and German invasion...they didn't.

We saved ourselves from that, what America did do however, was ensure mainland Europe was liberated.

Without America, the worst that would have happened is that the UK would have 'accepted' German domination of mainland Europe, while we turned the other cheek, minded our own business and kept our Empire.

It's well documented that Hitler would have found such an 'arrangement' the best outcome for all concerned.

If Hitler successfully consolidated his power in mainland Europe, and the US stayed neutral, I think Nazi Germany would have eventually come after Britain too. I'd like to see the documentation you refer to. But it's not something that can be proven. It's hypothetical.

Yeah the Olympics will be entertaining.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom