BruiserBear
Banned
My simple answer. No.
I believe it's quite possible the PS4 will be Sony's final game console.
I believe it's quite possible the PS4 will be Sony's final game console.
These two sentinces are sort of amazing together. Bravo!I think the ps4 will be like the vita: a generic piece of hardware that looks good on paper and has no defining characteristic. As long as MS and Nintendo don't knock it out of the park, it should sell decently, just based on the fact that it exists.
As it currently stands, they have three franchises that still ship and/or sell 5-6 million units with Gran Turismo, Uncharted, and God of War, but they have by far the biggest first party development and second party publishing operation of any console maker.
Since they're not targeting Nintendo, I feel they need to try and take Microsoft head on in the 5-10+ million selling multiplayer focused game category, and they need to do it early and often next generation, along with release at least two of their 5-6 million selling existing series in the first year of the system's life.
I'm not sure if they actually have the staff that can do this, but they should certainly be making it a huge focus even if they need to go to currently successful multiplayer studios and try to poach as much staff as possible.
These two sentinces are sort of amazing together. Bravo!
they shouldn't have developed vita, it was a complete waste of everybody's resources
It's PS3's off year. Most developers have moved onto PS4 and/or Vita. PlayStation All Stars is your safe of grace.they shouldn't have developed vita, it was a complete waste of everybody's resources
this years PS3 exclusive lineup was terrible, I haven't bought a single GOOD exclusive PS3 game this year....what the fuck happened?
If the major Sony first party devs are working on games for PS4 already, then it should be ok.
My question to GAF is, considering what we've seen with present day Sony, can we naturally assume there will be a change with the PS4 when it debuts? Will the PS4 kick off a change in culture and philosophy towards a more directed, ultimate goal that the entire company wants to achieve, or will it continue on with the also ran, "me too" habits that Sony of late have adopted?
Not many games ever sell Halo numbersThe problem is they spread themselves out too fucking much
They are Franchise Bloated
I understand it from the Gamer perspective of more content, differentiation, but it really dilutes the product
On the PS3 they had Uncharted + Killzone + Resistance + MAG + Warhawk as franchises
Rather focus on 1-2 main titles and make them superb, they stretch themselves out and try to accumulate sales though all of them
MS - Halo sells 10 Million Copies
Sony - Killzone + Resistance + MAG + Warhawk/Starhawk combined sell 8 million
That looks so weird
It takes Sony 5 titles to even get close to one title MS releases
You have to add Uncharted in some quasi-shooter way to match or surpass it, like the Sony Family scenario, so the Gun Shooter Genre
So, despite the expectation of repeating all the same mistakes, you think there's going to automatically be a different positive outcome in spite of it? How very Sony of you!Well, I think ps4 won't be a commercial flop like the vita, simply because Sony actually has a presence in the home console market and Nintendo is currently playing catch up in terms of dev support. Different situation.
Sony's big problem is that they assumed they'd always be top tier and therefore could get away with charging top tier pricing. If the economy had stayed good, they may have even gotten away with it for longer... but when money is tight, and you look at 2 TVs on the display floor and one looks only slightly better, but comes with twice the cost........
Yeah... That pretty much sums up everything of theirs.
So, despite the expectation of repeating all the same mistakes, you think there's going to automatically be a different positive outcome in spite of it? How very Sony of you!
My question to GAF is, considering what we've seen with present day Sony, can we naturally assume there will be a change with the PS4 when it debuts? Will the PS4 kick off a change in culture and philosophy towards a more directed, ultimate goal that the entire company wants to achieve, or will it continue on with the also ran, "me too" habits that Sony of late have adopted?
So, despite the expectation of repeating all the same mistakes, you think there's going to automatically be a different positive outcome in spite of it? How very Sony of you!
I think you need to focus on exclusives people want. Just having them isn't enough. PS3 arguably has the most exclusives of any of the 3 console manufacturers.This is the reason why exclusives will be as important as ever.
See, that still strikes me as "also ran" territory. Microsoft has that sector locked up. Not saying Sony can't plant their flag there, but I think Sony really needs to focus on something that isn't already being monopolized by a competitor. Unless you're suggesting that they shouldn't go the FPS route instead angling for another genre entirely. As you said, they do have the cinematic single player locked up, but that hasn't proven anywhere near as successful. It isn't 1997 anymore.Well, so far the closest thing to a vision they've had is cinematic single-player heavy games, which does do pretty well in the review circuit and forums like NeoGAF, but not so great in the "software that sells consoles, preferably at the 5-10+ million unit per game level".
As it currently stands, they have three franchises that still ship and/or sell 5-6 million units with Gran Turismo, Uncharted, and God of War, but they have by far the biggest first party development and second party publishing operation of any console maker.
Since they're not targeting Nintendo, I feel they need to try and take Microsoft head on in the 5-10+ million selling multiplayer focused game category, and they need to do it early and often next generation, along with release at least two of their 5-6 million selling existing series in the first year of the system's life.
I'm not sure if they actually have the staff that can do this, but they should certainly be making it a huge focus even if they need to go to currently successful multiplayer studios and try to poach as much staff as possible.
They need to fix their stupid fucking Corporate + Network Infrastructure
Stuff released in JP is different from NA which is different from EU
I mean that is really horrible
How can MS release it every fucking week on the clock, everywhere
Is it that fucking hard?
I say fire Jack, remove Grace, Put Yoshida as Overlord of Sony Stores, rather than just the studios
Kaz goes to do his CEO role, Yoshida gets full control of all 3 SCE sites, conforms them to 1
I hate that there's 3 different presidents, who then have 3 vice presidents, who have 3 minions under them, so lost in translation
The actual reality is that they are closing in on 70 million sold with PS3, selling strong in all regions after seven years on the market, have all of the third party support available, have arguably the strongest and most diverse first party studio lineup heading into next gen and have been neck and neck with MS all gen.
Yes it has been humbling for them to be knocked down from the highs of PS2, but to act like they aren't in a position to make a strong statement on the direction of next gen is just inaccurate. Frankly, anything can happen next gen just like it did this gen
As for Vita. Vita is an incredible little piece of hardware, launched at a reasonable price point, into a market place that isn't that interested. It's that simple. 3DS faced exactly the same last year and arguably still is stagnating outside of Japan. The market changed very quickly in a short time.
Of course it's relative. PS3 sold 14 million last year, and hasn't had a price drop in a long time. If they manage to reinstate more momentum with the new redesign that will be even more impressiveAccording to Sony´s numbers they sold 2,6 million units of PS2 and PS3 less compared to the year before. Strong is relative.
I think you need to focus on exclusives people want. Just having them isn't enough. PS3 arguably has the most exclusives of any of the 3 console manufacturers.
As it currently stands, they have three franchises that still ship and/or sell 5-6 million units with Gran Turismo, Uncharted, and God of War, but they have by far the biggest first party development and second party publishing operation of any console maker.
The problem is they spread themselves out too fucking much
They are Franchise Bloated
I understand it from the Gamer perspective of more content, differentiation, but it really dilutes the product
On the PS3 they had Uncharted + Killzone + Resistance + MAG + Warhawk as franchises
Rather focus on 1-2 main titles and make them superb, they stretch themselves out and try to accumulate sales though all of them
MS - Halo sells 10 Million Copies
Sony - Killzone + Resistance + MAG + Warhawk/Starhawk combined sell 8 million
That looks so weird
It takes Sony 5 titles to even get close to one title MS releases
You have to add Uncharted in some quasi-shooter way to match or surpass it, like the Sony Family scenario, so the Gun Shooter Genre
Early exclusives and new IPs will be a big dealBecause Sony have strong 1st party studios I think the PS4 can launch with great software in its first year, also rumours with Sony going for skmething less confusing than the cell they will have 3rd parties onboard. So its a matter of Microsoft exclusives vs Sony exclusives, and lately Sony has been good with exclusives. We dont know what Sucker Punch, Guerilla Games team 2, Evolution, Polyphonic and Naughty Dogg Team 2 have been developing si ce their last game, I am sure they are developing aome vig PS4 exclusives.
My simple answer. No.
I believe it's quite possible the PS4 will be Sony's final game console.
For overall company success, sure, corporate culture matters a lot, but for their gaming division, I'm not really sure how much it matters. They'll have good hardware that won't be too expensive this time, and they have studios that make great games and know how to use that hardware.
They've lost their ways in Marketing more than anything. Where Microsoft knew how to make people's eyes open with wonder, with ads for Gears, Halo or Kinect, SCE was for longest time just trying to repeat stuff that was working in the past, with not much success. They fell early, and there's no surefire formula for climbing back on top after that.
I think the bigger problem all the consoles will face in the next few years is the changing market, which IMO is what's making Vita do so much worse than PSP now, more than any lack of corporate culture on Sony's part.
With all due respect i find this argument pretty silly.. i mean its not like that they have fixed 100 developers and they asked them to develop 10 games when they could only have developed 4 games..
I think sony is the only company which give each game team as much time as they want.. and they have games getting developed in 4 yrs, 3 yrs without any pressure from sony..
Problem i think is that not all developers are equal.. and secondly sony marketing.. and thirdly sony marketing..
they dont know how to market and hype their game.. some of the gems are not even getting deserving sales..
I think you are discounting the areas in which they have started to turn it around PSN+/ Sony Mobile/Pictures/Cameras. I do admit they need to prove themselves with hardware lunches after the PS3 and Vita initial performance, but they're trending up as a company.
Resistance 3 came out after three years. Killzone 3 after two.Sales do matter though
Did we really need a Resistance 3 or Killzone 3 that quickly or even Starhawk
Sony isn't a charity, they might make their money back via slow burn, but making droplet noises in a huge fucking ocean that is the video game industry doesn't help
They should use resources to have 2-3 main games that all studios help/work out
Then if titles sell boatloads, you subsidize pet projects for the studios
It's like Sony is held hostage by their own studios
Look @ TLG, I mean come the fuck on, even GT to a point
At least Santa Monica/Naughty Dog deliver in fucking spades
They should get the lions share, if they fuck up, other studios with-in their eco-system have a chance to shine over take
Create competition with-in or have synergy that studios talk to each other and give advice
Sony shows themselves off as a Melting Pot, while really they are like a salad bowl, each section offed and sometimes mixed together
Please quantify how it is a wreck?Sony is doing a lot better in other facets, specifically the smartphone arena with their "One Sony" initiative, however this thread was mostly focused towards gaming which is still a wreck.
Some things I think will change for the better, and some for the worse.How do you see these things changing for PS4?
Agreed.
The fact that they have the guts to raise the price of the PS3 late during the gen tells me that they may still have the same "elite/corporate" attitude next gen.
Please quantify how it is a wreck?
Are you talking about sales or your opinion?What worries me most about the PS4 is the state of Sony first party games. Everyone always mentions it as a strength and they do have a bunch of franchises, but none of them are particularly good. Uncharted 3 was disappointing, God of War is milked to death and no longer exciting, GT5 has been significantly outdone by Forza and Criterion, resistance, infamous and killzone are alright but no one buys them. They release a ton of 7/10 or 8/10 level first party games with no franchise having an impact like Gears or Halo. I think the hardware will be fine but I have no confidence in Sony to release quality exclusives for it or to have a functional UI.
I'm surprised they didn't secure Monster Hunter on the Vita. Who was sleeping at the wheel there?
I think they will fine, but they're far from the juggernaut of the PS2 era. I doubt will ever see that Sony.
I'm talking about consoles
On the PS3 they had Uncharted + Killzone + Resistance + MAG + Warhawk as franchises
I'm talking about consoles
Both handhelds are being affected by a shrinking market. Has nothing to do with corporate culture.
See, that still strikes me as "also ran" territory. Microsoft has that sector locked up. Not saying Sony can't plant their flag there, but I think Sony really needs to focus on something that isn't already being monopolized by a competitor. Unless you're suggesting that they shouldn't go the FPS route instead angling for another genre entirely. As you said, they do have the cinematic single player locked up, but that hasn't proven anywhere near as successful. It isn't 1997 anymore.
Resistance 3 came out after three years. Killzone 3 after two.