Just what is Sony doing with Vita? If they've given-up, they should just kill it.

Oh come on, your post (not yourself) was just silly. Access to 70 games means it has the smallest games library out there. It offers not so much else. Why would average consumer care for such a deal?

Yeah but look at the great games that are part of that 70 figure. My point was that no one is looking at the entire library to make a choice, they are looking at a few games that make them want to buy the system.
 
I've been waiting for a good reason to buy a Vita since launch, but it hasn't come yet (for me). As much as I know I'd enjoy WipeEout 2048, Uncharted: Golden Abyss and Gravity Rush, three games is not enough for me to justify buying a new console. There doesn't seem to be anything 'must have' on the horizon either.

I feel pretty much the same about my 3DS at the moment, but at least we're guaranteed some great Nintendo games for it. Actually the upcoming games list for it is starting to look pretty decent.
 
The AC:L thread sort of confirmed the Vita's identity crisis for me. For all the "console on the go" claims, when reviews started dinging AC:L for being inferior to the console version there was some protest that it was unfair to compare the game to anything other than handheld standards. The Vita is trying to be a console in your hands, but the compromises involved make the experience imperfect and it winds up appealing to only a small subset of gamers. Which probably would have still worked out in Japan, except Sony doubled down on the West and expected 3rd parties to support the platform in Japan. The western market at large didn't bite on the compromised console experience, 3rd parties in Japan were lukewarm on the Vita, and now here we are.
 
Saying cold facts here: Nintendo have been very open about how disappointed they are with the 3DS' performance outside of Japan. It's clear to me that in the West, iOS and Android have almost completely taken over the market.
I mean that whenever anyone says "lol Japan has bad taste in gaming" I'll say "yeah, the West prefers Angry Birds over Dragon Quest".
 
Sony admitting they screwed up with a device and failed to support it with the proper software, marketing and attention it needed to succeed? and actually killing it altogether?

Sony admitting they did something wrong?

lol

When someone makes this kind of comment that actually shows how misinformed they are they should be expelled from the thread because you know they are blinding themselves to the actual topic.
Do you remember the PSN outage? What did Sony do?

What you did is the same thing as if I had come and said that Nintendo never acknowledged the 3DS had a slow start, which is a big lie since they cut the price down and announced the Ambassador program.

yes. Keep posting random pictures of what I assume to be Yoshida and other people at Sony without giving any context assuming I would understand it as if my life depended on being constantly up to date on minor news around a company that makes a console I dont own

can you please respond to the post with a counter argument or source to a situation that proved opposite to my statement instead of posting a fucking picture?

If you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about then why come here in the first place? You read "Vita" and "doom" in the same paragraph and felt like this thread was going to be food for your hatred? If you think the PSN outage was "minor news" then I don't really know what to say to you other than to leave this thread because of your ignorance.
 
There appear to be two arguments here.

One is "The Vita isn't dying because I play mine a lot, so you're wrong."

The other is "The Vita has unprecedentedly low sales for a major handheld and this does not appear like it will change in the future, which doesn't inspire faith in a healthy ecosystem."

The problem is anyone who insists on arguing the former will not agree to discuss the latter, so everything's going to go in circles.
There's also the third argument "The Vita has no games, it sucks, kill it with fire!!"... :p

But, yeah. There's not much to discuss.
A. If you're enjoying yours, you're just a fanboy trying to justify the purchase of a $250+ paperweight.

B. If you try to discuss it on the topic of sales, you're just SalesGAF interested in numbers, more than games!!!

C. If you don't like it, even if you have one you're just a fanboy of [insert opposite console/handheld here] and proceed to quote older posts from that user as evidence.

I'm in "A", I guess. Same way I can't I like Resident Evil 6 because "lol avatar quote". So...whatever happens, we all lose. :p


The AC:L thread sort of confirmed the Vita's identity crisis for me. For all the "console on the go" claims, when reviews started dinging AC:L for being inferior to the console version there was some protest that it was unfair to compare the game to anything other than handheld standards. The Vita is trying to be a console in your hands, but the compromises involved make the experience imperfect and it winds up appealing to only a small subset of gamers. Which probably would have still worked out in Japan, except Sony doubled down on the West and expected 3rd parties to support the platform in Japan. The western market at large didn't bite on the compromised console experience, 3rd parties in Japan were lukewarm on the Vita, and now here we are.
Agree with this.
It goes back to expectations. Contrary to what even Sony is doing, I don't want or expect a "portable PS3 in my hands", which is why I guess I'm loving mine.

Same happened with Call of Duty.
Last year, many around here were discussing the possibilities of playing multiplayer over 3G while in Starbucks, console parity with the PS3 version, a port of the PS3 version...and here we are now, with a spinoff that is basically the opposite they wished.

At the same time been contradictory. Becuase on every Call of Duty thread there's the "lol people play story in CoD?" and "lol they should sell the game as multiplayer only"..and yet, the Vita version is getting hate (aside the developer, and the cuts and the expected-low-quality of the game); becuase "what? there's no campaign story?! WTF Nihilistic!!".
 
I bought the thing for Gravity Rush and Persona 4 Golden, as well as to play PSP titles I never got to. It's delivered on that aspect and I personally don't focus enough on handhelds to be too worked up over the library.

I think the device isn't going to really ever be a success, but it's doing what I want it to do and that's enough for me.
 
By the way the big french store "fnac" has a christmas news paper and they have a BIG page at the back cover for the street psp at 99€, while they barely talk about the Vita inside the mag...
 
I don't understand what's happening with this handheld. I haven't bought one yet, but I love the hardware and absolutely want it to succeed. Like many others though, I figured I'd wait till the library gets beefed-up. With the holidays right around the corner, I thought by now we'd have new colors, maybe a small price-cut/new bundle, along with some sweet new titles. None of that has happened, and it's almost as if as far as Sony's concerned, it just doesn't exist anymore. I don't recall anything worthwhile being shown for it at E3 or TGS. Just what's going on here?

Also, this might not be the time to pick and choose, but here it goes: I was hoping not just for more games, but games that feel specifically unique to the handheld. I get that it's a powerful handheld, but I hate it when developers try to recreate the same home-console experience for it. I can already play that at home with a nicer set-up, give me Vita games that are distinctly Vita games as opposed to a me-too-PS3 clones.

1. there is an assassins creed bundle, which is the same cost as the vita alone, so it is technically a reduced price vita (i think it might even include a memory stick).
2. there is a white vita.
3. the system has playstation all-stars, assassins creed, need for speed, uncharted, wipeout, hot shots, gravity daze, persona 4, etc.. there are plenty of sweet titles.
 
When someone makes this kind of comment that actually shows how misinformed they are they should be expelled from the thread because you know they are blinding themselves to the actual topic.
Do you remember the PSN outage? What did Sony do?

What you did is the same thing as if I had come and said that Nintendo never acknowledged the 3DS had a slow start, which is a big lie since they cut the price down and announced the Ambassador program.

not really, because the 3DS situation is comparable to the Vita one, hence why I made the comment in the first place

alright, the PSN outage was a good example of them owning up, i'll give you that. To be fair if a company didnt do that with an incident like that they'd pretty much lose all credibility the next day.

The problem with the Vita stuff is that they arent doing anything about it beyond Yoshida admitting that 3rd party support isnt that strong. They are saying a price drop isnt needed and that we wont see one for a while. I just really, really think it needs it and that they know this, but chose to act as if nothing bad was happening instead of coming out and saying "we know it needs a price drop but we cant fucking do it yet"

as a side comment to your first sentence: god forbid someone comes into a thread without COMPLETE 100% SONY STATEMENT KNOWLEDGE completely open and welcoming the idea of being proven wrong. I forgot the elitism this thread required

someone please grab dirty Salsa and expell him from the thread at once!
 
Sorry Hitman, Halo 4, COD, and PS All stars? Oh and AC3 and Dishonored?

Yeah no. Dismissed

You can have whatever opinion you want on the quality of those games but I hope you know that those games are the big AAA titles the vita needs this holiday season to ensure success
 
I'll probably put more time into two Vita titles coming out this month (DJMax Technika Tune, Persona 4 Golden) than the entire time I've spent with my 3DS. Those two plus Lumines were reason enough to pick one up for me - the hardware is, as you mention, pretty great.

Software has been slow coming with nothing truly spectacular but that's pretty standard for handhelds in the first year. There's actually a decent amount of variety and quality available, depending on tastes. They're starting to push more games in the $5-$15 range as well, which is a nice sweet spot for developers targeting the platform down the road.

Sony selling the thing is a different story. Not showcasing Vita at E3 was a major misstep. Price is still too high for mass market, and the steep markup for memory is insulting. If there's any sense of urgency over there about how to make Vita more attractive to consumers, it's not really coming though. I do like the AC ad running in the U.S. but it's going to take quite a bit more to overcome the lingering perception that "Vita has no games."
 
Though sales have been far from phenomenal, I have a hunch that they're at least breaking even on the Vita when you include memory cards, digital transactions and the people who do own Vita's being enthusiasts who can be counted on to regularly spend money on games.

My hunch is that Sony in general is tightening its budgets across the board, and since the Vita isn't costing them anything (financially), they're just waiting until the absolute last moment to jump in and do something. I don't know if they have more bundles planned, or if they know something we dont about retailer deals, but they clearly expect sales to do something this holiday season. Christmas miracle?

We've already discusses to death how they're creating a vicious catch-22 of low sales leading to low support (which leads to low sales), and realistically, they could fix things in a heart beat by doing exactly what Nintendo did. A lot of people would like a Vita, and Sony's job should be convincing them to jump on it instead of waiting around any longer. If they don't, they're going to continue circling like vultures.
 
Vita seems to be screwed in 2013 as well. I mean, Sony's got some devs still making PS3 games while others have surely started on PS4 games, but what about Vita ? Is Sony using the cross-platform play as a way to compensate for the lack of Vita games?
 
Remaining schedule for 2012 ...

NOVEMBER 20th

Persona 4: Golden
PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale

NOVEMBER 27th

Ratchet & Clank: Full Frontal Assault

DECEMBER 11th

Sonic & All-Stars Racing Transformed

Uh you forgot the gamechanger
Call-of-Duty-Black-Ops-Declassified_US_ESRB_PSPboxart_160h.jpg
 
I get that part of the appeal for Vita is supposed to be the ability to play your PSN (PS1 games) and PSP library on tha glorious screen!

Problem is if you already OWN a PSP you can do JUST that right now minus the great Vita screen, so that is not enough of an incentive for people like us, Sony NEEDS to get extremely high quality EXCLUSIVE Vita content out there ASAP, not sure what the holdup is, PS3 seems to still be getting great games so i doubt it's impossible to do the same for Vita?

Well PSV is much better than PSP for PS1 games in terms of controls to, but yea nobody is gonna buy a PSV to get a bunch of 15 year old games.

The exact same stuff people are saying about Vita today people were saying about 3DS last year. Then Nintendo released Super Mario 3D Land and Mario Kart 7 and all of the sudden the 3DS has a vast rich library.

Vita has plenty of good games but nothing to really stand out. It just needs one or two big games to make people notice all the other stuff out there.
 
If Fifa, AC:L and COD all bomb (2/3 so far?) Sony are going to have to moneyhat 3rd parties to make games because else they're getting nothing.

I really find Sony's lax attitude disturbing, they just think everything is gonna turn out OK simply cos.
 
Vita fans are so delusional.

Not really.

The Vita is honestly the most I've ever used and enjoyed a system within a year of its launch. I own more games and enjoy more games on it than any other handheld I've ever owned. Been busy as a bee enjoying it since I've bought especially in October and now going into the holidays.

And I realize that it's far from a commercial success. But I honestly don't care about and really neither should anybody else. If you can't enjoy a system that is not selling well in spite of the games already on the platform (and continuing to come out on the platform) then there is probably something with you.
 
I must be in the minority here... but I really like my Vita. For me, it really helps with getting in game time while on the go. I typically only have three hours at night to devote to gaming, thanks to home and family responsibilities. So having a near console experience in the pocket (of my bag) fits my lifestyle perfectly. Nothing beats gaming at work.
 
alright, the PSN outage was a good example of them owning up, i'll give you that. To be fair if a company didnt do that with an incident like that they'd pretty much lose all credibility the next day.

god forbid someone comes into a thread without COMPLETE 100% SONY STATEMENT KNOWLEDGE completely open and welcoming the idea of being proven wrong. I forgot the elitism this thread required

God forbid someone in their ignorance accuse a company of something so blatantly right?

And yeah now that someone proved you wrong you come and downplay it by saying "of course they had to do that in that situation" after claiming that they wouldn't acknowledge a problem.
 
If Fifa, AC:L and COD all bomb (2/3 so far?) Sony are going to have to moneyhat 3rd parties to make games because else they're getting nothing.

I really find Sony's lax attitude disturbing, they just think everything is gonna turn out OK simply cos.

Vita is the first platform Sony has had since the PS1 in which 3rd party support wasn't a foregone conclusion.
 
Apparently vita won't turn around guys, Peff confirmed a slow start is a false analogy, even has proof.

Dedicated handhelds in the West have been given their last rites. Basically, nobody gives a shit about them any more: it's all about iOS and Android. And before you raise the 3DS, it's being doing GBA numbers outside of Japan, and software has been fairly disappointing across the board.

I really think this could turn around surprisingly quickly with the right circumstances..vita being available is one of them :P Apple had a decent idea, decent product and then flooooooooooooded the world with ads and use in tv/movies.. That's the biggest difference Imo. Sony underestimate the power of ads in the west.

Currygan said:
WB Skyzard

Glad to be back :P
 
If you can't enjoy a system that is not selling well in spite of the games already on the platform (and continuing to come out on the platform) then there is probably something with you.

I wouldn't say that.

I mean yeah, you can enjoy the system now, but it would be perfectly understandable if someone gets a bit bummed out by how it's doing seeing that as an indicator of the amount of support the system will get in the future (especially when you consider how much the Vita costs).
 
Well PSV is much better than PSP for PS1 games in terms of controls to, but yea nobody is gonna buy a PSV to get a bunch of 15 year old games.

The exact same stuff people are saying about Vita today people were saying about 3DS last year. Then Nintendo released Super Mario 3D Land and Mario Kart 7 and all of the sudden the 3DS has a vast rich library.

Vita has plenty of good games but nothing to really stand out. It just needs one or two big games to make people notice all the other stuff out there
.


Exactly! Get off your ass Sony and make it happen, dump some money into this thing if you want to see returns!
 
Wha- there's been a glut of games that were just recently dumped onto the system. Also New bundle (Assassins Creed) that reduces the prices of the system since it includes a game and a memory stick.



Ah you're one of those.

If so many people are echoing this persons sentiment, there might be something to this.
 
Like always: Vita topic saying it's doomed; Vita defenders coming up; iOS fans / delusional Vita fans saying both the handhelds are beyond bad; 3DS fans coming up and defending 3DS; hard fact ( sales ) posted; people saying "WHO CARES!!!I PLAY IT!!!11!!!", and then this repeats, and repeats, and repeats...
 
Like always: Vita topic saying it's doomed; Vita defenders coming up; iOS fans / delusional Vita fans saying both the handhelds are beyond bad; 3DS fans coming up and defending 3DS; hard fact ( sales ) posted; people saying "WHO CARES!!!I PLAY IT!!!11!!!", and then this repeats, and repeats, and repeats...

Two copies sold? That's not a bomb guys, stop trolling!!!

:p
 
Like always: Vita topic saying it's doomed; Vita defenders coming up; iOS fans / delusional Vita fans saying both the handhelds are beyond bad; 3DS fans coming up and defending 3DS; hard fact ( sales ) posted; people saying "WHO CARES!!!I PLAY IT!!!11!!!", and then this repeats, and repeats, and repeats...

THE NEVERENDING CYCLE
 
I'm not an insider or anything like that. It's just stuff I've picked up here and there. It could all be nonsense, for all I care. Next gen for me will consist of PC, Nintendo and OUYA. I honestly don't care too much about what Sony are doing, aside from the ramifications for the industry as a whole if they were to sell PS.

So in other words, it's completely and utterly bollocks?
 
They should if they want more games on the system. What's there at the moment isn't near enough.

Yeah, I never get the whole "gamers shouldn't care about the success of companies" statement/line of thinking.

Unless you want to continue to buy systems that last only 2-3 years tops, you kind of have to care about it in some way.
 
Only thing I could see helping Vita is a platform shift. Sell Xperia Vita phones, and open it up to Samsung to sell phones with the Vita/PSN app/gaming environment as well. Basically, NGAGE it.
 
You love the hardware, but you haven't bought one yet. Thats the problem OP.

No, that isn't the problem at all. Hardware doesn't do anything without software. You can't expect someone to buy a system just to look at it, dreaming wistfully of its potential.
 
this is what your post should have been. The fact that I said what I said shows that I clearly did not know about Yoshida admiting to that, no need for me to explain that I dont necesarelly follow those news that closely. I can make a statement and then be proven wrong.

That said: I also dont own a 3DS, and somehow I knew about Iwata's direct apology and showing of plans on how to move forward, followed with a price-drop and reward system for the early buyers. That's the kind of thing I mean

You may have known of Iwata's apology due to the fact that Nintendo follows that up with a course of action. They did the $80 price cut, the ambassador program, and a few weeks later announced that the largest Japanese third party franchise would be coming to 3DS. As I said, Sony's probably not in a position to do the $80 price cut with Vita, and even if they were the software that sells hardware just isn't there. There were Assassin's Creed, and Call of Duty games on PSP, they didn't light the world on fire. PSP's best sellers were from Final Fantasy, Grand Theft Auto, Gran Turismo, Monster Hunter, and God of War. Of that five, only a single one of them has an entry announced for Vita thus far. That single entry, unfortunately for Vita, is an HD port that'll be shared with PS3.
 
Top Bottom