There appear to be two arguments here.
One is "The Vita isn't dying because I play mine a lot, so you're wrong."
The other is "The Vita has unprecedentedly low sales for a major handheld and this does not appear like it will change in the future, which doesn't inspire faith in a healthy ecosystem."
The problem is anyone who insists on arguing the former will not agree to discuss the latter, so everything's going to go in circles.
There's also the third argument "The Vita has no games, it sucks, kill it with fire!!"...
But, yeah. There's not much to discuss.
A. If you're enjoying yours, you're just a fanboy trying to justify the purchase of a $250+ paperweight.
B. If you try to discuss it on the topic of sales, you're just SalesGAF interested in numbers, more than games!!!
C. If you don't like it, even if you have one you're just a fanboy of [insert opposite console/handheld here] and proceed to quote older posts from that user as evidence.
I'm in "A", I guess. Same way I can't I like Resident Evil 6 because "lol avatar quote". So...whatever happens, we all lose.
The AC:L thread sort of confirmed the Vita's identity crisis for me. For all the "console on the go" claims, when reviews started dinging AC:L for being inferior to the console version there was some protest that it was unfair to compare the game to anything other than handheld standards. The Vita is trying to be a console in your hands, but the compromises involved make the experience imperfect and it winds up appealing to only a small subset of gamers. Which probably would have still worked out in Japan, except Sony doubled down on the West and expected 3rd parties to support the platform in Japan. The western market at large didn't bite on the compromised console experience, 3rd parties in Japan were lukewarm on the Vita, and now here we are.
Agree with this.
It goes back to expectations. Contrary to what even Sony is doing, I don't want or expect a "portable PS3 in my hands", which is why I guess I'm loving mine.
Same happened with Call of Duty.
Last year, many around here were discussing the possibilities of playing multiplayer over 3G while in Starbucks, console parity with the PS3 version, a port of the PS3 version...and here we are now, with a spinoff that is basically the opposite they wished.
At the same time been contradictory. Becuase on every Call of Duty thread there's the "lol people play story in CoD?" and "lol they should sell the game as multiplayer only"..and yet, the Vita version is getting hate (aside the developer, and the cuts and the expected-low-quality of the game); becuase "what? there's no campaign story?! WTF Nihilistic!!".