What "I" like and what Giantbomb, or others, like is very different. For example, Tokyo Jungle is a joke of a game that is only entertaining for a few hours, and mostly because of its ridiculous premise. Patrick rationalized his enjoyment of it some other way (though on twitter, when pushed, described his fondness for the game as something that could "only come out of Japan", but earlier said that the game isn't just about its weirdness. whatever). Then, there's The Walking Dead, which I enjoyed immensely, but for simpler reasons than what some people give. (Game gets too much praise just because it is a "serious" story).
I tend to ask people I know who are really into movies/games/books two questions: What is their favorite whatever, and what is the best whatever they've ever seen or read? More often than not, those are two different answers, and the enjoyment of discussion isn't what they listed, but why those two questions don't have the same answer. And, more often than not, the people who list the same question are pretentious and boring, saying Citizen Kane is the best and favorite movie, or more recently, Vertigo (or whatever is the thing of the year).
I like a lot of stuff, including Walking Dead. I think it's hard to compare someone's taste in films and games because people like those things for different reasons. Is Walking Dead a well written and acted video game? Of course. Do I think it would work if judged as a piece of high budget television or movie, of course not. People were writing in Persona 4 as well written in a thread (fuck no).
In the end, I just think a lot of people in this thread (perhaps the Giant Bomb crew haven't yet looked at the list) are ignoring some games that came out earlier in the year. I can't think of a single game that had as much great content at $15 than Trials Evolution.