Joins wrong queue, wins anyway.Ahahaha, Standard RDW.
What a ballsy move.
Joins wrong queue, wins anyway.Ahahaha, Standard RDW.
What a ballsy move.
Joins wrong queue, wins anyway.
Uhh, wow.
http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Digital/MagicOnlineTourn.aspx?x=mtg/digital/magiconline/tourn/4843750
One of those decklists is not like the others.
Wait for him to attack, put the Exalted triggers on the stack, then kill the guy before he gets the PT buffs. He just lost his entire attack step and a dude.
Almost every event in Magic happens as a discrete action. Declaring attackers is one action. Exalted taking effect is a second action, and although it happens right away you have a window to play something in between them. Do you know how the stack works?Wait, explain this. They declare attacker then you ping the guy? Don't they get the exalted bonus once they are declared?
Wait, explain this. They declare attacker then you ping the guy? Don't they get the exalted bonus once they are declared?
I can't decide whether to skip the prereleases or not... I don't play standard anymore so the cards are kind of worthless and I sort of don't want to prepay for it. The reveals so far have been sort of underwhelming too. Not sure what to do, and it may be full if I wait too long.
Pongify is not a good card. It does not belong in the category of quality removal. In many cases, it will be worse than Unsummon, and it's leagues worse than Vapor Snag from last season. There are edge cases where it will be useful, but this card will not be ubiquitous. It will be sideboard tech against non-reanimator decks with bombs that can't be dealt with profitably any other way.
I just want the guild boxes. And the dice.
I need those freaking dice.
Uhh, wow.
http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Digital/MagicOnlineTourn.aspx?x=mtg/digital/magiconline/tourn/4843750
One of those decklists is not like the others.
Shit is this for real? LOL
What should I be laughing at? I don't follow, but I want to
You picked a really terrible example with Mr. Bargain.So blue should be able to kill a bomb creature outright for one mana? Is turning Grisselbrand into a 3/3 frog lizard really a fair trade? Isn't this why blue should have to splash for a color that could kill a bomb?
Like you said, blue has Unsummon for that already. Which fits better into the color-pie and blue's abilities. This card does not fit.
Uhh, wow.
http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Digital/MagicOnlineTourn.aspx?x=mtg/digital/magiconline/tourn/4843750
One of those decklists is not like the others.
I don't know much about Modern, but I'm glad to see that it looks like the format really is pulling from across the last 10 years of Magic instead of just a couple sets. I see some stuff from Time Spiral, Lorwyn, Alara, Zendikar, Innistrad, Mirrodin both old and new, even Tenth Edition. I mean, someone's running Slippery Boggle from Eventide for crying out loud.
Just won an NJ PTQ.That deck is obnoxious as hell to play against. Ugh.
It's hilarious to watch, I saw someone (I can't remember the name, something like Malague or Lalague, I wasn't at home so I don't know where to find his stream again) playing Bogle on Magic Online and I could practically feel his opponents' hatred towards hexproof.
Seeing an Edict effect being scoffed at by Misty Rainforest into Dryad Arbor made me like the deck even more. Plus the Spiritdancer crazyness too.
Ninja edit: okay, googled it and found it: http://www.twitch.tv/mlalague
It will be absolutely hilarious if they have to ban the 1-drop hexproof guys eventually.I played Bant hexproof in standard and was working on something that was really similar to the bogle.dec
It's absurdly good, but I guess the surprise element is out now that it's getting attention. Hexproof is broken, hopefully Wizards understands that now.
It will be absolutely hilarious if they have to ban the 1-drop hexproof guys eventually.
This one too:
![]()
This is a card that you should be very scared of as a developer.That's a scary card actually. 6 mana is a lot, but theoretically you're setting it up to make them sacrifice two permanents, discard two cards, and lose two life?
This is a card that you should be very scared of as a developer.
This is a card that you should be very scared of as a developer.
-4 cards. That's a lot.Let's look at it in Magical Christmas land scenario.
On turn six, assuming you have a creature on board that will be guaranteed a hit, for six mana you make them lose 2 life, discard two cards and sacrifice two permanents. That's not so bad and is probably on the safe side, considering if it's turn six and you get a creature through you should be in a pretty good spot anyway.
But who knows, we'll have to see how it plays out.
-4 cards. That's a lot.
Where are the boros and gruul cards :/
I think it's probably good at 4cmc. It's a pretty formidable ability. At the very least she gets a +1/+1 counter every time she attacks regardless of whether or not you have any other attacking creatures. Would probably be too good at 3cmc.
Yea my interest in this set has been spiraling downwards.
So far I'll be getting some shocklands and some... um... yea.