State of the Union 2013 |OT| less exciting than a cabin in Big Bear

Status
Not open for further replies.
People will whine about a big deal made about the water . . . . but the water bottle sticks out because the rest of the speech was so dull and forgettable.
 
Rand Paul: Freeze all spending or we're in danger of having our credit rating downgraded.

Yes, that's the worst that'll happen if we completely stop all government spending.

By that logic, we should spend more, and get our credit downgraded. Why? Because last time it happened yields on government debt went down...
 
Rand Paul: Freeze all spending or we're in danger of having our credit rating downgraded.

Yes, that's the worst that'll happen if we completely stop all government spending.

No, the worst is that we'll supposedly go bankrupt like Greece. Remember, treat government like a business...
 
RUBIO-IS-THIRSTY.gif
 
Maybe I missed something but I don't get the hubbub about the water bottle thing. *shrug*

Maybe as a distillation (heh) of the deer-in-the-headlights vibe coming from his whole spiel, but the act itself?
 
The funny thing is that Republicans actually think Democrats are nervous about Rubio after that performance. It seems that bubble they live in is still firmly in place.
 
Can't we do both? And again, what happens in the meantime? Continuing to subject employees to sub-poverty level wages? At the very least, minimum wage needs to be directly tied to cost of living. Now if we can reduce the cost of living, great, fine. In the bolded, it would seem there is a lack of a sustainable business model. Why do then those cuts have to come from employment wages? Why not order less or less expensive product? Find ways to save on rent/energy bills? Market more aggressively? Noone says you can't cut costs to meet profitability, but those cuts should not be to the detriment of employees who depend on your work to live.

I had a big explanation, but I'll just be honest with you:

It is not a sustainable business model. I think it might surprise you to know that it's not always about profits with small business owners: it's about providing a service as member of a community.It's hard to believe, I know. I too sometimes think of all business owners as bourgeoisie that light Cuban cigars with 100 dollar bills while working the proletariat to the bone. In America, it didn't used to be like that. There were corner stores that were part of small neighborhoods. That's dead. Replaced by national companies that have the leverage due to their size to negotiate a lower price from their vendors, and have their own trucks and warehouse system to cut out the middle man. I can just tell you that our community is poorer, more desolate, and more dependent on government services than ever before. Wal-Mart towers on top of a hill, over a rust-belt city of abandoned buildings that employed proportionally several times as many employees.

Raising minimum wage is about fairness. In the state of nature, those people would starve or have to compete for lowest wages without a safety net of a minimum wage. We know that's not good, and it's not right. We are better off when more people have a chance. In our current system, independent grocery stores have no chance at all. We make 5 cents on a 50 cent can of green beans, and shopping bags cost near 3 cents each. A 50 cent minimum wage increase can be devastating.

It's easy to turn your nose up at failing businesses on the outside, because you just don't know how hard it is to compete with these national retailers. And just maybe you don't live in flyover country, and don't know how crushingly hopeless it is to be young in a dying city.

I agree that it's not a sustainable business model. Before Super Wal-Mart, it was. But, that's capitalism. What good does a 1.75 minimum wage increase do in a community where there are a fraction of the people who used to work still working? I dunno. Perhaps we need it, and I definitely want people to have a living wage. But it's just not true to suggest a minimum wage increase is without concerns. I speak anecdotally, so what may be true for me, may be complete bullshit from your perspective. I am not involved in the family business myself, so forgive me if you find my analysis lacking.

I'm no conservative, so I welcome more progressive government regulation to help save middle American communities. Minimum wage increases are fine, but more needs to be done to keep small communities strong. That's my opinion, anyway.
 
Maybe I missed something but I don't get the hubbub about the water bottle thing. *shrug*

Maybe as a distillation (heh) of the deer-in-the-headlights vibe coming from his whole spiel, but the act itself?

For me it is akin to him coming up for air after being held underwater for too long. Plus the guy is just another GOP talking head, with nothing important to say.

*Time to watch HOUSE OF CARDS, folks*
 
Maybe I missed something but I don't get the hubbub about the water bottle thing. *shrug*

Maybe as a distillation (heh) of the deer-in-the-headlights vibe coming from his whole spiel, but the act itself?

It was just a little awkward as he ducked out of the camera frame. It was no big deal but I think it stands out as being the only memorable thing about the speech. That doesn't say much about the speech, does it?
 
Maybe I missed something but I don't get the hubbub about the water bottle thing. *shrug*

Maybe as a distillation (heh) of the deer-in-the-headlights vibe coming from his whole spiel, but the act itself?

Cause the speech sucked and that is why it stands out even more.

If Jets were good, would butt fumble be as funny?
 
Ok, I missed Rubio's response. Did he really stop for water during his live speech?

KuGsj.gif
Honestly, I've never seen anything like it. He wasn't addressing the Trout Farmers of Nova Scotia... there was barely any of the speech left. Recency effect ensures it is the aspect of his speech that is immortalized, eschewing all hope of having a better-remembered SOTU response than Jindal.
 
The funny thing is that Republicans actually think Democrats are nervous about Rubio after that performance. It seems that bubble they live in is still firmly in place.

I can never tell if it is fake bravado to buck up the troops or if they really think something like that. After the last election, I guess the latter may be more likely considering they did seem to buy into the Romney will win view.
 
I agree we should cut spending. Let's start by fixing Congressional salaries to median income in the United States, and banning bribes of any form by the public standard (not what Congress currently gets away with, ie lucrative jobs and gifts post term) jailable for life.

Then we can get the people that actually give a shit and aren't addicted to power in office and fix stuff.
 
So then what about a raise in minimum wage with exemptions for businesses that earn under a certain amount, or something?
 
At least you can't knock him for lacking a sense of humor.

How to get ahead in the new republican party: Have a name that ends in a vowel.

So then what about a raise in minimum wage with exemptions for businesses that earn under a certain amount, or something?

No easy answer. I'm afraid we are moving toward a one-retailer future eventually. I'd like to see action in the 'spirit' of antitrust laws that would prevent one firm from controlling too much of one market in conjunction with wage increases to offset the competitive advantage large retailers would have over independent businesses with local middle-class ownership, But, that's never going to happen.
 
Honestly, I've never seen anything like it. He wasn't addressing the Trout Farmers of Nova Scotia... there was barely any of the speech left. Recency effect ensures it is the aspect of his speech that is immortalized, eschewing all hope of having a better-remembered SOTU response than Jindal.

People will remember this speech . . . well, just the drink.
 
It's not that Rubio took a drink of water, it's that the bottle was a size fitting his rebuttal.
Personally I love the "way to support American water" angle.

Funnily enough, Poland Spring water, the #1 water brand in America, does come from Maine and is only sold in the US, though it's owned by a Swiss company that sounds French.

It has nothing to do with Poland.
 
If we cut government spending, reform entitlements, and raise taxes on the wealthy, then...unemployment will fall, the economy will grow, and health care costs will decrease. Is that a good summary?
 
So then what about a raise in minimum wage with exemptions for businesses that earn under a certain amount, or something?

Wouldn't work. Who'd want to work for the place paying you less unless the benefits were really good? Even then, if they couldn't afford to pay you a higher minimum wage, what's the likelihood that they'd have cushy benefits?

Sure some people might be interested based on ideals, but it would be a death sentence to most small companies.
 
Wouldn't work. Who'd want to work for the place paying you less unless the benefits were really good? Even then, if they couldn't afford to pay you a higher minimum wage, what's the likelihood that they'd have cushy benefits?

Sure some people might be interested based on ideals, but it would be a death sentence to most small companies.

I really need to see some numbers on that. I know that we don't have them yet, but we should be getting them soon now that the president mentioned it.
 
Wouldn't work. Who'd want to work for the place paying you less unless the benefits were really good? Even then, if they couldn't afford to pay you a higher minimum wage, what's the likelihood that they'd have cushy benefits?

Sure some people might be interested based on ideals, but it would be a death sentence to most small companies.

Yup, Washington state's economy is sure in the shiter for having a 9 dollar minimum wage.

Oh wait...

If we cut government spending, reform entitlements, and raise taxes on the wealthy, then...unemployment will fall, the economy will grow, and health care costs will decrease. Is that a good summary?

Cutting govt spending and lowering unemployment doesnt make sense because if you cut govt spening you are likely putting a govt worker out of work
 
Sure some people might be interested based on ideals, but it would be a death sentence to most small companies.

Youre seriously claiming that raising the minimum wage is a death kneel to small companies?

That claim is as absurd as the false claim that higher min wage = automatic higher prices.

What bothers me is that the min wage is an endless experiment with hundreds of data points - every year states and cities raise their min at different amounts.

Youd think going from new york state into vermont would show a massive price hike and abolition of small businesses....

Except it doesnt. At all.

Even when a state is $1 above the neighboring state, youll find the same prices and the same types of businesses.
 
Wouldn't work. Who'd want to work for the place paying you less unless the benefits were really good? Even then, if they couldn't afford to pay you a higher minimum wage, what's the likelihood that they'd have cushy benefits?

Sure some people might be interested based on ideals, but it would be a death sentence to most small companies.

You understand that most jobs don't pay the minimum wage now, right? How do you theorize that any of the businesses that pay minimum wage get employees at all when there are so many better-paying jobs?

You're committing the classic fallacy of assuming that the free market is really free. It isn't -- because people who don't work starve to death, they have little to no negotiating power. That's why it's so important to raise the minimum wage periodically (since people working that wage can't effectively agitate for better wages) and to improve the social safety net to help those workers defend themselves.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom