A lot of the dumb stuff Jesse does is only because he's disillusioned and treats Walt as a trustworthy father figure, though. Not that it excuses his actions, but considering Walt started all of this he has to take a good chunk of the responsibility for everything that follows.The Armorix "Walt is evil" debate: I don't think Walt is evil at all. He started off thinking he was going to die and did what he did for his family. That isn't the case anymore as he made dumb decisions and his pride gets in the way too often, leading to more trouble. However a lot of the bad he does was caused by Jesses dumb decisions too and Walt reacting to protect Jesse. I guess I'm in the middle of this debate... Walt is a "bad guy" but in this case I'm cheering for the bad guy and I hope he comes out clean in the end (probably won't happen though).
Gus and Tio are definitely on the kill list. Like...how would they not be. Walt blew up a bomb strategically while both were around to kill them. It does not get any more clear cut than that. You say he "didn't set off the bomb." He did! He waited until Tio was ringing the bell like mad in front of Gus, flipped a switch, and blew them to hell! That was literally the sequence of actions! You have no argument, zero.The Walt murder count debate: I don't think Walt killed Jane at all like some do. He also didn't set off the bomb to kill Gus although he would have if he had to do it. In the end he killed the 2 guys in season 1 out of self defense, the 2 dealers to save Jesse, and the 2 thugs in season 4 in the lab. I could be missing some but Jane, Gus, Tio, and Tyrus aren't on his kill list. Jesse has gotten off realtively easy since he just shot Gale and the guy in Mexico.
Walt didn't directly kill Tyrus. He's partially responsible for his death. His pride about being in control of the operation led to him forcing Jesse to kill Gale which led to Tyrus being exposed to the public which led to Gus killing Tyrus as an example and to keep the operation safe. Walt is partially responsible for Tyrus' death. This is also pretty inarguable.
As for Jane: I won't say that that one's inarguable, though I think it's pretty clear that he again shares some responsibility. You don't blame a junkie for being a junkie. Addiction is a disease. That doesn't mean it's fully malicious, but it was rash and selfish and short-sighted and cowardly. Those aspects of it, at least, are pretty impossible to deny. It's not brave or strong to let a mentally diseased person die in their sleep while you stand over their body.