Can MS change their ram to GDDR5 or is it too late at this point?

Ok seriously people. This fast ram is awesome but is not the end all be all of hardware. This is like the cell being hyped like crazy. I think it's great but damn.
 
All of a sudden DDR3 is slow. I know it is in comparison to GDDR5 but they still have to make games take advantage of it. But if MS doesn't have something up their sleeve I will probably be choosing PS4 next gen
 
No.

I can't belive people are even suggesting they use that much DDR3. It's a complete waste of money.

8 GBs of GDDR5 = a deliciois and filling New York steak

8 GBs of DDR3 = a small bucket of chicken from KFC. Filling, but not premium like the steak.

16 GBs of DDR3 = a huuuuuge bucket of KFC chicken. Way too much for you to eat. Why did buy that much chicken, ya dingus? You'll never be able to eat all that. What a waste!

This thread has gone crazy.
 
GDDR5 = higher bandwidth(good for graphics) but higher latency(bad for general computing). DDR3 = lower bandwidth ( not so good for graphics ) and lower latency ( good for general computing ).

720 also eDRAM which is good on bandwidth and latency but there is only a small amount.

So all MS has to do is double the eDRAM.
 
Playstation fans are going nuts right now. There's too much hyperbole going around. I have to hand it to Sony they have really nailed there PR this time around.
 
No one really knows enough to answer your question. But my gut feeling would be no. Of course no would be relative.
 
Is any of this really going to make as gigantic of a difference in real life as people are making it seem to be in this thread?

Honestly, not really but let them have their moment in the sun.

Don't get me wrong I am a big Sony fan too but its not the be all end all. MS will put out something that performs very close. The PC will catch up very quickly if its not already on par.
 
You better not watch the upcoming next Xbox unveil then.

I'm pretty sure it's going to be focused a lot on services and partnerships. I really don't think they care about being the best system for gamers anymore.
Yeah. Sony and third parties showed like 8 games, 5 of which are new. Other stuff was focused on gaming as well. The entire second hour was basically only games and concepts for games. Microsoft will have a hard time matching that or maybe not, since they are probably not even bothering.
 
I don't think the diff ram will be a HUGE factor. They still have the edram as a frame buffer. Devs will probably just have to work differently with the edram + ddr3 combo and should achieve similar results on the 720 provided it's gpu is just as capable. Maybe they'll be forced to use lower Los settings or less AA..who knows.

I'd be more concerned about the gpu differences than the memory type to be honest.
 
Is any of this really going to make as gigantic of a difference in real life as people are making it seem to be in this thread?

To be completely honest/logical... no.

If durango's specs are correct and it only has 12CUs then yes there will be quite a large graphical difference even with multiplats. I've stated this before but it's pointless have more CU's if you don't have the bandwidth to feed them. In the same way it's pointless to have more bandwidth if it's not feeding anything and just consuming more power. So it appears ms has acknowledged that and gone for a less render focussed machine meaning it will have less graphical processing capability.

I'm not sure exactly how much total computing power the durango is pushing but from the outside it clearly appears that there is quite a bit of bandwidth either being dedicated elsewhere or left unused. I mention this since there definitely appears to be over enough bandwidth to supply those 12 CUs.

In summary the PS4 seems to have quite a substantial edge, i would never use the term gigantic, in terms of graphics and physics processing. Is that edge enough to convince the average consumer, or even many of the individuals who call themselves gamers? I don't think so. Eyes are blinded by fickle hearts.

Once again this is logical conclusion based purely on the current leaks which are of course subject to change
 
Is any of this really going to make as gigantic of a difference in real life as people are making it seem to be in this thread?

Depends. Did you think the gap between PS3 v. X360 was noticeable? Both in multiplatform titles running better on X360 in general and with Sony's first party titles being the technical leaders of the generation.

As of now it looks like the gaps on both fronts are only going to widen, but both in favor of Sony. Multiplats will run better on it and Sony's first parties will have a bigger advantage over everyone else than they had on PS3 (after unlocking that fickle mistress).
 
Is any of this really going to make as gigantic of a difference in real life as people are making it seem to be in this thread?

Not really the difference not going to be that big .
The only people MS might lose is mutli consoles owners who looking for the best version on console ( this is not counting stuff like live etc etc )
 
The new controller seems to really take people's complaints into consideration.

I'm not going to even act like Im good at video games. My ability to switch between control schemes is awful. Forget controllers all together, but the thing I really dislike is the location of the thumbsticks, and how loose they are. Even if they tighten them up, I just don't find them to be all that comfortable. :/
 
what? are you serious? I really don't think you understand how this works. They presented this at a press conference, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg etc etc reported the stats of the new console already. shareholders wouldn't take kindly to lies. Fake a trailer, sure, but fake the technical specs for a machine that is already so far along in the process that it's impossible to change, no.



I guess you don't remember E3 2005 when Sony showed the PS3 with 2 hdmi ports & 3 ethernet ports. Telling us the PS3 would dual display 1080p @ 120fps. Well they lied.

Just saying....
 
I guess you don't remember E3 2005 when Sony showed the PS3 with 2 hdmi ports & 3 ethernet ports. Telling us the PS3 would dual display 1080p @ 120fps. Well they lied.

Just saying....

That was a 18 months before they would launch

The PS4 will launch in 8-10 months
 
I guess you don't remember E3 2005 when Sony showed the PS3 with 2 hdmi ports & 3 ethernet ports. Telling us the PS3 would dual display 1080p @ 120fps. Well they lied.

Just saying....

That is lying to the customer about ports and that is something that always happens. Sony lying to developers about the 8GB GDDR5 when they actually have 4GB? That is never going to happen, not when the PS4 is supposed to be released in 8 months from now.

Production has basically started a few weeks/months ago.
 
I guess you don't remember E3 2005 when Sony showed the PS3 with 2 hdmi ports & 3 ethernet ports. Telling us the PS3 would dual display 1080p @ 120fps. Well they lied.

Just saying....

no connection whatsoever. you're referring to external ports not internal architecture. They've changed the number of ports a few times in the life of the machine but did they ever change the internal architecture of the PS3 itself --beyond removing backward compatibility?
the controller also changed, do you consider that lie too?
 
Honestly, not really but let them have their moment in the sun.

Don't get me wrong I am a big Sony fan too but its not the be all end all. MS will put out something that performs very close. The PC will catch up very quickly if its not already on par.

If rumored xbox specs are correct, won't this mean that the PS4 multiplatform games would in most cases be assured not to be inferior tech-wise?
 
Hold on a second....

Dodge RAM.... Dodge Durango....

Holy SHIT

The new Xbox will be built entirely of RAM. IT'S BEEN UNDER OUR NOSES THIS WHOLE TIME
 
I was actually looking at the official xbox 720 specs in my dreams and it was just two xbox 360s duck taped together.

But anyways we don't actually know anything about the nextbox. Maybe the new system is super weak, idk, but I rather wait til the official Mountain Dew and Doritos sponsored reveal before I make a judgement call.
 
I don't think the diff ram will be a HUGE factor. They still have the edram as a frame buffer. Devs will probably just have to work differently with the edram + ddr3 combo and should achieve similar results on the 720 provided it's gpu is just as capable. Maybe they'll be forced to use lower Los settings or less AA..who knows.

I'd be more concerned about the gpu differences than the memory type to be honest.

Pretty much this. Devs will be able to do almost everything the PS4 can by taking a different approach. Ergo, the comments about devs having an easier time leveraging PS4's power.

Pertaining to GPU, I would not worry about too much given XB3 may be selected as the baseline for performance. And given it will be nowhere near as complicated to program for like PS3, multiplatforms would run just fine on both consoles.
 
Considering dev kits are basically pcs and I'm sure there have been several different iterations of the dev kits themselves I do not see any reason why they couldn't. It's entirely possible they had dev kits with ddr3 and a different dev kit with gddr5.

Now my personal opinion still holds that MS does not care about competing on a technical level anymore. They hit a home run with Kinect and are banking on that transitioning into this gen. It makes me sad to think about it.
 
I have 8 GB of DDR3 in my PC. I have 2gb DDR3 on my grapho card.

My PC destroys current consoles. I don't think MS will have a problem with 8GB plus wizard giz / special sauce.

It's great that Sony have pushed the boat out, but MS will still have a powerful console. If the rumours are true, it will still put a 360 to shame.
 
Top Bottom