Kotaku: The Wii U Won't Be Getting Unreal Engine 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Majority of 3rd parties use UE to make their games, EA is using Frostbite mostly. If those 2 engines don't support Wii U, it'll be too much of a task for said 3rd parties to release Wii U games and they will be much more likely to not bother releasing games for it.

Unreal is popular, but I don't think it has more than a plurarily. It's also not unreasonable to think that Unreal 3 might persist into the PS4/Durango era longer than Unreal 2.5 did for the HD twins, simply because it's a more capable, scalable engine that's already confirmed to be used on some next-gen/cross-gen titles. (Star Wars 1313, Thief 4) Being left behind with Unreal 3 is bad, but not nearly as bad as the Wii's predicament of having to recycle PS2/PSP games.
 
Trolling aside I'm a little confused as to why this thread is growing quickly. Did people not know that Epic confirmed this at GDC last year? Nothing has changed either with Nintendo or Epic and I don't see why anyone would have expected it to.
 
right, you guys have no clue how stupid this all sounds to someone like me when I see this hobby turn into fanboy pissing contest and then see developers encourage macho brinkmanship in something this really only boils down to what? GAMES

it is so much easer to enjoy games when I ignore the core's definition of what I've been playing the past 5 month

I don't really see this as death of Nintendo as much as I see myself at 40 growing tired of is going on right now in this thread among gamers who are happy to see other gamers get and play less games

Maybe the "trolliness" is an innate trait of being a "hardcore" gamer?..

As for me, this generation will be a repeat of the last one, when one have to have another console (or gaming PC) besides the current Nintendo console to have all bases covered.

Can somebody give Iwata a GAF membership? Maybe he will be able to steer the ship to clearer waters that way, just by reading the opinions here.
 
Never understood what Nintendo was doing with the Wii U. You drop your "hardcore" audience almost altogether with the Wii. They all get 360s and PS3s. Then, when those consoles are at the end of their cycles, they give us a system thats designed for "hardcore" users. They burned two bridges in a row and now have no place. What the fuck did they expect? Not to mention the fact that the specs are laughable. Graphics aren't everything, but to think that technology doesn't directly relate to improved games is foolish.
 
This was...this was before everyone started entering the room, right?

We don't exactly know, but it's the photo which Game Watch placed next to a block of text lamenting about the lack of developer interest in Nintendo's panel this year in their coverage of the Miiverse panel.
 
Nintendo should really go third party and find partnerships with content providers while keeping ownership of their brands.

As soon as Iwata is replaced, that move is inevitable. Nintendo's existence as a hardware manufacturer is coming to an end. There is simply no need for it anymore.

I think "cute" is a good word for you.

Cute.
 
Holy shit that pic.

Reminds me of

ron-paul.jpg

someone should put Iwata face on there
 
So, now Epic is betting against Nintendo... looking forward to see Nintendo results in the West for the year incoming, they'll be really interesting to see...
 
Why the hell would 3rd parties give a shit about the Wii U when it's debatable that Nintendo themselves give a shit about their own console.
 
In what way could they retaliate? If you mean to attempt to develop higher quality titles than the companies that are spurning Nintendo, that would be the result of opinion and only benefit Nintendo console owners.

Nintendo likely won't actively campaign against these companies. That would only lead to further ridicule and abandonment.

Nintendo can continue the course or change its strategy. Nintendo has the money to buy studios. Maybe it should. I just don't think retaliation is the best way to remedy this situation.

For starters, they could built hardware that actually has high performance. They need to refocus away from low TPD and concentrate on image qaulitym

Once they do that, they can compete against the big name engine developers like Epic and Crytek and undercut them in their market by offering the Nintendo engine free out of the box to all licensed developers.

Foster a familiar development environment and there will be no reason to use unreal or others.

Seems pretty obvious stuff to do.
 
Man that's gotta sting. It's sad that we've come to a point where developers openly laugh at the Wii U. That doesn't seem professional. But at the same time, it's sad what situation Nintendo cornered themselves in.

It's a shame, at least people who enjoy Nintendo games are covered, and know the good ones are coming. I've been a primarily Nintendo gamer most of my life, and this gen i used a PC for my gaming, and Nintendo handhelds. Even if i haven't played most of their games lately, my affinity lies with them.

Sadly, I'm left wondering if they can carry the load by themselves anymore, and the answer is most likely 'no', as evidenced by the late years of the Wii.

I too think there should be some changes at Nintendo, so long as they don't lose what makes them unique.

It's sad that we went from thishttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fldgF3bew1o to what's happening here.

I think they've finally realized the situation they're in, that their operational philosophy and the loss-averse nature of the company is fundamentally incompatible with how the rest of the gaming industry operates, particular in the West. The way in which they build eclectic hardware to fit their software doesn't jive with developers who desire easy to work with and powerful systems.

In some ways, it's a good thing to have this definite break. They don't have to waste further resources trying to court companies who want nothing to do with them. They can and are working to rectify the problem with restructuring and internal expansion, along with the removal of barriers for indie developers. I think they'll be fine in the long haul, but they really should have seen the writing on the wall when the Wii fell off a cliff and the 3DS came out to a tepid launch.
 
Well, I hope for Epic (& EA) that the Activision's "mantra" ("You don't bet against Nintendo") doesn't come true in the coming years.
 
no, coolwhip, you are the manchild. you are the one clinging onto a company that no longer satisfies your gaming needs because of nostalgia

Oh I see. I thought I was enjoying my time with my 3DS and Wii U, but I guess you know better. Anyway, let's not make this thread about you or me. Don't want to get banned again.
 
To point out how serious this is, look at this link, and scroll through the UE3 section:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Unreal_Engine_games

Notice all the developers( among the numerous AAA titles) who are now comfortable with the Unreal Engine tool kit and most likely will naturally move to UE4 for future development.

Now realize that the Wii U may never see any titles on this list starting in 2014 and beyond (if not now with recent news).
 
So, now Epic is betting against Nintendo... looking forward to see Nintendo results in the West for the year incoming, they'll be really interesting to see...

Well at the pace they're going now they might very well break 1 million wii u's in america this year.
 
For starters, they could built hardware that actually has high performance. They need to refocus away from low TPD and concentrate on image qaulitym

Once they do that, they can compete against the big name engine developers like Epic and Crytek and undercut them in their market by offering the Nintendo engine free out of the box to all licensed developers.

Foster a familiar development environment and there will be no reason to use unreal or others.

Seems pretty obvious stuff to do.
You think there is some kind of uniform, monolithic "Nintendo Engine"? They don't use middleware to make their games.
 
The more interviews / things like these happen, the more I think Nintendo will seriously need to release a "homeled" next gen, an hybrid home and portable device, especially considering that, indipendently from Wii U, Rein, Nintendo, etc.etc. I can't think the "AAA or nothing!" model can be sustained in the long run, and many tears of blood will be shred from developers and publishers.
 
For starters, they could built hardware that actually has high performance. They need to refocus away from low TPD and concentrate on image qaulitym

Once they do that, they can compete against the big name engine developers like Epic and Crytek and undercut them in their market by offering the Nintendo engine free out of the box to all licensed developers.

Foster a familiar development environment and there will be no reason to use unreal or others.

Seems pretty obvious stuff to do.

super obvious
 
The more interviews / things like these happen, the more I think Nintendo will seriously need to release a "homeled" next gen, an hybrid home and portable device, especially considering that, indipendently from Wii U, Rein, Nintendo, etc.etc. I can't think the "AAA or nothing!" model can be sustained in the long run, and many tears of blood will be shred from developers and publishers.

That's what they are probably planning and it would be a good move. The console market is a dead end street anyway.
 
Oh god come on. They have billions to spend and arent going anywhere. This thread is getting out of hand at this point

What do you mean by "aren't going anywhere"?

If you mean they're not going to go bankrupt anytime soon, I agree. That isn't the issue. The issue is they're not going anywhere in terms of market progression, the market is completely changing and they're being left behind. The era of consoles and dedicated portables is coming to an end, and Nintendo are the worst positioned to be able to make the move. This isn't "lol they're gonna go bankrupt this year", it's rather the long term future of the company is at risk because they're not forward thinking enough.

Iwata is still clinging to a dying business model.
 
no, coolwhip, you are the manchild. you are the one clinging onto a company that no longer satisfies your gaming needs because of nostalgia

It's silly to think you know another person's preferences and priorities well enough to declare that they must be fooling themselves. I mean, hell, I can get pretty Goddamn negative about "dudebro" games, but I know better than to tell people that they're not really having fun.
 
I suggested in another thread Nintendo should partner up with Microsoft.

Microsoft's lack of first party but ability to push out hardware could see benefits to both parties.

Replace Nintendo with Sega and that actually WAS in their plans.

I believe MS was responsible for the Dreamcast's OS, as well as the online, at one point MS wanted to allow DC compatibility with the Xbox.

I don't remember if MS wanted to officially buy Sega, but either way, things didn't go smoothly/Sega wasn't as good as a potential partner as MS thought, so they parted ways on that end.
 
Well, I hope for Epic (& EA) that the Activision's "mantra" ("You don't bet against Nintendo") doesn't come true in the coming years.

That was EA's mantra:

EA said:
Q: I know Nintendo came out today and was a little bit more cautious with their outlook for Wii U sales, doesn't sound like this is a platform you guys are really pursuing aggressively on. What does this really say about the consumers' willingness to adopt the next-gen consoles — we should have something new from Sony and Microsoft, so what does that say with Nintendo going through the early struggles on the Wii U?

EA's CEO: So, couple of things. First, you never count Nintendo out. They've got some of the best IPs in the game industry, when their marquee titles show up, that's when you usually see the bounce. I'm deeply respectful of the achievements they've had over the last several years, and so yeah, never really count them out.

Having said that, I wouldn't say that we see much correlation between the results that Nintendo have just shown with the console debut of the Wii U and what we see coming. We see a pretty sharp distinction and unfortunately I'm unable to go any further than that.

Ours is an industry where a lot of devices come in and represent themselves as the next generation or the next generation after that. You know in many ways, we would argue that the gen— what we're describing as "Gen 4", is yet to come — and it's that we're excited about, and that's what we're investing in, and frankly we've been quite consistent with that for some time, recognising the frustration our inability to articulate precisely why, causes for you.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=510832
 
*Developers laugh as the industry burns around them, proclaiming the joy of developing games only twice as expensive* That should be the article title.

But seriously Nintendo needs to just move on from this current group of 3rd parties. It's obvious they are aligned elsewhere for their business needs/wants and nothing Nintendo can do will change it.

Time for them to starting finding the next generation of developers and building their relationship with them, and getting some of those PC exclusive developers to make games for them. I am sure they can be had for a lot cheaper.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom