This whole thing is pretty brutal, so I expect Nintendo fans will find little details to quibble over that make the entire thing a non-issue in their eyes... "But X so this loses all credibility."
way to just shut everyone else down
This whole thing is pretty brutal, so I expect Nintendo fans will find little details to quibble over that make the entire thing a non-issue in their eyes... "But X so this loses all credibility."
Okay, it wasn't terrible, but what could you play in 2007? WarioWare? Super Mario Galaxy wasn't there until about a year after launch. It seems with almost EVERY Nintendo console, we are stuck waiting a year until the system actually sees decent support.
As much as I like Iwata, there's a lot of valid points and retracting in the article.
Maybe it's time for Iwata to Sashay Away. (laughs)
Really? I can think of one. The name. Wii U has no place for a console name.
Nintendo's craziness doesn't even add up. They never kept cartridges after the N64 so it makes the whole endeavor look worthless.
There is little justification to Nintendo's stupidness. It's basically "why can't we have good things?" with Nintendo's answer "I want to screw you".
touch screen gaming was new to the mainstream in 2005 though, at least thanks to the software nintendo provided. the dual screen was yamauchi's idea, but making the bottom screen a touch screen came from iwata.
Howard Lincoln did managed to convince EA to support the N64 after they said they wouldn't. Take a look at this article, it details how he handled third-party support for the N64.
www.notenoughshaders.com/2013/03/14/howard-lincoln-kicking-ass-before-reggie-came-along/
Another thing that bothers me about Iwata is that he promises 3rd party support every time. He did it for Gamecube, for Wii and Wii U. Instead of realising it will never happen and expanding Nintendo he just sat on his behind.
Another thing that bothers me about Iwata is that he promises 3rd party support every time. He did it for Gamecube, for Wii and Wii U. Instead of realising it will never happen and expanding Nintendo he just sat on his behind.
Another thing that bothers me about Iwata is that he promises 3rd party support every time. He did it for Gamecube, for Wii and Wii U. Instead of realising it will never happen and expanding Nintendo he just sat on his behind.
Another thing that bothers me about Iwata is that he promises 3rd party support every time. He did it for Gamecube, for Wii and Wii U. Instead of realising it will never happen and expanding Nintendo he just sat on his behind.
So many angry people in this thread. Iwata really pissed some people of. Or maybe it's the same people like always with another excuse to hate Nintendo. Who knows.
He's one of the worst things to happen to Nintendo.
He's destroying Nintendo, and yet Nintendo fans still worship the clown. It amazes me.
Hopefully he's fired by the end of the year and we can finally close this sad chapter.
Oh, the name wasn't about third parties. My earlier post covered my problem was both developers and consumers. But if it wasn't relevant you can ignore it.Would the name really have made a difference to the third party relations? I'm not the type of guy who believe that 3rd parties hate Nintendo. Its just, at least up until now Nintendo have always gone about it differently. Its like complaining the OUYA doesn't have AAA games when that's not what its about. Nintendo haven't been in parity with its competitors for a long time and even when they were the industry was a lot different and even then it was still quirky and odd and silly with mistakes and odd choices in hardware.
I don't know, its always going to be a strange mystery but the great thing is if you want a down to earth system there are two available right now, with a third being your PC.
Your interpretation.of criticism as anger is curious.
So many angry people in this thread. Iwata really pissed some people of. Or maybe it's the same people like always with another excuse to hate Nintendo. Who knows.
I'm less interested in him "breaking promises" and much more concerned that he doesn't seem to be learning. He seems to be caught off guard every single time third parties don't get on board, as if he was confident that this time they'd truly be getting Bioshock and GTA.
Since at least the middle of the Wii days, they should have been operating under the assumption that those parties will never be coming to their platforms and adjusted accordingly. If they ever came, it could be seen as a bonus. Instead, they seem to be constantly caught flatfooted, sure that this time they've finally created a machine that will attract the Western AAA developers, and when that doesn't happen it leaves gaps that they somehow were not expecting.
Criticism? Many people act if Nintendo has slaughtered their firstborn. I don't have so much time for gaming anymore but I always enjoy it to see how Nintendo pisses some people of by doing something totally different and sometimes stupid. What's great about this is the fact that Nintendo could do this for a looong time. All this people praying for Nintendo to fail and it just won't happen. Very entertaining to watch. ^^
I don't understand why Nintendo couldn't do the same as Sony. Sony improved its software output in the last 7 years in an impressive way but Nintendo did nothing or it was very Japan centric like a few deals with japanese developers (Fatal Frame, Monster Hunter or Bayonetta).
I thought we attack positions and not people on Neogaf?
Nintendo really needs a Western head, it seems that NOJ has no clue about today's gaming landscape.
This whole thing is pretty brutal, so I expect Nintendo fans will find little details to quibble over that make the entire thing a non-issue in their eyes... "But X so this loses all credibility."
There's a lot of people in this thread referring to the 3DS as a failure. Are we talking about the same 3DS?
Hasn't the 3DS sold about as many units as the DS did in the same timeframe?
Actually Nintendo increased its software output a lot during the last years. But i guess the games had not enough guns in them to be recognised.
I was actually under the impression that the 3DS had been doing well after a poor launch.
What do you want me to do riot NCL? With what money lolThis whole thing is pretty brutal, so I expect Nintendo fans will find little details to quibble over that make the entire thing a non-issue in their eyes... "But X so this loses all credibility."
So many angry people in this thread. Iwata really pissed some people of. Or maybe it's the same people like always with another excuse to hate Nintendo. Who knows.
Perhaps it's time for some outside influence at the top.I honestly don't know who could replace him. His resign could be the beginning of the apocalypse or the birth of a whole new universe.
Oh, the name wasn't about third parties. My earlier post covered my problem was both developers and consumers. But if it wasn't relevant you can ignore it.
Ouya and Nintendo are in 2 separate leagues in both history and influence.
It's not a strange mystery more than it's unnecessary weight. Again, this is stuff Nintendo doesn't have to do that affects their game output. And people defending these actions is what I find most annoying.
Forget PC gaming or Microsoft and Sony for a second and focus on Nintendo as a business acting weird.
I don't understand why Nintendo couldn't do the same as Sony. Sony improved its software output in the last 7 years in an impressive way but Nintendo did nothing or it was very Japan centric like a few deals with japanese developes (Fatal Frame, Monster Hunter or Bayonetta).
I honestly don't know who could replace him. His resign could be the beginning of the apocalypse or the birth of a whole new universe.
This is what bothers me. The inability to learn from past mistakes and expecting
that 3rd parties will jump on board because of hardware. And having hardware that will be technically obsolete in the console market by 2014.
Except the DS/3DS didn't have droughts, except for the post-launch period which is true for pretty much every console.
It may basically just a series of quotes, but damn if they don't do a good job of showing that nothing has been learned from any of the negatives they have experienced in the last 10 years.
I refuse to believe it's a by-product of their society. Nintendo being adamant to everyone, including themselves, seems to be their own self inflicted wound. We've had at least 2 other Japanese companies manufacture hardware and their behaviour can hardly if possibly be compared to Nintendo's own.I think it's less to do with weird and more to do with being foreign. Nintendo at heart and in all it's actions exude a Japanese like mythology. And I think that's it really. People don't forgive Nintendo for being weird but instead accept it as an inherent trait. Kinda like a relative from another country. They might act a bit weird but you just accept them for who they truly are.
It's not like Nintendo couldn't change I guess. But I don't even think it's Iwata. I'm betting the whole company work the same way and think the same way. I wouldn't be surprised if all of Nintendo's developers were mini Iwata's lol.
In a weird way I see Nintendo as a Japanese company exporting it's stuff to the rest of the world. It's no wonder they preform better at home.
Yes, the Wii U is chock full of games right now.Actually Nintendo increased its software output a lot during the last years. But i guess the games had not enough guns in them to be recognised.
I think the most etherish part of this article is that Iwata and co are complete hypocrites for saying they would simplify gaming input and then creating the most expensive controller ever
I refuse to believe it's a by-product of their society. Nintendo being adamant to everyone, including themselves, seems to be their own self inflicted wound. We've had at least 2 other Japanese companies manufacture hardware and their behaviour can hardly if possibly be compared to Nintendo's own.
The problem with Iwata is he's the one spearheading these things. There needs to be a CEO with a bigger sense of responsibility, even if the company is all like him.