Kotaku: Next Xbox will require online connection to start games

Can you imagine paying for xbox live being mandatory? Because games are using the cloud so it counts as Xbox live Gold service.

The box saying "Requires Xbox live gold", damn.

Yeah, that's not that far from how it is now. 50% of your game requires Xbox Live already. Now it would be 100%.
 
You mean casuals. I don't think most of the people on forums who are angry about this care about those 3 franchises.

I think you will find that Hardcore gamers play those games as well, in fact COD players probably game as much as anyone unless the definition of a 'Hardcore Gamer' is someone who only plays Japanese RPG's or WOW or something.
 
I think that even IF this becomes true, it won't be as big of a problem for MS as we might think. That is because most consumers are bitch-made with no resolve; they will eventually buckle at the knees and bend over to get their software fill.

I just don't think it'll play out for MS as we think it might if this ends up being true at all.
 
Assuming this is true, that would be reason enough for me to completely ignore the console. It's not as if Microsoft has any exclusive titles I'm interested in anyway.

I'm partially joking, as I'd buy it if it had games I want ... but for fucks sake, what idiot thought this would be a good idea?
 
This probably won't end up being true, however there's a part of me that wants it to be just for the shits n giggles. Waiting for official confirmation...

What good besides just for the "shits n giggles" can come out of this? If anything we should hope that all three systems will be as good as they can get and be successful, after all competition is a good thing for us consumers first.

Back on topic if the rumor is true then I'll probably get a used Durango for 80e at 2020 and just play the games I missed, no way I'm supporting such a thing.
 
shooting+yourself+in+the+foot.jpg

You could have posted that as well when they made the HDD and an Ethernet port mandatory to play online in the first xbox. Look how that turned out.
 
Naw im speaking pure profit. But you do seem to agree that they are banking on the gamble of converting customers to make up the deficit.

How sound logic that is remains to be seen.

Well, I think the argument is that there would be more pure profit from these connected customers as the conversion makes up for any lost profit. You can't force the conversion if you leave the not-connected option available, and while unfortunate, that does mean cutting off a potential revenue stream.

But yes, we certainly agree that whether such a gamble pays off is completely up in the air. I make no judgement about its worth, only that there is an economic sense.
 
I can feel bad for you that you can't enjoy something I can, but I'm not making buying decisions based on that. Especially when it comes to something as frivolous as entertainment. There's always Product B for you if Product A can't offer you what you want.

I think you misunderstood my point.

I wasn't expecting anyone to. What I find saddening is that some people won't care about issues and problems unless they affect them directly, and I think that's just wrong. People dropping by this thread and posting something like "I have a super-fast, always-on internet connection" are failing to see the big picture and failing to empathise about people who aren't as fortunate. Just because something doesn't concern you directly doesn't mean you should automatically disregard it and not care about those affected.

That doesn't mean you should boycott any product, but don't act like there is no problem with it just because you have no problem with it. Still, that's just my opinion.
 
You could have posted that as well when they made the HDD and an Ethernet port mandatory to play online in the first xbox. Look how that turned out.

If i remember right, only 20% of Xbox owners went online and that was the figure from right at the end so it didn't go that well really!.
 
At one time TV was beamed through the air for free as long as you purchased the gear to cathc that symbol. Commercials paid for continued content and we put up with them. Then cable came around and suddenly we were paying for a better feed with exsclusive content and commercials were still there. We bitched and moaned but continued to pay our cable bills.
(How can I possibly go to work tomorrow if I haven't seen the most recent Lost!?)

Now our games consoles are becoming family entertainment systems and we're bitching about having to be always connected.

I have complete lack of faith that enough people will vote with their wallets, so this too will come to pass.

I'm not saying its right, I'm saying historically we, people, are horrible consumers. Great for them, horrible for us.
If this BS is true, it's our duty as early adopters to tell our family and friends.
"If your internet goes down, you can't play!"
That's all it will take. Even the idiot sheep will be horrified.
/this is coming from an xbox fan btw.
 
Yeah, that's not that far from how it is now. 50% of your game requires Xbox Live already. Now it would be 100%.
It'd honestly be AMAZING if they not only made the console always online but require a subscription. I'd hope it either failed or at least become Microsoft's own special niche while mainstream and a good chunk of niche support went to PS4/WiiU/PC/anything portable instead, with any possibility to REALLY lead the industry lost.
 
You could have posted that as well when they made the HDD and an Ethernet port mandatory to play online in the first xbox. Look how that turned out.

What am I reading? The first Xbox included a HDD and Ethernet port by default, you couldn't even physically separate the two. This allowed for online play and didn't force anything on the user. Mandatory parts for online were mandatory for the entire console, and the HDD was extremely useful for all users not just for online games.
 
My internet has been super patchy this week. Reminds me why I don't support always-online DRM.

So if this is real, no next-gen Xbox for me.
 
People dropping by this thread and posting something like "I have a super-fast, always-on internet connection" are failing to see the big picture and failing to empathise about people who aren't as fortunate. Just because something doesn't concern you directly doesn't mean you should automatically disregard it and not care about those affected.

That doesn't mean you should boycott any product, but don't act like there is no problem with it just because you have no problem with it. Still, that's just my opinion.

It's fine, they will be the very first people raging about how they can't play any of the game they've bought on these forums the very first time Xbox Live goes down for routine maintenance.

Then the karmic wheel will let them know how that feels when they just get trolled hard by everyone who didn't buy into it with dealwithit.gif etc
 
What am I reading? The first Xbox included a HDD and Ethernet port by default, you couldn't even physically separate the two. This allowed for online play and didn't force anything on the user. Mandatory parts for online were mandatory for the entire console, and the HDD was extremely useful for all users not just for online games.

Practically NO one had Ethernet internet back then and look how it payed off for them.

Now fast forward to now and tell me, how many times are you seriously on your computer, phone or console and you're not connected online. Like seriously. Are you people on fucking crack or what?

I can count on one hand the number of times my internet was down in the passed 5 years. Jesus Christ.
 
You could have posted that as well when they made the HDD and an Ethernet port mandatory to play online in the first xbox. Look how that turned out.
Your post is crumbling, falling apart since the first word. You're seriously bolstering your acceptance to always online and all you can come up with is this weak ass nonsensical reply? Cmon son!
 
what if the always online is for used games.
you buy the game and you have to pay a $10 license fee in order to use it. basically a $10 activation fee.
 
Heh, Wii U doesn't seem so bad now.

WiiU is going to get a big boost this Christmas -

"Mum can i get that new Xbox for Christmas?"

"Well we will see what we can do if you're good"

"But....er....Mum you need to have the internet to play it......"

"What?....to play a games machine?, thats ridiculous. We are not paying that much for a new console then also paying an extra $20 per month just to use it!!!...........you can have a WiiU and be thankful for that!"








".....Fuck you mum"
 
I have been a huge Xbox supporter for 13 years now. I still remember the article I read about the original Xbox in EGM in, I believe October of 2000. It had Twisted Metal Black on the cover, and a short article on why how the Xbox would change the gaming landscape.

I kept the lime green "Xbox Unveiled" issue of EGM for like 10 years, and read the article that unveiled the console and controller design probably a thousand times. It was pretty much the only thing I read during "silent reading" in school for the year leading up to launch.

I preordered the original Xbox and kept a countdown calendar to it's original November 8th launch date and waited outside a Circuit City for like 18 hours to get a 360 when it came out.

I really hope this isn't the direction they are going. I won't be able to support it if they do. If this is strictly an anti-piracy measure, there has to be a better way, right?
 
And I see the exact opposite. People who say they don't want always online, cloud computing, games/video on demand, Kinect sensor required, VR, etc. don't want any progress in the game industry. People who think like you are harming gamers who want to see gaming and technology evolve and create new better experiences than we've had in the past.

The same argument you're making for "helping" the less fortunate gamers is no different than the argument that Xbox Live should have been designed for dial-up connections. I would say of the 40% who don't connect their game box to the Internet at least half probably have access to the Internet and just don't see a reason to connect the box. Don't underestimate how obtuse the average consumer can be, they have a limited idea of what a game console is for and sometimes they need to be pushed forward to see how much better it can be. Kudos to the company that says enough is enough, connect your box to the Internet already so we can build the experience we want to.

Requiring online and Kinect isn't "dangerous precedent" it is giving designers the opportunity to build experiences that aren't possible when you have to account for technology laggards. The people who fight against these things have an extremely limited view about how the game industry can evolve. Too many people here believe the only acceptable room for progress in the game industry is to improve the GPU/CPU and RAM while everything else must stay the same (including keeping a ridiculous optical drive that exists for no other purpose than to placate retail partners). No company entering the game industry today would include an optical drive or make online optional. Look at companies like Roku, OUYA, OnLive, Valve, and even Apple. These may be precedents of the game industry to build for offline and physical media, but these are not forward thinking ideas.

I fully agree that if these rumored requirements are real AND there is no material benefit to consumers that it is bullshit. But what are the chances that the Xbox team is designing a system that requires the Internet for no other reason than to serve ads? Obviously that's a financial incentive, but if that's really the only vision that the team has for gaming/community then there are bigger reasons to not want an Xbox than online requirements.
I think you need to backup and check your premises. The context of this discussion is around a rumor that suggests app/game functionality would be shut down on the Xbox Next if it cannot establish acceptable network connectivity within any given three minute window, whether the currently running app/game actually needs it or not. This is a _restriction_, not enhancement.

Obviously a game or app that requires a network connection to deliver some of its features will establish the availability of that connection itself and obviously someone who opts to play/use such a game/app will have to be aware of the need to enable the software to connect online. There's no reason why the console itself has to further police that for software or the user, certainly not for the sake of games that don't even need an online connection to be played properly.

These systems do not need to be "always" online to get the benefits of online and the simple reality is that progress is not achieved by becoming less resilient to adversity like you're basically proposing through total intolerance to offline use.
 
Yeah..this is kind of a dumb move. And I dont necessarily think its because people dont have internet, most of us do especially anyone who would buy a 720. I just think this sounds really bad, this type of news generates horrible PR and word of mouth.
 
Really just want to see what the benefit is to the user. With many other bad decisions this gen and in the past, they could be justified with some tangential benefit to the user; sure there shit DLC and on-disc DLC, but there was also good DLC; sure patches are annoying, but there have also been some good patches.

If this is true ...

I just don't see what benefit this has over this generation of consoles. I have one of the best home internet services in the country... 100MB up/down, but my internet still goes out. Beyond that, my router screws up, or my network switch loses it, or my roommate is tinkering with something and accidentally unplugs the internet.

I just don't see any benefit to the player, in any way.

Hoping MS leaked that on purpose to gage the Gaf reaction and then make their decision based on that reaction. I know that this isn't true, but hoping for it.
 
What am I reading? The first Xbox included a HDD and Ethernet port by default, you couldn't even physically separate the two. This allowed for online play and didn't force anything on the user. Mandatory parts for online were mandatory for the entire console, and the HDD was extremely useful for all users not just for online games.

It was the dumbest post in the thread by far. Why would the fact that you need and hdd to go online in the first place be a problem if every single one was mandatory in the first place?

Terrible spin. Corporate apologist is not even appropriate in this case. I think "Deluded fanboy who can't even defend this dumb practice properly" is better.
 
Has to be bullshit. Has to be. Absolutely no way this will work reliably in a lot of places given the unpredictability of internet connections. I'd be amazed if it happens.

Online one-time activation for games? Maybe. Always online though, surely not.
 
Hahaha. If this is true. . . man fuck that noise!

If this is true I will not be getting one, period. My consoles need to be able to function without an internet connection. I already own one partially internet reliant gaming device, my PC.

I don't want that mess.
 
Has to be bullshit. Has to be. Absolutely no way this will work reliably in a lot of places given the unpredictability of internet connections. I'd be amazed if it happens.

Online one-time activation for games? Maybe. Always online though, surely not.
Too many sources have reported this for it to be shaken off as BS, including EDGE who have been dead on with PS4 information.
 
Yeesh, I hope none of this is true. These nasty Durango rumors just won't die, and we keep hearing from "sources" that say this is all real.

I sure as hell hope not. Always online DRM is a disaster, but having a console that requires an online connection to even allow you to play games? Hell no. And I say that as someone living in a major metropolitan area that still experiences hours of no internet access on a regular basis.
 
Too many sources have reported this for it to be shaken off as BS, including EDGE who have been dead on with PS4 information.
Too many equally valid developer sources also exist that don't appear to possess knowledge of where the always online bit came from. And one that has proven himself more valid than all the others ever; SuperDAE, who says it's nonsense. Also EDGE being dead on with PS4 information doesn't suddenly mean they're dead on for Durango information.
 
Too many sources have reported this for it to be shaken off as BS, including EDGE who have been dead on with PS4 information.
Yeah I hate to say it but with so many different sources saying the same shit its probably true. At this point Im expecting Kinect always on, no used games and internet connection required to play games.

I just threw up a little.
 
You could have posted that as well when they made the HDD and an Ethernet port mandatory to play online in the first xbox. Look how that turned out.
I don't get you. Why would an ethernet port and a HDD be a bad thing for multiplayer?

What would be stupid is if internet access was required for single player games.
 
Top Bottom