SuperSonic1305
Member
They want us to get used to this so that when it happens we are not surprised. Hoping that by the time the console launches nobody will care anymore.
Can you imagine paying for xbox live being mandatory? Because games are using the cloud so it counts as Xbox live Gold service.
The box saying "Requires Xbox live gold", damn.
You mean casuals. I don't think most of the people on forums who are angry about this care about those 3 franchises.
This probably won't end up being true, however there's a part of me that wants it to be just for the shits n giggles. Waiting for official confirmation...
Naw im speaking pure profit. But you do seem to agree that they are banking on the gamble of converting customers to make up the deficit.
How sound logic that is remains to be seen.
I can feel bad for you that you can't enjoy something I can, but I'm not making buying decisions based on that. Especially when it comes to something as frivolous as entertainment. There's always Product B for you if Product A can't offer you what you want.
You could have posted that as well when they made the HDD and an Ethernet port mandatory to play online in the first xbox. Look how that turned out.
If this BS is true, it's our duty as early adopters to tell our family and friends.At one time TV was beamed through the air for free as long as you purchased the gear to cathc that symbol. Commercials paid for continued content and we put up with them. Then cable came around and suddenly we were paying for a better feed with exsclusive content and commercials were still there. We bitched and moaned but continued to pay our cable bills.
(How can I possibly go to work tomorrow if I haven't seen the most recent Lost!?)
Now our games consoles are becoming family entertainment systems and we're bitching about having to be always connected.
I have complete lack of faith that enough people will vote with their wallets, so this too will come to pass.
I'm not saying its right, I'm saying historically we, people, are horrible consumers. Great for them, horrible for us.
It'd honestly be AMAZING if they not only made the console always online but require a subscription. I'd hope it either failed or at least become Microsoft's own special niche while mainstream and a good chunk of niche support went to PS4/WiiU/PC/anything portable instead, with any possibility to REALLY lead the industry lost.Yeah, that's not that far from how it is now. 50% of your game requires Xbox Live already. Now it would be 100%.
You could have posted that as well when they made the HDD and an Ethernet port mandatory to play online in the first xbox. Look how that turned out.
You could have posted that as well when they made the HDD and an Ethernet port mandatory to play online in the first xbox. Look how that turned out.
People dropping by this thread and posting something like "I have a super-fast, always-on internet connection" are failing to see the big picture and failing to empathise about people who aren't as fortunate. Just because something doesn't concern you directly doesn't mean you should automatically disregard it and not care about those affected.
That doesn't mean you should boycott any product, but don't act like there is no problem with it just because you have no problem with it. Still, that's just my opinion.
What am I reading? The first Xbox included a HDD and Ethernet port by default, you couldn't even physically separate the two. This allowed for online play and didn't force anything on the user. Mandatory parts for online were mandatory for the entire console, and the HDD was extremely useful for all users not just for online games.
Your post is crumbling, falling apart since the first word. You're seriously bolstering your acceptance to always online and all you can come up with is this weak ass nonsensical reply? Cmon son!You could have posted that as well when they made the HDD and an Ethernet port mandatory to play online in the first xbox. Look how that turned out.
PS4 isn't doing this they already said it will play used games and doesn't have to always be online.Welp, im done. Hello PS3. Maybe. Unless it does the same shit.
Then Hello pc!
Heh, Wii U doesn't seem so bad now.
I think you need to backup and check your premises. The context of this discussion is around a rumor that suggests app/game functionality would be shut down on the Xbox Next if it cannot establish acceptable network connectivity within any given three minute window, whether the currently running app/game actually needs it or not. This is a _restriction_, not enhancement.And I see the exact opposite. People who say they don't want always online, cloud computing, games/video on demand, Kinect sensor required, VR, etc. don't want any progress in the game industry. People who think like you are harming gamers who want to see gaming and technology evolve and create new better experiences than we've had in the past.
The same argument you're making for "helping" the less fortunate gamers is no different than the argument that Xbox Live should have been designed for dial-up connections. I would say of the 40% who don't connect their game box to the Internet at least half probably have access to the Internet and just don't see a reason to connect the box. Don't underestimate how obtuse the average consumer can be, they have a limited idea of what a game console is for and sometimes they need to be pushed forward to see how much better it can be. Kudos to the company that says enough is enough, connect your box to the Internet already so we can build the experience we want to.
Requiring online and Kinect isn't "dangerous precedent" it is giving designers the opportunity to build experiences that aren't possible when you have to account for technology laggards. The people who fight against these things have an extremely limited view about how the game industry can evolve. Too many people here believe the only acceptable room for progress in the game industry is to improve the GPU/CPU and RAM while everything else must stay the same (including keeping a ridiculous optical drive that exists for no other purpose than to placate retail partners). No company entering the game industry today would include an optical drive or make online optional. Look at companies like Roku, OUYA, OnLive, Valve, and even Apple. These may be precedents of the game industry to build for offline and physical media, but these are not forward thinking ideas.
I fully agree that if these rumored requirements are real AND there is no material benefit to consumers that it is bullshit. But what are the chances that the Xbox team is designing a system that requires the Internet for no other reason than to serve ads? Obviously that's a financial incentive, but if that's really the only vision that the team has for gaming/community then there are bigger reasons to not want an Xbox than online requirements.
Is it irony that folks are posting online about how they will not use a console that requires it to be online?
No there isn't.Is it irony that folks are posting online about how they will not use a console that requires it to be online?
It really isn't ironic at all once you dissect the reasons why people are opposed to an always online console.Is it irony that folks are posting online about how they will not use a console that requires it to be online?
What am I reading? The first Xbox included a HDD and Ethernet port by default, you couldn't even physically separate the two. This allowed for online play and didn't force anything on the user. Mandatory parts for online were mandatory for the entire console, and the HDD was extremely useful for all users not just for online games.
Is it irony that folks are posting online about how they will not use a console that requires it to be online?
Is it irony that folks are posting online about how they will not use a console that requires it to be online?
Gamers: Fuck off with your online Kinection-required console, Microsoft!
Microsoft at E3: "We've purchased the Call of Duty, Madden, and FIFA franchises!"
Gamers:![]()
Too many sources have reported this for it to be shaken off as BS, including EDGE who have been dead on with PS4 information.Has to be bullshit. Has to be. Absolutely no way this will work reliably in a lot of places given the unpredictability of internet connections. I'd be amazed if it happens.
Online one-time activation for games? Maybe. Always online though, surely not.
Is it irony that folks are posting online about how they will not use a console that requires it to be online?
Too many equally valid developer sources also exist that don't appear to possess knowledge of where the always online bit came from. And one that has proven himself more valid than all the others ever; SuperDAE, who says it's nonsense. Also EDGE being dead on with PS4 information doesn't suddenly mean they're dead on for Durango information.Too many sources have reported this for it to be shaken off as BS, including EDGE who have been dead on with PS4 information.
Yeah I hate to say it but with so many different sources saying the same shit its probably true. At this point Im expecting Kinect always on, no used games and internet connection required to play games.Too many sources have reported this for it to be shaken off as BS, including EDGE who have been dead on with PS4 information.
I don't get you. Why would an ethernet port and a HDD be a bad thing for multiplayer?You could have posted that as well when they made the HDD and an Ethernet port mandatory to play online in the first xbox. Look how that turned out.
Didnt all Xboxes have a harddisk and an ethernet port?You could have posted that as well when they made the HDD and an Ethernet port mandatory to play online in the first xbox. Look how that turned out.