PJV3
Member
Don't stop the homeopathy. Just reduce their funding to 1p. They'll be really happy with that, because it'll make the funding far more effective.
Shame we got rid of the Ha'penny, even more effective.
Don't stop the homeopathy. Just reduce their funding to 1p. They'll be really happy with that, because it'll make the funding far more effective.
"Thatcher is reviled in parts of the country that are less important" - , Charles Moore on Radio Five Live.
I wonder if he's pro-union as well...
People going to the event just to turn their back when the coffin passed? Doesn't make sense to me. Is it just to try and get that physical statement of disapproval shown on TV?
There are no metrics available which lend creedance to the idea she fixed Britain or made us better off. Growth in the 70s was exactly the same as growth in the 80s. The 70s were what she saved us from apparently...
People going to the event just to turn their back when the coffin passed? Doesn't make sense to me. Is it just to try and get that physical statement of disapproval shown on TV?
"Thatcher is reviled in parts of the country that are less important" - , Charles Moore on Radio Five Live.
Financial Dereuglation
- Promoted instability, and channeled volatility at home and abroad
- Has created zero wealth (transfer payments only)
- Has enabled the transfer of wealth from those on lower incomes to those already well off
- City of London has now created the largest set of tax havens in the history of civilisation, helping to fleece literally the entire world.
Unmitigated disaster. I work in the City/West End FWIW.
Privatisation
Failures: All of them bar Telco's/airlines. No better service, higher costs, assets stripped and sold off.
There is a reason the 'market' doesn't work in industries's where monopolies are inherent and consumers have no choice. The reason for water shortages that occur more frequently is because the resevoirs have been sold off to PE funds across the world, drained and developed over.
I am not against privatisation. I am against privatisation of things which are so obviously incapable of fulfilling the requirements of a free market model vis-a-vis consumer sovreignty.
North Sea Oil
She spent all of this money on tax cuts (race to the bottom yay!) and paying out benefits to the millions of people that were left unemployed and homeless.
I am not going to defend Scargil or argue against the fact that the unions had gained too much power over industry. The way she resolved the issue though can not be supported. There should have been an effort to more slowly re-balanace the economy as there was in other countries. There was none. It is no surprise if you gut the primary source of income for entire communities of low-income workers you will create generational destitution. Which we are all currently paying for. This was her "price worth paying". Government is no longer interested in reducing unemployment.
Her legacy is of a hobbled national infrastructure, the completion of the corporate takeover of the political class and the promotion of the spiv economy. "There is no such thing as society".
She obliterated one-nation Toryism, it is now purely a party of the south and of a certain political class.
There are no metrics available which lend creedance to the idea she fixed Britain or made us better off. Growth in the 70s was exactly the same as growth in the 80s. The 70s were what she saved us from apparently...
GAF is by no means against the idea of free-markets. GAF is almost certainly against the idea of free-markets allowed to run wild, the libertarian philosophy which she followed as unshakable doctrine. Most people believe government has a role to play, to manage the excess (greed) of capitalism through regulation and redistribution of income, try and facilitate equal opportunties for lower-income children and the provision of merit goods.
She was a strong political figure. That is all. So was Stalin. FYI divisive is media code for "hated".
wow lol
The mining tax payers have quite a lot of clout.
"Thatcher is reviled in parts of the country that are less important" - , Charles Moore on Radio Five Live.
Chyeah, too much clout.
HA, well there you go. Far Right ideology in a nutshell.
That Gideon tear is 'shopped, right?
I mean, come on.
I personally don't think that the comment is anywhere near as disgusting as people rioting and looting and pillaging a town in celebration of someone's death.
I also don't think that the comment is anywhere near as disgusting as rocking up just to turn their back to the coffin as it passes by.
I'm finding it very hard to feel any sort of sympathy for these people, and it only strengthens my respect for her.
I personally don't think that the comment is anywhere near as disgusting as people rioting and looting and pillaging a town in celebration of someone's death.
I also don't think that the comment is anywhere near as disgusting as rocking up just to turn their back to the coffin as it passes by.
I'm finding it very hard to feel any sort of sympathy for these people, and it only strengthens my respect for her.
Because the people turning their backs or looting represent every person of the areas they come from right?
these people
I don't understand why you would protest, she has been out of power for 23 years, was a democratically elected (three times) leader, Labour maintained most of her policies and now she is dead, what good will protesting do when they are burying her? I get people might not agree with her/want to protest her policies but I don't understand how the funeral is the event for that.
I personally don't think that the comment is anywhere near as disgusting as people rioting and looting and pillaging a town in celebration of someone's death.
I also don't think that the comment is anywhere near as disgusting as rocking up just to turn their back to the coffin as it passes by.
I'm finding it very hard to feel any sort of sympathy for these people, and it only strengthens my respect for her.
Financial Dereuglation
- Promoted instability, and channeled volatility at home and abroad
- Has created zero wealth (transfer payments only)
- Has enabled the transfer of wealth from those on lower incomes to those already well off
- City of London has now created the largest set of tax havens in the history of civilisation, helping to fleece literally the entire world.
Unmitigated disaster. I work in the City/West End FWIW.
Privatisation
Failures: All of them bar Telco's/airlines. No better service, higher costs, assets stripped and sold off.
There is a reason the 'market' doesn't work in industries's where monopolies are inherent and consumers have no choice. The reason for water shortages that occur more frequently is because the resevoirs have been sold off to PE funds across the world, drained and developed over.
I am not against privatisation. I am against privatisation of things which are so obviously incapable of fulfilling the requirements of a free market model vis-a-vis consumer sovreignty.
North Sea Oil
She spent all of this money on tax cuts (race to the bottom yay!) and paying out benefits to the millions of people that were left unemployed and homeless.
I am not going to defend Scargil or argue against the fact that the unions had gained too much power over industry. The way she resolved the issue though can not be supported. There should have been an effort to more slowly re-balanace the economy as there was in other countries. There was none. It is no surprise if you gut the primary source of income for entire communities of low-income workers you will create generational destitution. Which we are all currently paying for. This was her "price worth paying". Government is no longer interested in reducing unemployment.
Her legacy is of a hobbled national infrastructure, the completion of the corporate takeover of the political class and the promotion of the spiv economy. "There is no such thing as society".
She obliterated one-nation Toryism, it is now purely a party of the south and of a certain political class.
There are no metrics available which lend creedance to the idea she fixed Britain or made us better off. Growth in the 70s was exactly the same as growth in the 80s. The 70s were what she saved us from apparently...
GAF is by no means against the idea of free-markets. GAF is almost certainly against the idea of free-markets allowed to run wild, the libertarian philosophy which she followed as unshakable doctrine. Most people believe government has a role to play, to manage the excess (greed) of capitalism through regulation and redistribution of income, try and facilitate equal opportunties for lower-income children and the provision of merit goods.
She was a strong political figure. That is all. So was Stalin. FYI divisive is media code for "hated".
I personally don't think that the comment is anywhere near as disgusting as people rioting and looting and pillaging a town in celebration of someone's death.
I also don't think that the comment is anywhere near as disgusting as rocking up just to turn their back to the coffin as it passes by.
I'm finding it very hard to feel any sort of sympathy for these people, and it only strengthens my respect for her.
"Thatcher is reviled in parts of the country that are less important" - Charles Moore
What. Fucking cocks."In a sense we are all Thatcherites now" - PM David Cameron
Two people were arrested in Brixton for looting on the night of her death. Two! Looting and pillaging indeed!
You should have included the following qualifier -- 'Rocking up' at a lavish and expensive state funeral, that we are ALL paying for! To register a protest at that and make known a distaste for all the eulogising is an entirely valid form of protest. The people who loved Thatcher aren't the only ones who live on the streets of Great Britain -- if the powers that be want to parade her through them, they'll have to put up with what people think of her.
And this tory twat's comments are pointedly directed at communities that have already been affected by this thankfully dead and gone harbinger of misery and inequality. There is literally nothing he can say that will be more hurtful or damaging to national equity than the legacy of Maggie Thatcher.
The annals of history will remember that she was not universally loved. Deal with it.
when do we go back to saying there isn't any money?
"Thatcher is reviled in parts of the country that are less important" - , Charles Moore on Radio Five Live.
Local elections in May
when do we go back to saying there isn't any money?
Jesus Christ.
I half think that these types are doing all they can to make Scotland vote yes and rid themselves of a liberal chunk of the electorate.
Local elections in May
Of course not, but pray tell, why didn't you make an equal protestation when it was said that Charles Moore represented the right? Or are you engaging in double standards?
Well I hope people remember when they get to the ballot box. That's if they can be assed to vote.
Though something tells me now the cuts have come and hit a lot of people with reality. There will be much more active voting.
Funny that, I don't remember commenting on other members posts about his comments, nor saying his comments represent the right?
At least funeral benefit seems to be on the up.
I personally don't think that the comment is anywhere near as disgusting as people rioting and looting and pillaging a town in celebration of someone's death.
I also don't think that the comment is anywhere near as disgusting as rocking up just to turn their back to the coffin as it passes by.
I'm finding it very hard to feel any sort of sympathy for these people, and it only strengthens my respect for her.
The woman who started it wanted to show everybody watching around the world that the country was NOT united in grief, as the Tories like to project. She said that the Thatcher's were perfectly entitled to stage an intimate funeral of an appropriate size for a former PM, but since they chose instead to stage such a grand and expensive funeral for such a divisive figure, a silent protest is fair game.
Guardian said:Blum wrote to the police and then spoke to an officer involved in security planning for the funeral who reassured her that the Met were happy for her protest to go ahead.
"It is the first time I have ever asked for permission to protest but I am a working mum now and I just can't afford to be kettled or arrested and miss the school pickup. He was very reassuring and we agreed a point near the beginning of the route where I can stage the protest and that I can advertise it."
Blum's Facebook event is one of several urging people to turn their back on the procession, which have attracted hundreds of supporters. One such group, Maggie's Good Riddance Party, plans to hold a "right jolly knees-up" outside St Paul's Cathedral.
"I don't want to upset anyone but I feel very strongly that public money is being used to venerate a deeply controversial politician who caused huge suffering and devastated this country," said Blum. "I don't know how big it will be but I felt like it was an important to let the world know that a lot of people in this country strongly disagreed with what Margaret Thatcher stood for."
Financial Dereuglation
- Promoted instability, and channeled volatility at home and abroad
- Has created zero wealth (transfer payments only)
- Has enabled the transfer of wealth from those on lower incomes to those already well off
- City of London has now created the largest set of tax havens in the history of civilisation, helping to fleece literally the entire world.
Unmitigated disaster. I work in the City/West End FWIW.
Privatisation
Failures: All of them bar Telco's/airlines. No better service, higher costs, assets stripped and sold off.
There is a reason the 'market' doesn't work in industries's where monopolies are inherent and consumers have no choice. The reason for water shortages that occur more frequently is because the resevoirs have been sold off to PE funds across the world, drained and developed over.
I am not against privatisation. I am against privatisation of things which are so obviously incapable of fulfilling the requirements of a free market model vis-a-vis consumer sovreignty.
North Sea Oil
She spent all of this money on tax cuts (race to the bottom yay!) and paying out benefits to the millions of people that were left unemployed and homeless.
I am not going to defend Scargil or argue against the fact that the unions had gained too much power over industry. The way she resolved the issue though can not be supported. There should have been an effort to more slowly re-balanace the economy as there was in other countries. There was none. It is no surprise if you gut the primary source of income for entire communities of low-income workers you will create generational destitution. Which we are all currently paying for. This was her "price worth paying". Government is no longer interested in reducing unemployment.
Her legacy is of a hobbled national infrastructure, the completion of the corporate takeover of the political class and the promotion of the spiv economy. "There is no such thing as society".
She obliterated one-nation Toryism, it is now purely a party of the south and of a certain political class.
There are no metrics available which lend creedance to the idea she fixed Britain or made us better off. Growth in the 70s was exactly the same as growth in the 80s. The 70s were what she saved us from apparently...
GAF is by no means against the idea of free-markets. GAF is almost certainly against the idea of free-markets allowed to run wild, the libertarian philosophy which she followed as unshakable doctrine. Most people believe government has a role to play, to manage the excess (greed) of capitalism through regulation and redistribution of income, try and facilitate equal opportunties for lower-income children and the provision of merit goods.
She was a strong political figure. That is all. So was Stalin. FYI divisive is media code for "hated".
Regarding the protests at the funeral:
People turning their backs was done in a very measured way. I'm not going to defend the twenty-somethings who want to dance on her grave, but it's a free country, and I don't think there is much more to really be said about it. The 41 year-old mother who spawned the idea for people to turn their backs at the funeral is not representative of the incredibly small minority of people that damaged property and looted shops in the aftermath of her death. As Radiohead said, two people were arrested for looting after her death. This is hardly significant at all. And for what it's worth, there were zero arrests at the funeral today and the protests were silent and completely peaceful.
I find the media reaction to the funeral, the BBC's cowardice in refusing to play a song and the extravagant and massively expensive funeral for such a hated figure to be much more noteworthy.
The country obviously has deep social problems, as evidenced by the England riots in 2011. This stems from the deep inequality that was accelerated under Thatcher. I don't think it's fair to link the silent protests started by a 41 year old mother to those of literally two mindless idiots who decided to loot a few shops and damage property.
Maybe we just have different priorities, but a comment from a former editor of the Telegraph, one of the biggest Tories in the country, saying what everybody in his party privately thinks, that areas of the country where Thatcher is reviled are less important, is much more disgusting than a silent protest at an over-extravagant funeral.
This is more or less the perfect review. Maybe mention the promotion of selfishness, but otherwise spot on.
I will be voting, the trouble is I don't know who to vote for anymore. Shall we set up a GAF UK Party ?
Made an emoticon:
![]()
![]()