• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Boston: One dead, one captured, city re-opened

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not particularly you, but I do remember lots of brazen posters in here last night proclaiming how "ridiculous" all of us Sunil defenders would look when it turned out it was him.

Some poor family got shat on yesterday for no reason at all, thanks to internet armchair detectives. Though the girl was in all her right to tweet what she did, as the FBI does ask you to come forward with any infomation. People just took it waaaay overboard.

I appreciate that. One thing from last night though: I still want to know what's up with that crazy old guy leaning against the railing and smirking. What kind of person sits back and "takes in the view" at a time like that? Run, old man. Run.
 
The distinction, of course, is that there isn't someone in West, Texas at large with guns and explosives. That doesn't render your point moot, but we're really not talking about equivalent things.

Even though, still, I feel this is more entertainment than actual news reporting.
 
Just got home from the gym:

Seriously. How is this still going on???

Two things combined:

  • Guy is hiding out in a well thought-out spot where it would take a while to find him
  • Cops are taking EVERYTHING seriously, anything suspicious is searched before proceeding
 
I appreciate that. One thing from last night though: I still want to know what's up with that crazy old guy leaning against the railing and smirking. What kind of person sits back and "takes in the view" at a time like that? Run, old man. Run.

Honestly, to me, the old man looks to be grimacing/in shock. Not smiling and enjoying the sunshine as people seem to have gathered.
 
I hope this is a joke post. The world isn't so monochrome.

Are you implying that there was some kind of legitimate rationale and logic to their actions? If so, what is it? Or is it really that you dislike someone relegating anything down to monochrome "evil" or "good", including terrorism?
 
Not a joke at all. The lives and safety of the police and civilians come first. The terrorists well being is irrelevant, they are insane and evil.

...there are no words for this kind of black and white "terrorists and murderers are insane and evil" kind of world view. These are people who went wrong at some point and were religiously/ideologically motivated to kill a bunch of people at the Boston Marathon. They don't deserve anyone's sympathy, but at the same time, "insane" and "evil" are such ridiculous, sweeping generalizations for people who, despite one of them saying he had no American friends, apparently did have a few.
 
Hell there's a bigger situation in West, Texas going on right now, people are still missing, yet no one gives a fuck. They prefer this live Hollywood movie instead.
We're pretty sure that the fertilizer factory isn't going to explode again, nor is it going to slink down to Austin, shoot some cops along the way, and escape. One is an industrial accident, while the other is a living, breathing, still potentially dangerous person.
 
Are the police forcing their way into homes now? Since when AREN'T people ALLOWING them to search their homes? I'm sure you are going to provide the evidence to back up your claims and prove your fears to be legitimate.

I think this is an ineffective defense, for the simple reason that there are probably some homes that aren't currently occupied by their owners but being searched anyway. Not being there, they obviously aren't giving consent.

Again, the more appropriate response is that this is a situation of hot pursuit, and it's a longstanding precedent that police may enter a home without a warrant during hot pursuit if they have reason to believe lives may be in danger. There's no constitutional violation, unless you want to quibble over the definition of "hot pursuit" -- but in this case, I think the definition would stand up.

Now, if the police were searching these houses, seizing evidence unrelated to the suspect being pursued, or making arrests based on that evidence, I would certainly mount strong objections to that. But as far as I know, there's no suggestion that that is happening. As long as they're entering houses specifically to find and arrest the armed and dangerous criminal they've been pursuing for the last several hours, I don't see a problem, and neither, I think, would the Supreme Court.
 
Suppose he somehow fled the vicinity. How long would it take (purely hypothetical of course) till they can acknowledge that they can't find him in Watertown and perhaps the entire Boston? And what would be the next step?
 
bomber-child.jpeg

I don't usually get emotional with images, but this one got a reaction out of me for whatever reason.
 
I wonder how far in advance this was planned. If we assume his brother went overseas for training or something to pull it off, I wonder if the Boston Marathon was a target from the start, or if that came up at some point in the first half of last year. Then I wonder how far in advance #2 knew about it as well, if only to see if you could connect anything he posted online to it as well.

It is so crazy how, with all the man power and video and stuff we have, that someone can be on the run for this long (assuming he isn't dead). I can understand it when a city is active and that sort of thing, but not when everything is essentially shut down like it is here. Has this ever happened on this scale ever before?
 
I don't remember media coverage like this after any of these events. It's like America has been waiting for a 9-11 part two, and this little ounce of it has people foaming at the mouth. It's a serious situation, I know, but the mass amount of attention to this is getting ridiculous.

Hell there's a bigger situation in West, Texas going on right now, people are still missing, yet no one gives a fuck. They prefer this live Hollywood movie instead.

False equivalency man! Your cape with FE stitched on it is in the mail.
 
Yes. Exactly.

Unibomber. Atlanta Olympics bomber. Hell, I don't remember a manhunt like this after Oklahoma City.

They are really different situations, though.

The Unabomber killed only 3 people over several years. If the cops had had an inkling of who he was, they would have rushed to him but that didn't happen; his search and capture was a slow process because they didn't really know where the guy was. He had been stranged from his brother for years, who was the guy who gave the key clues for his capture.

The Atlanta bomber remained on the run for years and was captured by a regular officer by almost coincidence, cause, again, they didn't know who the bomber was.

It is silly to suggest that the law wouldn't have reacted if they knew either of these criminals were in the middle of a city, armed and desperate.
 
I think this is an ineffective defense, for the simple reason that there are probably some homes that aren't currently occupied by their owners but being searched anyway. Not being there, they obviously aren't giving consent.

Again, the more appropriate response is that this is a situation of hot pursuit, and it's a longstanding precedent that police may enter a home without a warrant during hot pursuit if they have reason to believe lives may be in danger. There's no constitutional violation, unless you want to quibble over the definition of "hot pursuit" -- but in this case, I think the definition would stand up.

Now, if the police were searching these houses, seizing evidence unrelated to the suspect being pursued, or making arrests based on that evidence, I would certainly mount strong objections to that. But as far as I know, there's no suggestion that that is happening. As long as they're entering houses specifically to find and arrest the armed and dangerous criminal they've been pursuing for the last several hours, I don't see a problem, and neither, I think, would the Supreme Court.


Except unrelated evidence of unrelated crimes found during a search under the idea of hot pursuit is admissible isn't it?
 
It is just shows temperature differences and is extremely accurate. They can discern temperature differences of 0.07 deg F. During the day stuff will absorb heat from the sun and may mask some details but you still can easily pick out people, vehicles, and buildings.

Well I meant more due to the sheer amount of glass in an urban setting playing havok with details but I suppose you're talking more about tracking movements rather than searching for someone ducked out hiding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom