Wait this guy was wearing 900 dollars lv shoes. Doubt it.
Anyone hearing this on CNN.
There have been multiple indications that these two had far more money (in cash) than they reasonably should have, including very nice cars and clothing.
Wait this guy was wearing 900 dollars lv shoes. Doubt it.
Anyone hearing this on CNN.
Holy crap, this thread became huge.
They probably wouldn't have time for coffee, but I get what you're saying, hehJust for perspective I'm a card-carrying ACLU member and I'd let them in and make them coffee.
And what if the renewed interest in Sunil help his family find him?
Look the FBI ASKED for HELP. People tried to help. 99% of the leads called in where probably wrong.
I don't get the hate for people legitimately trying to assist police in tracking this guy down.
Cnn still saying they robbed 7-11
They are behind by 3 hours
I don't doubt that.If anyone refused a search right now then they are a fool. You would instantly become a person of interest at a time like this
So they didn't rob the 7-11? Or did they? And have they reached out to Suspect #1's wife?
Are they not asking permission?
All the internet civil rights lawyers in here are amazing. Keep on keeping on.
going off this tangent of invalid searches and such, I wonder if there's some sort of protection against anything the searching parties see in your house, against you.
I imagine there's been quite a few toilet flushes in Watertown.
Maybe it's the optimist in me but they really want to find this guy I doubt they're paying attention to any bongs or weed stashes.
Because I don't allow strangers in my home. And since this is America, that is enough of a reason (especially since systematically searching multiple blocks does not fall under the hot pursuit doctrine). This search is bordering on martial law and despite the intentions (the road to hell is paved with good intentions), anyone who respects the Fourth Amendment should be wary.
IBhatejustlikePatriotActdefenders
So they didn't rob the 7-11? Or did they? And have they reached out to Suspect #1's wife?
nothing to report i guess.
swat is out of the building again.
Talk about your false equivalentsBecause I don't allow strangers in my home. And since this is America, that is enough of a reason (especially since systematically searching multiple blocks does not fall under the hot pursuit doctrine). This search is bordering on martial law and despite the intentions (the road to hell is paved with good intentions), anyone who respects the Fourth Amendment should be wary.
IBhatejustlikePatriotActdefenders
Where is that car now?
They are rights and they are Duties. It's withing your rights to deny the police to enter your house searching for the terrorists, but it's your Duty to help the police catch him.
I don't know what country you are from, but this is how Americans rolls.
Sorry- I wasn't criticizing your point, just the words you chose to make it. That is, a crisis doesn't mean you should "stop caring" about your rights.I think you've misinterpreted my post. I'm on your side homey.
They highjacked a car at the 7-11.
Because I don't allow strangers in my home. And since this is America, that is enough of a reason (especially since systematically searching multiple blocks does not fall under the hot pursuit doctrine). This search is bordering on martial law and despite the intentions (the road to hell is paved with good intentions), anyone who respects the Fourth Amendment should be wary.
IBhatejustlikePatriotActdefenders
Unless they're stressed and want to kick back in between searches.
If you willingly allow officers into your home, your forego your Fourth Amendment rights. The discussion is in regards to individuals that refuse.
going off this tangent of invalid searches and such, I wonder if there's some sort of protection against anything the searching parties see in your house, against you.
I imagine there's been quite a few toilet flushes in Watertown.
Because I don't allow strangers in my home. And since this is America, that is enough of a reason (especially since systematically searching multiple blocks does not fall under the hot pursuit doctrine). This search is bordering on martial law and despite the intentions (the road to hell is paved with good intentions), anyone who respects the Fourth Amendment should be wary.
IBhatejustlikePatriotActdefenders
going off this tangent of invalid searches and such, I wonder if there's some sort of protection against anything the searching parties see in your house, against you.
I imagine there's been quite a few toilet flushes in Watertown.
Topic's gonna need to open a OT2 by nightfall.
This thread had nicer people in it during the AM hours.![]()
going off this tangent of invalid searches and such, I wonder if there's some sort of protection against anything the searching parties see in your house, against you.
I imagine there's been quite a few toilet flushes in Watertown.
Topic's gonna need to open a OT2 by nightfall.
Dude is still missing in action.Dude what happened when I went to sleep around 10am? They had him held up in the house, with a rocket in the basement I thought? Still nothing? Is the kid on the lose or in that house?
So which trumps liberty: Bombs? Dead cops? What specifically is your test case here?They gunned down police officers and tossed bombs into a neighborhood? Did you happen to notice how the city wasn't shut down before they did that? They were identified and nothing got locked down until they started killing more people. Is that not clear?
Cnn still saying they robbed 7-11
They are behind by 3 hours
This thread had nicer people in it during the AM hours.![]()
This thread had nicer people in it during the AM hours.![]()
Except unrelated evidence of unrelated crimes found during a search under the idea of hot pursuit is admissible isn't it?
why are we having a long protracted argument over hypothetical rights violations at this moment in time? christ.
why are we having a long protracted argument over hypothetical rights violations at this moment in time? christ.
I know! What happened, right? I liked the guys we were hanging with then.