Microsoft: Next Xbox will work even when your Internet doesn’t

That internal quote is vague as fuck. I read it as being tolerable of the instability of internet connections - ie there has to be one there in the first place.

It doesnt say: "Our games must work if there is no internet at all"

The hell, do you need someone to shout in your ear before you believe anything.
I don't know why you would have believed the first rumor either there was never a real source.
 
Why restrict it to next gen? They have a track record on other rumors, which might have been provided by similar sources. It's like you're choosing what to believe.

Don't websites usually identify the rumor being from the same source as previous rumors to lend credibility to the current rumor?

Is this not common practice?
 
EDGE's rumors as far as PS4 goes, were true. VGLeaks has gone both ways. Ars Technica has no track record on next-gen. Simple.

No one has a track record on Durango, your rules for selectively believing one source over others are so hopelessly contrived it's a wonder how you actually expect to be taken seriously.
 
Un-named, vague, sources, for which, the source documentation (the e-mail) isn't provided, is automatically true? lol

Nope, just that "according to latest rumors, earlier rumors were incorrect". These sites can easily manage to post more rumors before 21st that change things one way or another.
 
Baited. Awesome, thanks for the laugh.

:)

What does this even mean?


Either way, this is a good rumor finally. I enjoy MS IPs more than Sony's when it comes down to it and I was starting to feel a bit disparaged by how they were treating the consumer with the 'leaks' and such. I plan to pick up both this year so it's not really a 'battle' for me but I hope they both turn out to be more than just toll booths for 'services'.
 
the only reason to send a letter of information regarding a policy, is if the policy has changed.
so good news.
I'm still interested on whether the new xbox will function without the camera
(I dont mind buying another kinect, if microsoft really wants to sell me one with the console, but -like the one I have now- it stays off unless I say so.)
Also the thing about being able to run used games.

About the technology and the ..rumored technology, I would prefer that it would be cutting edge, but whatever it has inside should be good enough for a couple of years, so
as long as the two things above are offered - and I think they will be - its all good for me.
 
Well that is good news, too bad used games/rentals are going to be locked out. Maybe we will get some nice front loaded content to tempt us via a demo process or something.

Used games this gen, always online DRM next gen. For those saying it isn't happening because gamestop is happy? Guess who is selling you the code?
 
The writer of that article tweeted this
It's easy to see how a Steam-like approach could get interpreted as "always online". Ditto a Connected Standby approach.
I really hope it is like steam, my days of disc swapping are over.
 
Hey look, another sane individual. I think half the fun for people believing one rumor over the other is being able to say "I told you so." It's cringe worthy to see some of these posts. Just wait for the conference, please?

Exactly. When you have stuff like this:

Ah how did I know you wouldn't be pleased by this news? :P You really will cling on to any bad 720 news for as long as you can won't you.

It makes you not even want to go in the thread because it's just a lot of high-fiving and ass slapping from the Xbox fans and grumbling and etc. from everyone else. Let's just wait 2 more weeks, good grief.
 
the only reason to send a letter of information regarding a policy, is if the policy has changed.
so good news.
I'm still interested on whether the new xbox will function without the camera (I dont mind buying another kinect, if microsoft really wants to sell me one with the console, but -like the one I have now- it stays off unless I say so.)
Also the thing about being able to run used games.

About the technology and the ..rumored technology, I would prefer that it would be cutting edge, but whatever it has inside should be good enough for a couple of years, so
as long as the two things above are offered - and I think they will be - its all good for me.

Policy never changed. It has been the same way since the start.

People have to stop trying to make a narrative out of everything.
 
Anyone have any idea as to why MS would send this email to their own employees that are working on Durango?

Wouldn't those employees already know if nextbox is always online or not?
 
Lol people acting like this is true. Just like the EDGE rumour this is a rumour. Does anyone know the source of this rumour? Where Ars is getting its info from?
 
I don't think people really believed the first rumor until the Orth disaster.

I seem to remember everyone saying it's defiantly true now, everyone thought it was true then they used Orth as their evidence.
Not bad evidence mind you, but that was really about it.
 
hahhahha are you kidding ?
this is literally the only thing people talked about whenever durango came up. it created a massive shitstorm and got an employee fired. now tell me in what world is "no always online" not good news ?
My point being that this should not even be a thing.
The shitstorm was a good thing because the idea that a platform holder would push always-online is abhorrent.
News that this isn't the case is only 'good' in the same sense as 'the tumor is not malignant' is good news.
 
Exactly. When you have stuff like this:



It makes you not even want to go in the thread because it's just a lot of high-fiving and ass slapping from the Xbox fans and grumbling and etc. from everyone else. Let's just wait 2 more weeks, good grief.

What has that got to do with anything I said to Takuya?
 
Technically they would still be able to block used games with out required internet right?

Just be allowed to play used games without some stupid activation code. That's all i care about.
 
This is very good news if true. I just find it very strange details like these aren't common knowledge to full-time employees working on the next Xbox.

Maybe this means it's a final decision they only reached fairly recently?
 
Oh, I forgot. Those product overview sheets were totally meant for the press!
Lol - as if that makes it better. These unclear statements about how Durango should function weren't meant for the press! They were just meant for our internal project staff, so they could, you know, do their jobs effectively...based on non-specific criteria about fundamental system components. That's all.
 
Anyone have any idea as to why MS would send this email to their own employees that are working on Durango?

Wouldn't those employees already know if nextbox is always online or not?

Not everyone who works on a console has a complete understanding of every part of how the system functions.


Lol - as if that makes it better. These unclear statements about how Durango should function weren't meant for the press! They were just meant for our internal project staff, so they could, you know, do their jobs effectively...based on non-specific criteria about fundamental system components. That's all.

The people who sent it and people who received it knew exactly what the pieces meant. What is really so hard to understand?
 
A question to everyone in this thread.

If Durango is not always online, but still blocks used games and requires Kinect 2.0 to function, will you still be interested in the console providing that its first party lineup is somewhat decent?
 
Baited. Awesome, thanks for the laugh.

:)


Nah, you just got exposed and now you are back-pedaling by pretending like this was an elaborate bait just for laughs.

And even if you were, you'd be admitting to purposefully trolling, which is bannable.

Not a good look for you either way lol.

What does this even mean?


Either way, this is a good rumor finally. I enjoy MS IPs more than Sony's when it comes down to it and I was starting to feel a bit disparaged by how they were treating the consumer with the 'leaks' and such. I plan to pick up both this year so it's not really a 'battle' for me but I hope they both turn out to be more than just toll booths for 'services'.

I don't get it either. He thinks he's clever or something idk.

My point being that this should not even be a thing.
The shitstorm was a good thing because the idea that a platform holder would push always-online is abhorrent.
News that this isn't the case is only 'good' in the same sense as 'the tumor is not malignant' is good news.

How on earth is "the turmor is not malignant" NOT good news? Something bad supposedly happens, then you learn that it isn't bad at all. Explain how that is not good news.

Dem mental gymnastics.
 
The most obvious end to all of this is the next Xbox needs some Net connectivity to do specific tasks, which wouldn't surprise me if it was related to installations.

Heck, [conjecture incoming] maybe the real reason you need a connection is MSFT wants to decrypt the "game" similar to what Steam does, which prevents early playing/leaks, makes pirating much harder since the full game isn't present on disc always, and unfortunately, an effective way of limiting 2nd hand sales.
 
Twist: Nextbox has no single player games

I assume that's true in the same sense that there will be no single player PS4 games since any game can apparently be opened up to others over the 'net to take control of your game. I think that's a cool feature, but one I'd never use. Social gaming.
 
This is very good news if true. I just find it very strange details like these aren't common knowledge to full-time employees working on the next Xbox.

Maybe this means it's final a decision they only reached fairly recently?

Maybe there were some aspects that needed to be online all the time, or maybe they didn't want anyone to slip up and say it was always online.
Or maybe they just but this out there so people wouldn't keep on using it as a reason against the next-box.
 
Ars are credible, full stop. Whether you want them to be or not is irrelevant.

Now the questions remain, why do you doubt this report? Why do you find EDGE's rumor to be more credible? Why do you discount VGLeaks rumor? Are you posting with an agenda? Are you willing to bet your account that this is bogus or is this all just blatant anti-hype creation in every single Durango thread on this board?

I just don't get it. Why would you put your full faith in any report about an unreleased system without proof? Same for Edge. Same for VGLeaks. Why is this report worthy of being called truth, but the others are not? How are they not all rumors? You're really twisting these statements to imply there is some kind of anti-ms rhetoric where there is none.


Then how do you know that Ars has a good source? I guess I assumed you wouldn't claim Ars has good sources have the cornered the truth market unless you has something to back that up. I mean, otherwise you're just making statements based on blind faith, which seems odd.

Edit:
Policy never changed. It has been the same way since the start.

People have to stop trying to make a narrative out of everything.

Well, it certainly sounds like you've either got inside sources (which you deny), or you're just making blanket statements without anything to back it up. So I guess that pretty much puts an end to the conversation.
 
The writer of that article tweeted this

I really hope it is like steam, my days of disc swapping are over.

It's what I always believed it would be. Everyone had a different interpretation, and since the 'bad news is best news' crowd is the loudest every other explanation goes under in any discussion.
 
Anyone have any idea as to why MS would send this email to their own employees that are working on Durango?

Wouldn't those employees already know if nextbox is always online or not?
Nope. There was an article a while back that talked about how secure their offices were. I assume that too applies to employees. If you're working on the controller or the shell, no reason for you to know about DRM policies.
 
Who's to say that Ars' source is feeding them bullshit, and Ars is buying it? At worst, Ars fires the editor saying "He did not check his sources thoroughly enough, we apologize for the inconvenience, he has since been relieved of his duties.".
Peter Bright? No way he's getting fired. The guy has been right about all things MS for Ars for a long time. The worst anyone can say about him is that sometimes he gets a little too enthused for products that don't pan out well, like Windows Phone 7.
 
A question to everyone in this thread.

If Durango is not always online, but still blocks used games and requires Kinect 2.0 to function, will you still be interested in the console providing that its first party lineup is somewhat decent?

I dunno. Let's wait for the reveal first and E3.
 
A question to everyone in this thread.

If Durango is not always online, but still blocks used games and requires Kinect 2.0 to function, will you still be interested in the console providing that its first party lineup is somewhat decent?

It'd still be a tough sell, but it depends on what games they show me.
 
Top Bottom