I'm sure you would. It's racist to respect certain tribe's skill and tenacity in combat and understand how that would translate well into the ethos of a sports team, right?
...You seem to be repeating yourself a lot in this thread. We get it, you think Native Americans all survive on nothing but handouts and love these nicknames.
Jesus christ... I wonder if the team was called the Washington Wet backs, there'd be the same defense. Some of the replies here are shameful.
If Hispanics were only 1% or 2% of the population, I'm guessing it'd get the same kind of "shrug, who gives a shit?" attitude from a lot of people.
Name should not change. Yea, it's a bad name. But that's been their name for decades, and that area takes pride in it. They don't see it as a negative, but a positive. Everyone outside of the area doesn't like it? Well, it's not theirs to decide.
It would be embarrassing if they changed the name. It's only offending white people or natives not getting their proper cut.
Bit of a joke, probably nothing to do with the Redskins. However, some of the money has a trail with the Florida teams in similar standing.
It's one of the finest logos in all of sports.
That's not the logo at all! Stop your ludicrous smear campaign.
This is Chief Wahoo.
![]()
Again, some of the natives are getting handouts which probably ease the pain and suffering.
American football prints money. They could have the most racist logo on the planet, and you'll find a native to cash that blank cheque.
It's really one of my favorite logos. I just hate looking at Tito wear that stupid bucket sized red BP cap.
Cyclops is racist against people born with only one eye. The nerve...
Boston Celtics logo is pretty racist. Do all white people really smoke and play basketball?
By the way, this thread made me stumble across this site:
http://www.rsdb.org/races
Some of these are absolutely hilarious in how absurd they are.
Most of your posts are either bad attempts at comedy or tragically sad.
Actually, that was a different point. The Cleveland Indians are a Major League Baseball team, one who is fairly stingy. The comparison was to American Football teams who are making profits in another stratosphere. Why don't you read the thread?
It would be embarrassing if they changed the name. It's only offending white people or natives not getting their proper cut.
Bit of a joke, probably nothing to do with the Redskins. However, some of the money has a trail with the Florida teams in similar standing.
Again, some of the natives are getting handouts which probably ease the pain and suffering.
American football prints money. They could have the most racist logo on the planet, and you'll find a native to cash that blank cheque.
It's really one of my favorite logos. I just hate looking at Tito wear that stupid bucket sized red BP cap.
Most of your posts are either bad attempts at comedy or tragically sad.
well thats nice of them to take pride in a racial slur
well thats nice of them to take pride in a racial slur
No, I read the thread quite fine, thank you. You should re-read your posts though.
The Redskins will never change. They are an old franchise, in a powerful market in the most popular sport. There will never be a protest large enough to hurt their bottom line, nor a government/commissioner that will make them change.
The Indians on the other hand will be moved one day and then they will likely change the name. Or they will have completely phased out the logo to the point where it's moot.
Racial slur is racist. People don't have any issue with names like the Indians and Blackhawks.
Well, you actively troll me in the NBA thread, so I'm not surprised by your posting. I find it humorous a bit, but it's also part of the problem and why this topic comes up frequently in the sporting circles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Seminoles#Florida_State_University
That's what he is referring to
Maybe because Celts, Vikings and Irish are not racial slurs?Well few people have issues with Celtics or Vikings as mentioned. Or Fighting Irish.
Doesn't appear that you have. They have been quoted, so it's fairly easy to read, thanks.
I don't think I ever trolled you in NBAgaf, The Celtic's future is bleak. And I'm not trolling you now if that's what you're getting at.
His implication that if natives were all just cut a check they'd all be more than happy to forget about the whole thing is insulting.
How do you figure the Redskins won't change an the Indians will be as well as will be moved?
I'm sure you would. It's racist to respect certain tribe's skill and tenacity in combat and understand how that would translate well into the ethos of a sports team, right?
I don't think I ever trolled you in NBAgaf, The Celtic's future is bleak. And I'm not trolling you now if that's what you're getting at.
Ah, I see the type of person I am dealing with.
Do vikings even exist anymore lol
Do vikings even exist anymore lol
Redskins are, I think, the #2 most valuable franchise in the NFL behind the Cowboys. It's gonna be an uphill battle to make them change anything.
The Indians can barely draw a crowd, so far fewer people would care if they changed their name or logo. I doubt they'll ever actually relocate though.
Right...
You're dealing with someone who responded to your post. I explained your misunderstanding, and you continue to further find another point. What is your exact issue now?
If Sanjuro would hand me out an apology, then I'd be more than happy with his assumption that all us injuns are looking the other way since our pockets are being lined up.
If Sanjuro would hand me out an apology, then I'd be more than happy with his assumption that all us injuns are looking the other way since our pockets are being lined up.
I still can't believe a team uses this logo in 2013.
What misunderstanding?That you love bringing up the notion that Native Americans all love hand outs and gleefully ignore racism directed towards them? No, I got that quite easily.
If Sanjuro would hand me out an apology, then I'd be more than happy with his assumption that all us injuns are looking the other way since our pockets are being lined up.
I still can't believe a team uses this logo in 2013.
Notwithstanding the protests of activists, a 2002 poll commissioned by Sports Illustrated found that 75% of those American Indians surveyed had no objection to the Redskins name. The results of the poll have been criticized by American Indian activists due to Sports Illustrated's refusal to provide polling information (i.e. how participants were recruited and contacted, if they were concentrated in one region, if one ethnic group is over represented and the exact wording and order of questions). But in 2004, a poll by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania essentially confirmed the prior poll's findings, concluding that 91% of the American Indians surveyed in the 48 states on the mainland USA found the name acceptable and setting out in detail the exact wording of the questions.
its a racial slur only because people let it be.
You never hear racial slurs directed at natives because there's like 4 of em. Including professor Beef.
Actually I should get a DNA test, my dad straight up has chief wahoo's nose.
its a racial slur only because people let it be.
Sure are some ignorant as fuck posts in here but that's never surprising. It's a slur that's been kept simply because there's enough assholes who think it's fine and whine about some PC brigade because god fucking forbid they show some god damn empathy to a group that's been decimated, forced to live on reservations then disrespected year after fucking year with racial epithets and mascots.
You know they're called the Redskins, right
not the Voldemorts
Notwithstanding the protests of activists, a 2002 poll commissioned by Sports Illustrated found that 75% of those American Indians surveyed had no objection to the Redskins name. The results of the poll have been criticized by American Indian activists due to Sports Illustrated's refusal to provide polling information (i.e. how participants were recruited and contacted, if they were concentrated in one region, if one ethnic group is over represented and the exact wording and order of questions). But in 2004, a poll by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania essentially confirmed the prior poll's findings, concluding that 91% of the American Indians surveyed in the 48 states on the mainland USA found the name acceptable and setting out in detail the exact wording of the questions
The majority of Native Americans don't give a shit, they probably have more important things to worry about. And it's obvious the name was never intended to be demeaning, it was meant to be something in the same vein as warriors. Who is gonna name their team something demeaning? Doesn't make any sense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redskin_(slang)#Current_use
Notwithstanding the protests of activists, a 2002 poll commissioned by Sports Illustrated found that 75% of those American Indians surveyed had no objection to the Redskins name. The results of the poll have been criticized by American Indian activists due to Sports Illustrated's refusal to provide polling information (i.e. how participants were recruited and contacted, if they were concentrated in one region, if one ethnic group is over represented and the exact wording and order of questions). But in 2004, a poll by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania essentially confirmed the prior poll's findings, concluding that 91% of the American Indians surveyed in the 48 states on the mainland USA found the name acceptable and setting out in detail the exact wording of the questions.
And honestly how many of you have ever heard the term used in demeaning or racial terms in your life? I never have, and I've lived in areas with significant populations in AZ and CA.
Compare that with the countless times I've heard the N word and other slurs for jews and mexicans, there is no comparison. Let it go. It's simply not a racial slur in modern times.