With respect, I disagree again here. Sales aren't all about the game, and that's what we're talking about here, sales. Every year, millions and millions of people buy CoD because of the name. Those are PLAYERS buying the game because of their expectations.
Millions of people bought Wii consoles, Wii Sports, and so on after seeing Wii Sports played, having played it themselves, and then went on to buy similar software.
If we are judging the games themselves and saying that the games themselves should be the ones under scrutiny, then as great as my earlier examples, Galaxy, DKCR, etc etc, should have sold WAY WAY more than they did. But there are two different markets here.
You have casuals who helped sell nearly a hundred million Wii units, and bought up all of the casual games, yielding inflated sales numbers vs what the quality of the game itself should have actually been able to pull in...
And then you have the "hardcore" Nintendo gamer that bought the Zeldas and Donkey Kongs and XenoGajiggers. Those games sold RADICALLY less than the casual games.
So yes, I am judging the player. Angry birds is not THAT great of a game, but it's cheap, accessible, and it was popular, which only made everyone else buy it. Then it became a huge thing. The exact same thing happened with the Wii and Wii Sports, Mario Kart, and other Wii Party games. Hell, Wii Play was a ridiculously popular title. It just ALSO happened to come with a controller. Many people saw this as "buy a controller, get a cheap game to play with the fam."
Wii was a child of circumstance.