#PS4NoDRM #XboxOneNoDRM || Now do you "Believe?"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Keep making up excuses. Last year an EU court rejected EULA and ruled that people should have the right to sell their used games. Apparently you can't do that on Steam so basically Gabe is taking your rights away no matter how much lubricant he uses in the process.

The hypocrisy I see in this forum amazes me.

AFAIK, this is how it's always been for PC gaming. At least there is avenue provided to customers to get all the shit they paid for. You can't sit there and say that Gabe and Valve isn't taking care of its customers.
 
My mind has been literally transformed by the some of the world's greatest novels...if publishers and authors of physical books don't get a slice of used sales. Why should game publishers for what is by and large much less ground breaking work. They deserve first sale only and barely that at times.

You can't have it both ways. You don't like the freedoms of physical media? Then release your games in digital download form only. Having said that even in pure digtial downloads will have to find fair ways to allow users to share experiences between family and friends. It's part of the human tradition.

(See - DRM free music & learn something)

Novels don't cost tens of millions to make.
 
KE5dyXS.png


https://twitter.com/therealcliffyb/status/339095869028708352
Jesus Christ, in the past year or so it's like he' on a one man misson to kill all goodwill and respect he has earned from gamers. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like he's fighting on the wrong side of an imaginary war of 'us vs. them'. Not the smartest move to keep taunting and insulting the same group that buy your wares.
 
Keep making up excuses. Last year an EU court rejected EULA and ruled that people should have the right to sell their used games. Apparently you can't do that on Steam so basically Gabe is taking your rights away no matter how much lubricant he uses in the process.

The hypocrisy I see in this forum amazes me.
It did not reject EULA. It ruled that the specific term prohibiting transfer of the license was invalid in the specific circumstances of the case. EULA is a contract in which the rights and obligations of the parties are defined. It can contain pretty much anything and no court anywhere has ever said that terms in EULA can not be binding.
 
You think that was a legitimate question? It was more of a way to provoke a response (aka troll) but I have seen people dumb enough to make a direct 1:1 comparision to dd games and physical, so maybe I'm wrong.

Why is arguing against Steam DRM not allowed? If according to gaming message board, Sony and Microsoft should be have to remove some future DRM, then I don't understand why Steam shouldn't as well.
 
AFAIK, this is how it's always been for PC gaming. At least there is avenue provided to customers to get all the shit they paid for. You can't sit there and say that Gabe and Valve isn't taking care of its customers.

You are a young gamer aren't you? The PC used to have a used games market that was basically shut down to fight piracy. Whether Gabe is taking care of you or not, that does not change the fact that he does not allow you to sell your used games on Steam, which is not consumer friendly at all.
 
Yeah don't fuck with Playstation stuff in Finland! Only country in the world where Sly is more populair then Mario!

That said, I doubt they know anything of what HQ is going to do regarding this all. So we shouldn't read much into the tweet and the deletion.
 
Guys, please stop quoting that Cliffy tweet. All you're doing is feeding his ego and giving exposure. It's probably exactly what he wants.
 
Novels don't cost tens of millions to make.

Why should that make a difference?

Movies cost billions to make too... I can still give my friend my dvd/bluerays for him to watch.

The point is why are videogames special that these restrictions are okay?

No other industry does this....
 
Damn this has grown quite a lot, so good.

It's a shame that when it comes to the internet there are always some people who will say that it's stupid to do X or Y, or who just want to look smart when what it's being asked is not really the point.

But whatever. I am glad that the region free hashtag is also going well. Good, good.


I bet he thought at that moment "Those poor fools".
 
Why should that make a difference?

Movies cost billions to make too... I can still give my friend my dvd/bluerays for him to watch.

The point is why are videogames special that these restrictions are okay?

No other industry does this....
No? Where is blockbuster? That industry is headed to the same place
 
You are a young gamer aren't you? The PC used to have a used games market that was basically shut down to fight piracy. Whether Gabe is taking care of you or not, that does not change the fact that he does not allow you to sell your used games on Steam, which is not consumer friendly at all.

I'm 27, so I don't know if you consider that young. I wasn't aware of PC games having had a used game market, I'm just saying that Valve acknowledges the possibility that Steam could shut down one day, and if it did, it's customers would have nothing to worry about. They deserve a little credit for coming out ahead of that lingering question, and smacking everyone with reassurance. If I buy something digitally on iTunes, I'm not allowed to resell it to anyone. Why should I expect that from Steam?
 
No? Where is blockbuster? That industry is headed to the same place

Blockbuster still exists...they got murked by Netflix. Who only stopped their disc system due to people using streaming. That is not the case in the gaming industry because people aren't ready for it yet. We are years away from DD only. Rushing it is silly because it only prevents a ton of people from playing.

I live in Philly, a pretty big city, but even here my internet is ass and borks out often. So yeah i get that is going that way...but we are not ready for it.
 
I don't get it, why is this an issue only with games?

Is Toyota supposed to get a cut of the profit every time a consumer sells their car? Or Samsung if someone sells their phone? This applies to pretty much every physical product out there.

I think its an issue because of inflation / cost to make games. Gamers have been paying the same price for videogames for YEARS despite the cost to make these games becoming ludicrously expensive. I feel like that's why DLC has become such a big thing (I HATED DLC when it started becoming popular and I still hate most DLC now, with a few exceptions), and why now we're seeing these used games shenanigans.

I'm no economist though so I really have no idea wtf I'm talking about.

Edit: I don't like charging for used games either, I look at it the same way you do. I don't pay extra for a used book, why should I pay extra for a used video-game? I feel like the cost for videogames should increase though, as much as I hate the thought of paying more than $60 for one (hell I can't even justify spending that much most of the time, I usually wait for sales).
 
Is Toyota supposed to get a cut of the profit every time a consumer sells their car? Or Samsung if someone sells their phone? This applies to pretty much every physical product out there.

This.

They could have transitioned to full digital, but the problem IMHO still remains because the store would be ran by a single entity and there would be no competition.

Just watch apple, if apple decides to raise the minimum price for the apps (they already did) on the appstore what could you do? Buy iphone apps from Samsung? You still have to buy from apple that is the platform owner.

Ok, let's imagine the same thing on a platform where games costs 60$ each... they decide to raise prices by 10$, you either quit buying and sell your hardware or deal with it.

Not so cool in my book.
 
Novels don't cost tens of millions to make.

well movies do. In fact movies cost MORE then games to make. yet come out for $30 and have zero DRM. No excuse for it. The videogame industry thinks it's special and above the rules. It's not. Can't think of another industry that is so controlling and greedy. Maybe if they got their shit together and stopped betting the farm on AAA games and wasting money on hollywood voice actors that gamers don't really give a shit about they would be in a better position and not looking for some bogey man to blame their problems on.

I have no sympathy for crying devs/publishers on the used game issue. If it wasn't for used games/trading game I wouldn't buy nearly half the new games I do now and furthermore I wouldn't be as exposed to new series as I am now.
 
It did not reject EULA. It ruled that the specific term prohibiting transfer of the license was invalid in the specific circumstances of the case. EULA is a contract in which the rights and obligations of the parties are defined. It can contain pretty much anything and no court anywhere has ever said that terms in EULA can not be binding.
I'm not sure where you live, but the "specific circumstances" you mention include pretty much any EULA ever written.

If you have to click 'accept' in order to install a game, for example, the EULA is not valid. You would have to have had that information before buying the game at the store. Online stores' EULAs are also questionable as they usually only allow things that would be allowed anyway and otherwise just restrict the person who buys the product for arbitrary reasons. This is Germany, by the way. I'm no lawyer, but this is what well sourced articles say.
 
Novels don't cost tens of millions to make.

So what...Movies cost more to produce and market.

It's one thing to try this with digital downloads quite another to manipulate a physical format with draconian measures to control all aspects of sale. Publishers don't deserve anything but first sale of a psychical product, there is no compelling argument to think otherwise.
 
Hopefully when the world is back at work tomorrow, it will get picked up by a few more news sites and give it a bit more exposure.
 
Hopefully when the world is back at work tomorrow, it will get picked up by a few more news sites and give it a bit more exposure.

Yeah, can't really expect it to keep up momentum for that long. Should definite do like famousmortimer suggested and tweet some more right before E3.
 
using the hashtag in that way implies support.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that's why it's been pulled. Game journo websites would take that as a statement of intent. Not to say deleting it is a statement of intent though, I assume they did that because they plan a date to inform us.
 
No? Where is blockbuster? That industry is headed to the same place
Last time I checked, people are still flocking around the Red Boxes in the local super markets and still get Blu-rays and DVDs mailed to them from Netflix. I don't see physical discs disappearing anytime soon despite the displacement coming from digital streaming.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom