#PS4NoDRM #XboxOneNoDRM || Now do you "Believe?"

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm convinced agreements have long been in place with all major publishers and Sony, MS regarding DRM. If Sony pull the plug on their DRM solution it will cause all manner of issues. MS will either ask publishers for exclusives or they will pull DRM from the system. For DRM on consoles to work they (MS SONY) needs a system that is in balance between the two companies. One company doing it and the other not was never going to be a solution for publishers, they either both do it or neither of them do it. My guess both have been long signed up to a solution and no manner of screaming from core gamers will change anything.

Yes and publishers can wave goodbye to their PS3 revenues if they decide not to give full support to PS4.

Publishers are not in a position to piss off Sony when almost half of their revenue is made on Sony's platforms. Third parties cut off Sega and Nintendo because it made little difference to their bottom line if it resulted in sanctions on releasing on other platforms from those two. The same cannot be said for Sony.

We need to get this idea that publishers hold all the cards out of here. Sony are the platform holder where publishers make a fuck load of money, that position naturally comes with a lot of power to dictate terms. EA and Activision are not going to turn around and say no to PS4 releases if it means no more PS3 publishing. Investors will have the respective CEOs' heads on pikes if they stopped releasing PS3 games.
 
Oh wait...you'll just put the money into the platform where stronger DRM measures are incredibly common. Dat argument logic.

C'mon, man.

At least there are ways to play your game if the publisher puts in horrible DRM. There is none of that on console.
 
Posting from the other thread. With regards to expanding this campaign to include tweeting Microsoft
I disagree. This shouldn't be a campaign to make Microsoft cave in, but to make them look like the bringer of evil to the gaming consumer.

I think a much more useful tactic would be to fill Microsoft's twitter account with #PS4noDRM and #PS4UsedGames.
 
Oh wait...you'll just put the money into the platform where stronger DRM measures are incredibly common. Dat argument logic.

Honestly, this is the most incorrect argument people have been using for weeks for a plethora of reasons. You can't compare DRM on a console to the environment and ecosystem set-up for PC gaming.
 
I've showed my support.

Here's the thing though. When you purchase a physical game, that game then belongs to you and you alone. If you decide to hand in that game to a second-hand retailer, what rights, legally, does MS or Sony even have over that product? If anything it's the retailers possession and they are legally entitled to sell that game on as they see fit.

Has anyone looked into this or have any feedback on the legal ramifications?
 
Yes and publishers can wave goodbye to their PS3 revenues if they decide not to give full support to PS4.

Publishers are not in a position to piss off Sony when almost half of their revenue is made on Sony's platforms. Third parties cut off Sega and Nintendo because it made little difference to their bottom line if it resulted in sanctions on releasing on other platforms from those two. The same cannot be said for Sony.

We need to get this idea that publishers hold all the cards out of here. Sony are the platform holder where publishers make a fuck load of money, that position naturally comes with a lot of power to dictate terms. EA and Activision are not going to turn around and say no to PS4 releases if it means no more PS3 publishing. Investors will have the respective CEOs' heads on pikes if they stopped releasing PS3 games.

I'm not saying publishers do not publish on PS4 what I'm saying is if MS does it and Sony pulls the plug on DRM, MS has two options. Ask for exclusives Say, 3-6 month window before it's released on the the PS4 or they pull DRM from Xone. Personally I'm of the opinion that heads of agreement of long since been signed off by all concerned.
 
I disagree. This shouldn't be a campaign to make Microsoft cave in, but to make them look like the bringer of evil to the gaming consumer.

I think a much more useful tactic would be to fill Microsoft's twitter account with #PS4noDRM and #PS4UsedGames.

Stop pretending to care about consumers. This affects the whole industry and not just Sony. Although your bias shows with your avatar.
 
Stop pretending to care about consumers. This affects the whole industry and not just Sony. Although your bias shows with your avatar.
And the best way to push back is to make people not want to buy their product. Why would you put more money into the pockets of a company trying to push this initiative?
 
I disagree. This shouldn't be a campaign to make Microsoft cave in, but to make them look like the bringer of evil to the gaming consumer.

I think a much more useful tactic would be to fill Microsoft's twitter account with #PS4noDRM and #PS4UsedGames.

Are you joking?
 
Maybe to add the pressure, someone could create a Tumblr page and We could add a bit more detail why we Dont want always online drm and anti-used games?

Just a paragraph will do but it would show execs exactly why we dont want this?
 
I'm not saying publishers do not publish on PS4 what I'm saying is if MS does it and Sony pulls the plug on DRM, MS has two options. Ask for exclusives Say, 3-6 month window before it's released on the the PS4 or they pull DRM from Xone. Personally I'm of the opinion that heads of agreement of long since been signed off by all concerned.

Yeah, if the publisher go for the first one then Sony can pull the plug on PS3 releases. No timed exclusive games. It is more likely that MS will get some token timed exclusive DLC and free co-marketing for Xbone.

Btw, an agreement like that which restricts consumer rights would be viewed very dimly by the EU Competition Commission. MS, EA, Sony, Activision and the rest had better hope that no such agreement exists or they could all be fined for forming a collusion and their products could be banned from sale within the EU which would be devastating to all gaming companies.
 
I cannot believe how easy this could be for Sony. We've basically set the ball up on a tee for them. All they have to do is knock it out of the park.

There's been some talk on Twitter about what effect Sony could make at this point, and thus the usefulness of a campaign like this. Some are saying it's probably too late.

If you believe Sony has mandated a universal regime, and contracts are signed, then there is probably very little Sony can do now. It might not be so easy for them.

On the other hand, if nothing is signed, it could be easy from a PR point of view, but difficult from a publisher handling point of view.

And then there's the middle possibility - that an opt-in regime is in place for publishers. In that case, lobbying sony and publishers could at least make them aware of consumer sentiment if they roll ahead with using such a system. As long as this is a possible scenario I think it's worth keeping on the pressure.
 
I wonder if GameTrailers will use this as an example of how GAF can come together as a positive and productive force for the industry, in their documentary. It's certainly deserving of it, and it would provide a balanced perspective. Perhaps they've already completed it though. Quick edit in order perhaps? ;)
 
And the best way to push back is to make people not want to buy their product. Why would you put more money into the pockets of a company trying to push this initiative?

Maybe we should also tweet Microsoft telling them our thoughts like we are doing for Sony? As gamers. We should care about the industry. And not about a single company. Because this DRM bullshit will only be defeated if both companies get rid of it.
 
Maybe we should also tweet Microsoft telling them our thoughts like we are doing for Sony? As gamers. We should care about the industry. And not about a single company. Because this DRM bullshit will only be defeated if both companies get rid of it.
And #PS4noDRM and #PS4UsedGames do exactly that.
 
I've posted again for today. I think I'm going to start posting the tags regularly today, I just worry that if I post to the Sony bosses too much it'll make them block me or something lol.
 
Just a paragraph will do but it would show execs exactly why we dont want this?

Better yet show executives why THEY don't want this.

No used games is a person who buys a lot of games at launch having their used games sales limiting their spending pool.

Less sales is less DLC sales.

No rentals and used games won't allow people to 'try' new intellectual properties to build fanbases for future purchases.

No used game sales and rentals won't allow young gamers to expand their horizons and explore other genres.

The value on games with short campaigns and tacked on multi-player suddenly won't seem worth a purchase.

People who actively advertise your games with Let's Play and streams won't be able to necessarily afford all games anymore.
 
That is limiting it to one platform. It should just be #noDRM or something like that.
No, it's supporting the movement while showing them you won't buy their crap if they keep pushing anti-consumer tactics. Why would you even advertise their box's name for them like that?
 
Maybe we should also tweet Microsoft telling them our thoughts like we are doing for Sony? As gamers. We should care about the industry. And not about a single company. Because this DRM bullshit will only be defeated if both companies get rid of it.
In the OP are the people you need to tweet at Microsoft. And yes this is a problem for everyone.
 
And #PS4noDRM and #PS4UsedGames do exactly that.

I agree, they see this too. This isn't just for the fans of PS4, I think all gamers should stand up and let their voice (so to speak) be heard. This is just bad for the consumer, so if you are a fan of either console, you should be concerned.
 
Now is the right time to stir things up for the attention of Euro PlayStation contacts.

Yesterday was amazing, but it was also a bank holiday in the UK, where SCEE is based :) It's now 9am, and UK based companies should be getting back to work. Noise this morning would be a good idea :)

I have updated the tweet links in the Open Letter to target PlayStationEU and other SCEE accounts as well as the UK wing of publishers: http://gofreak-ie.appspot.com/ps4usedgames

@PlaystationEU
@SCEEBlog
@ElectronicArts
@Capcom_UK
@Ubisoft

( As well as, still, the big wigs in Japan and the US, @yosp, @philrosenberg )

If anyone has more personal accounts of relevant people in the european arms of these companies, that'd be great.

Share, tweet, link...anything! Just do it :)

Later I'll switch things back in the open letter to target the US. It'll also be their first day back after the weekend...but for now, let's work Europe.

tweets sent. will fire off again when you update for the US side
 
Better yet show executives why THEY don't want this.

No used games is a person who buys a lot of games at launch having their used games sales limiting their spending pool.

Less sales is less DLC sales.

No rentals and used games won't allow people to 'try' new intellectual properties to build fanbases for future purchases.

No used game sales and rentals won't allow young gamers to expand their horizons and explore other genres.

The value on games with short campaigns and tacked on multi-player suddenly won't seem worth a purchase.

People who actively advertise your games with Let's Play and streams won't be able to necessarily afford all games anymore.


Yeah stuff like that would be amazing. I think ill set it up myself in a bit if no one else wants to.
 
There's been some talk on Twitter about what effect Sony could make at this point, and thus the usefulness of a campaign like this. Some are saying it's probably too late.

If you believe Sony has mandated a universal regime, and contracts are signed, then there is probably very little Sony can do now. It might not be so easy for them.

On the other hand, if nothing is signed, it could be easy from a PR point of view, but difficult from a publisher handling point of view.

And then there's the middle possibility - that an opt-in regime is in place for publishers. In that case, lobbying sony and publishers could at least make them aware of consumer sentiment if they roll ahead with using such a system. As long as this is a possible scenario I think it's worth keeping on the pressure.

I find it very, very hard to believe that contracts would ever be put in place for a system like this, everything would be conducted on the basis of a nod here and a wink there. Formalising a system that restricts consumer rights into a contract would be a highly risky move because it could be viewed as a collusion to fix prices of games by the EUCC.
 
Maybe we should also tweet Microsoft telling them our thoughts like we are doing for Sony? As gamers. We should care about the industry. And not about a single company. Because this DRM bullshit will only be defeated if both companies get rid of it.
We don't need to shout their name on this one, and the other thread is useless. We are kinda doing both. If Microsoft stays ignorant on all of this backlash Sony is getting, we can't help them.
 
No, it's supporting the movement while showing them you won't buy their crap if they keep pushing anti-consumer tactics. Why would you even advertise their box's name for them like that?

Why advertise the PS4? The same should be said that you wont buy the PS4 if they push this anti-consumer tactic. Its pretty obvious they are planning to put used games DRM in it. Its just Microsoft was the first one to come out with it so they are getting all the hate.
 
Oh wait...you'll just put the money into the platform where stronger DRM measures are incredibly common. Dat argument logic.

Why do people keep saying this? Seriously there needs to be a sticky topic or something for these folks. Here are just two simple ways it is different.

1.PC games are super cheap( I've bought 5 GOOD games for 1 dollar before on steam, that shit ain't happening on console ever).

2. PC games are basically yours forever. If a publisher decides to shut down the servers it's okay cause a fan made one will just pop up to take it's place(example of this is you can still play Phantasy Star Online multiplayer on PC). Find an old game that's unplayable? Just look around there's probably a fan made patch to make it work once again. PC gaming keeps going, you don't ever have to worry about losing all your games once a new generation begins like you do on consoles.
 
Why advertise the PS4? The same should be said that you wont buy the PS4 if they push this anti-consumer tactic. Its pretty obvious they are planning to put used games DRM in it. Its just Microsoft was the first one to come out with it so they are getting all the hate.
Because they haven't confirmed any DRM measures and aren't actively supporting and pushing it. Hence #PS4noDRM and #PS4UsedGames to push that it remains that way.
 
We don't need to shout their name on this one, and the other thread is useless. We are kinda doing both. If Microsoft stays ignorant on all of this backlash Sony is getting, we can't help them.

Well both Sony and Microsoft know we don't like this DRM stuff. Now its about how many times we want to remind them.
 
Oh wait...you'll just put the money into the platform where stronger DRM measures are incredibly common. Dat argument logic.

Oh look it's the same insane argument.

1. There is more than 1 marketplace to buy games from on PC.

2. PC games are cheaper at launch in most cases.

3. On sale you can get basically any year old game for 10$ or less.

DAT strawman
 
Well both Sony and Microsoft know we don't like this DRM stuff. Now its about how many times we want to remind them.
I don't think you get what I'm saying. If Microsoft ignores this whole campaign and we still see that DRM, I don't think removing it was ever an option.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom