Seems like there was a question hard hitting enough to get the PR handler involved.
Do you have links to other E3 interviews where that happens all the time? I would love to watch them.
No, because it doesn't happen. That's exactly what I'm saying.
Seems like there was a question hard hitting enough to get the PR handler involved.
Do you have links to other E3 interviews where that happens all the time? I would love to watch them.
Current trends are showing the prevalence of digital downloads, but not the monopolization of it. Physical media are just as relevant. Both can exist, you know.
Again all everyone is telling you digital isn't the future its the its recent past and the present. IT ISN'T NEW OR THE FUTURE!!!!!
With zero follow-ups and anything Major Nelson said was immediately accepted as truth.The Reddit interview had good hard questions and it was conducted in a far more succint and professional manner, IMO.
It also means that the PR handler getting involved is evidence that this is more hard hitting than what you usually get.No, because it doesn't happen. That's exactly what I'm saying.
The Reddit interview had good hard questions and it was conducted in a far more succint and professional manner, IMO.
PS3 has no restrictions on disc games and although limited, account sharing is possible for digital titles (even full games). People still buy PS3 games. PS4 will work in exactly the same way.How are they not connected?
Do you not see how TONS of people would never have to buy games if there were no restrictions on disc games on top of having something like the family share plan for ALL games; retail and digital?
Some people would be able to go through the whole gen without buying any games just as long as they knew the right people -- and they would be able to go through out the whole gen doing so legally.
Yes, both can exist. It's just that pretty soon, we will more than likely get a major digital download only system. I can already tell.
How was he unprepared? He had pages of pre-written notes!
With zero follow-ups and anything Major Nelson said was immediately accepted as truth.
It also means that the PR handler getting involved is evidence that this is more hard hitting than what you usually get.
PS3 has no restrictions on disc games and although limited, account sharing is possible for digital titles (even full games). People still buy PS3 games. PS4 will work in exactly the same way.
Until that time an online-only requirement is ONErous and draconian.A major digital download only console won't come until people are ready for it.
How he operates on the E3 showroom is that he tries to sneak interviews with publishers by asking them on the spot.
He does schedule a lot of his interviews, but some of them are totally on the spot. In this case, where he wanted to interview MS personnel, he caught Major Nelson in between breaks. He had interview questions in his backpack for a possible interview that may have come up.
In this case, it is unperepaerd in th sense that he didn't know when an interview would come up or if one would, but prepared with fan questions and knowledge.
I'm not talking about cutting the interview short at ~13 minutes which was due to time and is fine, even though it would have been nice to give AJ a 2 minute warning, I'm talking about the 7 minute intervention.Not because he was low on time and had a show to go to? Remember, this was an unscheduled interview.
It is 2 for PS3, 2 for Vita. It used to be 5 for PS3.Isn't it only 2 accounts though in terms of sharing?
And it won't do as well as a console with options for physical media. Consumers like choice.
Yes, both can exist. It's just that pretty soon, we will more than likely get a major digital download only system. I can already tell.
I never said it was new.
All I said was that current trends show that more people are moving towards digital due to convenience. A major digital download only console won't come until people are ready for it.
Yeah, what I'm saying is despite his preparation, he didn't actually drill into the core topics at hand, which is in complete contrast to his mission.
Consumers also like convenience too.
Would iPod have done better if it had a CD player? Probably.
Overall though, as long as enough people are reading for it, the convenience can be a major selling point to many.
I have no idea. The statements we do have are contradictory, and people are just assuming the rest.Wait did I miss something here? MJ says "Do you not get the value or the family plan... <muffled> that you now only need 1 xbox gold subscription?"
I thought this was a family group that you selected, but they all had to have gold already. Have i not just been keeping up to date on the news?
Do ipods have to go online before allowing you to play your own MP3s? Does your bluray player?Would iPod have done better if it had a CD player? Maybe.
It is a shame, but I put it down to Joe's inexperience with it really. Although the core topics weren't detailed, it was evident he was progressing in the interview to getting to that point.
Ouya is all digital.
PSPgo is all digital.
I don't think the ouya will take the market by storm and the PSPgo certainly didn't.
Console gaming to me involves a cartridge or disc that I have to put into a system. I don't find anything out dated or burdensome about that. Also, I'm glad I can play my Sega Saturn, SNES, DC, GCN, etc.
I don't want a console whose future is up in the air, literally, we're dependent on clouds with Xbox One.
.For a non-professional it was a fair enough interview. AJ was blocked and dodged whenever Hryb felt uncomfortable. It was really cringeworthy but not for Joe. Quite a good job for an untrained interviewer.
A major digital download only console won't come until people are ready for it.
The only digital system that has flourished is Steam, and that's because of its competition. When a person buys a Xbone for all digital consumption, they only have one marketplace to purchase their games from, and that's directly from MS.
Buying physical media is also convenient, by the way. Look at Amazon.
Wait did I miss something here? MN says "Do you not get the value or the family plan... <muffled> that you now only need 1 xbox gold subscription?"
I thought this was a family group that you selected, but they all had to have gold already. Have i not just been keeping up to date on the news?
The people won't be ready for it until they are sure they won't be screwed over by it.
Can we all agree this has got to be the worst PR work ever done for any product in the history of mankind? I'm beyond words for what Microsoft is doing in terms of mixed messages right now, just unbelievable.
I have a question I dont think no one has made yet.
On my shared family library, can the others play if Im offline ?!
No confirmation but extremely likely to be true.I have a question I dont think no one has made yet.
On my shared family library, can the others play if Im offline ?!
I wonder if people will actually start 'selling' their Xbox LIVE accounts for the game libraries.
No confirmation but extremely likely to be true.
Yes. It was 5 people originally, but Sony reduced the number down to 2. Probably because publishers didn't like it. Maybe they won't like the family program either and MS either cuts it down too or allows publishers to restrict it? We simply don't know at this point, but we shouldn't get too hopeful here. There is a reason MS didn't come out at their unveiling or the E3 press conference announcing it, since it could be their best feature if it really works that way.Isn't it only 2 accounts though in terms of sharing?
If the library is managed in the cloud, I don't see a reason for requiring the main account to be online.I believe thats most likely the restriction they will impose.
No confirmation but extremely likely to be true.
That's not a bad prediction honestly, I see people on Steam through forums doing that already.
Do ipods have to go online before allowing you to play your own MP3s? Does your bluray player?
Why games? The answer has nothing to do with convenience for the customer.
Yes. It was 5 people originally, but Sony reduced the number down to 2. Probably because publishers didn't like it. Maybe they won't like the family program either and MS either cuts it down too or allows publishers to restrict it? We simply don't know at this point, but we shouldn't get too hopeful here. There is a reason MS didn't come out at their unveiling or the E3 press conference announcing it, since it could be their best feature if it really works that way.
Let's wait for MN blog post hopefully outlining the policy in detail and all the restrictions and what control publishers have.
How are they not connected?
Do you not see how TONS of people would never have to buy games if there were no restrictions on disc games on top of having something like the family share plan for ALL games; retail and digital?
Some people would be able to go through the whole gen without buying any games just as long as they knew the right people -- and they would be able to go through out the whole gen doing so legally.
Wouldn't locally lead to pirating?
So, you are saying that I shouldn't believe that the family share plan is true... even though MS has been talking about it more and more these past weeks?
so 2 people cant play at the same time using the family share plan? that sucks
Depending on how resales will work, that can go wrong. What if Person A sells their account to a Person B and then Person A trades in their games associated to their account? Does Person B get fucked over?