My big issue with all of this, is what the police did. This case would be very different if they did their jobs right the first time.
Is there any proof of the injuries that Zimmerman is saying he received? I imagine if his head was slammed on the ground multiple times there would be a lot of damage.
My big issue with all of this, is what the police did. This case would be very different if they did their jobs right the first time.
Is there any proof of the injuries that Zimmerman is saying he received? I imagine if his head was slammed on the ground multiple times there would be a lot of damage.
Me too, those cuts on the back of his head looked like nothing to me. Wouldn't he have a concussion if his head was slammed repeatedly on cement?
Let's summarize a few things that are true, no matter what the verdict is:
George Zimmerman shot an innocent teen to death AFTER provoking an altercation with him, AFTER being advised to back off by police.
Then, to save his skin, he effected a massive smear campaign, wrecking this dead child's reputation and using race and prejudice as energy for his defense.
He stalked and killed an innocent person and then slandered their reputation to stay out of jail.
And these aren't even disputable. So we'll go back and forth on Florida law, and arguments about self-defense AFTER Zimmerman instigated a fight, but the above happened, even by Zimmerman's own account.
There are some disputed points in this post.
Concussions are pretty easy to come by, tbh.
Did he have a concussion? I mean, if this raging criminal weed smoking thug slammed his head against the ground repeatedly I think there might be more than a scuff.
And didn't I read that this altercation happened in the grass? How did zimmerman's head get slammed into concrete if they were fight in the grass?
What kind of gun did Zimmerman have?
Wouldn't he have one then?
Fight went onto the concrete walk-way
My big issue with all of this, is what the police did. This case would be very different if they did their jobs right the first time.
Is there any proof of the injuries that Zimmerman is saying he received? I imagine if his head was slammed on the ground multiple times there would be a lot of damage.
Wouldn't he have one then?
Haven't all the witnesses stated that the fight they saw was on grass? Martin's body was found well onto the grass. And no blood was found on the walkway. Wasn't it very light rain? I doubt it was washed away.
What kind of gun did Zimmerman have?
Current witness said the fight started on the grass then moved to the concrete walk-way.
But indeed if you were getting your head smashed in on concrete i would indeed expect blood to be there.
Me too, those cuts on the back of his head looked like nothing to me. Wouldn't he have a concussion if his head was slammed repeatedly on cement?
Fight went onto the concrete walk-way
Did he have a concussion? I mean, if this raging criminal weed smoking thug slammed his head against the ground repeatedly I think there might be more than a scuff.
Current witness said the fight started on the grass then moved to the concrete walk-way.
But indeed if you were getting your head smashed in on concrete i would indeed expect blood to be there.
![]()
Poor Zimmerman, That concrete was so brutal. He did what he has to do....
If the current witness is credible it seems to corroborate Zimmerman's story. Is this a prosecution witness?
If the current witness is credible it seems to corroborate Zimmerman's story. Is this a prosecution witness?
Yes. He's a prosecution witness.
I can't imagine why they called him.
Wonder if they are just calling all of the eye-witnesses. Man he seems to dislike the defense lawyer.
If the current witness is credible it seems to corroborate Zimmerman's story. Is this a prosecution witness?
Looks like he could have been scratched on the back of the head with nails. Makes sense only if trayvon was on the bottom.
Just speculation, nothing beyond that.
That's what I'm asking.... the Defense mentioned this guy by name in the opening statement. And seeing how the Defense is leading him, it's gotta be a prosecution witness.
So, he claims:
1. Guy on top beating guy on the bottom in an MMA style.
2. Guy on bottom wearing red.
3. Screaming was coming from the guy on the bottom.
4. Guy on top was 'unrelenting.'
5. Close enough that he actually spoke to them.
That's what I'm asking.... the Defense mentioned this guy by name in the opening statement. And seeing how the Defense is leading him, it's gotta be a prosecution witness.
So, he claims:
1. Guy on top beating guy on the bottom in an MMA style.
2. Guy on bottom wearing red.
3. Screaming was coming from the guy on the bottom.
4. Guy on top was 'unrelenting.'
5. Close enough that he actually spoke to them.
I didnt see his entire statement but what I saw he stated that he did not witness the gun shot and he was not sure who called out for help. Not sure how that corroborates the story. What else did he say?
Did they actually say "MMA style" because that's pretty bad to hear. MMA fights are STOPPED with a ref due to what they can do to people, and wouldn't go well for the prosecution.
the prosecution is doing such a terrible job. I have no idea why they are getting entrenched in this Fight nonsense.
They should only call testimony that adds to the fact that
a) TM didn't commit any crime
b) He was being followed for a mile in the dark and rain by an unknown man
They should show, that THIS more than anything lead to the altercation, not who threw the first punch.
Must be a setup, prosecution has to be throwing this case.
Did they ask him if he saw where the gun was at that time?
I sure can't see why the defense would be happy to have a witness state that Trayvon was on top of Zimmerman, straddling him and hitting him.
Oh. Wait.
He claims he did not see a gun when the fight was going on and the dude was screaming.
The witness confirms a 'ground and pound' tactic. As I hate MMA and think boxing is superior, I don't know what that means. But apparently it is an MMA move.
Did they actually say "MMA style" because that's pretty bad to hear. MMA fights are STOPPED with a ref due to what they can do to people, and wouldn't go well for the prosecution.
Thanks for the condescending tone. If you read my post I said I didn't see the entire statement and I asked what else he said. Oh wait.
Thanks for the condescending tone. If you read my post I said I didn't see the entire statement and I asked what else he said. Oh wait.
Here's the thing about that MMA stuff...
Zimmerman's worked out at an MMA gym.
is his obviously broken nose also due to some light scratching? zeems like martino was bashing his face in to meLooks like he has 4 scratches on the back of his head.
I don't see bruising or bashing or the sort of random abrasions that would come from bashing a head against concrete. They didn't even do a major examination to see if there was an imprint.
Here's the thing about that MMA stuff...
Zimmerman's worked out at an MMA gym.
Can't you watch?
Here is the stream:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...l-live-video-chat-20130612,0,7210676.htmlpage
the prosecution is doing such a terrible job. I have no idea why they are getting entrenched in this Fight nonsense.
They should only call testimony that adds to the fact that
a) TM didn't commit any crime
b) He was being followed for a mile in the dark and rain by an unknown man
They should show, that THIS more than anything lead to the altercation, not who threw the first punch.
Must be a setup, prosecution has to be throwing this case.
a) TM didn't commit any crime
b) He was being followed for a mile in the dark and rain by an unknown man
I don't get your point.
Before the altercation, that's all fine and good. That isn't what the case is about though.
That also doesn't matter. Nothing illegal there by Zimmerman. Of the two Zimmerman had more of a right to be walking around in the community than TM, no matter if he was following someone or not.
The entire case hinges on who, physically, started the altercation. If it was TM, if he made first contact, then Zimmerman walks.