Is that supposed to be an actual quote? When was that said?
That's basically what this ruling insinuates. I better be ready to answer the questions of my superior citizens as to why I'm in this neighborhood.
Is that supposed to be an actual quote? When was that said?
I never heard "talk shit, get hit" in my life.
And the phrase you should really have said was, "sticks and stones", because usually people are allowed to say whatever the hell they want and hitting them still isn't warranted. Even your parents would tell you this shit, and any decent parent would tell their own kids this as well... it's not cool to hit someone first. People are doing the whole "yeah, but" in this instance because it's a "white" dude killing a black "child".
Zimmerman shouldn't have followed him or even talked to him, but that doesn't give ANYONE the right to hit him first. Furthermore, If someone attacked me, broke me nose, and then cracked my skull into the pavement without me ever throwing a punch, and I thought they would continue I'd shoot their ass in a heartbeat.
And to all the internet tough guys claiming his injuries weren't that bad, get real. Some dude is on top of you, beating on you you'd be pissing your damn pants and most of you would be crying like little girls. It's easy to say they weren't that bad, and the man didn't fear for himself from the comfort of your computer chair.
I wouldn't attack him, break his nose and then slam his head into the ground.
How about not turning around and beating on someone who is merely following you? When you decide to turn around and 'get physical' as you euphemistically put it you are the aggressor and the other person is defending themselves... Is this supposed to condemn the Zimmerman verdict? Because it's actually the opposite.
Anyways race is not a real thing
So basically this sets the precedent, at least in Florida, that it's alright to drive around late at night armed as a sort of vigilante confronting anyone you profile to be suspicious. Then the second that your random confrontation of an unsuspecting person causes them to become angry/upset to the point of getting physical you have the right to shoot and kill that person. Alright then...
Pretty much this.
And yes how this turned into a Black vs. White thing when GZ is hispanic is beyond me. I remember him being called a white hispanic in the initial reports.
A major part of the reason this case was such a mess.
How about not following people? Anyone has the right to feel threatened if someone is stalking them and to confront or fight said stalker.
![]()
Oh....
I never heard "talk shit, get hit" in my life.
And the phrase you should really have said was, "sticks and stones", because usually people are allowed to say whatever the hell they want and hitting them still isn't warranted. Even your parents would tell you this shit, and any decent parent would tell their own kids this as well... it's not cool to hit someone first. People are doing the whole "yeah, but" in this instance because it's a "white" dude killing a black "child".
Zimmerman shouldn't have followed him or even talked to him, but that doesn't give ANYONE the right to hit him first. Furthermore, If someone attacked me, broke me nose, and then cracked my skull into the pavement without me ever throwing a punch, and I thought they would continue I'd shoot their ass in a heartbeat
How about not following people? Anyone has the right to feel threatened if someone is stalking them and to confront or fight said stalker.
The Zimmerman apologists in this thread are mystifying.
Right to feel threatened, sure. But they don't have the right to physically attack and bruise them.
You do not have the legal right to initiate violence against someone who is stalking you. It's that simple.
Whatever the case was is whatever they couldn't justifyI think he was only guilty of manslaughter myself but murder 2 is NOT "premeditated murder"...
These are technicalities
The prosecution wasn't strong enough to bring forward a good enough case that justified premeditated murder
I think Zimmerman should get time but I don't think the jury ruled he was innocent because trayvon was black
you never mentioned about your neighbor til now. Second you're relying on stereotypes for vocal recognition of both races. Thirdly, you never mentioned that you went somewhere else to get beer other than from going to the bar to drink with a friend to getting ambushed on the way home down the street...that now have street lights. Next, you insult me because I provided therapeutic consultation. FInally...you're full of shit.
You do not have the legal right to initiate violence against someone who is stalking you. It's that simple.
I'm black.
I will not be going to Florida, since I would fear for my life walking from a 7 Eleven.
I love how all of this is now "fact" now that he is Not Guilty.
Whatever the case was is whatever they couldn't justify
I apologize I wasn't following the case intently or up to snuff on alot of the details
What I'm trying to say is there is no reason to believe Zimmerman is found not guilty of murder 2 because trayvon was black. That's just complete nonsense
Talk about unrealistically moving the goal posts. Dead women always change the equation no matter the race.
How about not turning around and beating on someone who is merely following you?
A Hispanic vs a black is essentially what this case is lol
I think Zimmerman was guilty but come the fuck on some of you are crazy with this black man thing
listen, if you can't shoot a kid through the heart that you stalk in your car who did nothing wrong then this just isn't the america i thought i lived in.
That's your reasoning, really? The brain is an extremely sensitive part of the body. Strong enough smacks can trigger all alarms for flight-or-fight reflexes.
You'll know how it is once you've actually been in a fight and have taken some strong punches directly on your cranium. Such attacks are always life-threatening.
HISPANIC IS NOT A RACE.
There are white Hispanics, black Hispanics, Asian Hispanics etc.
Please stop being ignorant of my ethnicity.
Why are you allowed to blatantly troll like this?
So if we're not armchair lawyers such as yourself we can't post our opinions on a forum? Hah don't make me laugh. Do yourself a favor and ignore me then smug assThen stop posting.
Among other things, this is further evidence that money truly can buy a better defense. Zimmerman's lawyers were just better.
As long as you can get them to throw the first punch, you can shoot to kill them.
These are technicalities
The prosecution wasn't strong enough to bring forward a good enough case that justified premeditated murder
I think Zimmerman should get time but I don't think the jury ruled he was innocent because trayvon was black
You're the layman. The people who aren't laymen are the jurors who heard the full evidence including the testimony and cross-examination of the experts called to the trial because of their relevant expertise. How many days of testimony did you sit through again?
So if we're not armchair lawyers such as yourself we can't post our opinions on a forum? Hah don't make me laugh. Do yourself a favor and ignore me then smug ass
bruh...This will blow over in a week.
Let some new Jordans come out.
=\
This will blow over in a week.
Let some new Jordans come out.
=\
I hope street justice succeeds where the law has failed.
It's been brought up about 20 times in this thread. Nobody said it was dropped.
I guess we argued when we assumed things huh?
You can agree with the verdict.
Don't come in here and try to justify the killing.
Over the line.