• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Verdict reached in George Zimmerman case - Not Guilty

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apparently I need to step my communication skills up lmao
Police are better prepared now.

The incompetence and under staffing of the LAPD during the rodney king riots was embarrassing.

You had alot of scared officers who were afraid to go to work while they city they swore to protect was destroyed.

They should have nutted up, get help from neighboring Leo departments , suit up the riot gear and get to cracking skulls.

With good aggressive policing countless injuries and millions of dollars could have been saved during the LA riots. You just gotta nip it in the butt early.

LAPD is shoot on sight now bro
 
GZ is a guilty man, but, I don't understand the people screaming this is a race issue. Is anytime a white man kills a black man or vice versa a race issue? No.

He racially profiled TM, which caused him to be a target of suspicion. The game was then on, which lead to the whole mess. He didn't leave it for the uniformed cops to take care of things. So many mistakes, the root being that the kid was black and maybe because it was raining, or because he had a hoodie on.
 
I find it strange that Trayvon who was stalked in the middle of the night by Zimmerman isn't protected under the stand your ground law as well. Technically under that law if Trayvon felt threatened he is allowed to defend him self with forceful defense, and Zimmerman himself said Trayvon saw his gun so he may have felt really threatened. I mean a guy stalking you in the middle of the night with a gun, most people won't respond well to that. However, he had a bad rep and I think this idea of "the world is better off without him" mentality seeps in whether knowingly or subconsciously and could have affected the jury some.

So really I don't think it matters how the story unfolded Zimmerman was always going to be the victim. If Trayvon was the one stalking Zimmerman in the middle of the night and ended up on his back and shot Zimmerman in self defense I think the ruling would have found Trayvon guilty of murder.
 
Just saying if you write like a high school freshman you might want to refrain from taking shots at other people's language skills.

Aww, that's cute. Should have gone with a lower bar, maybe Junior High.

This might shock you but I really couldn't decipher some of his earlier posts.
 
Wow. Why do I have come here? Anything you say now gets you labeled as a racist. Hey did you know blacks weren't the only ones rioting in LA? Lot of white people were rioting too, every race rioted because they were sick of Police brutality.

I don't know, why do you have come here? And you're empirically wrong about the demographics of the LA situation. I suspect you weren't even alive when it happened.
 
I find it strange that Trayvon who was stalked in the middle of the night by Zimmerman isn't protected under the stand your ground law as well. Technically under that law if Trayvon felt threatened he is allowed to defend him self with forceful defense, and Zimmerman himself said Trayvon saw his gun so he may have felt really threatened. I mean a guy stalking you in the middle of the night with a gun, most people won't respond well to that. However, he had a bad rep and I think this idea of "the world is better off without him" mentality seeps in whether knowingly or subconsciously and could have affected the jury some.

So really I don't think it matters how the story unfolded Zimmerman was always going to be the victim. If Trayvon was the one stalking Zimmerman in the middle of the night and ended up on his back and shot Zimmerman in self defense I think the ruling would have found Trayvon guilty of murder.

Trayvon wasn't protected because he died. He can't defend a claim that he was defending himself with what he had to prevent bodily harm, kidnapping, or whatever.

Don't die, get attention if you can. Call for help? lol :\

Edit: Also when you scream for help from now on, include your name so it can be clear who screamed for evidence, in case someone is listening or recording. This is something we learn from. Don't let history repeat itself.
 
He stopped following Martin when the police told him to.

Simple question. Which of Zimmermans lies do you pick to believe in?

1. He got out of his car, not to follow Martin, but to check street addresses.

2. He got out of his car to follow Martin but stopped when told to.

Everybody can form their own opinions, call him a killer, whatever you want but it is by legal fact that Zimmerman is not a murderer.

Obviously, thanks to the fact that he killed the only other person who witnessed the whole thing, he got away with killing someone.

Martin's family can't even sue him but that doesn't matter since Trayvon's mom trademarked her son's name, she's going to make so much money.

What exactly do you gain from bringing this up?
 
Aww, that's cute. Should have gone with a lower bar, maybe Junior High.

This might shock you but I really couldn't decipher some of his earlier posts.

You got lost when you tried to quote a post of mine where I responded to two people.

:3
 
Trayvon wasn't protected because he died. He can't defend a claim that he was defending himself with what he had to prevent bodily harm, kidnapping, or whatever.

Don't die, get attention if you can. Call for help? lol :

That......sounds like a terribly broken interpretation of the law.

Not directed towards you but Florida.

Speaking of I do think that was trayvon yelling for help on in the background of that phone call.
 
I guess those black people just aren't quite as violent and crazy as you thought.

But black people were violent and crazy back during the Rodney King riots? I think it was more that some people acted irrationally. It's incorrect to label based on the actions of a few, so you should stop doing that.
 
I don't know, why do you have come here? And you're empirically wrong about the demographics of the LA situation. I suspect you weren't even alive when it happened.

Well 65' was a long time ago. Or did you mean the the 1992 riot? Of course, he could be talking about the 1966' riots. So many white people participated in those.




How about you stop trying to talk down to people? Your not skilled at it anyway.



You got lost when you tried to quote a post of mine where I responded to two people.

:3


Haha, yeah. I just checked. GAF's quote system is awkward.


Sorry about that.
 
GZ is a guilty man, but, I don't understand the people screaming this is a race issue. Is anytime a white man kills a black man or vice versa a race issue? No.

This case was about two things. The first thing it was about was a young person that died.

The second component is the race issue, fueled by the media pouring gasoline on the fire.

I wonder how many media executives are almost in tears this morning because black people are acting civilized.
 
I don't know, why do you have come here? And you're empirically wrong about the demographics of the LA situation. I suspect you weren't even alive when it happened.

Yep clearly underaged because I don't think everything is a race issue. Were you even alive? I doubt it. 92 was not long ago. I don't like being called a racist.
 
Trayvon was protecting his neighborhood from weirdo stalkers with guns.

Zimmerman was protecting his neighborhood from black people.

Guess which one Florida thinks is not guilty?
 
http://youtu.be/v1HCtIyImtk

It's like 30 minutes long, but somewhere in there West talks about how he eventually finds evidence within the phone calls to deduce that Trayvon came back.

He does not say this. He's talking about the 4 minutes between phone calls between where Zimmerman claimed Martin was running and when we know contact was initiated again from the last 911 call. That is not evidence of Martin returning, which is why they did not present it as such during the case. They only speculated on it to cast doubt on what might have occurred during that time frame since they knew the prosecution would not have evidence to show exactly what took place in those minutes.
 
That......sounds like a terribly broken interpretation of the law.

Not directed towards you but Florida.

Speaking of I do think that was trayvon yelling for help on in the background of that phone call.

Well if the prosecution could have proven that the kid was threatened or life was in danger, but with no witnesses and martin being dead.....
 
Yep clearly underaged because I don't think everything is a race issue. Were you even alive? I doubt it. 92 was not long ago. I don't like being called a racist.

I think you might need to catch up on the LA riots. There was a lot to that.

A lot.
 
But black people were violent and crazy back during the Rodney King riots? I think it was more that some people acted irrationally. It's incorrect to label based on the actions of a few, so you should stop doing that.

There was no twitter and Facebook. There would have been no King riots if twitter was around, just lot of angry tweets! Social media has pacified a nation.
 
There was no twitter and Facebook. There would have been no King riots if twitter was around, just lot of angry tweets! Social media has pacified a nation.

Ugh

No. There were two entirely different climates between then and now. And just to put this in perspective, this isn't some huge revelation or casting of a first stone in race relations - many minorities "already understood" the dynamics of this case to begin with. This is nothing close to the weight of triggers that led to riots in the past.

Nowhere remotely close at all.
 
This case was about two things. The first thing it was about was a young person that died.

The second component is the race issue, fueled by the media pouring gasoline on the fire.

I wonder how many media executives are almost in tears this morning because black people are acting civilized.

Yeah. The expectation that blacks would riot is pretty much proof how low an opinion mainstream American society have for blacks. As you said, no doubt the networks were anticipating it (encouraging it, even?) as some sort of "event". Thankfully, the black community didn't fall into that trap and the networks and bigots were left disappointed.
 
Yeah. The expectation that blacks would riot is pretty much proof how low an opinion mainstream American society have for blacks. As you said, no doubt the networks were anticipating it (encouraging it, even?) as some sort of "event". Thankfully, the black community didn't fall into that trap and the networks and bigots were left disappointed.

We are tired and if we do that for every injustice we would never stop.
 
Well if the prosecution could have proven that the kid was threatened or life was in danger, but with no witnesses and martin being dead.....

Guess that's where it gets sticky for me and I'm sure many others. Zimmerman killed Trayvon, fact, and there was no substantial proof that it was in self defense. In fact eveidence shows Zimmerman pursued Trayvon not the other way around. Therefore, the charge should have been guilty of murder. Yet he is innocent because a jury "felt" it was self defense. Yet Trayvon can't be protected under the same pretense because he was killed.

Sounds absurd.
 
The fact we're still free. That and latinos and women.

10/10

----------------------------------------------

GOP will likely start to court Latinos in the coming years.





I swear, I thought that happened in Virginia. What ever happened to him?



The fact they lost the right to say "Nigger", while rappers such as Heavy D, Sisqo, and Emienem say it in eveyr song.

Unless Heavy D recorded a few new tracks before his death, I don't think he'll be saying much of anything. And now I'm sad.
 
tumblr_mf5niuBmjO1rypm56o1_500.png


Oh....

gotdamn
 
We are tired and if we do that for every injustice we would never stop.

Civility is the greatest tool to fight injustice. But its damn hard to have civility in the face of injustice.

All the way from slavery to the civil rights movement in the 1950s, and 60s, civility is why the black community has made strides against oppression and injustice, IMO. All rioting does is play into every stereotype the media wants to paint black people with and it gives negative reinforcement to racists and bigots. Showing black people acting civil and standing up for themselves goes a lot farther in the long run, and people from all races are more likely to sympathize and take up the banner with you. History has proven this.
 
10/10

----------------------------------------------

GOP will likely start to court Latinos in the coming years.






I swear, I thought that happened in Virginia. What ever happened to him?





Unless Heavy D recorded a few new tracks before his death, I don't think he'll be saying much of anything. And now I'm sad.

That is the joke, Fox news doesn't research.
 
There was no twitter and Facebook. There would have been no King riots if twitter was around, just lot of angry tweets! Social media has pacified a nation.

Forgive me, but were you being serious here? What was going on between the late fifties and sixties was on a level that is nowhere near where the state of the country it is today. There's no need to belittle what was going on then to try to make a point of what happened last night. I think you need to read up on your history to fully understand how ridiculous your statement sounds. If you were being serious that is.

...

As for my opinion on the verdict, I am incredibly disappointed. I've tried to do some searching about why he was found not guilty. I found this article from Slate, and I understand the reasoning there. I do, however, agree with Josh Marshall that there's no reason he should've been charged with manslaughter given how reckless Zimmerman was acting that night.
 
Look. At the end of the day, if Trayvon were the shooter and Zimmerman was the guy in a hoodie, this thing is tried and convicted of murder two months after the arrest.

There's nothing people can say to convince me that's not true.
 
Look. At the end of the day, if Trayvon were the shooter and Zimmerman was the guy in a hoodie, this thing is tried and convicted of murder two months after the arrest.

There's nothing people can say to convince me that's not true.
That makes sense considering he's under age and cannot carry around a loaded fire arm.
 
On facebook:

Me: So you really can't see anything wrong with a law that essentially makes it ok to murder if there are no witnesses due to you claiming self defense and just have to let prosecution try to disprove your claim?

Me: This law is flawed.

Friend: Or, alternatively, there are no witnesses and you are killed by your attacker because he was twice your size and you couldn't use deadly force


GAF, I just can't...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom