because it is? like I said, it's doing great in one market—and as a fan of pacific rim, that's fantastic! but that's just one market—the overall picture still looks like it'll top out at 400m WW. that's middling for a 200m blockbuster (and that's being generous), and not exactly sequel material. it's certainly possible that China's box office growth might help convince executives that a sequel is a good idea, but it doesn't change the fact that Pacific Rim isn't doing particularly well at the box office in the present. Not a catastrophic failure like RIPD, but it's still pretty questionable whether it'll even break even.
You're forgetting about Justice League Dark.Yeah, right alongside his other projects At the Mountains of Madness, Frankenstein, Slaughterhouse Five and Drood. Or his Haunted Mansion project. Probably somewhere in between Beauty and the Beast and Dark Universe as well. But not before his TV Shows The Strain and adaptation of Monster.
He will executive produce.Senator Soufflé;74112788 said:Pretty sweet. Though doesn't Del Toro have like another 20 projects to do first?
Good news, but I can't help but wonder what a sequel would be based around considering the ending of the first movie.
Good news, but I can't help but wonder what a sequel would be based around considering the ending of the first movie.
Good news, but I can't help but wonder what a sequel would be based around considering the ending of the first movie.
Mecha Kaijus.
Kaiju Master empire is probably huge so they'll be back I reckon.
Yeah, they blew up the Death Star. Luke can go home.
Um that's pretty damn easy to explain. Don't forget they have invaded other planets and even tried to do it to earth twice. What makes you think that they can't just make another portal?
Well it's not really the same. Unless they change a lot of the stuff that we know to be true in the sequel.
Good news, but I can't help but wonder what a sequel would be based around considering the ending of the first movie.
It's the same.
There is so much room for sequels.
Also, the bolded is basically how it is done well.
fuck Kaiju, just 1:1 copy the plot of G Gundam
good to go, and we might get a lumberjack Canada Jaeger out of it
I like GdT so I'm happy the movie is a success overseas, but really, this was a good looking, but ultimately very disappointing movie. Threadbare plot, cardboard characters. It looked great but it was a bore to sit through. I'd rather see GdT making movies like The Devil's Backbone or Pan's Labyrinth than tripe like Pacific Rim.
Pull Gipsy 2.0 out of the sequel, America doesn't deserves to have their Jaeger as the lead.
Pacific Rim has a poor script even by bad mecha anime standardsOf all the movies that didn't deserve a sequel, PR is the poster boy.
Oh, well. Perhaps Del Toro will hire writers who don't shit up the script with anime cliches.
The film should only be watched if you like giant monsters and robots. Otherwise you're going for the wrong reasons.
No offence, but the sequel should not be released in American cinemas. USA failed the test.
What complete nonsense. I simply expect better from a film maker with a vision.
Pacific Rim has a poor script even by bad mecha anime standards
Comparisons with Evangelion make no sense. It's like comparing The Terminator to 2001: A Space Odyssey because they both have homicidal computers.You know tons of people claim how deep and philosophical Evangelion is, without realising that it needed them three full length films to cover the story. Pacific Rim is what it is, Sunday morning cartoon esque characters and story which are likeable as well as serviceable for what they were aiming for and never insults the audience like many other summer blockbusters.
I don't have a problem with criticizing the pacing, because that's an actual issue with what the film is supposed to be. I thought the Alaska scene was fantastic and the pacing didn't suffer that much because it opened up the movie, but I can still understand why someone would be annoyed with the pacing.The problem with Pacific Rim is that it's just fucking boring for the first hour or so, that (some) characters are annoying even by movie standards and that there's stuff that leads nowhere (Ron Perlman's paycheck). People don't want this deep, philosophical script, they just want a fun, enjoyable movie where giant robots beat the shit out of giant monsters. Cut the first sixty minutes and Pacific Rim is highly enjoyable.
The problem with Pacific Rim is that it's just fucking boring for the first hour or so, that (some) characters are annoying even by movie standards and that there's stuff that leads nowhere (Ron Perlman's paycheck). People don't want this deep, philosophical script, they just want a fun, enjoyable movie where giant robots beat the shit out of giant monsters. Cut the first sixty minutes and Pacific Rim is highly enjoyable.
I find it strange how people still judge a movie solely by its script. If the script was all that mattered, we wouldn't be watching movies, we'd be listening to radio dramas.
It's no wonder John Carpenter's The Thing was critically panned on release; people were whining that the characters weren't developed enough in the dialogue and didn't pay attention to the shit that actually worked. Pacific Rim is no The Thing, but people are criticizing the wrong parts of it.
Comparisons with Evangelion make no sense. It's like comparing The Terminator to 2001: A Space Odyssey because they both have homicidal computers.
The Thing does a far, far better job of distracting you from the more dubious elements. Pacific Rim kind of shoves them in your face for ~3/4 of the film.I find it strange how people still judge a movie solely by its script. If the script was all that mattered, we wouldn't be watching movies, we'd be listening to radio dramas.
It's no wonder John Carpenter's The Thing was critically panned on release; people were whining that the characters weren't developed enough in the dialogue and didn't pay attention to the shit that actually worked. Pacific Rim is no The Thing, but people are criticizing the wrong parts of it.
I am glad the movie is making more money but honestly speaking, the film was kinda bad.
The mechas and kijus were cool but the fight scenes were so close-up that you couldn't really see much.
It was the equivalent of shaky cam fight scenes that plague a lot of movies today.
And then there was the terrible acting.
I think they could have done so much more with the concept but maybe that's what sequels are for.
The Thing does a far, far better job of distracting you from the more dubious elements. Pacific Rim kind of shoves them in your face for ~3/4 of the film.
I am glad the movie is making more money but honestly speaking, the film was kinda bad.
The mechas and kijus were cool but the fight scenes were so close-up that you couldn't really see much.
It was the equivalent of shaky cam fight scenes that plague a lot of movies today.
And then there was the terrible acting.
I think they could have done so much more with the concept but maybe that's what sequels are for.
Well yeah, it's The Thing. It's a really good movie. Still, you had critics saying shit like this.The Thing does a far, far better job of distracting you from the more dubious elements. Pacific Rim kind of shoves them in your face for ~3/4 of the film.
People strapped in a giant swaying and bucking machine with water getting sprayed into their faces tend to do that.It was so shitty. The overacting and constant yelling and grunts (as pointed out by numerous others) like they were VAs for anime/cartoons fucking KILLED the movie for me.
Hell, even the flashback sequences killed me due to the annoying sounds coming from the actor's mouths. I'm thinking to myself "Who THE FUCK DOES/SAYS THAT? STFU!"
The cinematography is clear in that sense, but the lighting/particle effects obfuscate the imagery somewhat. They just couldn't have one major battle take place during the daytime with clear weather conditions. :\the fight scene were the most clear I've seen in a long time actually... clear, wide shots
I never saw the particle effects or lighting as a problem; the kaiju and jaegers have big, clear shapes that aren't easily lost. It's like the T. rex in Jurassic Park. It's only when we get close-ups that those distinct shapes become harder to see.The cinematography is clear in that sense, but the lighting/particle effects obfuscate the imagery somewhat.
It's easy to get a general sense of what is happening, but it's harder to make out the finer details.I never saw the particle effects or lighting as a problem; the kaiju and jaegers have big, clear shapes that aren't easily lost. It's like the T. rex in Jurassic Park. It's only when we get close-ups that those distinct shapes become harder to see.
I did hear the lighting is a problem in 3D for the final fight, although I didn't experience this problem.underwater
If they don't get Yoji Shinkawa to design a Jaeger for a sequel, I will be disappointed. Let him do Gipsy Danger 2.0 or whatever the lead mecha is. *salivates at the thought*
People strapped in a giant swaying and bucking machine with water getting sprayed into their faces tend to do that.